Virtual Reality Improves Patient Experience and Anxiety During In-office Carpal Tunnel Release.

Background: This study examined how wide- awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) surgery in the office versus the standard operating room (OR) impacts patient experience, and the effect wide awake virtual reality (WAVR) has in conjunction with WALANT on patient experience. Methods: This is a patient-reported outcome study of patients undergoing carpal tunnel release by a single surgeon between August 2017 and March 2021. Patients were classified by location; traditional OR versus WALANT in-office. In-office patients were further classified by whether they chose to use WAVR or not. Patients rated overall experience, enjoyability, and anxiety using a Likert scale (1-7). Results: The online survey had a 44.8% response rate. OR patients were twice as likely to report a neutral or negative experience (23% versus 11%, P = 0.03), significantly lower enjoyment scores (44% versus 20%, P = 0.0007)' and higher anxiety (42% versus 26%, P = 0.04) compared with office-based WALANT patients. With the addition of WAVR, office patients reported higher enjoyment than those who did not use WAVR (85% versus 73%, P = 0.05). Patients reporting an anxiety disorder were more likely to choose WAVR when compared with patients without anxiety disorder (73.8% versus 56.4%). When they chose WAVR, they had greater anxiolysis (79% versus 47%, P = 0.01)' and increased enjoyment (90% versus 59%, P = 0.005). Conclusions: This study demonstrates improved patient experience in the office setting, further amplified by WAVR. Preexisting anxiety disorder is a positive predictive variable toward the patients' choice to use WAVR.

Virtual Reality Improves the Patient Experience during Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Hand Surgery: A Single-Blind, Randomized, Prospective Study.

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet surgery has been shown to decrease cost and hospital length of stay. The authors studied the use of virtual reality during wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet outpatient upper extremity surgery to assess its effect on patient pain, anxiety and fun. Patients undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet surgery were randomized to use (virtual reality) or not use (non-virtual reality) virtual reality during their procedures. Pain, fun, and anxiety were measured with a Likert scale at several time points, as were blood pressure and heart rate. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess overall satisfaction. Virtual reality patients exhibited lower anxiety scores during injection, during the procedure, and at the end of the procedure. There were no differences in blood pressure, heart rate, or pain scores. Compared with non-virtual reality patients, virtual reality patients' fun scores were higher. Virtual reality patients felt the experience helped them to relax, and they would recommend virtual reality-assisted wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet surgery. Among patients with self-reported preexisting anxiety, virtual reality patients had lower pain and anxiety scores during injection of local anesthesia compared with non-virtual reality patients. This study demonstrates that readily available virtual reality hardware and software can provide a virtual reality experience that reduces patient anxiety both during the injection of local anesthesia and during the surgical procedure. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 144: 408, 2019.) CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, II.

Comprehensive Multicenter Graduate Surgical Education Initiative Incorporating Entrustable Professional Activities, Continuous Quality Improvement Cycles, and a Web-Based Platform to Enhance Teaching and Learning.

BACKGROUND: It is increasingly important for faculty to teach deliberately and provide timely, detailed, and formative feedback on surgical trainee performance. We initiated a multicenter study to improve resident evaluative processes and enhance teaching and learning behaviors while engaging residents in their education. STUDY DESIGN: Faculty from 7 US postgraduate training programs rated resident operative performances using the perioperative briefing, intraoperative teaching, debriefing model, and rated patient visits/academic performances using the entrustable professional activities model via a web-based platform. Data were centrally analyzed and iterative changes made based on participant feedback, individual preferences, and database refinements, with trends addressed using the Plan, Do, Check, Act improvement methodology. RESULTS: Participants (92 surgeons, 150 residents) submitted 3,880 assessments during July 2014 through September 2017. Evidence of preoperative briefings improved from 33.9% ± 2.5% to 95.5% ± 1.5% between April and September 2014 compared with April and September 2017 (p < 0.001). Postoperative debriefings improved from 10.6% ± 2.7% to 90.2% ± 2.5% (p < 0.001) for the same period. Meaningful self-reflection by residents improved from 28.6% to 67.4% (p < 0.001). The number of assessments received per resident during a 6-month period increased from 6.4 ± 6.2 to 13.4 ± 10.1 (p < 0.003). Surgeon-entered assessments increased from 364 initially to 685 in the final period, and the number of resident assessments increased from 308 to 445. We showed a 4-fold increase in resident observed activities being rated. CONCLUSIONS: By adopting recognized educational models with repeated Plan, Do, Check, Act cycles, we increased the quality of preoperative learning objectives, showed more frequent, detailed, and timely assessments of resident performance, and demonstrated more effective self-reflection by residents. We monitored trends, identified opportunities for improvement and successfully sustained those improvements over time, applying a team-based approach.

Perioperative self-reflection among surgical residents.

BACKGROUND: We studied prevalence and predictors of meaningful self-reflection among surgical residents and with prompting/structured interventions, sought to improve/sustain resident skills. METHODS: Residents from six programs recorded 1032 narrative self-reflective comments (120 residents), using a web-based platform. If residents identified something learned or to be improved, self-reflection was deemed meaningful. Independent variables PGY level, resident/surgeon gender, study site/Phase1: July2014-August2015 vs. Phase2: September2015-September2016) were analyzed. RESULTS: Meaningful self-reflection was documented in 40.6% (419/1032) of entries. PGY5's meaningfully self-reflected less than PGY1-4's, 26.1% vs. 49.6% (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, resident narratives during Phase 2 were 4.7 times more likely to engage in meaningful self-reflection compared to Phase1 entries (p < 0.001). Iterative changes during Phase2 showed a 236% increase in meaningful self-reflection, compared to Phase1. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residents uncommonly practice meaningful self-reflection, even when prompted, and PGY5/chief residents reflect less than more junior residents. Substantial/sustained improvements in resident self-reflection can occur with both training and interventions.

Do female surgeons learn or teach differently?

BACKGROUND: Gender and/or gender-stereotypes might influence surgical education. We hypothesized that female surgeons might focus their learning and teaching differently from male surgeons. METHODS: Residents and surgeons (multi-institutional) individually recorded preoperatively discussed learning objectives (LO) for matching cases. Narratives were classified as knowledge-based, skill-based, or attitude-based. Multinomial logistic regression analyses, LO = dependent variable; independent variables = resident/surgeon gender, PGY level, timing of entry-to-procedure date, and quarters-of-year. RESULTS: 727 LOs from 125 residents (41% female) and 49 surgeons (20% female) were classified. Female residents were 1.4 times more likely to select knowledge over skill. With female surgeons, residents were 1.6 and 2.1 times more likely to select knowledge over skill and attitude over skill than if the surgeon was male. PGY 4/5 residents chose attitude-based LOs over junior residents. CONCLUSION: Resident, surgeon gender and year-of-training influence learning objectives. Whether this reflects gender stereotyping by residents or differences in attending teaching styles awaits further exploration.

A taxonomy of perioperative surgical learning: Trending resident skill acquisition.

BACKGROUND: Resident and curriculum evaluation require tracking surgical resident operative performance, yet what and when to measure remains unclear. METHODS: From a multi-institutional database, we reviewed 611 resident/surgeon-paired assessments of ACGME Milestones and modified OPRS ratings for different cases and postgraduate years. RESULTS: Faculty Milestone ratings increased with each PGY (p=<0.001) and correlated with resident self-ratings (ICC = 0.83). Mean OPRS scores increased in small increments with substantial intra-year variability. Progression among individual OPRS subcategories was not apparent from more global analyses. Interestingly, male faculty offered lower ratings than female faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Milestones and modified mean OPRS ratings suggest residents are learning, yet lack sufficient discrimination for promotion or curricular analysis. Differential progression through OPRS subcategories suggests a taxonomy of surgical learning that can be tailored to focus on different skills at each point in the training continuum. The effect of faculty gender on resident ratings awaits further study.

Female reproductive status and circulating blood leukocyte expression of selected metabolic or signaling genes involved in sex steroid metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the blood leukocyte expression of 22 sex steroid metabolic/signaling genes according to female reproductive status. METHODS: Michigan Fisheaters' Cohort participants underwent blood collection during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle or randomly in non-menstruating participants. Gene expression (GE) was measured using Taqman hydrolysis probes and quantitative RT-PCR. Repeatability of four genes was determined in a subgroup. RESULTS: Five premenstrual, 57 premenopausal (20 users of systemic hormonal contraception), and 43 postmenopausal females participated. After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons of median GE between groups, three findings remained significant: greater GE of AhR in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal non-users of systemic hormonal contraception; and greater GE of ESR2 and HSD17B7 in premenstrual girls compared to postmenopausal women. Modest intra-class correlations were identified for CYP 19, ESR1, and ESR2 GE measured both in 2007 and 2010, but no intra-class correlation over the same time period was found for CYP17. CONCLUSIONS: There was little differential variation of blood leukocyte sex steroid ge between premenopausal women in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and postmenopausal women for most genes analyzed, but it will be necessary to make statistical adjustments in future epidemiologic studies in two circumstances: 1) when comparing AhR GE in premenopausal women non-users of systemic hormone contraception with postmenopausal women and 2) when comparing ESR2 and HSD17B7 GE in studies that include premenstrual girls. Developmental differences may explain the differential GE found in ESR2 and HSD17B7 in premenstrual girls compared with postmenopausal women.