Further insights into the role of tumour characteristics in survival of young women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Optimizing the counselling of women ≤40years with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by investigating the role of young age and tumour characteristics on overall survival (OS). METHODS: A retrospective population-based study was done using data of EOC patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2014 registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyse clinical and tumour characteristics. Five- and 10-year OS rates were calculated using Kaplan Meier curves. To determine prognostic factors, univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: 1407 women ≤40years and 29,022 women >40years old were included. OS was higher for the younger women compared to older group (5-year survival of 65.6% vs. 32.7%, 10-year survival of 57.5% vs. 22.5%, respectively). The younger women had more often a mucinous (36.4%), well-differentiated (31.8%) tumour in early stage of disease (49.9%). Serous tumours (43.0%), high-grade (36.0%) and stage III (47.1%) were most frequently found in the older women. Histology, grade, stage, incidence year, and age group are independent prognostic factors for survival. OS of the young women for several combinations of tumour characteristics were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: Age is an independent prognostic factor for OS in EOC patients. Counselling on prognosis could be more individualised in young EOC patients using the tumour characteristics histology, stage and grade.

Opportunistic salpingectomy in women undergoing hysterectomy: Results from the HYSTUB randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether opportunistic salpingectomy in premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications is both hormonally and surgically safe, compared with hysterectomy without salpingectomy. STUDY DESIGN: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, women were randomised to undergo either hysterectomy with opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (intervention group) or standard hysterectomy with preservation of the Fallopian tubes (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference in serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (ΔAMH), measured pre-surgery and 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes and duration of hospital stay. The sample size was powered at 50 participants per group (n=100) to compare ΔAMH after hysterectomy with salpingectomy to ΔAMH after standard hysterectomy. RESULTS: Between March 2013 and December 2016, 104 women, aged 30-55 years, were randomly allocated to hysterectomy with opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (n=52) or standard hysterectomy (n=52). The baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The median ΔAMH was -0.14pmol/L (IQR -1.47-0.95) in the intervention group and 0.00pmol/L (IQR -1.05-0.80) in the control group (p=0.49). The addition of salpingectomy did not impair surgical results and it did not affect duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Addition of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy during hysterectomy did not result in a larger effect on ovarian reserve when compared with hysterectomy alone, neither did it affect surgical outcomes. Therefore, opportunistic salpingectomy seems to be a safe procedure in premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions.

Very high uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the only effective surgical strategy to reduce the increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Given the long-term health consequences of premature surgical menopause, we need insight in uptake and timing of RRSO to guide us in improving healthcare. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers diagnosed and counseled at the multidisciplinary Family Cancer Clinic of the Radboud university medical center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 1999 and 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze uptake and timing of RRSO. RESULTS: Data of 580 BRCA1/2 were analyzed. The uptake of RRSO among mutation carriers who are currently above the upper limit of the recommended age for RRSO, is 98.5% and 97.5% for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. The vast majority undergoes RRSO ≤40 (BRCA1) or ≤45 (BRCA2) years of age, provided that mutation status is known by that age: 90.8% and 97.3% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of RRSO among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who were counseled at our Family Cancer Clinic is extremely high. High uptake might be largely attributed to the directive and uniform way of counseling by professionals at our Family Cancer Clinic. Given the fact that RRSO is often undergone at premenopausal age in our population, future research should focus on minimizing long-term health consequences of premature surgical menopause either by optimization of hormone replacement therapy or by investigating alternative strategies to RRSO.