A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral perifosine with different loading schedules in patients with refractory neoplasms.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of perifosine (NSC 639966), an alkylphospholipid modulator of signal transduction, using different oral loading and maintenance regimens in an effort to avoid gastrointestinal toxicity while seeking maximal sustained plasma concentrations. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with advanced neoplasms were treated with monthly cycles of perifosine loading doses of 300, 600, 900, 1,200 and 1,500 mg (dose levels 1 through 5, respectively) on days 1-2 depending on the actual dose of the initial cycle. For subsequent cycles, perifosine loading doses were reduced to 100, 200, 300, 400 and 1,000 mg at the respective corresponding dose levels. Daily perifosine "maintenance" doses of 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg for levels 1 through 5, respectively, commenced on days 2 or 3 and continued for a total of 21 days. No treatment was given for days 22-27. The pharmacokinetics of perifosine with these schedules was characterized. RESULTS: Dose-limiting diarrhea developed at or above dose level 4. The MTD and recommended phase II dose was dose level 3B, with a loading dose of 900 mg on day 1 divided into two doses of 450 mg administered 6 h apart and a maintenance dose of 150 mg on day 2 through 21. On subsequent cycles, the loading dose was reduced to 300 mg. Non-gastrointestinal toxicities included three episodes of gout or gout-like syndromes observed at doses above the MTD. The median peak plasma concentration of perifosine achieved at the MTD was approximately 8.3 µg/mL. Four patients had stable disease ranging from 167 to 735 days. CONCLUSIONS: Perifosine given according to a loading and maintenance schedule can safely sustain concentrations of drug, approaching concentrations achieved in preclinical models with evidence of anti-tumor effect.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of MS-275, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with advanced and refractory solid tumors or lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose, the dose-limiting toxicity, and determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic profiles of MS-275. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma were treated with MS-275 orally initially on a once daily x 28 every 6 weeks (daily) and later on once every-14-days (q14-day) schedules. The starting dose was 2 mg/m2 and the dose was escalated in three- to six-patient cohorts based on toxicity assessments. RESULTS: With the daily schedule, the MTD was exceeded at the first dose level. Preliminary PK analysis suggested the half-life of MS-275 in humans was 39 to 80 hours, substantially longer than predicted by preclinical studies. With the q14-day schedule, 28 patients were treated. The MTD was 10 mg/m2 and dose-limiting toxicities were nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and fatigue. Exposure to MS-275 was dose dependent, suggesting linear PK. Increased histone H3 acetylation in peripheral-blood mononuclear-cells was apparent at all dose levels by immunofluorescence analysis. Ten of 29 patients remained on treatment for > or = 3 months. CONCLUSION: The MS-275 oral formulation on the daily schedule was intolerable at a dose and schedule explored. The q14-day schedule is reasonably well tolerated. Histone deacetylase inhibition was observed in peripheral-blood mononuclear-cells. Based on PK data from the q14-day schedule, a more frequent dosing schedule, weekly x 4, repeated every 6 weeks is presently being evaluated.

Effects of alpha1-acid glycoprotein on the clinical pharmacokinetics of 7-hydroxystaurosporine.

OBJECTIVE: UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine) is a small molecule cyclin-dependent kinase modulator currently under clinical development as an anticancer agent. In vitro studies have demonstrated that UCN-01 is strongly bound to the acute-phase reactant alpha (1)-acid glycoprotein (AAG). Here, we examined the role of protein binding as a determinant of the pharmacokinetic behavior of UCN-01 in patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from a group of 41 patients with cancer receiving UCN-01 as a 72-hour i.v. infusion (dose, 3.6 to 53 mg/m(2)/day). RESULTS: Over the tested dose range, total drug clearance was distinctly nonlinear (P = 0.0076) and increased exponentially from 4.33 mL/hour (at 3.6 mg/m(2)/day) to 24.1 mL/hour (at 54 mg/m(2)/day). As individual values for AAG increased, values for clearance decreased in a linear fashion (R(2) = 0.264; P = 0.0008), although the relationship was shallow, and the data showed considerable scatter. Interestingly, no nonlinearity in the unbound concentration (P = 0.083) or fraction at the peak plasma concentration of UCN-01 was apparent (P = 0.744). CONCLUSION: The results suggest the following: (1) that extensive binding to AAG may explain, in part, the unique pharmacokinetic profile of UCN-01 described previously with a small volume of distribution and slow systemic clearance, and (2) that measurement of total UCN-01 concentrations in plasma is a poor surrogate for that of the pharmacologically active fraction unbound drug.

Clinical pharmacology of flavopiridol following a 72-hour continuous infusion.

BACKGROUND: Flavopiridol, a novel flavone derivative, inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase-1. We initiated a Phase I trial in patients with refractory solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose and characterize the adverse effect profile. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical pharmacology of flavopiridol. METHODS: Serial plasma samples were collected and analyzed by HPLC using electrochemical detection. The pharmacokinetics were analyzed by noncompartmental analysis. Enterohepatic recirculation was studied by analyzing fecal samples, with an attempt to correlate cholecystokinin and post-infusional peak concentrations. The plasma protein binding was studied using equilibrium dialysis. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were treated with flavopiridol at 13 dose levels for a total of 504 cycles of treatment. The average steady-state concentration was 26.5 and 253 nM at 4 and 122.5 mg/m2, respectively. The clearance ranged from 49.9 to 2943 mL/min, with nonlinearity at doses >50 mg/m2/d. A post-infusional increase in plasma flavopiridol concentrations was noted in a subset of patients and generally occurred between 3 and 24 hours after the end of infusion. Flavopiridol was found in fecal matter, suggesting enterohepatic recirculation. There was nonsaturable plasma protein binding of flavopiridol (fu = 6%). CONCLUSIONS: The dose-limiting toxicity for the Phase I trial of flavopiridol was secretory diarrhea. We failed to identify a clear relationship between dose or concentration and diarrhea. At 50 and 78 mg/m2/d, the mean steady-state plasma concentrations were 278 and 390 nM. These concentrations were well above those noted for in vitro antiproliferative activity. Nonlinear elimination was observed at doses above 50 mg/m2/d, and postinfusional peaks appear to be related to enterohepatic recirculation.

Flavopiridol-related proinflammatory syndrome is associated with induction of interleukin-6.

BACKGROUND: Flavopiridol is a flavonoid with antiproliferative effects mediated, in part, by inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases. Clinical manifestations in a previous Phase I trial in patients with refractory malignancies treated with a 72-h flavopiridol infusion included a proinflammatory syndrome consisting of fever, fatigue, and "local" tumor pain with concomitant alterations in plasma acute-phase reactant proteins. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the proinflammatory syndrome observed in this trial was associated with modulation of plasma cytokines. METHODS: Patients receiving flavopiridol (n = 76) had serial plasma samples drawn preinfusion and during the infusion for evaluation of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-12, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, basic-fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels by standard ELISA assays. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test the significance of the difference between the baseline (time 0) plasma cytokine levels compared with the values of each subsequent data collection time points (8, 24, 48, and 72 h). RESULTS: There was a significant and sustained increase in plasma IL-6 levels at all time points when compared with baseline values. Paired values were used in the statistical analysis. Median plasma (interquartile range) values of IL-6 were elevated from 15.5 (9-52) pg/ml at baseline to 23 (4-48) pg/ml (P < 0.01) at 8 h; from 15 (2-48) pg/ml at baseline to 46 (21-105) pg/ml (P < 0.001) at 24 h; from 16 (9-52) pg/ml at baseline to 61 (32-170) pg/ml (P < 0.001) at 48 h; and from 15.5 (6-48) pg/ml to 68 (40-200) pg/ml (P < 0.001) at 72 h. Significance was maintained even when adjusted for multiple comparisons. The relative increase in IL-6 concentration was dose-dependent. Moreover, IL-6 elevation had a direct correlation with flavopiridol peak plasma concentration, flavopiridol area under the curve, and plasma C-Reactive protein levels. A significant decrease in plasma granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor occurred at the 8-h sampling point: 50 pg/ml (interquartile range 10-205 pg/ml, P < 0.01) when compared with baseline plasma levels and 71 pg/ml (interquartile range 5-152 pg/ml, P < 0.01). No changes in the other pro or anti-inflammatory cytokines were observed. Immunohistochemistry studies in bone marrow aspirates from a prospective group of patients in this trial demonstrated approximately 4-fold induction of IL-6 (compared with baseline), mostly in non-T cells. CONCLUSION: Biochemical analysis of plasma in patients undergoing infusional flavopiridol found a significant dose-dependent induction of IL-6. IL-6 elevation could be a marker for the process leading to the appearance of the proinflammatory syndrome observed in patients treated with infusional flavopiridol. The mechanism(s) underlying IL-6 induction and its significance are still unknown but may influence strategies to modulate flavopiridol's clinical effects.

Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of flavopiridol 1-h i.v. infusion in patients with refractory neoplasms.

A phase I trial of flavopiridol administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion schedule was explored. Fifty-five patients were treated with flavopiridol at doses ranging from 12 to 78 mg/m2 daily for 5, 3 and 1 day every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis was performed together with analysis of a promoter polymorphism of the UGT1A1 gene. Peak concentrations and areas under the time-concentration curve of flavopiridol were linear within the doses studied. Estimated clearance was 13.8+/-4.9 l/h/m2 (mean+/-SD), volume of distribution at steady-state was 64.9+/-43.4 l/m2 and elimination half-life was 5.2+/-4.9 h. Forty-nine of the 55 patients were genotyped for the promoter polymorphism. We found five (10%) homozygous and 11 (22%) heterozygous patients for UGT1A1*28, which alters the reference sequence (TA)6TAA to the variant (TA)7TAA by an extra TA dinucleotide insertion within the TATA box. One patient was heterozygous for the sequence of five TA repeats, (TA)5TAA. The remaining 32 patients did not have the UGT1A1*28 allele (homozygous for the reference sequence). Associations of the UGT1A1 promoter genotype with either the pharmacokinetic parameters or diarrhea (occurrence and severity) were not observed in this study. The pharmacogenetic analyses did not support that the UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism could affect flavopiridol pharmacokinetics and alter the incidence and severity of diarrhea induced by the drug.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of flavopiridol administered as a daily 1-hour infusion in patients with advanced neoplasms.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol administered as a daily 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with advanced neoplasms were treated with flavopiridol at doses of 12, 17, 24, 30, 37.5, and 52.5 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days; doses of 50 and 62.5 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days; and doses of 62.5 and 78 mg/m(2)/d for 1 day. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of flavopiridol with these schedules. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia developed at doses >/= 52.5 mg/m(2)/d. Nonhematologic toxicities included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension, and a proinflammatory syndrome characterized by anorexia, fatigue, fever, and tumor pain. The median peak concentrations of flavopiridol achieved at the MTDs on the 5-day, 3-day, and 1-day schedule were 1.7 micro mol/L (range, 1.3 to 4.2 micro mol/L), 3.2 micro mol/L (range, 1.7 to 4.8 micro mol/L), and 3.9 micro mol/L (1.8 to 5.1 micro mol/L), respectively. Twelve patients had stable disease for >/= 3 months, with a median duration of 6 months (range, 3 to 11 months). CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses of flavopiridol as a 1-hour infusion are 37.5 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days, 50 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days, and 62.5 mg/m(2)/d for 1 day. Flavopiridol as a daily 1-hour infusion can be safely administered and can achieve concentrations in the micromolar range, sufficient to inhibit cyclin-dependent kinases in preclinical models. Further studies to determine the optimal schedule of flavopiridol as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents are underway.