Standard of Care Versus Metastases-directed Therapy for PET-detected Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Following Multimodality Treatment: A Multi-institutional Case-control Study.

BACKGROUND: Most prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a biochemical failure following primary multimodality treatment (surgery and postoperative radiotherapy) relapse in the nodes. OBJECTIVE: To perform a matched-case analysis in men with lymph node recurrent PCa comparing standard of care (SOC) with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: PCa patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression following multimodality treatment were included in this retrospective multi-institutional analysis. INTERVENTION: The SOC cohort (n=1816) received immediate or delayed androgen deprivation therapy administered at PSA progression. The MDT cohort (n=263) received either salvage lymph node dissection (n=166) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (n=97) at PSA progression to a positron emission tomography-detected nodal recurrence. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint, cancer-specific survival (CSS), was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At a median follow-up of 70 (interquartile range: 48-98) mo, MDT was associated with an improved CSS on univariate (p=0.029) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.64) adjusted for the year of radical prostatectomy (RP), age at RP, PSA at RP, time from RP to PSA progression, Gleason score, surgical margin status, pT- and pN-stage. In total, 659 men were matched (3:1 ratio). The 5-yr CSS was 98.6% (95% CI: 94.3-99.6) and 95.7% (95% CI: 93.2-97.3) for MDT and SOC, respectively (p=0.005, log-rank). The main limitations of our study are its retrospective design and lack of standardization of systemic treatment in the SOC cohort. CONCLUSIONS: MDT for nodal oligorecurrent PCa improves CSS as compared with SOC. These retrospective data from a multi-institutional pooled analysis should be considered as hypothesis-generating and inform future randomized trials in this setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate cancer patients experiencing a lymph node recurrence might benefit from local treatments directed at these lymph nodes.

Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Contemporary adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline recommendation for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at either open (ORP) or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at a high-volume center is unknown. To assess guideline recommended and observed PLND rates in a high-volume center cohort. METHODS: We relied on the Martini-Clinic database and focused on patients treated with either ORP or RARP, between 2010 and 2013. Actual performed PLND was compared to European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline recommendation defined by nomogram predicted risk of lymph node invasion >5%. Categorical and multivariable logistic regression analyses targeted two endpoints: 1) probability of guideline recommended PLND and 2) probability of no PLND, when not recommended by EAU guideline. RESULTS: Within 7868 PCa patients, adherence to EAU PLND guideline recommendation was 97.1% at ORP and 96.8% at RARP (p = 0.7). When PLND was not recommended, it was more frequently performed at RARP (71.6%) than at ORP (66.2%) (p = 0.002). Gleason score, PSA and number of positive biopsy cores were independent predictors for both either PLND when recommended, or no PLND when not recommended (all p < 0.05). Clinical tumor stage, age and surgical approach were also independent predictors for no PLND when not recommended (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence of the indication to EAU guideline recommended PLND is high at this high-volume center. Neither ORP nor RARP represent a barrier for PLND, when recommended. However, a high number of patients underwent PLND despite absence of guideline recommendation. Possible staging advantages and PLND related complications needs to be individually considered, especially, when LNI risk is low.

[DaVinci robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: benefit for obese men? - A matched-pair analysis]. / Roboterassistierte radikale Prostatektomie : Vorteil bei adipösen Männern? - Eine Matched-pair-Analyse.

BACKGROUND: Open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in obese patients (BMI ≥30) is associated with increased perioperative morbidity. The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible benefit of DaVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) compared to RRP in obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 255 patients with a localized prostate cancer (PCa) and BMI ≥30 treated with radical prostatectomy from January 2009 to December 2011. To adjust for risk factors of increased perioperative morbidity (nerve-sparing, pelvic lymph node dissection, prostate volume), a propensity score-based matching was performed between RRP and RARP (n=115 each group). Both groups were compared by taking into consideration histopathological outcomes as well as peri- and postoperative (30 days) morbidity. RESULTS: There were no differences in histopathological characteristics (pT/pN-stage, Gleason score, R-stage; all p>0.05) in both groups. Mean blood loss (276 ml vs. 937 ml), transfusion rate (0.9% vs. 8.7%) and 30-day complications according to the Clavien classification system (Clavien ≥ 2; 9.5% vs. 22.6%) were decreased in RARP (all p<0.05). In a multivariate logistic regression model, RARP vs. RRP was associated with a significantly reduced risk of a Clavien ≥ 2 complication during follow-up (OR 0.3; p= 0.0047). Recovery of continence was significantly better for RARP patients after 3 months (p= 0.02). There was no difference in erectile function 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Our findings of decreased transfusion and complication rates and a trend of better early recovery of continence in RARP should be considered in obese patients (BMI >30) scheduled for radical prostatectomy.

Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan.

Therapeutic options for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remain limited. In a multicenter, Phase II study, 65 patients with histologically confirmed CRPC received a biomodulatory regimen during the six-month core study. Treatment comprised daily doses of imatinib mesylate, pioglitazone, etoricoxib, treosulfan and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Responders could enter an extension phase until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. Mean PSA was 45.3 ng/mL at baseline, and 77 % of patients had a PSA doubling time <3 months. Of the 61 evaluable patients, 37 patients (60.6 %) responded or had stable disease and 23 of them (37.7 % of 61 patients) were PSA responders. Among the 23 responders mean PSA decreased from 278.9 ± 784.1 ng/mL at baseline to 8.8 ± 11.6 ng/mL at the final visit (week 24). The progression-free survival (PFS) was 467 days in the ITT population. Of the 947 adverse events, 57.6 % were suspected to be drug-related, 13.8 % led to dose adjustment or permanent discontinuation and 40.2 % required concomitant medication. This novel combination approach led to an impressive PSA response rate of 37.7 % in CRPC patients. The good PSA response and PFS rate combined with the manageable toxicity profile suggest an alternative treatment option.

No impact of blood transfusion on oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the association between blood loss, blood transfusion (BT) and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, metastasis-free and overall survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a large single-center cohort of patients. Perioperative BT at oncologic surgery has been reported to be a potential risk factor for cancer recurrence and survival in several cancer entities. Current studies addressing the relationship between BT, blood loss and BCR-free survival in prostate cancer patients are controversial and include only series with fairly small patient cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 11,723 patients who underwent RP between 01/1992 and 08/2011 were analyzed. Cox regression analysis, including preoperative PSA level, pT stage, lymph node status, Gleason score, margin status, blood loss, transfusion rate (allogeneic or autologous), tested the relationship between blood loss, transfusion and BCR-free, metastasis-free and overall survival. Additionally, propensity score-matching analysis was performed to adjust differences in tumor characteristics. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant relationship between blood loss or BT and BCR-free, metastasis-free or overall survival. In multivariate analysis PSA level, pT stage, Gleason score, margin status and lymph node status were independent factors for a BCR (p < 0.0001). These results were identical after propensity score matching analysis, comparing patients with and without BT. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale analysis revealed no correlation between blood loss, blood transfusion and oncological outcome in prostate cancer patients treated with RP. Therefore, the association between higher blood loss or transfusion rate and cancer recurrence as described in other surgical treated tumor entities seems to be irrelevant in prostate cancer patients.

[Alpha emitter radium-223 dichloride: new therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases]. / Alphastrahler Radium-223-Dichlorid: Neue Therapie beim kastrationsresistentes Prostatakarzinom mit symptomatischen Knochenmetastasen.

Radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) is an alpha emitter with low toxicity for the treatment of patients with castrations-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and symptomatic bone metastases showing a 30% reduction in the risk of death, as compared to placebo. Because of the favorable physical and chemical characteristics, Ra-223 can be handled easily in daily practice based on interdisciplinary co-operation between urology and nuclear medicine. Ra-223 has been approved under the product name Xofigo® by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

[DGFIT: Immune and targeted therapy in urologic oncology ­ what can be expected?]. / DGFIT: Immun- und Targeted Therapie in der Uroonkologie ­ was können wir erwarten?

Immune and targeted therapy represent innovative therapy options in oncology. An overview of novel immune and targeted therapy options in urologic oncology presented at the most recent scientific urological and oncological meetings is given by representatives of the German Association of Immune and Targeted Therapy (DGFIT). Besides renal cell cancer, where targeted therapy is well established, new immune and targeted approaches in prostate and bladder cancer are discussed, summarizing current results and new developments with relevant impact for the treating physician.

Influence of low-molecular-weight heparin dosage on red blood cell transfusion, lymphocele rate and drainage duration after open radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: To assess the rates of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, pelvic lymphoceles, and prolonged drainage duration in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) receiving perioperative bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, 114 RP patients receiving bridging therapy with 60 mg (n = 63) or ≥80 mg (n = 51) Enoxaparin/d were compared to 1327 consecutive RP patients receiving 40 mg Enoxaparin/d. Logistic regression models were used to test the effect of LMWH dosage on all three outcomes. Covariables included age, body mass index (BMI), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), prostate volume, pelvic lymph node dissection, and pathological stage. RESULTS: The RBC transfusion rates in patients treated with 40, 60 and ≥80 mg were 4.9, 9.5 and 19.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). The respective lymphocele rates were 6.4, 3.2 and 2.0% (p = 0.26). The respective rates of drainage duration of ≥4 days were 6.7, 4.8 and 16.7% (p = 0.088). After adjusting for confounding factors, patients receiving ≥80 mg were 4.1-fold more likely to be transfused than patients receiving prophylactic LMWH (p = 0.02). Similarly, patients receiving ≥80 mg were 3.2-fold more likely to have a drainage duration of ≥4 days than patients receiving prophylactic LMWH (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a perioperative bridging with LMWH in RP are more likely to receive a RBC transfusion and to have prolonged drainage duration. Conversely, bridging therapy was not associated with an increased risk of lymphocele formation.

[Metastatic renal cell cancer in Germany in 2010. Impact of different target therapies]. / Sequenztherapie beim metastasierten Nierenzellkarzinom in Deutschland 2010. Bedeutung der verschiedenen Target-Substanzen.

BACKGROUND: Since 2006 in Germany six different target drugs for therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) have been used. Comparative studies for the application with the same indication are absent, and the order of potential sequential therapy is up to now unclear. The aim of the study was to collect data on therapy decisions in Germany regarding mRCC in the age of "targeted therapy". At the same time the study addressed the central question of sequencing of the different therapy options. In addition, the data of this study were to be compared to a study already published in 2008. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2010, four groups of doctors specialized in the therapy of patients with mRCC were asked for their behaviour in the first-, second- and third-line or sequential therapy. Those questioned included urologists in private practice (n=40), oncologists in private practice (n=40), hospital urologists (n=35) and hospital oncologists (n=35). Further the reasons for a therapy decision should be stated or weighted. RESULTS: Altogether 92% of all patients with mRCC were treated. Urologists in private practice treat only 30% of their patients themselves. The earlier used immune therapies (IFN, IL-2) no longer play a role. Sunitinib is used most often in first-line therapy by urologists in private practice (50.4%) and oncologists in private practice (47.1%). In second- and third-line therapy everolimus is used by urologists in private practice (27.1%, 26.3%) and sorafenib (28.6%) or everolimus (26.4%) by oncologists in private practice. Hospital oncologists use primarily sunitinib (56.1%), in second-line sorafenib (45.5%) and in third-line above all everolimus (19.4%). Hospital urologists use sunitinib most often for first-line therapy (57.6%) and sorafenib for second-line treatment (37.3%), while in third-line therapy temsirolimus (49.6%) and also everolimus (30.4%) were used. CONCLUSIONS: The therapy of mRCC is determined very strongly by the substances sunitinib and sorafenib. The mTOR inhibitors have recently been increasingly included in the second- and third-line therapy. With the introduction of the new targeted therapies, the treatment of these special patients is performed less by urologists and increasingly more by oncologists. This trend is strengthened in comparison to the DGFIT study from 2008.

[F(18)]-fluoroethylcholine combined in-line PET-CT scan for detection of lymph-node metastasis in high risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy: Preliminary results from a prospective histology-based study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of PET/CT using ([F(18)]fluorethylcholine (FEC) for lymph node (LN) staging in high risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with localised PCa and > or =20% LN risk according to a published nomogram were prospectively enrolled. FEC PET/CT was done minimum 14 d after prostate biopsy. Afterwards, open RP and extended pelvic LN dissection (ePLND) were performed. Clinical stage, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and biopsy Gleason Grading were assessed and histopathological evaluation of the RP-specimens and dissected LN has been performed. The results from PET/CT were compared with LN metastasis according to their anatomical site. RESULTS: Overall, 285 LN have been removed with a mean number of 15 nodes per patient (7-26). Of the 20 patients, 9 men were LN positive (45%), which corresponds to 31 positive LN with a mean size of 7 mm (0.8-12 mm). Dissection of the obturator fossa, external iliac artery/vein and internal iliac artery/vein revealed 36%, 48% and 16% of positive LN, respectively. FEC PET/CT did not detect one single positive LN, thus was false-negative in 31 metastasis and true negative in 254 LN. CONCLUSION: Based on our results which confirmed experience from the previous studies, FEC PET/CT scan did not prove to be useful for LN staging in localised PCa prior to treatment and should thus not be applied if clinically occult metastatic disease is suspected.

[Impact of immunotherapy in metastatic kidney cancer in Germany after introduction of new target therapy--results of a telephone survey of the German Society of Immuno- and Targeted Therapy (DGFIT)]. / Welche Bedeutung hat die Immuntherapie beim metastasierten Nierenzell-karzinom nach Einführung der neuen Target-Substanzen in Deutschland--Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Umfrage der DGFIT.

INTRODUCTION: Until recently, the standard therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Germany consisted of interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-alfa (IFN) as single agents or in combination, with or without chemotherapy. Since 2005, new drugs (target drugs) in the therapy for mRCC are available. The aim of this study was to analyse the current therapy standard in Germany. METHODS: By representative telephone interviews (GFK-Nürnberg by order of DGFIT) the following colleagues were contacted A: urologists in private practice (n = 40), B: oncologists in private practice (n = 40), C: hospital urologists (n = 35) and D: hospital oncologists (n = 35). Screening criteria were 1) responsibility for therapy in mRCC; 2) therapy of at least 10 patients with mRCC per year. RESULTS: Patients/year: A: n = 19, B: n = 17, C: n = 43, D: n = 21. 98% of patients with mRCC were treated: A: the most frequent therapy was sunitinib (43%, 42%, 33% as first-, second-, third-line), B: the most frequent therapy was sunitinib (45% as first-line, 37% as second-line), the most frequent third-line therapy was sorafenib (35%); C: the most frequent therapy were sorafenib and sunitinib (first-line 26% vs. 27%, second-line 46% vs. 42%), in third-line therapy additionally temsirolimus 24%; D: primary sorafenib and sunitinib (first-line 33% vs. 40%, second-line 46% vs. 42%), in third-line therapy additionally temsirolimus 23%. Immunotherapy (IL-2, IFN with or without chemotherapy) in mRCC plays in Germany for the second- and third-line therapy in A-D no major role (less than 10%). Otherwise, for first-line therapy immunotherapy has some relevance: A: 25%, B: 37%, C: 33%, D: 16%. The most important criteria for therapy decision making in A-D were: efficacy, toxicity, drug approval status. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with mRCC in Germany were seen by hospital urologists. Sunitinib (in first-line) and sorafenib (in second-line) are currently the most frequent prescribed drugs in mRCC. Temsirolimus is used mostly for third-line therapy (followed by sunitinib/sorafenib). Treatment of mRCC in Germany is increasingly being performed by oncologists.

[The value of real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer]. / Die Wertigkeit der Echtzeitelastographie in der Diagnostik des Prostatakarzinoms.

Randomized biopsy sampling under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance is the gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. In addition improvements in the quality of conventional ultrasound, new methods that complement conventional TRUS are opening the door to earlier and better targeted diagnosis of prostate cancer. One of these new methods is sonoelastography. Its impact on prostate cancer diagnostics has not yet been fully investigated, but the number of publications on this new technique indicate increasing interest in it.

Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: The Partin Tables represent the most commonly used staging tool for radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates. The Partin Tables' predictions are used to guide the type (nerve preserving RP) and/or the extent (RP with wide resection) of RP. We examined the ability of the Partin Tables' predictions incorrectly assigning the stage at RP. METHODS: The testing of the Partin Tables (external validation) was based on 3105 patients treated with RP at a single European institution. Standard validation metrics were used (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, AUC) to test the three endpoints predicted by the Partin Tables, namely the presence of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node invasion (LNI). RESULTS: Ideal predictions are denoted with 100% accuracy vs. 50% for entirely random predictions. For the 2001 version of the Tables the accuracy defined by the AUC was 79.7, 77.8, and 73.0 for ECE, SVI, and LNI, respectively. For the 2007 version of the Tables the corresponding accuracy estimates were 79.8, 80.5, and 76.2. The relationship between predicted probabilities and observed rates was poor. CONCLUSION: The Partin Tables are meant to guide clinicians about the safety of nerve bundle preservation at RP, about the need for seminal vesicle resection or for lymphadenectomy. Therefore, the use of the Partin Tables predictions may significantly affect the type and/or the extent of RP. In their present format the Partin Tables are not accurate enough to influence the pre-operative decision making regarding the type or extent of RP.

[Role of lymph node dissection in prostate cancer]. / Stellenwert der Lymphadenektomie beim Prostatakarzinom.

We present a comprehensive literature review and critical discussion of the diagnostic and therapeutic value of lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Lymph node dissection is currently the most reliable staging procedure for detecting lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. Accuracy increases with the extent of the procedure. Overall, in patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection, a favorable long-time cancer-specific survival can be observed. These data seem to be independent of the extent of the lymph node dissection and also independent of the administration of adjuvant therapy. It can be suspected that patients with lymph node metastases present different prognostic groups based on the extent of lymph node involvement. However, these risk groups might reflect only a lead-time bias, so the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection remains unclear. In conclusion, the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection in prostate cancer must be sufficiently evaluated in prospective clinical trials. Each patient should be individually counseled regarding his individual tumor features and the use of statistical prognostic tools such as nomograms.

[Active surveillance for prostate cancer]. / Aktive Uberwachung des Prostatakarzinoms.

Active surveillance is a valuable treatment option in patients with newly diagnosed low-risk prostate cancer. Studies considering a watchful waiting approach showed favourable cancer-specific survival rates in such patients and it is assumed that patients benefit from a definitive therapy if life expectancy exceeds 10-15 years. Therefore active surveillance is especially valuable in older men and in patients with an elevated comorbidity profile. Precise identification of histologically and clinically insignificant prostate cancers is still not possible today. Active surveillance includes regular PSA measurements combined with follow-up biopsies; however, no standardized protocol exists so far. Histological progression in the follow-up biopsy and PSA elevation are the most important criteria for initiating definitive therapy. Today only a minority of low-risk patients join an active surveillance protocol and a substantial proportion of these men leave such a protocol early without evidence of progression. The psychological burden of living with an untreated cancer seems to be responsible for this. Active surveillance has the potential to lead to undertreatment as there is some evidence that prolonged treatment delay might adversely affect outcome of definitive therapy.

Interleukin-2 inhalation therapy temporarily induces asthma-like airway inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled interleukin-2 (IL-2) is an effective and safe treatment in metastasing renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but known to potentially elicit respiratory symptoms. OBJECTIVES: The present study analyses the effects of IL-2 using a panel of measures including markers of airway inflammation. METHODS: Ten patients with mRCC (7m/3f; mean age, 63 yrs) were measured at baseline, 6-10 days after start of therapy (n = 5, inhaled IL-2 only; n = 5, inhaled IL-2 plus 1/11th of daily dose subcutaneously), and 16-29 days later under continuous combined (inhaled plus subcutaneous) therapy, including additional subcutaneous IFN-alpha in 8 patients. RESULTS: After start of therapy median FEV1 declined from 108 to 85 to 90 % predicted and the provocative concentration of methacholine eliciting a 20 % fall in FEV1 (PC20 FEV1) from 16 to 8 to 3 mg/mL, while the level of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) rose from 27 to 79 to 60 ppb and the percentage of sputum eosinophils from 2 to 18 to 37 % (p<0.01, each), accompanied by cough and dyspnoea (p<0.05). One patient who stopped therapy, was back to baseline values when measured 2 months later. Cytokine production by blood or sputum T lymphocytes was not markedly altered by IL-2 inhalation. CONCLUSIONS: IL-2 inhalation therapy in patients with metastasing renal cell carcinoma is capable of temporarily inducing symptomatic, functional and inflammatory alterations similar to those of bronchial asthma.

[Technical aspects of nerve sparing during retropubic prostatectomy]. / Aspects techniques de la préservation nerveuse au cours de la prostatectomie rétropubienne.

Retropubic radical prostatectomy is the most commonly used therapeutic option for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. An ongoing stage migration towards organ-confined cancers allows performing a nerve-sparing procedure in a growing number of patients. Key elements for achieving convincing functional results are a sphincter preserving Ligation of the distal part of Santorini's plexus and the subtle preparation of the neurovascular bundle. This article gives a detailed description of the operative technique. Furthermore, a strategy for patient selection and tumour selection for the indication of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) is suggested.

Interleukin-2/interferon-alpha2a/13-retinoic acid-based chemoimmunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: results of a prospectively randomised trial of the German Cooperative Renal Carcinoma Chemoimmunotherapy Group (DGCIN).

We performed a prospectively randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of four subcutaneous interleukin-2-(sc-IL-2) and sc interferon-alpha2a (sc-IFN-alpha2a)-based outpatient regimens in 379 patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Patients with lung metastases, an erythrocyte sedimentation rate < or =70 mm h(-1) and neutrophil counts < or =6000 microl(-1) (group I) were randomised to arm A: sc-IL-2, sc-IFN-alpha2a, peroral 13-cis-retinoic acid (po-13cRA) (n=78), or arm B: arm A plus inhaled-IL-2 (n=65). All others (group II) were randomised to arm C: arm A plus intravenous 5-fluorouracil (iv-5-FU) (n=116), or arm D: arm A plus po-Capecitabine (n=120). Median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (arm A; 3-year OS: 29.7%) and 18 months (arm B; 3-year OS: 29.2%) in group I, and 18 months (arm C; 3-year OS: 25.7%) and 16 months (arm D; 3-year OS: 32.6%) in group II. There were no statistically significant differences in OS, progression-free survival, and objective response between arms A and B, and between arms C and D, respectively. Given the known therapeutic efficacy of sc-IL-2/sc-INF-alpha2a/po-13cRA-based outpatient chemoimmunotherapies, our results did not establish survival advantages in favour of po-Capecitabine vs iv-5-FU, and in favour of short-term inhaled-IL-2 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving systemic cytokines.