RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Drug repurposing offers a strategic alternative to the development of novel compounds, leveraging the known safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of medications, such as linezolid and levofloxacin for tuberculosis (TB). Anti-malarial drugs, including quinolones and artemisinins, are already applied to other diseases and infections and could be promising for TB treatment. METHODS: This review included studies on the activity of anti-malarial drugs, specifically quinolones and artemisinins, against Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC), summarizing results from in vitro, in vivo (animal models) studies, and clinical trials. Studies on drugs not primarily developed for TB (doxycycline, sulfonamides) and any novel developed compounds were excluded. Analysis focused on in vitro activity (minimal inhibitory concentrations), synergistic effects, pre-clinical activity, and clinical trials. RESULTS: Nineteen studies, including one ongoing Phase 1 clinical trial, were analysed: primarily investigating quinolones like mefloquine and chloroquine, and, to a lesser extent, artemisinins. In vitro findings revealed high MIC values for anti-malarials versus standard TB drugs, suggesting a limited activity. Synergistic effects with anti-TB drugs were modest, with some synergy observed in combinations with isoniazid or pyrazinamide. In vivo animal studies showed limited activity of anti-malarials against MTC, except for one study of the combination of chloroquine with isoniazid. CONCLUSIONS: The repurposing of anti-malarials for TB treatment is limited by high MIC values, poor synergy, and minimal in vivo effects. Concerns about potential toxicity at effective dosages and the risk of antimicrobial resistance, especially where TB and malaria overlap, further question their repurposing. These findings suggest that focusing on novel compounds might be both more beneficial and rewarding.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Antituberculosos , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Antimaláricos/farmacología , Antituberculosos/farmacología , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , AnimalesRESUMEN
Non-timely reporting, selective reporting, or non-reporting of clinical trial results are prevalent and serious issues. WHO mandates that summary results be available in registries within 12 months of study completion and published in full text within 24 months. However, only a limited number of clinical trials in infectious diseases, including those done during the COVID-19 pandemic, have their results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. An analysis of 50 trials of eight antiviral drugs tested against COVID-19 with a completion date of at least 2 years ago revealed that only 18% had their results published in the registry, with 40% not publishing any results. Non-timely and non-reporting practices undermine patient participation and are ethically unacceptable. Strategies should include obligatory reporting of summary results within 12 months in clinical trial registries, with progress towards peer-reviewed publication within 24 months indicated. Timely publication of research papers should be encouraged through an automated flagging mechanism in clinical trial registries that draws attention to the status of results reporting, such as a green tick for trials that have reported summary results within 12 months and a red tick in case of failure to do so. We propose the inclusion of mandatory clinical trial reporting standards in the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines, which should prohibit sponsor contract clauses that restrict reporting (referred to as gag clauses) and require timely reporting of results as part of the ethics committees' clearance process for clinical trial protocols.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Pandemias , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , SesgoRESUMEN
Histopathology is the study of how disease alters human and animal tissue and is based on the microscopic examination of stained tissue sections. To maintain tissue integrity, preserving it from degradation, it is initially fixed, primarily with formalin, before being treated with alcohol and organic solvents, allowing the infiltration of paraffin wax. The tissue can then be embedded in a mold and sectioned, usually at a thickness between 3 and 5 µm, before staining with dyes or antibodies to demonstrate specific components. As the paraffin wax is insoluble in water, it is necessary to remove it from the tissue section before applying any aqueous or water-based dye solution, to allow the tissue to successfully interact with the stain. This deparaffinization/hydration step is normally carried out using xylene, an organic solvent, followed by hydration using graded alcohols. However, this use of xylene has been shown to have detrimental effects on acid-fast stains (AFS), such as those employed to demonstrate Mycobacterium, including the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), as the integrity of the lipid-rich wall present in these bacteria may be compromised using xylene. A simple, novel method, Projected Hot Air Deparaffinization (PHAD) removes the solid paraffin from the tissue section without the use of any solvents, which produces significantly improved staining results using AFS. PHAD relies on the projection of hot air onto the histological section to melt and remove paraffin from the tissue, which can be achieved using a common hairdryer. â¢PHAD relies on the projection of hot air onto the histological section which can be achieved using a common hairdryer.â¢The blowing force is such that melted paraffin is removed from the tissue in 20 min.â¢Subsequent hydration allows for using aqueous histological stains with success, such as the fluorescent auramine O acid-fast-stain.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Histopathology is an important method for diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis, yet tissue sections are often negative for mycobacteria after use of acid-fast stain (AFS). This study investigated the mechanism of AFS use and the detrimental effect of histologic processing-in particular, xylene deparaffinization-on AFS and mycobacterial detection. METHODS: The target of the fluorescent Auramine O (AuO) AFS was investigated using triple staining with DNA- and RNA-specific dyes. The effect of xylene deparaffinization on the acid fastness of mycobacteria in cultures or tissue sections was studied using AuO fluorescence as a quantitative marker. The xylene method was compared with a novel, solvent-free projected-hot-air deparaffinization (PHAD). RESULTS: Co-localization of AuO with DNA/RNA stains suggests that intracellular nucleic acids are the true target of AFS, producing highly specific patterns. Xylene reduces mycobacterial fluorescence significantly (P < .0001; moderate effect size, r = 0.33). The PHAD process yielded significantly higher fluorescence than xylene deparaffinization in tissues (P < .0001; large effect size, r = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Auramine O can be applied for nucleic acid staining of mycobacteria in tissues producing typical beaded patterns. Acid-fast staining depends heavily on the integrity of the mycobacterial cell wall, which xylene appears to damage. A solvent-free tissue deparaffinization method has the potential to increase mycobacterial detection significantly.
Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium , Xilenos , Humanos , Benzofenoneido , Calor , Colorantes , Coloración y Etiquetado , ARNRESUMEN
According to current guidelines, atovaquone-proguanil (AP) malaria chemoprophylaxis should be taken once daily starting one day before travel and continued for seven days post-exposure. However, drug-sparing regimens, including discontinuing AP after leaving malaria-endemic areas are cost-saving and probably more attractive to travelers, and may thus enhance adherence. AP has causal prophylactic effects, killing malaria parasites during the hepatic stage. If early hepatic stages were already targeted by AP, AP could possibly be discontinued upon return. Pharmacokinetic data and studies on drug-sparing AP regimens suggest this to be the case. Nevertheless, the evidence is weak and considered insufficient to modify current recommendations. Field trials require large numbers of travelers and inherently suffer from the lack of a control group. Safely-designed controlled human malaria infection trials could significantly reduce study participant numbers and safely establish an effective AP abbreviated regimen which we propose as the optimal trial design to test this concept.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Humanos , Antimaláricos/farmacología , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Proguanil/farmacología , Proguanil/uso terapéutico , Atovacuona/farmacología , Atovacuona/uso terapéutico , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/prevención & control , Combinación de Medicamentos , Viaje , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Malaria in infants is common in high-transmission settings, especially in infants >6 months. Infants undergo physiological changes impacting pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-malarial drugs and, consequently, the safety and efficacy of malaria treatment. Yet, treatment guidelines and evidence on pharmacological interventions for malaria often fail to address this vulnerable age group. This review aims to summarize the available data on anti-malarial treatment in infants. AREAS COVERED: The standard recommended treatments for severe and uncomplicated malaria are generally safe and effective in infants. However, infants have an increased risk of drug-related vomiting and have distinct pharmacokinetic parameters of antimalarials compared with older patients. These include larger volumes of distribution, higher clearance rates, and immature enzyme systems. Consequently, infants with malaria may be at increased risk of treatment failure and drug toxicity. EXPERT OPINION: Knowledge expansion to optimize treatment can be achieved by including more infants in antimalarial drug trials and by reporting separately on treatment outcomes in infants. Additional evidence on the efficacy, safety, tolerability, acceptability, and effectiveness of ACTs in infants is needed, as well as population pharmacokinetics studies on antimalarials in the infant population.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Lactante , Humanos , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atovaquone/proguanil (AP) is a highly effective malaria chemoprophylaxis combination. According to current guidelines, AP is taken once daily during, and continued for seven days post exposure. A systematic review by Savelkoel et al. summarised data up to 2017 on abbreviated AP regimens, and concluded that discontinuing AP upon return may be effective, although the available data was insufficient to modify current recommendations. The same applies to other studies evaluating during-travel dose-sparing regimens. METHODS: A literature search in Pubmed and Embase was performed including search terms related to AP prophylaxis and pharmacokinetics to search for recent studies on abbreviated AP regimens published since 2017. RESULTS: Since the 2017 review, no new studies assessing discontinuing AP ad-hoc post-exposure prophylaxis have been published. Two new studies were identified assessing other abbreviated AP regimens; one investigated a twice-weekly AP regimen in 32 travellers, and one a three-day AP course in therapeutic dose (1000/400 mg) prior to exposure in 215 travellers. No malaria cases were detected in the study participants adhering to these regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Further research would be needed if the research question is considered of sufficient importance to facilitate evidence-based decision-making to modify current guidelines, as efficacy studies in travellers are fraught with confounders. We recommend human challenge trials to study abbreviated AP regimens pertaining to malaria chemoprophylaxis as they allow for rational, subject number, time- and cost-saving trial designs.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Atovacuona/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/prevención & control , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Proguanil/uso terapéutico , ViajeRESUMEN
Fluid therapy is an important supportive measure for patients with severe malaria. Patients with severe malaria usually have normal cardiac index, vascular resistance, and blood pressure and a small degree of hypovolaemia due to dehydration. Cell hypoxia, reduced kidney function, and acidosis result from microcirculatory compromise and malarial anaemia, which reduce tissue oxygenation, not hypovolaemia. Hence, aggressive fluid loading does not correct acid-base status, enhance kidney function, or improve patient outcomes, and it risks complications such as pulmonary oedema. Individualised conservative fluid management is recommended in patients with severe malaria. Physical examination and physiological indices have limited reliability in guiding fluid therapy. Invasive measures can be more accurate than physical examination and physiological indices but are often unavailable in endemic areas, and non-invasive measures, such as ultrasound, are mostly unexplored. Research into reliable methods applicable in low-resource settings to measure fluid status and response is a priority. In this Review, we outline the current knowledge on fluid management in severe malaria and highlight research needed to optimise fluid therapy and improve survival in severe malaria.
Asunto(s)
Malaria Falciparum , Malaria , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Humanos , Hipovolemia/complicaciones , Hipovolemia/terapia , Malaria/terapia , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Microcirculación , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Fluid management is challenging in malaria patients given the risks associated with intravascular fluid depletion and iatrogenic fluid overload leading to pulmonary oedema. Given the limitations of the physical examination in guiding fluid therapy, we evaluated point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and lungs as a novel tool to assess volume status and detect early oedema in malaria patients. METHODS: To assess the correlation between IVC and lung ultrasound (LUS) indices and clinical signs of hypovolaemia and pulmonary oedema, respectively, concurrent clinical and sonographic examinations were performed in an observational study of 48 malaria patients and 62 healthy participants across age groups in Gabon. RESULTS: IVC collapsibility index (CI) ≥ 50% on enrolment reflecting intravascular fluid depletion was associated with an increased number of clinical signs of hypovolaemia in severe and uncomplicated malaria. With exception of dry mucous membranes, IVC-CI correlated with most clinical signs of hypovolaemia, most notably sunken eyes (r = 0.35, p = 0.0001) and prolonged capillary refill (r = 0.35, p = 0.001). IVC-to-aorta ratio ≤ 0.8 was not associated with any clinical signs of hypovolaemia on enrolment. Among malaria patients, a B-pattern on enrolment reflecting interstitial fluid was associated with dyspnoea (p = 0.0003), crepitations and SpO2 ≤ 94% (both p < 0.0001), but not tachypnoea (p = 0.069). Severe malaria patients had increased IVC-CI (p < 0.0001) and more B-patterns (p = 0.004) on enrolment relative to uncomplicated malaria and controls. CONCLUSION: In malaria patients, POCUS of the IVC and lungs may improve the assessment of volume status and detect early oedema, which could help to manage fluids in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Malaria , Edema Pulmonar , Humanos , Malaria/complicaciones , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos , Edema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Edema Pulmonar/etiología , Ultrasonografía , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Background: Clinical scores for sepsis have been primarily developed for, and applied in High-Income Countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the performance of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) scores for diagnosis and prediction of mortality in patients with suspected infection in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched until May 18, 2021. Studies reporting the performance of at least one of the above-mentioned scores for predicting mortality in patients of 15 years of age and older with suspected infection or sepsis were eligible. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. PRISMA guidelines were followed (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020153906). The bivariate random-effects regression model was used to pool the individual sensitivities, specificities and areas-under-the-curve (AUC). Findings: Twenty-four articles (of 5669 identified) with 27,237 patients were eligible for inclusion. qSOFA pooled sensitivity was 0·70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0·60-0·78), specificity 0·73 (95% CI 0·67-0·79), and AUC 0·77 (95% CI 0·72-0·82). SIRS pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0·88 (95% CI 0·79 -0·93), 0·34 (95% CI 0·25-0·44), and 0·69 (95% CI 0·50-0·83), respectively. MEWS pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0·70 (95% CI 0·57 -0·81), 0·61 (95% CI 0·42-0·77), and 0·72 (95% CI 0·64-0·77), respectively. UVA pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0·49 (95% CI 0·33 -0·65), 0·91(95% CI 0·84-0·96), and 0·76 (95% CI 0·44-0·93), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the pooled analysis. Interpretation: Individual score performances ranged from poor to acceptable. Future studies should combine selected or modified elements of different scores. Funding: Partially funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (17/63/42).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/inmunología , Neoplasias/inmunología , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/mortalidad , Coinfección/mortalidad , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Interferón gamma/metabolismo , Interleucinas/metabolismo , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standby emergency self-treatment (SBET) is often recommended as an anti-malaria strategy for travellers to low-risk endemic areas. This self-treatment enables competent malaria therapy, if medical assistance is unavailable. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends performing reliable diagnostic tests before starting antimalarial treatment. For the self-diagnosis of malaria in travellers, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) can be used to confirm the infection before SBET is used. The aim of this research is to assess the use of RDT and/or SBET in travellers. METHODS: We searched the databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL) using terms and synonyms for 'self-diagnosis' and 'self-treatment' combined with 'malaria' and 'travel'. Articles in English, French and German were included. Potential articles were screened and extracted by two authors (KU and PS). Only original articles and case reports documenting the self-use of RDT and/or SBET in travellers were included. Data were extracted using a standardised approach. We defined 'correct use' of RDT and SBET. Data on number and performance of RDT and SBET use, as well as malaria verification were collected in an Excel table. Five meta-analyses were performed using a random effects model and calculating pooled proportions. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018108874). RESULTS: The research resulted in 867 articles of possible relevance on RDT and 955 articles on SBET. After screening, a total of 4 articles on RDT use and 17 articles for SBET use in travellers were included in the systematic review. Most of the RDT were performed and interpreted properly by the travellers (pooled proportion 88%, 95% confidence interval (CI) from 64% to 97%), whereby the proportion of correct performance was increased after a pre-travel test run (97%). Major problems in the implementation such as pricking finger, placing blood drop, identifying lines and interpreting results could be discovered. We found data on 1025 SBET uses in studies of travellers to high-risk African countries. In these studies, the pooled proportion of SBET uses was 6% (95% CI from 2% to 13%). We found 545 SBET uses in studies of travellers to countries of mixed malaria risk. In these studies, the pooled proportion of SBET uses was 2% (95% CI from 1% to 7%). Furthermore, the evaluation showed a high proportion of correct SBET use (pooled proportion 69%, 95% CI from 35% to 90%). As a cause for incorrect use, errors in dosage (under- or overdose), disregard of minimal incubation period (< 7 days since first possible malaria exposure) and absence of fever were identified. Four cases of post-SBET severe adverse events were documented. In a third of travellers who used SBET, a Plasmodium spp. infection could be detected (pooled proportion 31%, 95% CI from 16% to 51%). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the majority of travellers were able to use RDT and SBET correctly. Standardised pre-travel instructions and specific training are indicated to increase the proportions of correct RDT and SBET use. With improved and user-friendly technology, RDT may become an integral part of SBET malaria recommendations for travellers. Combined use of RDT and SBET could be an appropriate strategy for selected subgroups of travellers to low-risk, remote malaria areas. Future research should focus on combined RDT and SBET strategies.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Plasmodium/aislamiento & purificación , Automedicación , Autoexamen , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Humanos , Viaje , Enfermedad Relacionada con los ViajesAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Instituciones de Salud/provisión & distribución , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , África del Sur del Sahara , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/economía , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Instituciones de Salud/economía , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pandemias/economía , Atención al Paciente/normas , Equipo de Protección Personal/economía , Neumonía Viral/economía , SARS-CoV-2 , Sierra LeonaRESUMEN
It has been well documented that Zika virus (ZIKV) can be sexually transmitted. Dengue virus (DENV) shows many similarities with ZIKV; both belong to the genus Flavivirus and share the same main vector route of transmission. Moreover, they share overall architectural features on a molecular level, with a highly similar structure and distinctive insertions, deletions and mutations of their respective E proteins, and it has been suggested that they use a common pathophysiological pathway. In view of similarities with other sexually transmissible viruses, the question arises as to whether DENV could also be sexually transmissible. Limited animal model data do not suggest otherwise. The presence of dengue virus in - and human-to-human, non-vector transmission from - various bodily fluids other than semen or vaginal secretions has been documented anecdotally. Several anecdotal reports described prolonged presence of DENV in semen, urine and vaginal secretions. In 2019, two cases of likely sexual transmission were reported from Spain and South Korea, respectively. We discuss the evidence for and against a relevant DENV sexual transmission potential, highlight controversies and propose a future research agenda on this issue.