Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 39(4): 696-705, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093027

RESUMEN

Language-appropriate care is critical for equitable, high-quality health care, but educational standards to assure graduate medical trainees are prepared to give such care are lacking. Detailed guidance for graduate medical education is provided by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education through the following: (1) an assessment framework for competencies, subcompetencies, and milestones for trainees and (2) the Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) Pathways for assessment of trainees' learning environments. These tools do not include a robust framework to evaluate trainees' abilities to offer language-appropriate care. They also do not address the learning environment's potential to support such care. A multidisciplinary group of linguistic, medical, and educational experts drafted a new subcompetency with milestones and an expanded CLER Pathway to highlight the importance of equitable care for patients who prefer languages other than English. These resources offer residency and fellowship programs tools to guide assessment, curriculum development, and learning-environment improvements related to language-appropriate care. Recognizing that programs have unique needs and resources, we propose a range of initial actions to address language equity. A focus on language diversity in the learning environment can have a broad and lasting impact on care quality, patient safety, and health equity.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Acreditación , Atención a la Salud , Lenguaje , Competencia Clínica
2.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 17: e479, 2023 09 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667881

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize strategies for strengthening public health system resilience for pandemics, disasters, and other emergencies using a scorecard approach. METHODS: The United Nations Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard) was applied across 5 workshops in Slovenia, Turkey, and the United States of America. The workshops focused on participants reviewing and discussing 23 questions/indicators. A Likert type scale was used for scoring with zero being the lowest and 5 the highest. The workshop scores were analyzed and discussed by participants to prioritize areas of need and develop resilience strategies. Data from all workshops were aggregated, analyzed, and interpreted to develop priorities representative of participating locations. RESULTS: Eight themes emerged representing the need for better integration of public health and disaster management systems. These include: assessing community disease burden; embedding long-term recovery groups in emergency systems; exploring mental health care needs; examining ecosystem risks; evaluating reserve funds; identifying what crisis communication strategies worked well; providing non-medical services; and reviewing resilience of existing facilities, alternate care sites, and institutions. CONCLUSIONS: The Scorecard is an effective tool for establishing baseline resilience and prioritizing actions. The strategies identified reflect areas in most need for investment to improve public health system resilience.


Asunto(s)
Desastres , Pandemias , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Ecosistema , Urgencias Médicas , Salud Pública
3.
Teach Learn Med ; 25(4): 306-11, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24112199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing demand for medical Spanish training, there has never been a comprehensive review of the methodology and outcomes of existing programs. PURPOSE: This article critically reviews studies published about medical Spanish education and proposes best practices for curriculum design and program research and evaluation. METHODS: The authors reviewed articles published on medical Spanish programs in the United States from 1977 to 2012, then appraised them for the presence of five factors commonly used in second-language acquisition (SLA) research. RESULTS: Only 2 of 23 published studies of programs met all 5 criteria. There was high variability in design and infrequent use of valid and reliable outcome measures. No consensus emerged as to best practices. Instead, reported outcomes were often inadequate surrogate markers for desired educational outcomes in interactions with Spanish speakers. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant need for effective medical Spanish programs based on solid SLA principles and research methods.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Hispánicos o Latinos , Multilingüismo , Barreras de Comunicación , Curriculum , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...