RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: During the 2022 mpox outbreak, the province of Quebec, Canada, prioritized first doses for pre-exposure vaccination of people at high mpox risk, delaying second doses due to limited supply. We estimated single-dose mpox vaccine effectiveness (VE) adjusting for virus exposure risk based only on surrogate indicators available within administrative databases (eg, clinical record of sexually transmitted infections) or supplemented by self-reported risk factor information (eg, sexual contacts). METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study between 19 June and 24 September 2022. Information from administrative databases was supplemented by questionnaire collection of self-reported risk factors specific to the 3-week period before testing. Two study populations were assessed: all within the administrative databases (All-Admin) and the subset completing the questionnaire (Sub-Quest). Logistic regression models adjusted for age, calendar-time and exposure-risk, the latter based on administrative indicators only (All-Admin and Sub-Quest) or with questionnaire supplementation (Sub-Quest). RESULTS: There were 532 All-Admin participants, of which 199 (37%) belonged to Sub-Quest. With exposure-risk adjustment based only on administrative indicators, single-dose VE estimates were similar among All-Admin and Sub-Quest populations at 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]:-2 to 59) and 30% (95% CI:-38 to 64), respectively. With adjustment supplemented by questionnaire information, the Sub-Quest VE estimate increased to 65% (95% CI:1-87), with overlapping confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Using only administrative data, we estimate one vaccine dose reduced the mpox risk by about one-third; whereas, additionally adjusting for self-reported risk factor information revealed greater vaccine benefit, with one dose instead estimated to reduce the mpox risk by about two-thirds. Inadequate exposure-risk adjustment may substantially under-estimate mpox VE.
Asunto(s)
Mpox , Vacuna contra Viruela , Humanos , Quebec/epidemiología , Autoinforme , Estudios de Casos y ControlesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In Québec, Canada, we evaluated the risk of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection associated with (1) the demographic and employment characteristics among healthcare workers (HCWs) and (2) the workplace and household exposures and the infection prevention and control (IPC) measures among patient-facing HCWs. DESIGN: Test-negative case-control study. SETTING: Provincial health system. PARTICIPANTS: HCWs with PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosed between November 15, 2020, and May 29, 2021 (ie, cases), were compared to HCWs with compatible symptoms who tested negative during the same period (ie, controls). METHODS: Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of infection were estimated using regression logistic models evaluating demographic and employment characteristics (all 4,919 cases and 4,803 controls) or household and workplace exposures and IPC measures (2,046 patient-facing cases and 1,362 controls). RESULTS: COVID-19 risk was associated with working as housekeeping staff (aOR, 3.6), as a patient-support assistant (aOR, 1.9), and as nursing staff (aOR, 1.4), compared to administrative staff. Other risk factors included being unexperienced (aOR, 1.5) and working in private seniors' homes (aOR, 2.1) or long-term care facilities (aOR, 1.5), compared to acute-care hospitals. Among patient-facing HCWs, exposure to a household contact was reported by 9% of cases and was associated with the highest risk of infection (aOR, 7.8). Most infections were likely attributable to more frequent exposure to infected patients (aOR, 2.7) and coworkers (aOR, 2.2). Wearing an N95 respirator during contacts with COVID-19 patients (aOR, 0.7) and vaccination (aOR, 0.2) were the measures associated with risk reduction. CONCLUSION: In the context of the everchanging SARS-CoV-2 virus with increasing transmissibility, measures to ensure HCW protection, including vaccination and respiratory protection, and patient safety will require ongoing evaluation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Virosis , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Quebec/epidemiología , Factores Protectores , Factores de Riesgo , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
Background: The prevalence of post-COVID conditions (PCC) and associated physical, psychological, and cognitive symptoms was assessed among Quebec healthcare workers (HCWs) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: This case-control study compared 6061 symptomatic HCWs with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 between July 2020 and May 2021 with a random sample of 4390 symptomatic HCWs who were test-negative controls. The prevalence of physical symptoms lasting ≥4 weeks (PCC4w) or ≥12 weeks (PCC12w) was estimated among hospitalized and nonhospitalized cases. In multivariate models, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, as well as vaccine history, were evaluated as potential risk factors. Prevalence ratios compared 4 aspects of self-reported cognitive dysfunction among PCC cases to controls, adjusting for psychological distress and fatigue. Results: PCC4w and PCC12w prevalences of 46% (2746/5943) and 40% (653/1746), respectively, were observed among nonhospitalized cases and 76% (90/118) and 68% (27/37), respectively, among hospitalized cases. Hospitalization, female sex, and age were associated with higher PCC risk. A substantial proportion of nonhospitalized PCC4w cases often or very often reported cognitive dysfunction, including concentration (33%) or organizing (23%) difficulties, forgetfulness (20%), and loss of necessary items (10%). All 4 aspects of cognitive dysfunction were associated with PCC4w symptoms, psychological distress, and fatigue. Conclusions: PCC may be a frequent sequela of ambulatory COVID-19 in working-age adults, with important effects on cognition. With so many HCWs infected, the implications for quality healthcare delivery could be profound if cognitive dysfunction and other severe PCC symptoms persist in a professionally disabling way. Further evaluation of PCC prevalence and prognosis is warranted.
RESUMEN
The efficiency of training programmes in handling designed to prevent injuries has rarely been demonstrated by studies in the workplace. This study aimed to identify factors that may favour or inhibit the application of safe handling principles by paramedics performing full-body transfers of patients from a stair chair to a stretcher. In an observational field study, handling methods used in 45 patient transfers from a stair chair to stretcher were characterised. Principles concerning the physical environment seem to be applied frequently, but those applicable during the transfer are neglected. Principles taught during training may not be applied due to the physical constraints of the workplace and the underestimation of risk exposure. The results suggest that training should be enhanced, not by focussing on handling techniques but by focussing on compromise and the capacity to adapt work techniques based on the working context and the team-mate.
Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud/educación , Educación/métodos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/normas , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/prevención & control , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Camillas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Few studies have quantified the risk of musculoskeletal disorders during patient transfers in total assistance mode in real-life prehospital emergency care situations. An index to assess the overall risk of patient transfers was created; it makes it possible to quantify risk based on the patient's position and the height of the patient's location. An analysis of 71 transfers executed by paramedics in actual work situations showed that moving a patient from the ground was characterized by acute sagittal flexions and axial rotations, respectively, 42% and 12% of the time. When the patient was lying on a raised surface, the lifting index and perceived exertion were the lowest (2.55; easy). According to the overall risk index, patient transfers from the ground are the riskiest. Paramedics execute many risky lifts even in favorable patient handling contexts.
Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movimiento/fisiología , Movimiento y Levantamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/efectos adversos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Postura , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Quebec Emergency Department Management Guide (QEDMG) is a unique document with 78 recommendations designed to improve the organization of emergency departments (EDs) in the province of Quebec. However, no study has examined how this guide is perceived or used by rural health care management. METHODS: We invited all directors of professional services (DPS), directors of nursing services (DNS), head nurses (HN), and emergency department directors (EDD) working in Quebec's rural hospitals to complete an online survey (144 questions). Simple frequency analyses (percentage [%] and 95% confidence interval) were conducted to establish general familiarity and use of the QEDMG, as well as perceived usefulness and implementation of its recommendations. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent (19/26) of Quebec's rural EDs participated in the study. A total of 82% (62/76) of the targeted stakeholders participated. Sixty-one percent of respondents reported being "moderately or a lot" familiar with the QEDMG, whereas 77% reported "almost never or sometimes" refer to this guide. Physician management (DPS, EDD) were more likely than nursing management (DNS and especially HN) to report "not at all" or "little" familiarity on use of the guide. Finally, 98% of the QEDMG recommendations were considered useful. CONCLUSIONS: Although the QEDMG is considered a useful guide for rural EDs, it is not optimally known or used in rural EDs, especially by physician management. Stakeholders should consider these findings before implementing the revised versions of the QEDMG.
Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías como Asunto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Salud Rural , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Quebec/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study originated from patients' demands that they be better informed and that their meningioma diagnosis be considered serious. Meningioma are brain tumours that represent about 30% of all primary brain tumours. In 90% of the cases, they are non-cancerous. The objective was to identify whether educational intervention by nurses would have a positive impact on transition. METHOD: The study lasted 12 months and included two groups: intervention and control. Intervention involved the verbal and written delivery of answers to frequently asked questions, as well as patient follow-up for six weeks post-surgery. Nurses were available during the preparation for discharge, as well as the follow-up call 48-72 hours later. RESULTS: Educational nursing care had no demonstrable effect. DISCUSSION: Differences between the groups might have influenced the effect of educational intervention. Our results suggest certain lines of thought as to the doses of information that should be given based on stages of care and individual particularities.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Atención Domiciliaria de Salud/organización & administración , Neoplasias Meníngeas/enfermería , Meningioma/enfermería , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The impacts of emergency work on firefighters have been well documented and summarised, but this is not the case for paramedics. This paper explores the literature regarding the impact of work stress on paramedics. OBJECTIVE: To identify the literature available on the effect of paramedics' jobs on their health status. METHODS: Electronic database used: MEDLINE (Ovid, PubMed, National Library of Medicine) between 2000 and 2011. Key words used for the computer searches were: paramedics, emergency responders, emergency workers, shift workers, post-traumatic symptoms, obesity, stress, heart rate variability, physiological response, blood pressure, cardiovascular and cortisol. Exclusion criteria were: studies in which participants were not paramedics, participants without occupational exposure, physical fitness assessment in paramedics and epidemiological reports regarding death at work. RESULTS: The electronic databases cited 42 articles, of which we excluded 17; thus, 25 articles are included in this review. It seems clear that paramedics accumulate a set of risk factors, including acute and chronic stress, which may lead to development of cardiovascular diseases. Post-traumatic disorders, sleeping disorders and obesity are prevalent among emergency workers. Moreover, their employers use no inquiry or control methods to monitor their health status and cardiorespiratory fitness. CONCLUSIONS: More studies are needed to characterise paramedics' behaviour at work. These studies could allow the development of targeted strategies to prevent health problems reported in paramedics.