Blood culture sampling rate in hospitalised children as a quality indicator for diagnostic stewardship.

PURPOSE: Recommendations regarding the optimal number of blood cultures in children are not available. The aim of this article is to describe the correlation between blood culture (BC) rates and laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBSI) rates, on different paediatric wards of a tertiary-care centre in Germany. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a paediatric university hospital, from 1st January to 31st December 2018. All blood cultures collected from neonatal (NICU) and paediatric intensive-care units (PICU), haematology/oncology, and general paediatric wards were included. There were no exclusion criteria. BC taken/1000 patients-days (BC rates/BCR) and LCBSI/1000 patient-days at risk (LCBSI rates) were calculated for each unit. RESULTS: A total of 6040 patients were admitted to the hospital with 3114 of them into wards studied. Of the 3072 BCs collected, 200 (6.5%) were positive. Collection of BCs was performed in 51/77 (66.2%) of admitted patients on NICU, in 151/399 (37.8%) of PICU patients, in 163/755 (21.6%) of haematology/oncology patients, and in 281/1883 (14.9%) of children on general paediatric wards. Gram-positive bacteria were the most commonly detected organisms in blood cultures from all wards with exception of NICU. The BCR in NICU, PICU, haematology/oncology wards, and general wards were 61.6, 196.2, 358.4, and 52.3, respectively. Excluding commensal pathogens and possible contaminations, the LCBSI rates in the same units were 2.4, 5.6, 4.4, and 1.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found different BCR values according the ward studied, being higher in patients with high risk of bloodstream infection such as haematology/oncology patients.

Effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in neonatology: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are recommended to improve antibiotic use in healthcare and reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of ASPs in reducing antibiotic consumption, use of broad-spectrum/restricted antibiotics, antibiotic resistance and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in neonates. METHODS: We searched PUBMED, SCIELO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database (January 2000-April 2019) to identify studies on the effectiveness of ASPs in neonatal wards and/or neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Outcomes were as follows: reduction of antibiotic consumption overall and of broad-spectrum/target antibiotics, inappropriate antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance and HAIs. ASPs conducted in settings other than acute care hospitals, for children older than 1 month, and ASPs addressing antifungal and antiviral agents, were excluded. RESULTS: The initial search identified 53 173 titles and abstracts; following the application of filters and inclusion criteria, a total of six publications were included in the final analysis. All studies, of which one was multi-centre study, were published after 2010. Five studies were conducted exclusively in NICUs. Four articles applied multimodal interventions. Reduction of antibiotic consumption overall and/or inappropriate antibiotic use were reported by four articles; reduction of broad-spectrum/targeted antibiotics were reported by four studies; No article evaluated the impact of ASPs on AMR or the incidence of HAI in neonates. CONCLUSION: ASPs can be effectively applied in neonatal settings. Limiting the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and shorting the duration of antibiotic treatment are the most promising approaches. The impact of ASPs on AMR and HAI needs to be evaluated in long-term studies.

Patterns of antimicrobial consumption in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Germany and Brazil.

Antibiotic consumption (AC) is a key component of antimicrobial stewardship programs to recognize local patterns of antibiotic use. Our aim was to measure AC in neonatal units, including neonatal (NICU)/paediatric (PICU) intensive care units in different countries. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study in three NICUs, one neonatal ward, and three PICUs with a total of 84 beds. Global and individual AC in days of therapy (DOT) and DOT per 1000 patient-days were assessed. During the study period, 2567 patients were admitted, corresponding to 4961 patient-days in neonatal units and 9243 patient-days in PICUs. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were more frequent in Brazil than in Germany. Average AC was 386.5 and 1335.5 DOT/1000PD in German and Brazilian neonatal units, respectively. Aminopenicillins plus 3rd generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in German neonatal units, while aminopenicillins plus aminoglycosides were the class most commonly used in Brazilian NICU. Average AC was 888.1 and 1440.7 DOT/1000PD in German and Brazilian PICUs, respectively. Antipseudomonal penicillins were most commonly used in the German PICU, and glycopeptides were the most frequently prescribed in Brazilian PICUs. Carbapenems represented 2.3-14% of total DOTs in German neonatal units and 4% in the Brazilian NICU and 13.0% in the German PICU and 6-12.2% in Brazilian PICUs. We concluded that different patterns of most commonly prescribed antibiotics were observed in neonatal units and PICUs in these two countries, probably related to different local patterns of antibiotic resistance, with a higher antibiotic consumption in Brazilian study units.