RESUMEN
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence of postpartum complications, including depression, in new mothers who had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and to assess whether these differ from mothers who never had JIA. Methods: Our cohort study used data from physician billing and hospitalizations covering Quebec, Canada. We identified females with JIA with a first-time birth between 1 January 1983 and 31 December 2010 and assembled a control cohort of first-time mothers without JIA from the same administrative data, matching 4:1 for date of first birth, maternal age and area of residence. We compared the following postpartum complications: major puerperal infection, anaesthetic complications, postpartum haemorrhage, thromboembolism, obstetrical trauma, complications of obstetrical surgical wounds and maternal depression in the first year after delivery, in the JIA vs non-JIA groups, using bivariate analysis and multiple logistic regression. Results: The mean age at delivery was 24.7 years in the JIA group (n = 1681) and 25.0 years for the non-JIA group (n = 6724). Mothers with JIA were more likely to experience complications attributable to anaesthetic [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 2.17, 95% CI; 1.05, 4.48], postpartum haemorrhage (aRR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.42, 3.11) and thromboembolism (aRR = 5.27, 95% CI: 1.83, 15.17) but were at lower risk for obstetrical trauma (aRR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.95) or newly to develop depression in the first year postpartum (aRR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.68). Conclusion: Mothers with JIA appear to be at higher risk for complications attributable to anaesthesia, postpartum haemorrhage and thromboembolism. Prevention strategies for postpartum haemorrhage and thromboembolism may be especially important in this population.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil/complicaciones , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Trastornos Puerperales/etiología , Adulto , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión Posparto/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Quebec , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with a history of juvenile arthritis are at higher risk for heart disease and hypertension and for developing adverse maternal outcomes: gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal hypertension, and preeclampsia/eclampsia. METHODS: We designed a nested case-control study from a cohort of first-time mothers with prior physician billing codes suggesting juvenile arthritis, and a matched comparison group without juvenile arthritis. For the nested case-control design, we selected 3 controls for each case for the outcomes of heart disease (n = 403), prepregnancy hypertension (n = 66), gestational diabetes mellitus (n = 285), maternal hypertension (n = 561), and preeclampsia/eclampsia (n = 236). We used conditional logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age and education. RESULTS: Having juvenile arthritis was associated with heart disease (odds ratio [OR] 2.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15-5.15]) but not with gestational hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or preeclampsia/eclampsia. All 66 cases of prepregnancy hypertension had juvenile arthritis. Having prepregnancy hypertension was strongly associated with preeclampsia/eclampsia (OR 8.05 [95% CI 2.69-24.07]). CONCLUSION: Women with a history of juvenile arthritis had a higher risk of heart disease. This risk signals the potential importance of cardiac prevention strategies in juvenile arthritis. As this was a retrospective study, it was not possible to correct for some relevant potential confounders. Further studies should assess the impact of medications, disease severity, and other factors (e.g., obesity) on cardiac outcomes in juvenile arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Eclampsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Madres , Oportunidad Relativa , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether children born to women who had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) had more adverse birth outcomes than children born to mothers who never had JIA. METHODS: Our cohort study used data from physician billing and hospitalizations covering the province of Quebec, Canada. We identified all women with JIA with a first-time birth between January 1, 1983, and December 31, 2010, and assembled a control cohort of first-time mothers without JIA from the same administrative data, matching 4:1 for date of first birth, maternal age, and area of residence. We compared outcomes (stillbirth, prematurity, small for gestational age, and major congenital anomalies) in the JIA versus non-JIA groups using logistic regression. RESULTS: Mean age at delivery was 24.7 years in the JIA group (n = 1681) and 25.0 years for the non-JIA group (n = 6724). Women who had JIA were at higher risk for a premature baby [adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.42], a baby small for gestational age (adjusted RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.37), and a child with a congenital malformation (adjusted RR 6.51, 95% CI 5.05-8.39). Neural tube defects were higher in the JIA offspring: 1.61% (95% CI 1.11-2.33) versus 0.03% (95% CI 0.01-0.11) in the non-JIA group, as were congenital heart defects: 1.07% (95% CI 0.68-1.69) versus 0.58% (95% CI 0.42-0.79). CONCLUSION: Most women with JIA will deliver a normal baby, even though they are at higher risk for having a child with adverse birth outcomes. Research is needed to understand pathophysiologic mechanisms and to investigate the effects of medications during childhood and youth on future birth outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil , Anomalías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Resultado del Embarazo , Mortinato , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Masculino , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The transition from pediatric to adult health care can be challenging for adolescents with chronic illnesses. As a result, many adolescents are unable to transfer to adult health care successfully. Adequate measurement of transition readiness and transfer satisfaction with disease management is necessary in order to determine areas to target for intervention towards improving transfer outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically review and critically appraise research on transition readiness and transfer satisfaction measures for adolescents with chronic illnesses as well as to assess the psychometric quality of these measures. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, ERIC, and ISI Web of Knowledge for transition readiness and transfer satisfaction measures for adolescents with chronic health conditions. Two reviewers independently selected articles for review and assessed methodological quality. RESULTS: In all, eight readiness and six satisfaction measures met the inclusion criteria, for a total of 14 studies, which were included in the final analysis. None of these measures have well-established evidence of reliability and validity. Most of the measures were developed ad hoc by the study investigators, with minimal to no evidence of reliability and/or validity using the Cohen criteria and COSMIN checklist. CONCLUSION: This research indicates a major gap in our knowledge of transitional care in this population, because there is currently no well-validated questionnaire that measures readiness for transfer to adult health care. Future research must focus on the development of well-validated transition readiness questionnaires, the validation of existing measures, and reaching consensus on outcomes of successful transfer.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Transición a la Atención de Adultos , Adolescente , Enfermedad Crónica , HumanosAsunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Mostaza Nitrogenada/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
We report the results of a Phase I/II dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide when combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3, at five dose levels of cyclophosphamide to a maximum of 700 mg on days 1 and 8 of a 28-d cycle. Patients received lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-21 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1-4 and 8-11. The MTD was 600 mg cyclophosphamide, days 1 and 8. Grade 3/4 haematological complications occurred in 26% of patients, grade 3/4 infection in 3% (both at 700 mg cyclophosphamide), with thromboembolic complications in 6% of patients. Overall complete response (CR) rate was 29%, very good partial response rate 7% and partial response rate 45% giving an overall response rate of 81%. After 21 months median follow-up, projected 2-year progression-free survival was 56%, with 80% overall survival at 30 months. Ten further patients were treated at MTD with a 40% CR rate. No dose reductions for any study drugs or deaths occurred during cycles 1-9. Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is a safe, effective combination in relapsed myeloma inducing a high response rate, warranting further investigation in phase III trials.