Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
World J Surg ; 38(4): 985-91, 2014 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24305917

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is a dreaded surgical complication that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Despite its prevalence, there is no consensus on the management of anastomotic leak. This study aimed to review the management of anastomotic leak in the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery at two institutions. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all anastomotic leaks occurring after surgery in the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery at two teaching institutions during 1997-2008. RESULTS: Altogether, 103 leaks occurred in 1,707 anastomoses (6 %), with a median time to diagnosis of 20 days (2-1,400 days). The 90-day mortality rate was 3 %. The majority of cases were managed nonoperatively (73 %), and the majority of leaks were from an extraperitoneal anastomosis (67 %). Success (i.e., radiographic demonstration of a healed leak, restored gastrointestinal continuity) occurred in 54 % of operatively managed leaks and 57 % of nonoperatively managed leaks (56 % overall). Operative management differed by leak location. In 91 % of patients with intraperitoneal leaks, the anastomosis was resected. In 76 % of patients with extraperitoneal leaks, diversion and drainage alone was performed without manipulating the anastomosis. Nonoperative management was successful for 57 % of extraperitoneal leaks and 58 % of intraperitoneal leaks. There was no significant difference in the success rates based on type of management (operative/nonoperative) for either extraperitoneal or intraperitoneal leaks. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic leak continues to result in patient morbidity and mortality. Its diverse presentation requires tailoring management to the patient. Nonoperative and operative treatments are viable options for intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal leaks based on patient presentation.


Anastomotic Leak/therapy , Colon/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Colorectal Surgery/education , Combined Modality Therapy , Drainage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Ileostomy , Illinois , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 46(8): 1115-7, 2003 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12907909

INTRODUCTION: Although massive presacral bleeding during rectal mobilization is uncommon, it can rapidly destabilize a patient. Traditional attempts at control include tamponade with pelvic packing and application of sacral thumbtacks. The aim of this review is to describe the anatomic basis of injury and summarize our experience with this challenging problem, with emphasis on the simple, readily available, effective technique of rectus abdominis muscle fragment welding. METHODS: A retrospective review of eight patients who underwent muscle fragment welding for presacral bleeding incurred during rectal mobilization was undertaken. This technique involves harvesting a small piece of rectus abdominis muscle, which is held in place with a forceps to occlude the bleeding site. Electrocautery adjusted to the highest setting is then applied to the forceps to "weld" closed the bleeding point. RESULTS: Control of presacral bleeding was achieved in all eight patients (3 males) with this technique without complications attributable to this method. Previous attempts at pelvic packing failed in all eight patients. CONCLUSION: Muscle fragment welding is a safe, readily available, and highly effective method of controlling massive presacral bleeding.


Abdominal Muscles/surgery , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Hemostasis, Surgical/methods , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Sacrum/blood supply , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
...