Within-participants reliability and measurement error of magnetization transfer imaging determinations within the healthy cervical spinal cord.

PURPOSE: To assess the within-participant reliability and measurement error in the determination of MTR in the healthy human cervical spinal cord. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of twenty healthy controls (10 male, mean ± sd age: 33.9 ± 3.5 years, 10 females, mean ± sd age: 47.5 ± 14.4 years), with no family history of any neurological disorders or a contraindication to MRI scanning were recruited over a period of two months. Each participant was scanned twice with a 3T MRI scanner using standard MTI sequences. Spinal Cord Toolbox (v5.4) was used for image post-processing. Data were first segmented and then registered to a template and then MTR was computed. The within-participant coefficients of variation (CV%), single and average within-participants intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were determined for MT values over the volume between the 2nd and 5th cervical vertebrae for the total WM and for specific WM regions: dorsal column (DC), ventral column (VC) and lateral column (LC). RESULTS: MTR showed poor to excellent within-participant reliability for the total WM, DC, VC and LC with single/average ICC values of 0.03/0.06, 0.10/0.18, 0.39/0.75, and 0.001/0.002, respectively, and the CV% reported an acceptable variation with values less than 10%. The Bland-Altman plots showed good within-participant agreement between the scan-rescan values. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that clinical trials using MTI technique are feasible and shows that quantitative MTI can monitor tissue changes in degenerative WM patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: MTI with its MTR index provide broad assessment of the integrity of white matter tissue and are being studied widely in brain as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of different neurological diseases.

The impact of X-ray scatter correction software on abdomen radiography in terms of image quality and radiation dose.

INTRODUCTION: The conventional anti-scatter grid is widely used in X-ray radiography to reduce scattered X-rays, but it increases patient dose. Scatter-correction software offers a dose-reducing alternative by correcting for scattered X-rays without a physical grid. Grids and software correction are necessary to reduce scatter radiation and improve image quality especially for the large body parts. The scatter correction can be beneficial in situations where the use of grid is challenging. The implementation of grids and advanced software correction techniques is imperative to ensure that radiographic images maintain high levels of clarity, contrast, and resolution, and ultimately facilitating more accurate diagnoses. This study compares image quality and radiation dose for abdomen exams using scatter correction software and physical grids. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom (abdomen) underwent imaging with varying fat and lean tissue layers and body mass index (BMI) configurations. Imaging parameters included 70 kVp tube voltage, 110 cm SID, and Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) both lateral and central chambers. AP abdomen X-ray projections were acquired with and without an anti-scatter grid, and scatter correction software was applied. Image quality was assessed using contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) metrics. The tube current mAs was considered an exposure factor that affected radiation dose and was used to compare the VG software and physical grid. Radiation dose was measured using Dose Area Products (DAP). The effective dose was estimated using Monte Carlo simulation-PCXMC software. Paired t-tests were used to investigate the image quality difference between the Gridless and VG software, Gridless and PG, and VG software and PG approaches. For the DAP and effective dose, paired t-test was used to investigate the difference between VG software and PG. RESULTS: Images acquired with a grid had the highest mean CNR (71.3 ± 32) compared to Gridless (50 ± 33.8) and scatter correction software (59.3 ± 37.9). The mean SNR of the grid images was (82.7.3 ± 38.9), which is 18% higher than the scatter correction software images (70.4 ± 36.7) and 29% higher than in the Gridless images (62.9.3 ± 34). The mean DAP value was reduced by 81% when the scatter correction software was used compared to the grid (mean: 65.4 µGy.m2 and 338.2 µGy.m2, respectively) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). Scatter correction software resulted in a lower effective dose compared to physical grid use, (mean difference± SD = -0.3 ± 0.18 mSv) with a significant difference (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Scatter correction software reduced the radiation dose required but images employing a grid yielded higher CNR and SNR. However, the radiation dose reduction might affect the image quality to a level that impacts the diagnostic information available. Thus, further research needs to be conducted to optimise the use of the scatter correction software. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Objectively, X-ray scatter correction software might be promising in conditions where a grid cannot be applied.

Diffusion tensor imaging within the healthy cervical spinal cord: Within- participants reliability and measurement error.

BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising technique for the visualization of the cervical spinal cord (CSC) in vivo. It provides information about the tissue structure of axonal white matter, and it is thought to be more sensitive than other MR imaging techniques for the evaluation of damage to tracts in the spinal cord. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the within-participants reliability and error magnitude of measurements of DTI metrics in healthy human CSC. METHODS: A total of twenty healthy controls (10 male, mean age: 33.9 ± 3.5 years, 10 females, mean age: 47.5 ± 14.4 years), with no family history of any neurological disorders or a contraindication to MRI scanning were recruited over a period of two months. Each participant was scanned twice with an MRI 3 T scanner using standard DTI sequences. Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT) software was used for image post-processing. Data were first corrected for motion artefact, then segmented, registered to a template, and then the DTI metrics were computed. The within-participants coefficients of variation (CV%), the single and average within-participants intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots for WM, VC, DC and LC fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were determined for the cervical spinal cord (between the 2nd and 5th cervical vertebrae). RESULTS: DTI metrics showed poor to excellent within-participants reliability for both single and average ICC and moderate to high reproducibility for CV%, all variation dependent on the location of the ROI. The BA plots showed good within-participants agreement between the scan-rescan values. CONCLUSION: Results from this reliability study demonstrate that clinical trials using the DTI technique are feasible and that DTI, in particular regions of the cord is suitable for use for the monitoring of degenerative WM changes.

Reporting radiographers within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries - motivation for becoming a reporting radiographer.

INTRODUCTION: Radiographer-led reporting originated in the United Kingdom as a strategy to reduce reporting backlog and time taken to report images. The effectiveness of reporting radiographers has been demonstrated, but their motivational factors have not been thoroughly explored. This survey aims to understand the incentives for radiographers to pursue postgraduate education in reporting radiography across Europe. METHODS: An online survey was conducted, collecting data across a range of topics such as demographic information, professional role, and job satisfaction. Questions assessing the influence of motivational factors on the decision to become a reporting radiographer are presented in this study. Descriptive statistics characterized the respondents' demographics. The motivational aspects were analysed quantitatively by regression analyses. Thematic analyses were performed for the free text responses on motivational aspects. RESULTS: 239 respondents from the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands, Ireland, and Malta completed the survey's motivation section. Increased knowledge and new challenges were the most motivating factors for becoming a reporting radiographer, while less exposure to radiation and less patient contact were the least motivating factors. Job satisfaction was a significant motivator. Gender significantly correlated with the importance of social connections for female reporting radiographers. A cross-country comparison showed that title and position and job security were more important for reporting radiographers from the UK. CONCLUSION: Taking in consideration that a sample of 239 is not generalisable for the role, this survey does provides insights into the motivation behind being a reporting radiographer in Europe. Factors such as increased knowledge, new challenges, and job satisfaction play significant roles. Hindrances experienced by reporting radiographers included lack of time, support, and standards, while aspirations for further professional development were expressed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A thorough understanding of the motivation behind pursuing postgraduate studies in reporting radiography is a valuable tool for managers, aiding in fostering a positive work environment and attracting/keeping qualified personnel. The findings of this study can be employed in the development of strategies to support and enhance the practice of reporting radiographers.

Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: Support, role satisfaction, and advanced clinical practice within the European federation of radiographer society (EFRS) member countries.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing number of radiographers are undertaking image reporting throughout Europe. However, there are variations in practice and experience in European countries. The study aim was to investigate reporting radiographer's perceptions in relation to support for their role and workload satisfaction and elements of advanced practice that may also be undertaken. METHODS: Following institutional ethical approval an online 34 item questionnaire survey was circulated via social media; Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn in a 12-week period in 2022 across Europe. The survey data were managed by the online secure database REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Data was collected across a range of questions, of which those relating to support for, and barriers to radiographer reporting, role and job satisfaction, and other role elements are reported here. RESULTS: A response level of 345 individual reporting radiographers replied to the survey from 15 European countries; some questions were optional and therefore had a lower response rate. There was consensus about the need for support from radiologists and management, protected time, and funding to support the reporting role. The majority of respondents received additional pay for taking on this role and expressed satisfaction with their role and workload. In relation to elements of advanced practice, the majority of respondents were involved in educational and managerial activities, and there was interest, but limited involvement, in research. CONCLUSION: There was a consensus about the support needed, and perceived barriers to, radiographer reporting, between reporting radiographers from different countries. Whilst there is some commonality in relation to activities such as supervision and education, there was clearer variety in relation to opportunities for research between the respondents, perhaps reflecting the differences between reporting as a standalone role development and reporting as part of an advanced clinical practice role. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As there is increasingly an emphasis on advanced clinical practice, reporting radiographers are likely to require support to develop their skills so that they can actively participate in the broader activities associated with this role, including education, leadership, and research.

Ultrasound compared with projection radiography for the detection of soft tissue foreign bodies - A technical note.

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue foreign bodies (STFBs) present a diagnostic challenge depending on their composition. Untreated complications can arise, namely infection through to loss of function. General (projection) radiography is recommended as the first line imaging examination. However, some STFBs are radiolucent, leading to false negative radiographs. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare ultrasound with projection radiographs for the detection of a range of different types of STFB. METHOD: Ethical approval (for use of participants to evaluate images) was granted by the Higher Education Institute's departmental Ethics Committee. Seven hand phantoms were created from a water, gelatine and psyllium mix. A different STFB (radiolucent and radiopaque) was inserted into six phantoms, with the seventh being a control. Ultrasound and projection radiograph images were generated of each phantom. Participants (academics and radiography students) reviewed all images. RESULTS: 50 responses were received from a study population of approximately 400, (10 academics, 40 students). The ability of ultrasound to detect radiolucent foreign bodies performs well compared with projection radiography: sensitivity 94% versus 9%, specificity 90% versus 88%. For radiopaque foreign bodies the data was more mixed: sensitivity 96% versus 99%, specificity 90% versus 88%. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that ultrasound is superior to projection radiography for the detection of radiolucent STFBs. Limitations include the lack of formal postgraduate ultrasound training within the study population and a lack of simulated bony structure within the hand phantoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ultrasound has the potential to be a useful modality in the detection of STFBs, particularly radiolucent objects. There are associated challenges such as conducting ultrasound in the vicinity of a wound, but further exploration of this application of ultrasound is warranted.

Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: An overview of the role within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries.

INTRODUCTION: Reporting radiographers undertake an important role in healthcare and for the radiographer profession in general. First introduced in the United Kingdom, reporting radiographers are now practicing in several other European countries. Our objective was to investigate the workforce of reporting radiographers across the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) community. METHOD AND MATERIAL: A voluntary anonymous 34 item electronic survey was distributed online using social media accounts such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn covering a wide range of topics relating to professional role, advanced practice, education, and seniority. The questionnaire was distributed during a 12-week period in 2022. RESULT: A total of 345 individual responses were received from 15 countries with majorities of respondent from United Kingdom (n = 245, 71%) and Denmark (n = 66, 19%). Mean age was 41.9 (S.D 9.8), similar for females, 42.5 (S.D 9.0) and men 40.9 years (S.D 9.7). Most reporting radiographers worked in public hospitals (90%). The vast majority of the respondents (n = 270, n = 94%) authored and signed their own clinical reports while a minority (n = 18, 6%) stated that their reports were checked by radiologists. CONCLUSION: The survey highlights the scope of practice of reporting radiographers working in Europe. Reporting is becoming a career path for an increasing number of radiographers across Europe and there is assess to academic education and clinical support. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Reporting radiographers fulfil an important role within the current demands of healthcare. This demand is likely to increase in the future, and therefore it is vital that there is some form of standardisation in the level of education that this group of healthcare professionals receive.

"I think this could be a big success" - A mixed methods study on practitioner perspectives on the acceptance of a virtual reality tool for preparation in MRI.

INTRODUCTION: A key part of a radiographer's role within MRI is providing the required emotional support to help patients succeed with a scan. Being informed is important; whilst information leaflets and videos are commonly used, these can be limited in their representation of the experience. Virtual reality tools are being shown to reasonably replicate a scan experience, having a positive impact on patient satisfaction and anxiety. The aim was to obtain the views of practitioners on the use and implementation of such a tool in practice. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted looking at the use of a virtual scan experience for patients prior to MRI. Nine radiographers attended two focus group sessions to see the tool and undergo a virtual experience. Following this, a survey based on the technology acceptance model was completed along with a semi-structured discussion about its use. RESULTS: Perceived usefulness, ease of use, attitude and intention to use were all positive towards the virtual scan tool. All practitioners saw value in such a tool and how it could be implemented within practice, highlighting areas for improvement and development. CONCLUSION: The practitioner's perspective was that access to such a virtual scan experience could be of use to better prepare and support those patients needing extra support before a real scan. Acknowledgement of having time to discuss patient concerns was noted and this could provide a means of doing so away from busy scanning lists whilst not taking up additional time. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Use of VR tools could be a conduit through which trust and rapport are built in advance away from busy scanning lists, thereby not impacting on operational throughput and hindering efficiency.

Exploring current undergraduate student perspectives on the introduction of the degree apprenticeship scheme in diagnostic radiography - a single institution study.

INTRODUCTION: The first degree apprenticeship programme in diagnostic radiography was launched in March 2020. This route into radiography runs in parallel with 'conventional' pre-registration programmes where students apply to a higher education institution (HEI) and undertake discrete clinical placements. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of pre-registration students on the diagnostic radiographer degree apprenticeship route. METHODS: A qualitative approach (online questionnaire) gathered attitudes and opinions of pre-registration students from a single HEI, regarding the degree apprenticeship programme. Participants were pre-registration medical imaging students from all stages of the programme (n = 204). Braun and Clarks's thematic analysis was employed for data analysis. RESULTS: A response rate of 21% (n = 44) was recorded. Four themes emerged from data analysis: (1) misunderstandings surrounding the degree apprenticeship, (2) financial implications and (3) practical experience associated with both degree courses and (4) the experience the pre-registration degree has to offer. CONCLUSION: There was an apparent lack of understanding regarding the degree apprenticeship leading students to misinterpret aspects of the course. Additionally, students highlighted the earning aspect of the apprenticeship to be an advantage in comparison to student debts associated with the traditional pre-registration programmes. Furthermore, students emphasised the advantage of the clinical focus practice associated with the degree apprenticeship. Nevertheless, students who have selected the HEI route still value what the traditional pre-registration degree offers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As degree apprenticeship programmes become widely available, a greater awareness should, therefore, follow. In the interim, there is scope for HEIs to seek to raise awareness of degree apprenticeship provision. HEIs should seek to allay any concerns and highlight the benefits of having this alternative route into the profession.

Review of claustrophobia incidence in MRI: A service evaluation of current rates across a multi-centre service.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic Resonance Imaging remains an anxious experience for many, often exhibiting as fear of enclosed spaces. A useful metric to assess its prevalence and impact in practice is premature termination due to claustrophobia. Incidence varies and depends on many factors such as the physical nature of the imaging equipment and examination being undertaken, as well as the patient themselves. METHODS: Scan appointment data from between April 2019-March 2021 was extracted and reviewed. Analysis included the type of scanner used, patient age, sex, examination area, funding source, attendance and completion status. Binomial logistic regression was performed to look for any relevant predictors of failure to scan due to claustrophobia. RESULTS: Overall incidence of incomplete examinations due to claustrophobia was 0.76%. Whilst the majority of scans were performed on conventional systems, those undergoing Open scans were over three times more likely to fail a scan due to claustrophobia, whilst those undergoing UpRight scanning were half as likely. Likelihood of claustrophobia increases with females, those between 45-64years of age, funded by the NHS and entering the scanner head first or having a head scan. CONCLUSION: Incidence of incomplete scanning is below 1% but with the potential for further reduction with implementation and use of improved scanner design and technology. Understanding the impact of other variables is also useful to raise awareness of those at greater risk of claustrophobia. However, there are wider influences beyond data alone to consider and account for. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Whilst occurrence of claustrophobia is low, there remains a cost impact, as well as an importance in understanding the patient experience. Drawing on operational data can help provide a limited, generalised view to support service improvement.

Scoping review: How is virtual reality being used as a tool to support the experience of undergoing Magnetic resonance imaging?

OBJECTIVES: Undergoing a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan continues to be a source of anxiety and concern for many patients. Various interventions have been developed and are used in regular clinical practice to support patients through the procedure. A novel approach which is gaining traction is that of virtual reality (VR) as a tool to support patient experience in MRI. This scoping review considers how it is currently being used and developed and discusses how effective it may be. KEY FINDINGS: The eight papers found show a range of approaches being used; as a preparatory tool, exposure therapy or distraction technique. All of which show general positive influence on patient anxiety, compliance, and acceptability. The more recent, but limited number of papers, show this to be a developing field. CONCLUSION: The potential for the use of VR lies in its ability to closely replicate the real world as a preparatory and exposure technique for those likely to experience concerns over the MRI procedure itself. The reality of the virtual environment also provides opportunity to spend time coaching patients in advance without the need to take up actual scanner time, thereby providing a safe space in which preparation and support can be given. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is argued that a better understanding of the theoretical basis on which VR may be working would further help development and implementation in clinical practice. This could then support a truly patient-centred approach to management of claustrophobia and associated anxieties related to MRI.

Radiographer Perspectives on current occurrence and management of claustrophobia in MRI.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is well known to be a source of anxiety for patients, commonly appearing as claustrophobia. One of the main reasons for this is due to the physical nature of the scanner itself. Despite technological improvements, there is lacking evidence on whether these improvements have resulted in a reduction in claustrophobia and anxiety in the clinical setting. Background anxiety associated with the current COVID-19 pandemic may also have shown an increase in prevalence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to survey MRI radiographers on their perspectives on the occurrence and management of claustrophobia in modern day clinical practice. METHODS: Following ethical approval, an online survey was used to gather the opinions of MRI radiographers. This used closed ranking questions as well as open responses to gain insight into how this issue may be presenting in practice, preferences in management, and barriers to providing support. RESULTS: Responses provide an up-to-date view on how radiographers perceive both displays of anxiety and associated impacts on patient outcome, the considered sources of anxiety, the use and effectiveness of support strategies, barriers to providing this support, and views on how COVID-19 has impacted on practice. CONCLUSION: The study provides a current view from radiographers on their experience of claustrophobia in practice. It shows that this remains a regular part of practice within the modality. Therefore, for MRI radiographers managing this is an essential component of their role. Communication and interaction with the patient are recognised as important, although time is a barrier to always being able to provide patient centred care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ongoing support is needed for both patients and radiographers to improve experience within MRI.

Radiographer advanced and consultant practice and community diagnostic hubs - a vision for the future.

OBJECTIVES: This article combines a brief narrative review of the Richards Report with an overview of current radiographer advanced and consultant clinical practice (ACCP) to provide suggestions for future ACCP within radiography. KEY FINDINGS: The 'Diagnostics: Recovery and Renewal' report by Professor Sir Mike Richards, published in 2020, has identified a need for improvements to be made to diagnostic services. His recommendations include the introduction of Community Diagnostic Hubs (CDHs) that would provide quicker and easier access to diagnostic tests for patients(1) A narrative review around the concept of Advanced and Consultant Clinical Practice (ACCP) for radiographers demonstrates the capability of the radiographers to expand their role. The article concludes with a vision of how CDHs could potentially provide multiple career pathways for radiographers working at this level of practice. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is acknowledged that some of these concepts are a combination of visionary and aspirational in outlook rather than being entirely based on current practice. The intention of this article, and the implications for practice, are to support on-going discussions to enable radiography, as a profession, to seek ways and opportunities to do things differently whilst ensuring that the patient remains at the centre of the services delivered.