Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Deficiencia de IgG/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/sangre , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Deficiencia de IgG/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We used data from the Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey to test the hypothesis that patients with COPD who report less engagement with their disease management are also more likely to report greater impact of the disease. METHODS: This was a population-based, cross-sectional survey of 4,343 subjects aged ≥40 years from 12 countries, fulfilling a case definition of COPD based on self-reported physician diagnosis or symptomatology. The impact of COPD was measured with COPD Assessment Test, modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, and hospital admissions and emergency department visits for COPD in the prior year. The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) instrument and the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) were used to measure patient disease engagement and medication adherence, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of subjects reported being either disengaged or struggling with their disease (low engagement: PAM-13 levels 1 and 2), and 35% reported poor adherence (MMAS-8 <6). In univariate analyses, lower PAM-13 and MMAS-8 scores were significantly associated with poorer COPD-specific health status, greater breathlessness and lower BMI (PAM-13 only), less satisfaction with their doctor's management of COPD, and more emergency department visits. In multivariate regression models, poor satisfaction with their doctor's management of COPD was significantly associated with both low PAM-13 and MMAS-8 scores; low PAM-13 scores were additionally independently associated with higher COPD Assessment Test and modified Medical Research Council scores and low BMI (underweight). CONCLUSION: Poor patient engagement and medication adherence are frequent and associated with worse COPD-specific health status, higher health care utilization, and lower satisfaction with health care providers. More research will be needed to better understand what factors can be modified to improve medication adherence and patient engagement.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Participación del Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Autocuidado , Adulto , Anciano , Brasil , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Admisión del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Using data from the Continuing to Confront COPD International Physician and Patient Surveys, this paper describes physicians' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prognosis, and compares physician and patient perceptions with respect to COPD. METHODS: In 12 countries worldwide, 4,343 patients with COPD were identified through systematic screening of population samples, and 1,307 physicians who regularly saw patients with COPD were sampled from in-country professional databases. Both patients and physicians completed surveys about their COPD knowledge, beliefs, and perceptions; physicians answered further questions about diagnostic methods and treatment choices for COPD. RESULTS: Most physicians (79%) responded that the long-term health outlook for patients with COPD has improved over the past decade, largely attributed to the introduction of better medications. However, patient access to medication remains an issue in many countries, and some physicians (39%) and patients (46%) agreed/strongly agreed with the statement "there are no truly effective treatments for COPD". There was strong concordance between physicians and patients regarding COPD management practices, including the use of spirometry (86% of physicians and 76% of patients reporting they used/had undergone a spirometry test) and smoking cessation counseling (76% of physicians reported they counseled their smoking patients at every clinic visit, and 71% of smoking patients stated that they had received counseling in the past year). However, the groups differed in their perception about the role of smoking in COPD, with 78% of physicians versus 38% of patients strongly agreeing with the statement "smoking is the cause of most cases of COPD". CONCLUSION: The Continuing to Confront COPD International Surveys demonstrate that while physicians and patients largely agreed about COPD management practices and the need for more effective treatments for COPD, a gap exists about the causal role of smoking in COPD.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pacientes/psicología , Percepción , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Brasil , Broncodilatadores/provisión & distribución , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , República de Corea , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Espirometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIM: Utilizing data from the Continuing to Confront COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) International Physician Survey, this study aimed to describe physicians' knowledge and application of the GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD diagnosis and treatment recommendations and compare performance between primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians from 12 countries were sampled from in-country professional databases; 1,307 physicians (PCP to respiratory specialist ratio three to one) who regularly consult with COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis patients were interviewed online, by telephone or face to face. Physicians were questioned about COPD risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, including knowledge and application of the GOLD global strategy using patient scenarios. RESULTS: Physicians reported using spirometry routinely (PCPs 82%, respiratory specialists 100%; P<0.001) to diagnose COPD and frequently included validated patient-reported outcome measures (PCPs 67%, respiratory specialists 81%; P<0.001). Respiratory specialists were more likely than PCPs to report awareness of the GOLD global strategy (93% versus 58%, P<0.001); however, when presented with patient scenarios, they did not always perform better than PCPs with regard to recommending GOLD-concordant treatment options. The proportion of PCPs and respiratory specialists providing first- or second-choice treatment options concordant with GOLD strategy for a GOLD B-type patient was 38% versus 67%, respectively. For GOLD C and D-type patients, the concordant proportions for PCPs and respiratory specialists were 40% versus 38%, and 57% versus 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey of physicians in 12 countries practicing in the primary care and respiratory specialty settings showed high awareness of COPD-management guidelines. Frequent use of guideline-recommended COPD diagnostic practices was reported; however, gaps in the application of COPD-treatment recommendations were observed, warranting further evaluation to understand potential barriers to adopt guideline recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Concienciación , Brasil , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , México , Médicos de Atención Primaria/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pronóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Neumología/tendencias , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Especialización/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey aimed to estimate the prevalence and burden of COPD globally and to update findings from the Confronting COPD International Survey conducted in 1999-2000. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in 12 countries worldwide were identified through systematic screening of population samples. Telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted between November 2012 and May 2013 using a structured survey that incorporated validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Eligible patients were adults aged 40 years and older who were taking regular respiratory medications or suffered with chronic respiratory symptoms and reported either 1) a physician diagnosis of COPD/emphysema, 2) a physician diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, or 3) a symptom-based definition of chronic bronchitis. The burden of COPD was measured with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale. RESULTS: Of 106,876 households with at least one person aged ≥40 years, 4,343 respondents fulfilled the case definition of COPD and completed the full survey. COPD prevalence ranged from 7% to 12%, with most countries falling within the range of 7%-9%. In all countries, prevalence increased with age, and in all countries except the US was greater among men (range 6%-14%) than among women (range 5%-11%). A significant disease burden was observed when considering COPD symptoms or health status, and showed wide variations across countries. Prevalence of moderate-to-severe dyspnea (mMRC scale ≥2) ranged from 27% to 61%, and mean CAT score ranged from 16.0 to 24.8, indicating medium-to-high impairment. CONCLUSION: This survey, representing 12 countries, showed similar rates of estimated COPD prevalence across countries that were higher than those reported a decade ago in the original Confronting COPD International Survey. A significant burden of COPD was demonstrated by symptoms and health care-resource use, similar to that reported in the original survey.