A German version of the Oral Impacts of Daily Performances-reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE: The Oral Impact of Daily Performances (OIDP) is a dental patient-reported outcome measure (dPROM) for the estimation of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and takes the frequency as well as the severity of problems into account; however, it is not available in German language. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the reliability and validity of the German version of the OIDP in patients of a private practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Translation of the original OIDP version was performed by a forward-backward process. Reliability was evaluated in terms of construct stability (test-retest) for the single items and the sum scores. The responsiveness to change in oral health status was assessed by pre- and post-treatment comparison, in addition. Validity was assessed as convergent validity in comparison with other dPROMs (OHIP-14; GOHAI) and objective dental findings. RESULTS: A total of 330 patients participated in this study (mean age: 42.0 (18.0)). The OHRQoL of the participants was relatively high (OIDP score 4.3 (SD 14.3), OHIP score 4.8 (SD 5.3), GOHAI score 54.2 (SD 5.4)). A moderate construct stability for the total OIDP-score (ICC 0.686) was found whilst reliability for the single items varied between 0.179 (social contact) to 0.559 (showing teeth). Significant correlations were found for OIDP and OHIP (p < 0.001; r = 0.361) and OIDP and GOHAI (p < 0.001; r = - 0.391) indicating moderate validity with a tendency to even stronger correlations for OIDP-s and OIDP-f (r ≥ 0.500). CONCLUSIONS: The German version of the OIDP demonstrated sufficient reliability and validity. OIDP's general performance should be interpreted cautiously as the outcome was detected in a specifically healthy population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The OIDP is yet the only dPROM that evaluates both severity as well as frequency which makes validation interesting regarding specific target populations.

Predictability and outcome of titanium color after different surface modifications and anodic oxidation.

To investigate the predictability and the outcome of surface modification techniques, including anodization. Four surface modification techniques were evaluated in this in-vitro study: sandblasting (S), polishing+anodizing (PA), sandblasting+anodizing (SA), polishing+etching+ anodizing (PEA). Color coordinates L*, a* and b* were collected using a spectroradiometer. Color differences between all groups were quantified by use of ΔE00. A possible influence of group membership was evaluated using 1-way ANOVA. Pair-wise inter-group comparisons were performed using post-hoc Tukey tests. PA specimens were the brightest and showed a pronounced yellowish and reddish hue. S and SA groups were significantly darker and predictability of outcome was higher compared to another groups. The most predictable surface treatment method is sandblasting. Anodizing techniques come along with the brightest and most chromatic color impression of the titanium.

Effect of grinding adjustments on the color of monolithic zirconia.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Monolithic zirconia restorations have become popular because of their excellent mechanical properties and acceptable esthetics. While the biomechanical properties of zirconia have been investigated, research into their esthetic properties is sparse. Zirconia can be colored by infiltration before sintering, although how occlusal adjustment can affect restoration color is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the color of differently characterized monolithic white and precolored zirconia specimens after standardized grinding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: White and precolored monolithic zirconia plates (Cercon ht) (n=36) were stained by infiltration with target colors Vita A2, A3.5, and A4. In a standardized experimental arrangement, all plates were ground in 9 steps, and the color was measured with a spectroradiometer at each step. Color differences (ΔE00) were analyzed by using regression analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the inverse prediction with confidence intervals (α=.05). RESULTS: Mechanical material removal had a significant effect on the color stability (P<.05) of both white and precolored monolithic zirconia. For each grinding step and each target color, the precolored groups had a significantly lower ΔE00 mean than the white groups (P<.05), except at the 20-µm step for groups W-A4 and P-A4 (P>.05). For target color A2, the difference was significant with P<.001 at all 9 grinding steps. For target color A3.5, the difference was significant with P=.003 at grinding level 20 µm, and P<.001 for all other grinding steps. For target color A4, the difference was not significant with P=.603 at grinding level 20 µm, whereas the difference was significant with P=.007 at grinding level 50 µm, and with P<.001 for all other grinding steps. CONCLUSIONS: Precolored zirconia had less color change after grinding than white zirconia. This study established grinding depths for white and precolored zirconia corresponding to color perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.

Development of a German version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: Limited assessment tools for estimating the oral health of nursing home residents are available in the German language. AIMS: To develop a German version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) and to evaluate test-retest and inter-examiner reliability in use for the assessment of nursing home residents' oral health by caregivers before and after dental training. METHODS: The original English version of the OHAT was translated into German by a forward-backward translation process. Reliability assessments were conducted in a nursing home (n = 18) by independent application of the OHAT by two trained dentists and four professional caregivers. After receiving dental training, the caregivers repeated the OHAT with the same participants. Reliability analyses of single items were performed using Cohen's kappa statistics. Intra-class correlations were compiled to assess reliability of the total scores. T tests were used to compare percentage agreement, and under- and overestimation of findings between a reference dentist and the caregivers before and after the training unit. RESULTS: Specificity and sensitivity of the German OHAT were 87% and 86%. Test-retest reliability of the total OHAT score as estimated by the dentists was excellent (ICC 0.910; 95% CI 0.776-0.965). Before training, mean κ values between the reference dentist and caregivers ranged between 0.155 and 0.912, whereas the inter-examiner reliability of most items was only fair. After training, overall agreement between the dentist and the caregivers improved significantly from 62.1 to 83.1% (p < 0.001), as well as satisfying inter-examiner agreement for the single items. CONCLUSIONS: The German version of the OHAT is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of oral health conditions of nursing home residents. When used by caregivers, instruction on the tool and practical training are mandatory to ensure reliable estimations. However, further studies with a larger sample size are encouraged to verify the outcomes of this study.

The effects of prosthetic status and dementia on the chewing efficiency of seniors in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: The oral health of seniors in nursing homes is compromised. Furthermore, reduced chewing efficiency is described to be associated with reduced cognition. However, studies investigating how prosthetic status affects the chewing efficiency of nursing home residents are not available. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between prosthetic status, dementia and chewing efficiency of seniors in nursing homes. METHODS: This study was performed in nine nursing homes. In addition to assessing the general and medical data of the participants, a dental examination was assessed and the severity of dementia was evaluated by use of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Furthermore, chewing efficiency was assessed by use of a two-colour mixing ability test. Descriptive and bivariate statistics, as well as linear regression models with the dependent variable chewing efficiency and possible confounders, were used to analyse data at P < .05. RESULTS: Complete target variables of 146 participants were analysed. The mean (SD) chewing efficiency of the study sample, as expressed by the variance of hue, was .590 (.250). The type of prosthesis used (P < .001), the number of occluding tooth pairs (P < .001) and the presence of dementia (P = .002) were the main variables significantly affecting chewing efficiency. The condition of removable dentures also had an effect (P = .016). Multivariate testing predominantly confirmed these associations. CONCLUSION: The chewing efficiency of seniors in nursing homes is somewhat compromised. Beyond dental aspects, suffering from dementia seems to reduce the chewing efficiency. Further interventional/longitudinal studies are, however, encouraged to verify this outcome.

Differences Between the Oral Health of People Aged 50 and 70 Years - An Exploratory Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the extent of differences between the oral health of people aged 50 and 70 years in a community-based setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research is part of the Interdisciplinary Study on Adult Development (ILSE). All participants lived in the city of Heidelberg, Germany. For the dental study, 194 participants born 1930-1932 (n = 88) or 1950-1952 (n = 106) underwent a comprehensive dental examination. For each participant the number of teeth present, the number of decayed, missing, and filled tooth surfaces (DMF-S), the Plaque Index (PI), the Gingiva Index (GI) and the Community Index of Periodontal Treatment Needs (CPITN) were determined. Depending on the structure of the data, differences between the birth cohorts were calculated by use of t tests or chi-squared tests. Multivariate analysis was also performed to assess possible effects of gender and birth cohort. RESULTS: Oral health conditions were significantly worse among septuagenarians than among quinquagenarians. Besides poorer oral hygiene, as measured by use of PI and GI (p <0.001), periodontal conditions were worse for septuagenarians (p <0.001), who also had fewer natural teeth (p <0.002); the number of carious lesions was similar in the cohorts (p >0.05). These results were confirmed by multivariate analysis and seem to be mostly gender independent. CONCLUSIONS: Oral hygiene and health is poor for quinquagenarians and septuagenarians, with more problems associated with greater age but not with gender. Longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate the intraindividual development of changes of oral health during ageing.

How reliable and accurate is the shade determination of premolars by spectrophotometry?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of spectrophotometric shade determination of premolars and to compare the results with those for incisors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven participants with natural maxillary incisors and premolars were recruited to investigate the research question. The colour of test teeth (incisors, n = 210; premolars, n = 192) was measured by use of the Vita Easyshade Advance (ES-A) and Vita Easyshade V (ES-V). Accuracy was evaluated by rating the shade tab matches recommended by the devices (scale, 1 = excellent match to 3 = mismatch). Inter-device reliability between the ES-A and ES-V for measurement of incisors and premolars was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). The ratings for the accuracy of the devices were analysed using descriptive and bivariate statistics. A linear regression model was used to evaluate possible independent influencing confounders on the shade match. RESULTS: Inter-device agreement of the ES-A and ES-V for measurement of incisors and premolars was excellent for all colour components (ICC > 0.9). The accuracy of both devices was acceptable to excellent for incisors and premolars, although the ES-V was more accurate than the ES-A (p < 0.001). No significant difference in accuracy was detected between premolars and incisors (p = 0.182). The linear regression model confirmed the bivariate testing. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and accuracy of spectrophotometric shade determination seem comparable for incisors and premolars. The recently introduced ES-V seems more accurate than its predecessor model. Further studies are needed to validate the results of this study.

Oral health-related quality of life as a predictor of subjective well-being among older adults-A decade-long longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate possible longitudinal associations between oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and subjective well-being among quinquagenarians and septuagenarians over up to 10 years of clinical observation. METHODS: This research is part of the "Interdisciplinary Study on Adult Development and Aging (ILSE)." All participants lived in an urban region of southwest Germany. One hundred and fifty-two participants born in 1930-1932 (older cohort, OC; n = 54) and 1950-1952 (younger cohort, YC; n = 98) underwent comprehensive psychological, medical and dental examinations at baseline and up to 10 years thereafter. The Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was used to assess OHRQoL. The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale (PGCMS), general life satisfaction (GLS) and individuals' general satisfaction with their health (SWH) were used to evaluate subjective well-being. Regression models and structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to analyse the longitudinal associations between OHRQoL and subjective well-being. RESULTS: A cross-lagged prediction model revealed a positive association between baseline OHRQoL and subjective well-being across 10 years for both birth cohorts, OC [0.49 (0.21; 0.69)] and YC [0.36 (0.24; 0.52)]. However, higher subjective well-being at baseline was not a predictor of better OHRQoL 10 years later for either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: OHRQoL seems to be a substantial predictor of subjective well-being in quinquagenarians and septuagenarians across the rather long observational period. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm this finding.

Is compromised oral health associated with a greater risk of mortality among nursing home residents? A controlled clinical study.

AIM: The objective of this controlled clinical study was to evaluate the association between oral health and 1-year mortality among nursing home residents with or without oral health intervention. METHODS: This research was part of a multidisciplinary intervention study (EVI-P) performed in 14 nursing homes in Germany. Two-hundred and nineteen nursing home residents were included in the study and assigned to an intervention group, for which dental health education was offered and ultrasonic baths were used for denture cleaning (n = 144), or to a control group (n = 75). Before the intervention, each participant was examined, and dental status, plaque control record (PCR), Denture Hygiene Index, and results from the Revised Oral Assessment Guide were recorded. Amount of care needed and dementia were also assessed, by use of the Barthel Index and the Mini Mental State Examination, respectively. Participant mortality was determined after 12 months, and bivariate analysis and logistic regression models were used to evaluate possible factors affecting mortality. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis detected a direct association between greater mortality and being in the control group (p = .038). Participants with higher PCR were also more likely to die during the study period (p = .049). For dentate participants, the protective effect of being in the intervention group was confirmed by multivariate analysis in which covariates such as age and gender were considered. CONCLUSION: Oral hygiene and oral health seem to affect the risk of mortality of nursing home residents. Dental intervention programs seem to reduce the risk of 1-year mortality among nursing home residents having remaining natural teeth. Further studies, with larger sample sizes and evaluation of the causes of death, are necessary to investigate the reasons for these associations.

Risk factors for tooth loss in middle and older age after up to 10 years: An observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to identify risk factors for tooth loss in two birth cohorts, quinquagenarians and septuagenarians, after up to 10 years of clinical observation. DESIGN: One hundred and twenty-three participants were recruited from the Interdisciplinary Study of Adult Development (ILSE) and examined at baseline and up to 10 years after. Thirty-nine and 84 participants belonged to the older (OC; born in 1930/32) cohort and younger (YC; born in 1950/52) cohort, respectively. Each participant underwent a dental examination comprising evaluation of the dental status (number of teeth, prosthetic restorations), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), DMF-S, periodontal probing depths (PD) and tooth mobility (TM). Incidence of tooth loss over the study period was calculated for both cohorts as well as for the grouped dental target variables. A logistic regression model for tooth loss (0=tooth present/1=tooth lost) was compiled with possible binary confounders. RESULTS: During the study period (eight years in mean), 1.2 (1.9) and 2.6 (2.6) teeth were lost in YC and OC, respectively, reflecting correspondent loss rates of 5% and 14% (p<0.001). However, primarily TM >1 merged into substantial tooth loss (60% lost). The regression analysis confirmed the bivariate findings. Older age and worse oral health issues were identified as risk factors for tooth loss(p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both quinquagenarians and septuagenarians show relevant tooth loss over a period of up to 10 years but more in septuagenarians. The predominant predictor for tooth loss seems to be greater tooth mobility. With the rising challenges due to aging in several societies, knowing the risks might help clinicians when weighing treatment strategies and should encourage refining preventive measures for older patients.

Oral health-related quality of life and prosthetic status of nursing home residents with or without dementia.

PURPOSE: The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effect of prosthetic status on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of nursing home residents with or without dementia. METHODS: The study was performed in 14 nursing homes across the federal state of Baden-Württemberg, Germany. All eligible participants were included, and general and medical information and information about their dental and prosthetic statuses were collected. The Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was administered to evaluate OHRQoL. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) served to classify participants into living or not living with dementia according to the established cutoff value for dementia (MMSE <24). Parametric bivariate statistics and logistic regression models were used to analyze data at P<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 169 participants were included in this study. The mean age of the participants was 82.9 years. A total of some 70% of the sample was living with dementia. The mean GOHAI score along the sample was 49.1 (8.3), and 41% of the sample reported substantially compromised OHRQoL (GOHAI <50). OHRQoL was statistically similar for people with or without dementia (P=0.234); objective oral health was also similar in both groups (P>0.05). The number of teeth (odds ratio [OR]: 2.0), the type of prosthetic status (OR: 6.5), and denture-related treatment needs (OR: 2.4) were the major factors significantly affecting OHRQoL (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The OHRQoL of elderly nursing home residents is substantially compromised. Several prosthetic treatment needs for residents living with or without dementia were identified. Edentulism without tooth replacement and having <5 teeth resulted in an increased risk of substantially compromised OHRQoL. Further studies should be conducted to determine whether improvements in prosthetic status can increase OHRQoL.

Poor dental hygiene and periodontal health in nursing home residents with dementia: an observational study.

Poor oral health conditions are well documented in the institutionalized elderly, but the literature is lacking research on relationships between dementia and periodontal health in nursing home residents. The purpose of this cohort study, therefore, was to assess whether dementia is associated with poor oral health/denture hygiene and an increased risk of periodontal disease in the institutionalized elderly. A total of 219 participants were assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to determine cognitive state. According to the MMSE outcome, participants scoring ≤20 were assigned to dementia group (D) and those scoring >20 to the non-dementia group (ND), respectively. For each of the groups D and ND, Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and Denture Hygiene Index (DHI) linear regression models were used with the confounders age, gender, dementia, number of comorbidities and number of permanent medications. To assess the risk factors for severe periodontitis as measured by the Community Index of Periodontal Treatment Needs, a logistic regression analysis was performed. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences of GBI as well of DHI for demented and healthy subjects (p > 0.05). Severe periodontitis was detected in 66 % of participants with dementia. The logistic regression showed a 2.9 times increased risk among demented participants (p = 0.006). Oral hygiene, denture hygiene and periodontal health are poor in nursing home residents. The severity of oral problems, primarily periodontitis, seems to be enhanced in subjects suffering from dementia. Longitudinal observations are needed to clarify the cause-reaction relationship.

Improving oral health of institutionalized older people with diagnosed dementia.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has revealed poor oral hygiene and health among older people suffering from dementia. To evaluate the oral health and denture hygiene of older people with and without dementia, six months after carer have followed a dental education programme. METHOD: Ninety-three older people living in four long-term care homes in south-western Germany were included in this longitudinal cohort study. All participants were allocated into two groups on basis of the medical dementia diagnosis extracted from the medical records in the care documentation: suffering from dementia (n = 33) or not (n = 60). For each participant plaque control record, gingival bleeding index (GBI), community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN), and denture hygiene index (DHI) were assessed at baseline and six months after carer have followed a dental education programme, and after use of ultrasonic devices for denture cleaning. Differences between all target variables from baseline to follow-up, and between participants with and without dementia, were evaluated by bivariate and multivariate testing. RESULTS: In bivariate testing, participants with dementia had a significantly lower DHI (p < 0.001), a lower GBI (p < 0.05), and a lower CPITN (p < 0.01) at follow-up. In participants without dementia, only for DHI (p < 0.001) a significant improvement was observed. In multivariate analyses, the significant association could not be reproduced (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Use of ultrasonic baths can be a successful means for improving denture hygiene among older people in long-term care with and without dementia. Education for carer in order to improve oral hygiene, however, seems to be of minor significance and to be more effective for people with dementia.

Determinants of oral health-related quality of life of the institutionalized elderly.

BACKGROUND: Diminished oral health of the institutionalized elderly has frequently been reported. This is not only of significance with regard to nutrition and general health, but it can also affect oral health-related quality of life. This paper evaluates the effects of oral and general conditions on oral health-related quality of life for the institutionalized elderly, as measured by the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-four residents of four long-term care homes in southern Germany agreed to participate in this study, and interviews were conducted using the GOHAI questionnaire. The Revised Oral Health Assessment Guide was applied to allocate participants into two groups: satisfactory oral health and poor oral health. To evaluate the effects of age, gender, number of chronic diseases, frequently taken drugs, care level, Mini-Mental State Examination score, periodontitis (for participants with their own teeth), pressures caused by prostheses, and type of denture worn, a linear regression model with the total GOHAI score was calculated with these determinants. RESULTS: The mean ± SD GOHAI score was 53.3 ± 6.2 in the satisfactory oral health group and 48.7 ± 7.3 in the poor oral health group. Statistical analysis showed that the GOHAI scores were significantly different in satisfactory oral health and poor oral health groups (P = 0.030) and were affected by care level (P = 0.008) and type of dentures worn (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that oral health-related quality of life of the institutionalized elderly is low and is positively associated with better oral health.

Increasing dependency of older people in nursing homes is associated with need for dental treatments.

To determine relationships between the need for dental treatments of institutionalized elderly people and cognitive impairment and the general level of care needed. Two hundred and sixty-eight residents of long-term care facilities in Germany were included in this study. Age, sex, diseases, number of frequently taken drugs, and location of the long-term care facility of the participants were recorded. For each participant, the need for care was assessed by use of the Barthel index (BI). Cognitive impairment was evaluated by use of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). To assess dental treatment needs, the revised oral assessment guide (ROAG) was applied for different oral health conditions, which were rated "healthy" or "treatment needed". Spearman correlations were performed to evaluate associations between BI and MMSE and dental treatment needs. Statistical analysis revealed significant associations of BI (P<0.001) and MMSE (P=0.015) with the ROAG score. Increasing dependency and decreasing cognitive ability worsen oral health and increase the need for dental treatment.

Early loading of implants with fixed dental prostheses in edentulous mandibles: 7.2-year clinical results from a prospective study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective follow-up study was to evaluate survival and success of early-loaded implants placed in the edentulous mandible and the survival of the fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after in mean 7.2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (mean age 64.5 years, 18.9% male) received 185 implants in the intraforaminal area of the edentulous mandible (five implants per patient). Within 2 weeks, all implants were early loaded with fixed dental prostheses. The patients were recalled once a year for clinical and radiographic examinations. The 17 patients (79 implants) attending the recall in 2012 were additionally asked for their satisfaction of functional and aesthetic aspects. RESULTS: During a mean observation time of 7.2 years, 20 implants were lost in 11 patients, resulting in implant survival of 89.2%. Eight of all implants (4.3%) had too much marginal bone loss to satisfy the criteria of success. A total of 19 prosthetic complications and aftercare measurements had to be performed between in mean 4.5 to 7.2 years of observation. The survival of the original FDPs decreased to 83.8%. Of the 17 patients attending the recall in 2012, a total 59.5% had a satisfactory oral hygiene. According to the criteria of Albrektsson, the success rate for the remaining 79 implants was 89.9% after in mean 11.7 years. Patient satisfaction for assessment of functional and aesthetic aspects was in median 9 and 8 on the numeric rating scales. CONCLUSION: Long-term observation of in mean 7.2 years showed satisfactory results for both implant and superstructure survival. Prosthetic complications were easy to repair in most cases, but patients' ability for oral hygiene was reduced after the longer observation period. Especially in elderly patients, their attitudes and manual skills should be considered when planning the design of a new superstructure.

Survival of double-crown-retained dentures either tooth-implant or solely implant-supported: an 8-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To compare survival and incidence of complications for solely implant-supported double-crown-retained dentures (DCRDs) and combined tooth-implant-supported DCRDs for restoration of a complete jaw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were consecutively admitted to treatment at the Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, during a time period from 2003 to 2011. Schedule and unscheduled visits were recorded on standardized documentation forms. Age, gender, location of implants, number of abutment teeth, jaw, and antagonist were assessed as possible factors affecting the number of complications per patient. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with 66 DCRDs on 209 implants and 102 teeth were included. Of these, 30 dentures on 129 implants were solely implant-supported whereas the other 36 were combined tooth-implant-supported. During an observation period of up to 8.3 years (mean 3.4 years; SD 1.9) superstructure survival was 93.3% for the solely implant-supported DCRDs and 100% for the combined tooth-implant-supported DCRDs. Survival without major complications was 86.7% and 83.3%, respectively. Gender and location of both superstructure and implants were statistically associated with a greater number of complications. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this exploratory retrospective study, not only solely implant-supported DCRDs but also superstructures combining remaining teeth and implants within DCRDs might be a reliable treatment option for elderly patients. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this, however.

Retrospective comparison of semipermanent and permanent cementation of implant-supported single crowns and FDPs with regard to the incidence of survival and complications.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the fixation modalities semipermanent and permanent for all cemented single crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs) placed at the Department of Prosthodontics in the years 2002 to 2010 with regard to the incidence of survival and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-one patients (48.5% male, mean age 57.3 years) received 166 FDPs and 232 single crowns. A total of 50.6% of the FDPs and 54.7% of the single crowns were fixed using semipermanent cements. Aside from fixation, age, gender, type, location, and material of the suprastructures were assessed as possible factors affecting complications, namely de-cementation, chipping, framework, or abutment fracture. RESULTS: During an observation period of up to 6.6 years (mean 2.24 years; standard deviation 1.38), the survival rates were 96.4% and 100% for FDPs (semipermanent/permanent cementation), and 98.4% and 92.4% for single crowns (semipermanent/permanent). The success rates achieved, counting every complication, for the FDPs were 61.9% and 70.7% (semipermanent/permanent) and for single crowns were 75.6% and 77.1% (semipermanent/permanent). The cement used had a significant effect on loss of retention of the FDPs (p = .006), but no significant effect on the retention of the single crowns. Cementation procedure exhibited no significant impact on chipping for both FDPs and single crowns. The frequency of framework or abutment fractures was too low for further statistical analyses. CONCLUSION: Both semipermanent and permanent cementation of FDPs and single crowns resulted in high survival rates. Within the limitations of the study design, because of the amount of chairside aftercare required, implant-borne FDPs could be recommended for permanent cementation.

Oral health-related quality of life is linked with subjective well-being and depression in early old age.

Although a body of research has targeted predictors of well-being and depression in old age, the consideration of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) as a predictor of these major psychosocial endpoints has been rare in the previous literature. The objective of this study was to test whether OHRQoL is associated with well-being and depression, after controlling for relevant confounders; also, the mediating role of subjective health, a major predictor of both well-being and depression, has been explored. OHRQoL was measured by two commonly used assessment instruments, the geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI) and oral health impact profile (OHIP); well-being was assessed by the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale (PGCMS) and depression by the self-rating depression scale (SDS). We used a subsample of 197 participants from the older cohort (1930-1932) of the Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development. Regression models and structural equations modeling (SEM) were used for the test for study variable relationships. Both GOHAI and OHIP revealed significant associations to both PGCMS and SDS at the bivariate level. In regression analyses considering gender, household situation, subjective health, and both OHRQoL indicators, only OHIP remained a significant predictor of well-being and depression. In addition, supportive evidence for a mediating role of subjective health regarding the linkage between OHRQoL and an overall latent construct of well-being was found in the SEM analysis. In conclusion, OHRQoL is significantly linked with well-being and depression in old age, while subjective health is able to mediate the relationship. The generally underrated role of OHRQoL with respect to well-being and depression in late adulthood deserves more attention.

Differences in lightness, chroma, and hue in the anterior teeth of quinquagenarians and septuagenarians.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, for both genders and two elderly age groups, differences in lightness, chroma, and hue of pairs of natural anterior teeth, so that more accurate information on color would be available for the production of dentures with a natural appearance. The subjects in the younger group (YG) were 54 to 56 years of age, those in the older group 73 to 75 (N = 195, 48% women). Tooth color was measured using a spectrophotometer. Mixed models were calculated for each pair of teeth, with gender as a fixed factor. Gender did not have a significant effect in either age group. In both groups, differences in chroma between upper canines and lateral incisors and in lightness and hue between upper and lower canines were observed. In the YG, additional differences were found, with the only exception of the comparison between upper central and lateral incisors. The nongender-specific color differences observed should be considered when producing denture teeth for these groups of patients, in order to come as close as possible to the natural color ideal.