A survey on preferences, attitudes, and perspectives of Italian urology trainees: implications of the novel national residency matching program.

BACKGROUND: Since 2014, a new residency program selection process has been established with a national examination. The aim of this study was to assess characteristics, career goals, and practice preferences of current Italian urology residents. METHODS: A web-based survey of 25 items performed from May 2021 to September 2021 was sent to 585 Italian urology residents. Descriptive analyses were conducted to describe the surveys' domains: demographics characteristics, studies, plans for fellowship training, interest in the urology field, and career expectations. RESULTS: Four hundred and one residents completed the online survey (response rate 68.5%). Most residents were male (70.3%), with a median of 29 (IQR 28-31) years. Urology was the first chosen School in 325 (81.0%) cases, and 174 (43.4%) trainees have chosen to remain in the same University. Uro-oncology was the main field, and endourology the main subspeciality of interest, respectively. More than 40.0% of residents expressed a good level of satisfaction for the training urological course. 232 (57.2%) residents were strongly interested in seeking a hospital career, followed by private career (43.4%) and academic career (20%). CONCLUSIONS: After the introduction of the novel national residency matching program the Italian Urology trainees showed a good satisfaction level. Further improvements of the Italian residency programs should be focused on the training network within and outside the main School of Urology.

Can We Clinically Distinguish Anejaculation From Retrograde Ejaculation in Patients on α1A-Blockers Therapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the physiopathology of ejaculatory disorders (EjD) and discriminate between retrograde ejaculation (REj) and anejaculation (AEj) induced by α1A-blockers, through the association between the mean postorgasm seminal vesicle volume and the presence of sperm in midstream urine, in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic enlargement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Therapy-naïve male patients with LUTS and without previous EjD were treated with α1A-blockers. Pre- and post-treatment EjD were investigated through question 4 of the 4-item Male Sexual Function questionnaire and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction Short Form (MSHQ-EjD-SF). After 12 weeks, postorgasm urine was collected for sperm count and seminal vesicle volume was calculated through transrectal ultrasound. RESULTS: All 42 patients reported with EjD after treatment with α1A-blockers: 4-item Male Sexual Function questionnaire and MSHQ-EjD-SF Q4 scores were significantly higher (P <.001) and MSHQ-EjD-SF Q1-3 score was significantly lower (P <.001) than before. Postorgasm seminal vesicle volume was significantly higher in patients with postorgasm sperm-negative urine (AEj), and lower in patients with postorgasm sperm-positive urine (REj; P <.001). CONCLUSION: We clearly demonstrated an association between the presence of sperm in the midstream urine and seminal vesicle volume after orgasm, strongly confirming and differentiating the hypothesis of a dual etiology for EjD (REj vs AEj) secondary to α1A-blockers therapy for LUTS.