Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BI 705564, a highly selective, covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, in Phase I clinical trials in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single- and multiple-rising doses (MRDs) of BI 705564 and establish proof of mechanism. METHODS: BI 705564 was studied in 2 placebo-controlled, Phase I clinical trials testing single-rising doses (1-160 mg) and MRDs (1-80 mg) of BI 705564 over 14 days in healthy male volunteers. Blood samples were analysed for BI 705564 plasma concentration, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) target occupancy (TO) and CD69 expression in B cells stimulated ex vivo. A substudy was conducted in allergic, otherwise healthy, MRD participants. Safety was assessed in both studies. RESULTS: All doses of BI 705564 were well tolerated. Geometric mean BI 705564 plasma terminal half-life ranged from 10.1 to 16.9 hours across tested doses, with no relevant accumulation after multiple dosing. Doses ≥20 mg resulted in ≥85% average TO that was maintained for ≥48 hours after single-dose administration. Functional effects of BTK signalling were demonstrated by dose-dependent inhibition of CD69 expression. In allergic participants, BI 705564 treatment showed a trend in wheal size reduction in a skin prick test and complete inhibition of basophil activation. Mild bleeding-related adverse events were observed with BI 705564; bleeding time increased in 1/12 participants (8.3%) who received placebo vs 26/48 (54.2%) treated with BI 705564. CONCLUSION: BI 705564 showed efficient target engagement through durable TO and inhibition of ex vivo B-cell activation, and proof of mechanism through effects on allergic skin responses. Mild bleeding-related adverse events were probably related to inhibition of platelet aggregation by BTK inhibition.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of roflumilast.

INTRODUCTION: Roflumilast is a selective PDE4 inhibitor recently approved for oral, once-daily treatment of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Clinical trials have demonstrated the effect of roflumilast on reducing exacerbation frequency and improving lung function in COPD, while its mode of action may offer the potential to target the inflammatory processes underlying COPD. Roflumilast is, therefore, an important addition to current therapeutic options. It is catalyzed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and 3A4 to its active metabolite, roflumilast N-oxide, which accounts for > 90% of roflumilast total PDE4 inhibitory activity. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and considers the effects of co-administration with CYP inhibitors or inducers, and other medications commonly used in patients with COPD, on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide. EXPERT OPINION: Roflumilast has novel anti-inflammatory activity in COPD that provides the physician with a treatment option beyond bronchodilation. It can be co-administered with many medications commonly used by patients with COPD and its anti-inflammatory activity provides incremental benefits on top of existing therapies. Future research will further elucidate the impact of roflumilast on COPD and beyond, while alternative dosing regimens may offer a means to ameliorate transient tolerability issues.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide by total phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitory activity and development of a population pharmacodynamic-adverse event model.

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is an oral, selective phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibitor in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Both roflumilast and its metabolite roflumilast N-oxide have anti-inflammatory properties that contribute to overall pharmacological activity. OBJECTIVES: To model the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide, evaluate the influence of potential covariates, use the total PDE4 inhibitory activity (tPDE4i) concept to estimate the combined inhibition of PDE4 by roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide, and use individual estimates of tPDE4i to predict the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. METHODS: We modelled exposure to roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide (21 studies provided the index dataset and five separate studies provided the validation dataset), extended the models to COPD (using data from two studies) and assessed the robustness of the parameter estimates. A parametric bootstrap estimation was used to quantify tPDE4i in subpopulations. We established logistic regression models for each AE occurring in >2% of patients in a placebo-controlled trial that achieved a p-value of <0.2 in a permutation test. The exposure variables were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of roflumilast, the AUC of roflumilast N-oxide and tPDE4i. Individual AUC values were estimated from population models. RESULTS: Roflumilast pharmacokinetics were modelled with a two-compartment model with first-order absorption including a lag time. A one-compartment model with zero-order absorption was used for roflumilast N-oxide. The final models displayed good descriptive and predictive performance with no appreciable systematic trends versus time, dose or study. Posterior predictive checks and robustness analysis showed that the models adequately described the pharmacokinetic parameters and the covariate effects on disposition. For roflumilast, the covariates of sex, smoking and race influenced clearance; and food influenced the absorption rate constant and lag time. For roflumilast N-oxide, age, sex and smoking influenced clearance; age, sex and race influenced the fraction metabolized; bodyweight influenced the apparent volume of distribution; and food influenced the apparent duration of formation. The COPD covariate increased the central volume of distribution of roflumilast by 184% and reduced its clearance by 39%; it also reduced the estimated volume of distribution of roflumilast N-oxide by 21% and reduced its clearance by 7.9%. Compared with the reference population (male, non-smoking, White, healthy, 40-year-old subjects), the relative geometric mean [95% CI] tPDE4i was higher in patients with COPD (12.6% [-6.6, 35.6]), women (19.3% [8.2, 31.6]), Black subjects (42.1% [16.4, 73.4]), Hispanic subjects (28.2% [4.1, 57.9]) and older subjects (e.g. 8.3% [-11.2, 32.2] in 60-year-olds), and was lower in smokers (-19.1% [-34.0, -0.7]). Among all possible subgroups in this analysis, the subgroup with maximal tPDE4i comprised elderly, Black, female, non-smoking, COPD patients (tPDE4i 217% [95% CI 107, 437] compared with the value in the reference population). The probability of a patient with tPDE4i at the population geometric mean [95% CI] was 13.0% [7.5, 18.5] for developing diarrhoea, 6.0% [2.6, 9.4] for nausea and 5.1% [1.9, 8.6] for headache. CONCLUSIONS: Covariate effects have a limited impact on tPDE4i. There was a general association between tPDE4i and the occurrence of common AEs in patients with COPD.

The targeted oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast do not exhibit significant pharmacokinetic interactions.

This nonrandomized, fixed-sequence, 3-period study investigated potential pharmacokinetic interactions between the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast, approved for the treatment of asthma, and roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor in clinical development for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pharmacokinetic interactions are of interest because both drugs may be coadministered and share a common metabolic pathway via cytochrome P450 3A. Single-dose montelukast (10 mg, po) was administered alone in period 1, followed by repeated once-daily roflumilast alone (500 microg, po) for 12 days (period 2). In period 3, 500 microg qd roflumilast was coadministered with 10 mg qd montelukast for 8 days. Different pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated for montelukast alone, for steady-state roflumilast and its pharmacologically active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide alone, for single-dose montelukast when coadministered with steady-state roflumilast, and for steady-state roflumilast and its N-oxide metabolite when coadministered with steady-state montelukast. The AUC and Cmax of montelukast were modestly increased by 9% and 8%, respectively, when single-dose montelukast was coadministered with steady-state roflumilast. The pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in steady state remained unchanged when repeat-dose montelukast was coadministered at steady-state. Concomitant administration of both drugs was well tolerated. These findings suggest that no dose adjustment is warranted for either drug when roflumilast and montelukast are coadministered.

Investigation of a potential food effect on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in healthy subjects.

This open, randomized, single-dose crossover study investigated effects of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and its major active N-oxide metabolite. Twelve healthy subjects received oral roflumilast 500 microg (2 x 250 microg) after overnight fasting and after breakfast. Blood was sampled up to 54 hours for pharmacokinetic profiling of roflumilast and N-oxide. Geometric mean ratios (fed/fasted) for point estimates (PE) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for AUC(0-last), AUC(0-infinity), and C(max) of both compounds. After the meal, roflumilast C(max) (PE, 0.59; 90% CI, 0.49-0.70) was modestly reduced; N-oxide C(max) (PE, 0.95; 90% CI, 0.90-1.01) was unchanged. Roflumilast t(max) was delayed in fed state (2.0 +/- 0.4 hours) versus fasted state (1.0 +/- 0.2 hours); N-oxide t(max) was unaltered. No significant food effect on roflumilast AUC(0-last) (PE, 1.04; 90% CI, 0.90-1.21), AUC(0-infinity) (PE, 1.12; 90% CI, 1.00-1.25), and respective N-oxide AUCs (PE, 0.91; 90% CI, 0.79-1.04; PE, 0.99; 90% CI, 0.92-1.06) occurred. Because roflumilast N-oxide is the major contributor to roflumilast's overall pharmacologic effects, these findings suggest that roflumilast can be taken with or without food.