Reducing Postoperative Swelling, Edema, and Ecchymosis after Open Rhinoplasty Using Intranasal Drainage.

Reducing postoperative strain on the patient after rhinoplasty is an important goal for the surgeon. Many strategies are described to reach that goal. One strategy is to remove blood from under the dissected soft tissue envelope by drains, before it can infiltrate the different layers causing ecchymosis, edema, and swelling. In our setting with wide degloving and using drains, we could show a significant reduction in ecchymosis on day 2 and 14 after surgery (p = 0.006 and p = 0.017). We also observed a significant effect for edema and general swelling on day 2 (p = 0.027 and p = 0.004), but this effect did not reach significance for these two parameters on day 14. And although the long-term effect needs to be assessed in the future, we found that using drains in open rhinoplasty with wide degloving is an easily applicable, cheap, and reproducible approach to reduce postoperative ecchymosis, edema, and swelling.

My Approach to Preservation Rhinoplasty.

Preservation rhinoplasty entails the preservation of the supportive ligaments, preservation of the cartilage structure, and preserving the anatomy of the nasal dorsum. The preservation methods I use are described in this article.

Differences between Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: Indications, Techniques, Grafts, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The nose is at the center of the face and has essential functional and aesthetic properties. Over recent years, rhinoplasty has gained increasing popularity through the influence of "selfies" and social media. As a result, a growing demand for secondary correction has also emerged. Revision rhinoplasty is more complex than primary cases and often requires the use of extranasal grafting material. The authors sought to analyze the indications, techniques, and outcomes after primary and revision rhinoplasty. METHODS: A total of 245 patients (153 primary cases and 92 revisions) undergoing surgery at the authors' specialized clinic for facial plastic surgery were included. All patients were treated by an experienced facial plastic surgeon according to the authors' established clinic standards. A retrospective data analysis was performed to evaluate the differences between the groups regarding the indications, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Although more patients sought revision surgery for aesthetic reasons alone than isolated functional issues, almost two-thirds of the revision patients had functional and aesthetic problems in combination. Complex reconstructive techniques, extracorporeal septoplasties, and extranasal grafts were more commonly used in revision cases. The occurrence of another revision during the follow-up period was significantly higher after revision surgery compared to primary rhinoplasty cases (primary rhinoplasty, 10.5 percent; revision surgery, 23.9 percent; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: There are differences between primary and revision rhinoplasty that must be appreciated by the treating surgeon. The patient should be informed about the increased complexity of the secondary procedure, the possible need for extranasal grafts, and the increased risk of a further revision. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

40 Years of Total Extracorporeal Septal Reconstruction: The Past, Present, and Future.

BACKGROUND: Even today, severe septal deformities are a challenging problem for any rhinoplasty surgeon. Standard techniques are often not able to achieve satisfactory long-term results regarding function or aesthetic form. In such severe cases, a partial or total extracorporeal septal reconstruction may be used, as these techniques provide reliable and lasting results. METHODS: The aim of this work is to present the authors' experience with the technique of total extracorporeal septal reconstruction and its development to today's standard and to prove its effectiveness in the long-term follow-up. RESULTS: This article presents 40 years of clinical experience in this field and describes the technical changes that have evolved. Low complication rates, safe techniques, and favorable long-term outcomes of the total extracorporeal septal reconstruction show the benefits of this technique. CONCLUSION: The indication for a total extracorporeal septal reconstruction has been limited by the development of less complex surgical procedures, but it still represents the best technique to achieve long-term functional and aesthetic results in patients with very complex septal deformities. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Suture techniques and cartilage grafts in nasal tip surgery: An algorithm in primary and secondary rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: In most primary and secondary rhinoplasties, the adjustment of the nasal tip in terms of position, projection, and configuration is mandatory. Usually, this is one of the most challenging parts of the operation. The aim of this study was to present a step-by-step algorithm that evaluates popular techniques for a predictable outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-surgeon retrospective review of primary and secondary rhinoplasty patients was undertaken for nasal tip refinement. An overview of popular and clinically relevant suture techniques and cartilage grafts is provided, in particular, concerning the position, projection, and rotation. On the basis of clinical examples, we will present different indications, the latest operative treatment options, and long-term results. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2018, we devised an algorithm based on 322 patients. Ninety patients (28%) were admitted for primary rhinoplasties and 232 patients for secondary rhinoplasties (72%). Our patients reported overall high satisfaction rates, and no further revisions were required. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative analyses and the knowledge of different suture techniques and cartilage grafts for nasal tip surgery are crucial factors for a successful postoperative outcome.

How to Reduce the Probability of a Pollybeak Deformity in Primary Rhinoplasty: A Single-Center Experience.

Being a very common and highly stigmatizing deformity following primary rhinoplasty, a pollybeak deformity should be avoided during any primary rhinoplasty, especially in patients with thick nasal skin. Two surgical techniques used in the authors' department to decrease the probability of its development in at-risk patients are described in this article: the authors' modification of the supratip suture initially described by Guyuron, and a direct excision of excessive skin that the authors term supratip excision, reserved for rare cases with massive skin excess. In addition, a brief overview of the results of the authors' case series of 74 patients treated with the supratip suture technique, and 21 patients treated with the supratip excision technique over a 5-year period, is given. In the authors' experience, very good aesthetic results are achieved using either of the two techniques in selected cases.

Bony Fixation of the Nasal Framework.

The importance of a straight and stable central framework is beyond dispute. Many authors allude to technical aspects how to achieve the above-mentioned requirements. Far less is said about the contact zones of the framework and how to achieve a long-lasting and solid fixation. In the authors' patient group, they found the need to work on the septum/the central framework in approximately 84% of the cases. In 61% of the patients, the authors had to operate on the fixation point. Of course, there is a great variety of anatomical findings. So the required techniques differ immensely. The surgeon must be prepared for all kinds of different situations. Especially the dorsal fixation and the anchoring on the maxilla without having a standard anterior nasal spine can be a great challenge. In their daily routine, suture techniques (e.g., the transcutaneous transosseous cerclage suture) have become the authors' working horse for these complex fixation situations.

Free Diced Cartilage: A New Application of Diced Cartilage Grafts in Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Irregularities or deformities of the nasal dorsum after hump reduction account for a significant number of revision rhinoplasties. The authors therefore developed a technique of meticulously dicing and exactly placing free diced cartilage grafts, harvested from septum, rib, or ear cartilage. The cartilage paste is used for smoothening, augmentation, or camouflaging of the nasal dorsum in primary or revision rhinoplasties. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of multisurgeon consecutive open approach rhinoplasties from January to December of 2014 was conducted at a single center. The authors compared the outcome of three different techniques to augment or cover the nasal dorsum after an observation period of 7 months. In group I, 325 patients with free diced cartilage grafts as the only onlay were included. In group II, consisting of 73 patients, the dorsal onlay was either fascia alone or in combination with free diced cartilage grafts. Forty-eight patients in group III received a dorsal augmentation with the classic diced cartilage in fascia technique. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-six patients undergoing primary and secondary rhinoplasties in which one of the above-mentioned diced cartilage techniques was used were included in the study. The authors found revision rates for dorsal irregularities within the 7-month postoperative observation period of 5.2, 8.2, and 25 percent for groups I, II, and III, respectively. CONCLUSION: The authors' findings strongly support their clinical experience that the free diced cartilage graft technique presents an effective and easily reproducible method for camouflage and augmentation in aesthetic and reconstructive rhinoplasty.

Refining the Nasal Dorsum with Free Diced Cartilage.

Refining the nasal dorsum has become a major challenge in modern rhinoplasty as irregularities of the nasal dorsum account for a significant number of revision surgeries. In our department, free diced cartilage is now routinely applied for smoothening of the nasal dorsum. In this retrospective study, the outcomes with regard to irregularities or contour deficits of the nasal dorsum of 431 rhinoplasty cases operated by a single surgeon between July 2013 and June 2015, using free diced cartilage, are compared with 327 cases operated by the same surgeon between January 2007 and December 2008, before the introduction of the free diced cartilage technique. A decrease in early revision surgeries (i.e., revision within the 2-year period evaluated) due to dorsal irregularities or contour deficits is seen. Being a quick, easy, and highly cost-effective procedure, we feel that free diced cartilage is currently the ideal technique for refinements of the nasal dorsum.

Nasal Reconstruction: Extending the Limits.

Reconstructing the 3-dimensional structure of the nose requires the maintenance of its aesthetic form and function. Restoration of the correct dimension, projection, skin quality, symmetrical contour, and function remains problematic. Consequently, modern approaches of nasal reconstruction aim at rebuilding the units rather than just covering the defect. However, revising or redoing a failed or insufficient reconstruction remains very challenging and requires experience and creativity. Here, we present a very particular case with a male patient, who underwent 37 operations elsewhere and presented with a failed nasal reconstruction. We describe and illustrate the complex steps of the nasal rereconstruction, including the reconstruction of the forehead donor site, surgical delay procedures for lining, and the coverage with a third paramedian forehead flap.

New Suturing Techniques to Reconstruct the Keystone Area in Extracorporeal Septoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Severe septal deformations require adequate treatment to restore shape and function using extracorporeal septoplasty. Because it has been criticized for being technically demanding to execute and has increased risk for aesthetic complications, the authors have developed two new suture techniques for refixation of the neoseptum. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of multisurgeon consecutive extracorporeal septoplasties performed from January of 2014 to December of 2014 was conducted at a single institution using the criss-cross or transcutaneous transosseous cerclage suture (group 1) compared with fixation at the upper lateral cartilages only (group 2). RESULTS: One hundred ten extracorporeal septoplasties were performed in 110 patients over 12 months. Group 1 consisted of 58 patients (53 percent), whether receiving the criss-cross [12 patients (21 percent)] or the transcutaneous transosseous cerclage suture [46 patients (79 percent)], and group 2 consisted of 52 patients (47 percent). The median follow-up was 11 months (range, 6 to 16 months). Operative revision because of complications at the dorsum or the keystone area had to be performed in no case in group 1 and in five cases (9.6 percent) in group 2, resulting in a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.0212). There were no complications such as bleeding or infection observed in any of the 110 cases. CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate and to reduce the complication rate after extracorporeal septoplasty, the authors have developed the criss-cross and transcutaneous transosseous cerclage suture to overcome the important and technically demanding reimplantation of the neoseptum. Thus, the authors believe that these new operative techniques are safe and reproducible procedures that may take a permanent place among extracorporeal septoplasty procedures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of 2-Stage Versus 3-Stage Paramedian Forehead Flap Techniques: A 9-Year Comparative Study With Prospectively Collected Data.

BACKGROUND: The 3-stage forehead flap technique has been described as an aesthetic improvement after nasal reconstruction compared with the 2-stage technique. A standardized evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes of the 2-stage versus 3-stage paramedian forehead flap after nasal reconstruction was performed. METHODS: Between July 2003 and December 2012, 102 patients underwent either 2-stage or 3-stage paramedian forehead flap techniques. A standardized patient satisfaction questionnaire was used to assess resulting nasal appearance and function. Additionally, 2 plastic surgeons performed blinded assessments of the aesthetic outcome using a standardized photographic evaluation form. Together, these evaluations demonstrated functional and aesthetic outcomes (flap thickness, shape, color, flap hair growth, donor-site scars, and nasal symmetry). RESULTS: Functional and aesthetic outcomes according to the self-assessment questionnaire were similar between groups. On inclusion of the surgeon's evaluation, with a greater satisfaction was apparent from the reconstructed alar of the 2-stage group (Mann-Whitney U test, p = .03, Fisher exact test, p = .024, respectively). CONCLUSION: No clear evidence supported enhanced aesthetic results when the 3-stage forehead flap technique was used, especially in relation to flap thickness compared with the 2-stage technique. The 2-stage technique remains the state-of-the-art choice for nasal reconstruction, even in cases involving complex defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, Level III, and retrospective comparative study with prospectively collected data.

A Cohort Study of Paramedian Forehead Flap in 2 Stages (87 Flaps) and 3 Stages (100 Flaps).

BACKGROUND: In nasal reconstruction, the paramedian forehead flap is traditionally performed in 2 stages. To minimize the risk of flap necrosis, Millard described a 3-stage technique in a series of 5 cases in 1974. In this technique, an intermediate step of flap thinning is performed after flap transfer and before pedicle division. In this article, we compare the 2- and 3-stage techniques of paramedian forehead flaps for nasal reconstruction to determine the type and prevalence of complications related to each procedure. METHODS: Here, we present a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of paramedian forehead flaps for nasal reconstruction performed during a period of 6 years. We included all patients with 2- (n=87) and 3-stage (n=100) paramedian forehead flaps who had consistent and complete electronic patient records and followed them up for at least 6 months after pedicle division. We performed a regression analysis to adjust for the unequal distribution of complex cases. RESULTS: Demographic factors and the causes for the nasal defects were similar in both groups. Although the nasal reconstructions were significantly more complex in the 3-stage group, the rate of partial forehead flap necrosis was similar in both groups (2-stage, 3.4%; 3-stage, 5%; P=0.601). A regression analysis showed that the relative risk of partial flap necrosis in complex cases did not differ significantly between groups (relative risk, 0.80; P=0.705). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, our study is the largest series published to date and the first one to compare the prevalence of forehead flap necrosis in the 2- versus the 3-stage technique for paramedian forehead flaps. We found no evidence that the use of a 3-stage forehead flap lowers the prevalence of necrosis. Until larger multicenter studies or meta-analyses can be conducted, smaller yet well-conducted studies such as the present one provide critical data and represent an important contribution to the field. Future research should investigate whether the 3-stage technique produces better aesthetic results than the 2-stage technique.

Reconstruction of the septum with an autogenous double-layered conchal L-strut.

BACKGROUND: One of the most important preconditions for a straight nose is a straight and stable cartilaginous L-shaped frame with sufficient support for the nasal tip and the cartilaginous dorsum. Where the structure of the septal cartilage is destroyed, a sufficient L-strut must be reconstructed. This article presents a technique for reconstruction of an autogenous L-strut using double-layered conchal cartilages. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted with a subsequent follow-up evaluation 10.5-22 months later. The conchal L-strut was used for 26 patients to reconstruct a new septal frame. The full details of the planning process, L-frame construction, and technical data are described together with two typical cases. RESULTS: In all 26 cases, the authors were able to reconstruct a sufficient neoseptum. In 25 cases, the neoseptum remained straight. Only in one case did the anterior border deviate immediately after the operation. No slippage from the nasal spine was found. The anchoring to the nasal bones and the upper lateral cartilages was stable. However, one asymmetric columella base was found, caused by an asymmetric support to the footplates by the transplant. The osteocartilagenous vault was successfully reconstructed in all the patients. Of the 26 patients, 25 described a marked improvement in their nasal breathing. CONCLUSION: The reported technique enables the surgeon to reconstruct the complete cartilagenous L-frame with both conchal cartilages. For certain cases, this technique of autogenous reconstruction of the nasal septum could be a valuable alternative to reconstruction with rib cartilage.

Lining in nasal reconstruction.

Restoring nasal lining is one of the essential parts during reconstruction of full-thickness defects of the nose. Without a sufficient nasal lining the whole reconstruction will fail. Nasal lining has to sufficiently cover the shaping subsurface framework. But in addition, lining must not compromise or even block nasal ventilation. This article demonstrates different possibilities of lining reconstruction. The use of composite grafts for small rim defects is described. The limits and technical components for application of skin grafts are discussed. Then the advantages and limitations of endonasal, perinasal, and hingeover flaps are demonstrated. Strategies to restore lining with one or two forehead flaps are presented. Finally, the possibilities and technical aspects to reconstruct nasal lining with a forearm flap are demonstrated. Technical details are explained by intraoperative pictures. Clinical cases are shown to illustrate the different approaches and should help to understand the process of decision making. It is concluded that although the lining cannot be seen after reconstruction of the cover it remains one of the key components for nasal reconstruction. When dealing with full-thickness nasal defects, there is no way to avoid learning how to restore nasal lining.

Lower lateral crural reverse plasty: a technique to correct severe concavities of the lateral crus.

BACKGROUND: Excessive concavities of the lower lateral crura can lead to heavy aesthetic disfigurement of the nasal tip and to insufficiencies of the external nasal valve. This study reviewed experience with the lower lateral crural reverse plasty technique that uses the existing cartilage to create the desired lower lateral cartilage contour and provides sufficient alar rim support. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted with a follow-up period ranging from 9 to 33 months. The technique was applied in primary (n = 13) and secondary (n = 3) open rhinoplasties to correct severe concavities of the lower lateral cartilages. Two case examples and intraoperative photographs are presented to illustrate the technique and its results. RESULTS: The lower lateral crural reverse plasty proved its applicability for the functional and aesthetical correction of severe lower lateral crura concavities. By dissecting the distorted lateral crus, turning it around, and suturing it back in place, surgeons can "reconstruct" a new lateral crus with existing cartilage. No additional cartilage is needed, and no harvesting at a different location needs to be performed. After rhinoplasty, no alar rim instabilities were observed. In three cases, even preexisting instabilities were corrected. Aesthetically enduring results were observed, and no overcorrection or alar retraction was seen. CONCLUSION: With the lower lateral crural reverse plasty, severe concavities of the lower lateral crura can be corrected. This technique is a useful and reproducible procedure, performed without additional tissue to achieve functionally and aesthetically satisfying and enduring results.

Stimulation of steroid-suppressed cutaneous healing by repeated topical application of IGF-I: different mechanisms of action based upon the mode of IGF-I delivery.

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is accepted as a potent stimulus of wound healing when applied in combination with its binding proteins. However, there is only one study published that has investigated the effect of repeated topical application of unbound IGF-I on ischemic wound healing. The aim of this study was to show the effect of daily topical IGF-I therapy on cutaneous ulcer healing in a steroid-suppressed wound model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Full-thickness wounds were created on the back of 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats. Before surgery, animals received depot-steroids subcutaneously. Wounds were treated daily with either a standard hydrogel dressing (control), topical IGF-I dissolved in 0.2% methylcellulose gel (IGF-I gel), or a hydrogel dressing containing IGF-I (IGF-I dressing). After 7 days of treatment, wounds were excised and measured by photoplanimetry. SMA- and PCNA-expression as well as the formation of granulation tissue were assessed in tissue sections. Results are given as median(min-max). Differences between groups were calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Subcutaneous injection of depot-steroids induced a significant delay in healing, as shown by an enlarged wound size [44(33-65) versus 25(20-35)] mm(2); P = 0.001). In steroid-treated rats, both IGF-I gel and IGF-I dressing enhanced excisional healing, as shown by a significant reduction in wound size (P = 0.0001), with IGF-I released from the dressing being even more effective than IGF-I gel (P = 0.03). However, in these animals only IGF-I released from the hydrogel dressing stimulated SMA- (P = 0.03) as well as PCNA-expression (P = 0.001) and increased granulation tissue formation (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a repeated application of topical IGF-I enhances cutaneous ulcer healing. In addition, only the controlled release of IGF-I from the hydrogel dressing is capable of reversing the steroid-induced delay of healing, suggesting different mechanisms of action with respect to the mode of IGF-I delivery.