Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spine Deform ; 12(4): 1137-1143, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: EOSQ-24 is a disease specific patient-reported outcome score used to assess the quality of life in patients with early-onset scoliosis. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the EOSQ-24 to Finnish language and to assess the reliability and validity of the translation. METHODS: Cross-cultural adaptation and cross-cultural validation were performed to the Finnish translation of the EOSQ-24. Patients and/or their caretakers were then recruited to assess the psychometric properties of the translation. We assessed the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and discriminative abilities. One-hundred-and-three patients filled the questionnaire. RESULTS: EOSQ-24 was successfully translated into Finnish. The translation showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.94), satisfactory item-total correlations ranging from 0.6 to 0.9, and moderate to strong inter item correlations. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.7 to 0.96 indicating good to excellent agreement. Patients with neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis reported lower EOSQ-24 scores when compared to patients' idiopathic and congenital scoliosis. There was a significant negative correlation between major curve and EOSQ-24 scores in patients with idiopathic early onset scoliosis. CONCLUSION: The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the measure were found to be satisfactory. A marked ceiling effect was observed, indicating a potential source of error.


Asunto(s)
Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Escoliosis , Humanos , Escoliosis/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Femenino , Masculino , Finlandia , Niño , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Edad de Inicio , Traducciones , Adolescente , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Comparación Transcultural
2.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 43(6): e451-e457, 2023 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36998176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Congenital spinal anomalies represent a heterogeneous group of spinal deformities, of which only progressive or severe curves warrant surgical management. Only a limited number of studies have investigated the impact of surgery on the health-related quality of life and very limited data exists comparing these outcomes to healthy controls. METHODS: A single surgeon series of 67 consecutive children with congenital scoliosis (mean age at surgery 8.0 y, range: 1.0 to 18.3 y, 28 girls) undergoing hemivertebrectomy (n = 34), instrumented spinal fusion (n = 20), or vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib procedure (n = 13) with a mean follow-up of 5.8 years (range: 2 to 13 y). The comparison was made to age and sex-matched healthy controls. Outcome measures included the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire both pre and postoperatively, radiographic outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: The average major curve correction was significantly better in the hemivertebrectomy (60%) and instrumented spinal fusion (51%) than in the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib group (24%), respectively ( P < 0.001). Complications were noted in 8 of 67 (12%) children, but all patients recovered fully during follow-up. Pain, self-image, and function domains improved numerically from preoperative to final follow-up, but the pain score was the only one with a statistically significant change ( P = 0.033). The Scoliosis Research Society pain, self-image, and function domain scores remained at a significantly lower level at the final follow-up than in the healthy controls ( P ≤ 0.05), while activity scores improved to a similar level. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for congenital scoliosis improved angular spinal deformities with a reasonable risk of complications. Health-related quality of life outcomes improved from preoperative to final follow-up, but especially pain and function domains remained at a significantly lower level than in the age and sex-matched healthy controls. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.


Asunto(s)
Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Escoliosis/complicaciones , Estudios de Seguimiento , Calidad de Vida , Titanio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dolor/etiología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos
3.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 45(23): E1604-E1614, 2020 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32858743

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive series of patients treated at two institutions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and surgical outcomes of Shilla growth guidance and magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) treatment in patients with syndromic and neuromuscular early-onset scoliosis (EOS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Knowledge of the outcomes of Shilla instrumentation is limited. METHODS: We identified 13 children treated with Shilla and 18 children treated with MCGR with syndromic or neuromuscular EOS (major curve ≥45 degree) before the age of 10 years with minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcome parameters included clinical data, radiographic as well as HRQoL outcomes (EOSQ-24 questionnaire). RESULTS: Mean preoperative major curves were 64 degree (range, 45-108 degree) in the Shilla group and 58 degree (range, 45-85 degree) in the MCGR group (P = 0.151). At final follow-up, mean major curves were 31 degree (range, 9.4-54 degree ) and 30 degree (range, 16-53 degree), respectively (P = 0.392). The mean major curve correction was 45% in the Shilla group and 48% in the MCGR group during the follow-up (P = 0.383). Spinal (T1-S1) and T1-T12 growth were significantly better (P = 0.006 and 0.042) in the MCGR than in the Shilla group during the distraction period. At final follow-up, 11 (85%) children in the Shilla group and 17 (94%) in the MCGR group had achieved T1-T12 length of ≥18 cm (P = 0.202). There were significantly more surgical procedures in the MCGR group (mean 2.6 vs. 1.4, P = 0.034) with no difference in the number of complications (P = 0.768). EOSQ24 domains were similar at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Shilla growth guidance provided similar correction of spinal deformity, equal number of complications, but with significantly less surgical procedures in patients treated for EOS when compared with MCGR instrumentation. MCGR provided with slightly better spinal growth during the distraction period. There were no significant differences between the quality of life assessments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Ortopédicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA