Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vestib Res ; 34(2-3): 103-112, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The upright head roll test (UHRT) is a recently introduced diagnostic maneuver for lateral semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LSC-BPPV). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the UHRT. METHODS: Two separate studies were conducted. Study 1 analyzed 827 results of videonystagmography (VNG) to assess UHRT reliability, and Study 2 analyzed 130 LSC-BPPV cases to evaluate UHRT validity. RESULTS: The inter-test reliability between UHRT and the supine head roll test (SHRT) showed substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.753) in direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.836) in distinguishing the direction of DCPN. The validity assessment of UHRT showed high accuracy in diagnosing LSC-BPPV (80.0%) and in differentiating the variant types (74.6%). UHRT was highly accurate in diagnosing the canalolithiasis type in LSC-BPPV patients (Cohen's kappa = 0.835); however, it showed only moderate accuracy in diagnosing the cupulolithiasis type (Cohen's kappa = 0.415). The intensity of nystagmus in UHRT was relatively weaker than that in SHRT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: UHRT is a reliable test for diagnosing LSC-BPPV and distinguishing subtypes. However, UHRT has a limitation in discriminating the affected side owing to a weaker intensity of nystagmus than SHRT.


Asunto(s)
Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno , Canales Semicirculares , Pruebas de Función Vestibular , Humanos , Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/diagnóstico , Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Canales Semicirculares/fisiopatología , Anciano , Adulto , Pruebas de Función Vestibular/métodos , Pruebas de Función Vestibular/normas , Movimientos de la Cabeza/fisiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Nistagmo Patológico/diagnóstico , Nistagmo Patológico/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven , Nistagmo Fisiológico/fisiología
2.
Saudi Med J ; 43(1): 9-30, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35022280

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of self-collected saliva in coronavirus desease-19 (COVID-19) screening procedures. METHODS: A total of 6 databases were reviewed from their inception until August 2021. Sensitivity and specificity were measured by extracting items (true-positive, true-negative, false-positive and false-negative) from each paper. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy based on Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were included in the final analysis. The diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of self-collected saliva was 196.2022 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 117.8833-326.5546). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.955. For detecting COVID-19, self-collected saliva had a moderate sensitivity of 0.8476 [0.8045-0.8826] and positive predictive value of 0.9404 [0.9122-0.9599] but high specificity of 0.9817 [0.9707-0.9887] and negative predictive value of 0.9467 [0.9130-0.9678]. In a subgroup analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of self-collected saliva tended to be higher for symptomatic (vs. asymptomatic) examinees. CONCLUSION: Although naso/oropharyngeal swab tests are the most accurate and important diagnostic tools, the saliva-based testing method can be used as a suitable alternative test, with the advantages of increased patient convenience, efficient testing, and the need for fewer medical staff and resources. In particular, simple collecting method such as drooling or spitting without coughing would be effective in evaluating the symptomatic patients.PROSPERO no.: CRD42021279287.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Saliva , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes
3.
Oral Oncol ; 121: 105463, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343782

RESUMEN

Although transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery affords several advantages, the use of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas to create and maintain the working space may cause complications such as subcutaneous emphysema and a CO2 embolism. We have used a self-retaining retractor as an alternative to CO2 gas insufflation for some time; we here report its feasibility and safety. We reviewed the medical records of 131 patients who underwent transoral endoscopic thyroid lobectomy; we compared the "CO2 group" and the "retractor" group. All thyroid tumors were completely removed with negative surgical margins. No major complication occurred in the retractor group. Two major events occurred in the CO2 group: one case of permanent vocal cord palsy and one CO2 embolism. Significant subcutaneous emphysema of the neck and chest were noted in 17.7% of CO2 group patients, but in no retractor group patient. Wound infection occurred in one patient in each group but improved after appropriate management. The total operation times from incision to suture did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.514). Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy using a self-retaining retractor as an alternative to CO2 gas insufflation is feasible and safe. The superiority of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy would be emphasized by avoiding CO2 gas insufflation, thus eliminating the risk of CO2 gas-related complications.


Asunto(s)
Embolia , Insuflación , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales , Enfisema Subcutáneo , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Tiroidectomía/instrumentación , Dióxido de Carbono/efectos adversos , Embolia/prevención & control , Humanos , Insuflación/efectos adversos , Enfisema Subcutáneo/etiología , Enfisema Subcutáneo/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/cirugía , Tiroidectomía/efectos adversos
4.
Dig Surg ; 28(4): 245-51, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21654172

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) in early gastric cancer (EGC) with special interest in a learning curve effect. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of EGC patients who underwent LADG (n = 100) and sex-, age- and body mass index- (BMI) matched EGC patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG; n = 100) were compared retrospectively. In addition, the outcomes between the early (n = 50) and late LADG group (n = 50) were compared. RESULTS: The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly smaller in the LADG group than in the ODG group (29.3 vs. 36.4, p < 0.001). The operative time of the LADG group was significantly longer than in the ODG group (249.1 vs. 152.9 min, p < 0.001). The complication rates were comparable between both groups (14 vs. 13%, p = 0.84). No cancer-related death was observed in either group. Between early and late LADG groups, the operative time was shorter (p < 0.001) and the number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher (p = 0.016) in the late group. CONCLUSIONS: LADG seems to be a safe and feasible procedure in treating EGC, as it shows comparable outcomes with ODG. The potential disadvantages of LADG, such as longer operation time and smaller number of retrieved lymph nodes, diminished after overcoming the learning curve.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Curva de Aprendizaje , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA