Navigating the Landscape of Medical Device Advisories: A Special Report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are often important for regulating cardiac rate and rhythm. Pacemakers and defibrillators are among the top 10 most-implanted medical devices, with >1.5 million devices implanted annually. While millions of patients have benefited with improved quality of life and survival, CIED-systems are increasingly complex and do not always perform according to expectations. Advisory notices communicate important information about the safety and performance of a medical device to healthcare providers and patients. Medical device recalls are common, with >35 unique device recalls in the past five years. From an ethical standpoint, CIED recalls highlight a range of considerations including the consent process, duty to report, how best to promote autonomous decision-making, trust in the healthcare system, as well as disproportionate impact of these considerations on equity-deserving groups. The purpose of the current article is to review and advise regarding the process around medical device advisory and recall, with a specific focus on clinicians caring for patients affected by these devices. We have sought the input of a lawyer, a patient advocacy group, and an ethicist to guide the clinical management of, and communications regarding, device recalls and advisories. Diligent surveillance and a clear, transparent patient consent process regarding these small but potentially serious device-anomalies is paramount in ensuring patients feel safe and informed. Meaningful patient engagement helps to ensure optimal communication and disclosure mechanisms before implant and throughout follow-up, accessibility of information both in the initial implant and recall action process, and trust in healthcare systems and providers.

Implications of Cardiopulmonary Risk for the Management of COPD: A Narrative Review.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) constitutes a major global health burden and is the third leading cause of death worldwide. A high proportion of patients with COPD have cardiovascular disease, but there is also evidence that COPD is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in cardiovascular disease. Patients with COPD frequently die of respiratory and cardiovascular causes, yet the identification and management of cardiopulmonary risk remain suboptimal owing to limited awareness and clinical intervention. Acute exacerbations punctuate the progression of COPD in many patients, reducing lung function and increasing the risk of subsequent exacerbations and cardiovascular events that may lead to early death. This narrative review defines and summarises the principles of COPD-associated cardiopulmonary risk, and examines respiratory interventions currently available to modify this risk, as well as providing expert opinion on future approaches to addressing cardiopulmonary risk.

Impact of the method of calculating 30-day readmission rate after hospitalization for heart failure. Data from the VancOuver CoastAL Acute Heart Failure (VOCAL-AHF) registry.

BACKGROUND: Thirty-day readmission rate after heart failure (HF) hospitalization is widely used to evaluate healthcare quality. Methodology may substantially influence estimated rates. We assessed the impact of different definitions on HF and all-cause readmission rates. METHODS: Readmission rates were examined in 1,835 patients discharged following HF hospitalization using 64 unique definitions derived from five methodological factors: (1) ICD-10 codes (broad vs narrow), (2) index admission selection (single admission only first-in-year vs. random sample; or multiple admissions in year with vs. without 30-day blanking period), (3) variable denominator (number alive at discharge vs. number alive at 30-days), (4) follow-up period start (discharge date vs day following discharge), and (5) annual reference-period (calendar vs fiscal). The impact of different factors was assessed using linear-regression. RESULTS: The calculated 30-day readmission rate for HF varied more than 2-fold depending solely on the methodological approach (6.5% to 15.0%). All-cause admission rates exhibited similar variation (18.8% to 29.9%). The highest rates included all consecutive index admissions (HF 11.1-15.0%, all-cause 24.0-29.9%), and lowest only one index admission per patient per year (HF 6.5-11.3%, all-cause 18.8-22.7%). When including multiple index admissions and compared to blanking the 30-days post-discharge, not blanking was associated with 2.3% higher readmission rates. Selecting a single admission per year with a first-in-year approach lowered readmission rates by 1.5%, while random-sampling admissions lowered estimates further by 5.2% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Calculated 30-day readmission rates varied more than 2-fold by altering methods. Transparent and consistent methods are needed to ensure reproducible and comparable reporting.

Qualitative Analysis of Patient Decisional Needs for Medications to Treat Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The development of tools to support shared decision-making should be informed by patients' decisional needs and treatment preferences, which are largely unknown for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) pharmacotherapy decisions. We aimed to identify patients' decisional needs when considering HFrEF medication options. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. We recruited patients with HFrEF from 2 Canadian ambulatory HF clinics and clinicians from Canadian HF guideline panels, HF clinics, and Canadian HF Society membership. We identified themes through inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants included 15 patients and 12 clinicians. Six themes and associated subthemes emerged related to HFrEF pharmacotherapy decision-making: (1) patient decisional needs included lack of awareness of a choice or options, difficult decision timing and stage, information overload, and inadequate motivation, support and resources; (2) patients' decisional conflict varied substantially, driven by unclear trade-offs; (3) treatment attribute preferences-patients focused on both benefits and downsides of treatment, whereas clinicians centered discussion on benefits; (4) quality of life-patients' definition of quality of life depended on pre-HF activity, though most patients demonstrated adaptability in adjusting their daily activities to manage HF; (5) shared decision-making process-clinicians' described a process more akin to informed consent; (6) decision support-multimedia decision aids, virtual appointments, and primary-care comanagement emerged as potential enablers of shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFrEF have several decisional needs, which are consistent with those that may respond to decision aids. These findings can inform the development of HFrEF pharmacotherapy decision aids to address these decisional needs and facilitate shared decision-making.

Validation of machine learning models for estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction on point-of-care ultrasound: insights on features that impact performance.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) algorithms can accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiography, but their performance on cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the performance of an ML model for estimation of LVEF on cardiac POCUS compared with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and formal echo reported LVEF. METHODS: Clinicians at a tertiary care heart failure clinic prospectively scanned 138 participants using hand-carried devices. Video data were analyzed offline by an ML model for LVEF. We compared the ML model's performance with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and echo reported LVEF. RESULTS: There were 138 participants scanned, yielding 1257 videos. The ML model generated LVEF predictions on 341 videos. We observed a good intraclass correlation (ICC) between the ML model's predictions and the reference standards (ICC = 0.77-0.84). When comparing LVEF estimates for randomized single POCUS videos, the ICC between the ML model and Level III echocardiographers' estimates was 0.772, and it was 0.778 for videos where quantitative LVEF was feasible. When the Level III echocardiographer reviewed all POCUS videos for a participant, the ICC improved to 0.794 and 0.843 when only accounting for studies that could be segmented. The ML model's LVEF estimates also correlated well with LVEF derived from formal echocardiogram reports (ICC = 0.798). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that clinician-driven cardiac POCUS produces ML model LVEF estimates that correlate well with expert interpretation and echo reported LVEF.

Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: 2024 Status and Management Update.

In 2021, the Canadian Journal of Cardiology published a "Practical Clinical Practice Update" to address emerging concerns about myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.1 Since publication, researchers have underscored the importance of standardizing diagnostic criteria and evaluation of incident cases. In this brief review, we summarize new evidence about the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with mRNA COVID-19 post-vaccine myocarditis and pericarditis. We also provide consensus guidance for evaluation, management, and follow-up. Finally, we identify persistent knowledge gaps that inform the National Active Surveillance Study of Myocarditis and/or Pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination (MYCOVACC) and areas for future research.

Sex Differences in High-Cost Users of Healthcare for Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Healthcare resource use for atrial fibrillation (AF) is high, but it may not be equivalent across all patients. We examined whether sex differences exist for AF high-cost users (HCUs), who account for the top 10% of total acute care costs. Methods: All patients aged ≥ 20 years who presented to the emergency department (ED) or were hospitalized with AF were identified in Alberta, Canada, between 2011 and 2015. The cohort was categorized by sex into HCUs and non-HCUs. Healthcare utilization was defined as ED, hospital, and physician visits, and costs included those for hospitalization, ambulatory care, physician billing, and drugs. All costs were inflated to 2022 Canadian dollars (CAD$). Results: Among 48,030 AF patients, 45.1% were female. Of these, 31.8% were HCUs, and the proportions of female and male patients were equal (31.9% vs 31.7%). Female HCUs were older, more likely to have hypertension and heart failure, and had a higher stroke risk than male HCUs. Mean healthcare utilization did not differ among HCUs by sex, except for number of ED visits, which was higher in male patients (12.7% vs 9.2%, P < 0.0001). Overall, HCUs accounted for 65.8% of the total costs (CAD$3.4 billion). Almost half of total HCU costs were attributable to female HCUs (CAD$966.1 million). Significant differences were present in the distributions of HCU-related costs (male patients: 74.6% hospitalization, 9.5% ambulatory care, 12.4% physician billing, 3.5% drugs; female patients: 77.7% hospitalization, 7.4% ambulatory care, 11.5% physician billing, 3.5% drugs, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Despite having a lower AF prevalence, female patients represent an equal proportion of HCUs, and account for almost half the total HCU costs. Interventions targeted at reducing the number of AF HCU are needed, particularly for female patients.

Contexte: L'utilisation des ressources en santé est élevée pour la fibrillation auriculaire (FA), mais elle n'est pas forcément équivalente pour tous les patients. Nous avons examiné s'il existait des différences entre les sexes pour ce qui est des cas très coûteux de FA, qui représentent les 10 % supérieurs des coûts totaux de soins de courte durée. Méthodologie: Tous les patients âgés de 20 ans et plus qui se sont présentés au service des urgences ou qui ont été hospitalisés pour une FA ont été répertoriés en Alberta, au Canada, entre 2011 et 2015. La cohorte a été divisée par sexe en fonction des utilisateurs très coûteux et des autres utilisateurs. L'utilisation des soins de santé était définie comme des consultations aux urgences, à l'hôpital ou chez le médecin, et les coûts comprenaient les hospitalisations, les soins ambulatoires, les honoraires des médecins et les médicaments. Tous les coûts ont été convertis en dollars canadiens ($ CA) de 2022. Résultats: Parmi les 48 030 patients atteints de FA, 45,1 % étaient des femmes et 31,8 % étaient des utilisateurs très coûteux, en proportions égales entre les femmes et les hommes (31,9 % vs 31,7 %). Parmi les utilisateurs très coûteux, les femmes étaient plus âgées, plus susceptibles de présenter de l'hypertension et une insuffisance cardiaque, et leur risque d'AVC était plus élevé comparativement aux hommes. L'utilisation moyenne des soins de santé n'affichait pas de différences chez les utilisateurs très coûteux selon le sexe, à l'exception des consultations aux urgences, qui étaient plus fréquentes chez les hommes (12,7 % vs 9,2 %, p < 0,0001). Dans l'ensemble, les utilisateurs très coûteux représentaient 65,8 % des coûts totaux, qui étaient de 3,4 milliards de dollars canadiens. Les femmes représentaient par ailleurs près de la moitié du total des utilisations très coûteuses (966,1 millions de dollars canadiens). Des différences significatives ont été observées quant à la répartition des coûts liés aux utilisateurs très coûteux (hommes : hospitalisations [74,6 %], soins ambulatoires [9,5 %], honoraires des médecins [12,4 %], médicaments [3,5 %]; femmes : hospitalisations [77,7 %], soins ambulatoires [7,4 %], honoraires des médecins [11,5 %], médicaments [3,5 %], p < 0,0001). Conclusions: Bien que la FA soit moins fréquente chez les femmes que chez les hommes, celles-ci représentent une proportion tout aussi importante des utilisations très coûteuses et comptent pour presque la moitié des coûts totaux attribuables aux utilisateurs très coûteux. Des interventions visant à réduire les utilisations très coûteuses pour la FA sont donc nécessaires, particulièrement chez les femmes.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: everything the clinician needs to know.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly recognised and diagnosed in clinical practice, a trend driven by an ageing population and a rise in contributing comorbidities, such as obesity and diabetes. Representing at least half of all heart failure cases, HFpEF is recognised as a complex clinical syndrome. Its diagnosis and management are challenging due to its diverse pathophysiology, varied epidemiological patterns, and evolving diagnostic and treatment approaches. This Seminar synthesises the latest insights on HFpEF, integrating findings from recent clinical trials, epidemiological research, and the latest guideline recommendations. We delve into the definition, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies (non-pharmacological and pharmacological) for HFpEF. We highlight ongoing clinical trials and future developments in the field. Specifically, this Seminar offers practical guidance tailored for primary care practitioners, generalists, and cardiologists who do not specialise in heart failure, simplifying the complexities in the diagnosis and management of HFpEF. We provide practical, evidence-based recommendations, emphasising the importance of addressing comorbidities and integrating the latest pharmacological treatments, such as SGLT2 inhibitors.

Heightened long-term cardiovascular risks after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events following an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients with COPD using administrative data from Alberta, Canada from 2014 to 2019. Exposure periods were 12 months following moderate or severe exacerbations; the reference period was time preceding a first exacerbation. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death or a first hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome, heart failure (HF), arrhythmia or cerebral ischaemia. Time-dependent Cox regression models estimated covariate-adjusted risks associated with six exposure subperiods following exacerbation. RESULTS: Among 1 42 787 patients (mean age 68.1 years and 51.7% men) 61 981 (43.4%) experienced at least one exacerbation and 34 068 (23.9%) died during median follow-up of 64 months. The primary outcome occurred in 43 564 (30.5%) patients with an incidence rate prior to exacerbation of 5.43 (95% CI 5.36 to 5.50) per 100 person-years. This increased to 95.61 per 100 person-years in the 1-7 days postexacerbation (adjusted HR 15.86, 95% CI 15.17 to 16.58) and remained increased for up to 1 year. The risk of both the composite and individual CV events was increased following either a moderate or a severe exacerbation, though greater and more prolonged following severe exacerbation. The highest magnitude of increased risk was observed for HF decompensation (1-7 days, HR 72.34, 95% CI 64.43 to 81.22). CONCLUSION: Moderate and severe COPD exacerbations are independent risk factors for adverse CV events, especially HF decompensation. The impact of optimising COPD management on CV outcomes should be evaluated.

Epidemiology and treatment of heart failure with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Canadian primary care.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are largely managed in primary care, but their intersection in terms of disease burden, healthcare utilization, and treatment is ill-defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined a retrospective cohort including all patients with HF or COPD in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network from 2010 to 2018. The population size in 2018 with HF, COPD, and HF with COPD was 15 778, 27 927, and 4768 patients, respectively. While disease incidence declined, age-sex-standardized prevalence per 100 population increased for HF alone from 2.33 to 3.63, COPD alone from 3.44 to 5.96, and COPD with HF from 12.70 to 15.67. Annual visit rates were high and stable around 8 for COPD alone but declined significantly over time for HF alone (9.3-8.1, P = 0.04) or for patients with both conditions (14.3-11.9, P = 0.006). For HF alone, cardiovascular visits were common (29.4%), while respiratory visits were infrequent (3.5%), with the majority of visits being non-cardiorespiratory. For COPD alone, respiratory and cardiovascular visits were common (16.4% and 11.3%) and the majority were again non-cardiorespiratory. For concurrent disease, 39.0% of visits were cardiorespiratory. The commonest non-cardiorespiratory visit reasons were non-specific symptoms or signs, endocrine, musculoskeletal, and mental health. In patients with HF with and without COPD, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor use was similar, while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use was marginally higher with concurrent COPD. Beta-blocker use was initially lower with concurrent COPD compared with HF alone (69.3% vs. 74.0%), but this progressively declined by 2018 (74.5% vs. 73.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HF and COPD continues to rise. Although patients with either or both conditions are high utilizers of primary care, the majority of visits relate to non-cardiorespiratory comorbidities. Medical therapy for HF was similar and the initially lower beta-blocker utilization disappeared over time.

Kidney function monitoring and trajectories in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently co-exist. The frequency of kidney monitoring and range of kidney function in patients with AF in clinical practice are uncertain. METHODS: All adult Albertans with AF between 2008 and 2017 were identified using ICD-9 and -10 codes 427.3 and I48. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories were defined using eGFR by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative equation and albuminuria results within 6 months of eGFR measurement. eGFR trajectories were compared from baseline to maximum value within the following year. RESULTS: Among 105,946 patients with AF, 16.0% were KDIGO category G1 (eGFR ≥ 90), 49.0% G2 (60-89.9), 19.8% G3a (45-59.9), 11.4% G3b (30-44.9), and G4 3.8% (15-29.9). Albuminuria was normal/mild 83.4%, moderate 11.7%, and severe 4.9%. Kidney monitoring was more common among people with lower eGFR and worse albuminuria, from approximately twice annually for G1-2/A1-2 to 8 times annually in stage G4A3. Approximately 60-80% of patients received guideline-recommended monitoring, consistent across KDIGO stages. With lower baseline eGFR, annual change in eGFR decreased while the relative proportion of patients who worsened compared to improved increased: for baseline eGFR 60-89.9, 16.7% worsened vs 6.7% improved, but for eGFR 30-44.9, 8.8% worsened but only 1.0% improved. CONCLUSION: The frequency of kidney function monitoring in patients with AF increased with worsening KDIGO risk category and adhered to KDIGO guidelines in approximately three quarters of patients. A minority of patients had moderate to severe eGFR impairment, of whom most remained stable over 1 year.

Access to Heart Failure Services in Canada: Findings of the Heart and Stroke National Heart Failure Resources and Services Inventory.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of heart failure (HF) in Canada necessitates commensurate resources dedicated to its management. Several health system partners launched an HF Action Plan to understand the current state of HF care in Canada and address inequities in access and resources. METHODS: A national Heart Failure Resources and Services Inventory (HF-RaSI) was conducted from 2020 to 2021 of all 629 acute care hospitals and 20 urgent care centres in Canada. The HF-RaSI consisted of 44 questions on available resources, service,s and processes across acute care hospitals and related ambulatory settings. RESULTS: HF-RaSIs were completed by 501 acute care hospitals and urgent care centres, representing 94.7% of all HF hospitalisations across Canada. Only 12.2% of HF care was provided by hospitals with HF expertise and resources, and 50.9% of HF admissions were in centres with minimal outpatient or inpatient HF capabilities. Across all Canadian hospitals, 28.7% did not have access to B-type natriuretic peptide testing, and only 48.1% had access to on-site echocardiography. Designated HF medical directors were present at 21.6% of sites (108), and 16.2% sites (81) had dedicated inpatient interdisciplinary HF teams. Among all of the sites, 28.1% (141) were HF clinics, and of those, 40.4% (57) had average wait times from referral to first appointment of more than 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gaps and geographic variation in delivery and access to HF services exist in Canada. This study highlights the need for provincial and national health systems changes and quality improvement initiatives to ensure equitable access to the appropriate evidence-based HF care.

Validation of a Case Definition to Identify Patients Diagnosed With Cardiovascular Disease in Canadian Primary Care Practices.

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death globally. This study validates a primary care-based electronic medical record case definition for CVD. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study explores electronic medical record data from 1574 primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. A reference standard was created by reviewing medical records of a subset of patients in this network (n = 2017) for coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Together, these data produced a CVD reference. We applied validated case definitions to an active patient population (≥ 1 visit between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019) to estimate prevalence using the exact binomial test (N = 689,301). Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and t tests characterized patients with vs without CVD. Results: The optimal CVD Case Definition 2 had a sensitivity of 68.5% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 61.6%-74.8%), a specificity of 97.8% (95% CI: 97.0%-98.4%), a positive predictive value of 77.7% (95% CI: 71.6%-82.7%), and a negative predictive value of 96.5% (95% CI: 95.8%-97.1%). Included in this CVD definition was a strong CAD case definition with sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI: 84.6%-96.1%), specificity of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.6%-98.8%), a PPV of 74.8% (95% CI: 67.8%-80.7%), and an NPV of 99.5% (95% CI: 99.1%-99.7%). This CVD definition also included CeVD and PVD case definitions with low sensitivity (77.6% and 36.6%) but high specificity (98.6% and 99.0%). The estimated prevalence of CVD among primary care patients is 11.2% (95% CI, 11.1%-11.3%; n = 77,064); the majority had CAD (6.4%). Conclusions: This study validated a definition of CVD and its component parts-CAD, CeVD, and PVD. Understanding the prevalence and disease burden for patients with CVD within primary care settings can improve prevention and disease management.

Contexte: La maladie cardiovasculaire (MCV) est l'une des premières causes de décès dans le monde. Cette étude valide une définition de cas dans les dossiers médicaux électroniques en soins primaires pour la MCV. Méthodologie: Cette étude intersectionnelle rétrospective explore les données provenant des dossiers médicaux électroniques de 1 574 fournisseurs de soins primaires participant au Réseau canadien de surveillance sentinelle en soins primaires. Une norme de référence a été créée en vérifiant les dossiers médicaux d'un sous-ensemble de patients dans ce réseau (n = 2017) à la recherche d'une coronaropathie, d'une maladie cérébrovasculaire ou d'une maladie vasculaire périphérique. Ensemble, ces données ont produit une référence pour la MCV. Nous avons appliqué des définitions de cas validées à une population de patients actifs (≥ 1 consultation entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 31 décembre 2019) pour estimer la prévalence à l'aide du test binomial exact (N = 689 301). Des statistiques descriptives, des tests de χ2, et des tests t ont permis de caractériser les patients atteints ou non de MCV. Résultats: La définition de cas no 2 optimale pour la MCV avait une sensibilité de 68,5 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 61,6 à 74,8 %), une spécificité de 97,8 % (IC à 95 % : de 97,0 à 98,4 %), une valeur prédictive positive de 77,7 % (IC à 95 % : de 71,6 à 82,7 %) et une valeur prédictive négative de 96,5 % (IC à 95 % : de 95,8 à 97,1 %). On a inclus à cette définition de MCV une définition d'un cas de coronaropathie puissante, avec une sensibilité de 91,6 % (IC à 95 % : de 84,6 à 96,1 %), une spécificité de 98,3 % (IC à 95 % : de 97,6 à 98,8 %), une valeur prédictive positive de 74,8 % (IC à 95 % : de 67,8 à 80,7 %) et une valeur prédictive négative de 99,5 % (IC à 95 % : de 99,1 à 99,7 %). Cette définition de la MCV incluait aussi des cas de maladie cérébrovasculaire et de maladie vasculaire périphérique ayant une faible sensibilité (77,6 % et 36,6 %), mais une spécificité élevée (98,6 % et 99,0 %). La prévalence estimée de la MCV parmi les patients en soins primaires est de 11,2 % (IC à 95 % : de 11,1 à 11,3 %; n = 77 064); la majorité présentant une coronaropathie (6,4 %). Conclusions: Cette étude validait une définition de la MCV et de ses composantes ­ coronaropathie, maladie cérébrovasculaire et maladie vasculaire périphérique. Une compréhension de la prévalence et du fardeau de la maladie pour les patients atteints de MCV en soins primaires peut améliorer la prévention et la prise en charge de cette maladie.

EXAcerbations of COPD and their OutcomeS on CardioVascular diseases (EXACOS-CV) Programme: protocol of multicountry observational cohort studies.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the risk of certain cardiovascular (CV) events is increased by threefold to fivefold in the year following acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), compared with a non-exacerbation period. While the effect of severe AECOPD is well established, the relationship of moderate exacerbation or prior exacerbation to elevated risk of CV events is less clear. We will conduct cohort studies in multiple countries to further characterise the association between AECOPD and CV events. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective longitudinal cohort studies will be conducted within routinely collected electronic healthcare records or claims databases. The study cohorts will include patients meeting inclusion criteria for COPD between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. Moderate exacerbation is defined as an outpatient visit and/or medication dispensation/prescription for exacerbation; severe exacerbation is defined as hospitalisation for COPD. The primary outcomes of interest are the time to (1) first hospitalisation for a CV event (including acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, arrhythmias or cerebral ischaemia) since cohort entry or (2) death. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models will compare the hazard of a CV event between exposed periods following exacerbation (split into these periods: 1-7, 8-14, 15-30, 31-180 and 181-365 days) and the unexposed reference time period, adjusted on time-fixed and time-varying confounders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Studies have been approved in Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain and the UK, where an institutional review board is mandated. For each study, the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Patient Eligibility for Established and Novel Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies After Acute Heart Failure Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization presents an opportunity to optimize pharmacotherapy to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study's aim was to define eligibility for initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy and newer heart failure (HF) agents from recent clinical trials in the AHF population. METHODS: The authors analyzed patients with an AHF admission within the CAN-HF (Canadian Heart Failure) registry between January 2017 and April 2020. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as LVEF >40%. Eligibility was assessed according to the major society guidelines or enrollment criteria from recent landmark clinical trials. RESULTS: A total of 809 patients with documented LVEF were discharged alive from hospital: 455 with HFrEF and 354 with HFpEF; of these patients, 284 had a de novo presentation and 525 had chronic HF. In HFrEF patients, eligibility for therapies was 73.6% for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), 94.9% for beta-blockers, 84.4% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), 81.1% for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and 15.6% for ivabradine. Additionally, 25.9% and 30.1% met trial criteria for vericiguat and omecamtiv mecarbil, respectively. Overall, 71.6% of patients with HFrEF (75.5% de novo, 69.5% chronic HF) were eligible for foundational quadruple therapy. In the HFpEF population, 37.6% and 59.9% were eligible for ARNIs and SGLT2 inhibitors based on recent trial criteria, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients admitted with AHF are eligible for foundational quadruple therapy and additional novel medications across a spectrum of HF phenotypes.

Patient experiences of implantable cardiac monitoring in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: an exploratory study.

AIMS: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited heart disease. Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are increasingly used in this population to provide closer monitoring, with the potential for notification systems. However, little is known regarding the psychological impact this information may have on patients. The Abbott Confirm Rx™ ICM has the capability of connecting to the patient's smartphone to enable active participation in their care, as well as two-way communication between the patient and their care providers. This study aimed to explore individuals' experiences of having a smartphone-enabled ICM to monitor for arrhythmias in HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 participants. Utilizing a grounded theory approach, the interview guide was modified based on emerging themes throughout the study. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied to categorize interview data into codes and overacting themes, with each interview independently coded by two study members. Analysis revealed three key themes: (i) psychological impact, (ii) educational needs, and (iii) technology expectations. Participants reported that receiving feedback from ICM transmissions resulted in improved symptom clarity, providing reassurance, and aiding implantable cardioverter defibrillator decision-making. Some participants reported uncertainty regarding when to send manual transmissions. Lastly, participants reported the app interface did not meet expectations with regard to the amount of data available for patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, utilizing a smartphone app to facilitate two-way communication of ICM transmissions was well accepted. Future directions include addressing gaps in educational needs and improvements in the patient interface with increased access to data.