Determinants of Return to Work After a Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify prognostic factors for return to work (RTW) after stroke. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase were systematically searched. STUDY SELECTION: Studies had to include people of working age (<65 years old) at the time of stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, or subarachnoid hemorrhage). The evaluation of RTW and rate of RTW had to be mentioned. Study selection was done by 2 independent authors. In total, 1241 articles were screened, 39 met all inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Characteristics of included studies were recorded independently by 2 authors. Differences were resolved through discussion or with a third author. Quality was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network quality assessment tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 39 studies, prognostic factors for RTW were hemorrhagic stroke (odds ratio 0.53 [95% confidence interval 0.45-0.60], n=18 studies), sex (men) (1.26 [1.14-1.40], n=31), aphasia (0.37 [0.20-0.69], n=7), occupation (white collar worker) (1.84 [1.64-2.06], n=17), independence in activities of daily living (3.99 [1.73-9.23], n=7), and stroke severity (NIHSS) (1.23 [1.08-1.39], n=6). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis highlighted positive and negative prognostic factors associated with RTW after stroke. Two categories were distinguished: modifiable and non-modifiable prognostic factors. This study provides information to help understand the issues, set appropriate objectives and implement appropriate strategies to guide people to RTW after stroke. Randomized controlled studies are needed to better evaluate work-place intervention programs as well as the effects of intravenous thrombolysis, and cognitive and neuropsychological rehabilitation on return-to-work rates after stroke.

Use of immersive virtual reality for stress reduction during botulinum toxin injection for spasticity (RVTOX): a study protocol of a randomised control trial.

INTRODUCTION: Botulinum toxin injection is a common way to help reduce spasticity in the body caused by central neurological damage such as cerebral stroke, multiple sclerosis or traumatic brain injury. The pain felt during the injection causes most patients to experience significant stress for further injections, the level of which is variable between patients.Immersive virtual reality is a digital technique that simulates the three-dimensional spatial and sound environment around a person said to be immersed in this virtualised world. The effectiveness of virtual reality comes from the intensity of this multisensory immersion, known as the feeling of presence (ie, subjective experience of being in one place or one environment, even when you are physically in another one).Only one research article in paediatrics has shown that immersive reality technique has a positive impact on the level of pain and agitation suffered during botulinum toxin injections. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate with sufficient assurance the following research hypothesis: virtual reality can help adults cope with the stress and pain of botulinum toxin treatment injection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The research hypothesis will be tested using a randomised stepped-wedge method versus a non-invasive technique (headset with virtual reality session) to its control (headset with no image nor audio).The design leads to considering the injection as a statistical unit as all participants will undergo the standard condition, the control technique and virtual reality technique. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Patients will be fully and fairly informed in terms of their understanding of the objectives and constraints of the study and the possible risks involved. They will also be entitled to refuse the study and/or withdraw, and this refusal will have no impact on their follow-up as part of their pathology. Dissemination of the results of this study will be through peer-reviewed publications, and national and international conferences.Ethics were approved by the Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest in January 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05364203.

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided VS Electrical-stimulation-guided Botulinum Toxin Injections in Triceps Surae Spasticity after Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections using ultrasound-guidance vs electrical-stimulation-guidance in triceps surae (soleus and gastrocnemius) spasticity after stroke. DESIGN: A clinical, single-centre, prospective, interventional, single-blind, cross-over, randomized trial, with outpatients in the tertiary care hospital. After randomization, subjects received electrical-stimulation-guided, followed by ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxinA injection (n = 15), or the same 2 procedures in the reverse order (n = 15) with the same operator, 4 months apart. The primary endpoint was the Tardieu scale with the knee straight at 1 month after injection. RESULTS: The 2 groups did not differ in Tardieu scale score (effect size = 0.15, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.22 to 0.51, p = 0.43). In addition, the muscle localization technique used had no influence on walking speed, pain on injection or spasticity, assessed at 1 month after the injection, using the modified Ashworth scale. Ultrasound-guided injections were faster to administer than electrical-stimulation-guided injections. CONCLUSION: In agreement with previous research, no differences were found in the efficacy of ultrasound-guided or electrical-stimulation-guided abobotulinumtoxinA injections in triceps surae spasticity after stroke. Both techniques are of equal use in guiding muscle localization for botulinum toxin injections in spastic triceps surae.

[A driving simulator for the benefit of patients]. / Un simulateur de conduite au service des patients.

Particularly innovative in the management of patients with non-progressive brain injuries, the unit for the assessment of fitness to drive at Clermont-Ferrand university hospital is equipped with a driving simulator. It allows assessments and specific driver rehabilitation to be carried out in optimal safety.

Efficacy of two injection-site localisation techniques for botulinum toxin injections: a single-blind, crossover, randomised trial protocol among adults with hemiplegia due to stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Botulinum toxin injections are an effective treatment for limb spasticity following stroke. Different tracking techniques are used for this purpose: palpation, electrostimulation, electromyography and ultrasound. Yet very few studies have compared these different techniques, and none has successfully proved the superior efficacy of ultrasound-guided injections compared to another tracking method. The primary objective of our study was therefore to compare the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections depending on the tracking technique used: ultrasound versus electrostimulation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a clinical, single-centre, prospective, interventional, single-blind, crossover, randomised trial. In total, 30 patients aged between 18 and 80 years presenting with triceps surae spasticity (evaluated >1 on the modified Ashworth scale) associated with hemiplegia sequelae due to stroke will be included. The patients will be selected among those who attend for consultation the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of the Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. One group will receive the abobotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) injection guided by electrostimulation then ultrasound, and the second group's botulinum toxin injections will be guided by ultrasound then electrostimulation. For each patient, the duration of study participation is 5 months. The primary end point is variation in passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion at slow and high speeds (Tardieu scale) with the knee straight. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethics approval form the CPP of Rhônes-Alpes region. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01935544; pre-results.

The contribution of kinematics in the assessment of upper limb motor recovery early after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Kinematic assessment of upper limb motor recovery after stroke may be related to clinical scores while being more sensitive and reliable than clinical evaluation alone. OBJECTIVE: To identify the potential of kinematics in assessing upper limb recovery early poststroke. METHODS: Thirteen patients were included within 1 month poststroke and evaluated once a week for 6 weeks and at 3 months with (a) the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and (b) kinematic analysis of reach-to-grasp movements. The link between clinical and kinematic data was identified using mixed model with random coefficient analysis. RESULTS: Movement time, trajectory length, directness, smoothness, mean and maximum velocity of the hand were sensitive to change over time and distinguished between movements of paretic, nonparetic, and healthy control limbs. The FMA score increased with movement smoothness over time, explaining 62.5% of FMA variability. CONCLUSION: Kinematic analysis of reach-to-grasp movements is relevant to assess upper limb recovery early poststroke, and is linked to the FMA. Kinematics could provide more accurate real-time indicators of patients' recovery as compared with the sole use of clinical scores, although it remains challenging to establish the universality of the reaching model in relation to motor recovery after stroke.

Motor recovery of the ipsilesional upper limb in subacute stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the time-related changes in motor performance of the ipsilesional upper limb in subacute poststroke patients by using clinical and kinematic assessments. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal, prospective, monocentric study. SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation department. PARTICIPANTS: Stroke patients (n=19; mean age, 62.9y) were included less than 30 days after a first unilateral ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke. The control group was composed of age-matched, healthy volunteers (n=9; mean age, 63.1y). INTERVENTIONS: Clinical and kinematic assessments were conducted once a week during 6 weeks and 3 months after inclusion. Clinical measures consisted of Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Box and Block Test (BBT), Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and Barthel Index. We used a 3-dimensional motion recording system during a reach-to-grasp task to analyze movement smoothness, movement time, and peak velocity of the hand. Healthy controls performed both clinical (BBT and 9HPT) and kinematic evaluation within a single session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BBT and 9HPT. RESULTS: Recovery of ipsilesional upper arm capacities increased over time and leveled off after a 6-week period of rehabilitation, corresponding to 9 weeks poststroke. At study discharge, patients demonstrated similar ipsilesional clinical scores to controls but exhibited less smooth reaching movements. We found no effect of the hemispheric side of the lesion on ipsilesional motor deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence that ipsilesional motor capacities remain impaired at least 3 months after stroke, even if clinical tests fail to detect the impairment. Focusing on this lasting ipsilesional impairment through a more detailed kinematic analysis could be of interest to understand the specific neural network underlying ipsilesional upper-limb impairment.

Changes in bimanual coordination during the first 6 weeks after moderate hemiparetic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Better understanding of how bimanual coordination changes over the first weeks of recovery after stroke is required to address the potential utility for bimanual rehabilitation. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis can provide quantitative assessment of unimanual and bimanual movements. OBJECTIVE: To assess the natural evolution of reaching kinematics during standard poststroke rehabilitation, focusing on bimanual coordination. METHODS: A total of 12 hemiparetic, moderately impaired patients were included within 30 days after a first unilateral ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke; 7 kinematic assessments were performed once a week for 6 weeks and at 3 months after inclusion. The reach-to-grasp task was performed in 3 different conditions: unimanual with the healthy limb (UN), unimanual with the paretic limb (UP), and bimanual (BN/BP). RESULTS: For the paretic limb, movement fluency (number of movement units and total movement time) was lower for bimanual reaching compared with unimanual reaching. For bimanual reaching, (1) movement kinematics were similar for both limbs, (2) recovery patterns of both limbs followed a similar profile with a plateau phase at 6 weeks poststroke, and (3) intertrial variability of between-hands synchronization decreased over sessions, although the mean delays remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: Bimanual coordination started to become efficient 6 weeks after onset of stroke, so for patients such as those we tested, this time could be most opportune to start bimanual-oriented rehabilitation. The challenge in future research includes determining the characteristics of patients who may best benefit from bimanual therapy.

People post-stroke perceive movement fluency in virtual reality.

We investigated the visual perception of biological movement by people post-stroke, using minimal kinematic displays. A group of twenty patients and a group of twelve age-matched healthy controls were asked to judge movement fluency. The movements to judge were either displayed as an end-point dot or as a stick-figure of the arm and trunk. It was found that the perception of movement fluency was preserved post-stroke, however, with an increase in the variability of judgment. Moreover, the end-point dot representation ameliorated what was perceived and judged, presumably by directing attention to the important kinematic cues: smoothness and directness of the trajectory. We conclude that, despite perception of actions is influenced by the ability of the observer to execute the observed movement, hemiparesis has a mild effect on the perception of biological movement. Yet, a valuable virtual learning environment for upper-limb rehabilitation should be implemented to provide the observer with neither too much, nor too little information to maximize learning.