RESUMEN
Background: Our main objective was to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on cancer services and cancer patients in terms of disease severity, morbidity and mortality. Secondary objectives were to characterize cancer type, affected age groups, gender, comorbidities, infectivity, and to identify cancer treatment delay and its complications after COVID-19 infection. Methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic health records of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected cancer patients from April 2020 to March 2021 was done. The following parameters were investigated upon-new and follow-up cases during the pandemic and its preceding years (2018-2019, 2019-2020), age, sex, type of cancer, comorbidities, presentation, symptomatology and treatment for COVID-19, time to recovery, complications, delay in treatment and survival outcome. Statistical analysis using chi-square testing was done on the above variables. Results: There was a 50.49% reduction in the number of new and follow-up cases as compared to that of the previous years. Seventy-four out of 310 (23.87%) COVID-19 positive cancer patients were aged in their sixth decade with the commonest type being hematological malignancies. A proportion of 84.8% (n=263) patients were asymptomatic. Univariate analysis was statistically significant for mortality with regard to age ≥60 years (P=0.034), type of malignancy (P=0.000178), hypertension (P=0.0028), symptomatology of COVID-19 infection (P=0.0016), site of treatment and oxygen/intervention (P<0.0001). There was an average delay in treatment time of 5 to 6 weeks. Multivariate analysis showed that gastrointestinal (GI) and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) malignancies and oxygen requirement (>2 L/min) were responsible for the 20.65% mortality rate. Conclusions: The pandemic significantly affected the care of cancer patients with decreased cases, late presentation, delayed treatment with potentially worse mortality outcome. Although they have decreased immunity, majority were asymptomatic. Most of the fatalities were in the GI and HPB malignancies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast are rare fibroepithelial tumors that are generally more prone to recurrence. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the clinicopathological features, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic interventions, along with their respective outcomes, to identify the factors associated with a recurrence of PTs of the breast. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cohort and observational study was conducted, which entailed analyzing the clinicopathological data of patients who were previously diagnosed or presented with PTs of the breast between 1996 and 2021. Data included the total number of patients diagnosed with PTs of the breast and their ages, tumor grade on initial biopsy, tumor location (left or right breast), tumor size, therapeutic interventions carried out (including surgery-either mastectomy or lumpectomy-and adjuvant radiotherapy), final tumor grade, recurrence status, type of recurrence, and time to recurrence. RESULTS: We analyzed data on a total of 87 patients who were pathologically proven to have PTs, and 46 patients (52.87%) were found to have recurrences. All patients were female, with a mean age at diagnosis of 39 years (range 15-70). Patients aged <40 years had the highest incidence of recurrence, with a rate of 54.35% (n = 25/46), followed by patients aged >40 years, with a rate of recurrence of 45.65% (n = 21/46). A total of 55.4% of patients presented with primary PTs and 44.6% had recurrent PTs at presentation. The average time to local recurrence (LR) from the completion of treatment was 13.8 months, whereas for systemic recurrence (SR), it was 15.29 months. Surgery (mastectomy/lumpectomy) was the major determinant for local recurrence (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) had a minimal recurrence of PTs. Patients who were found to have a malignant biopsy on initial diagnosis (triple assessment) had a higher incidence of PTs and were more prone to SR than LR. Surgery was a determining factor in the increased rate of LR, with lumpectomy associated with a higher incidence of LR than mastectomy.