OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pentoxifylline (PTX) slows the decline of muscle strength and function in ambulatory boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial comparing 12 months of daily treatment with PTX or placebo in corticosteroid-treated boys with DMD using a slow-release PTX formulation (~20 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome was the change in mean total quantitative muscle testing (QMT) score. Secondary outcomes included changes in QMT subscales, manual muscle strength, pulmonary function, and timed function tests. Outcomes were compared using Student t tests and a linear mixed-effects model. Adverse events (AEs) were compared using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 64 boys with DMD with a mean age of 9.9 ± 2.9 years were randomly assigned to PTX or placebo in 11 participating Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group centers. There was no significant difference between PTX and the placebo group in total QMT scores (p = 0.14) or in most of the secondary outcomes after a 12-month treatment. The use of PTX was associated with mild to moderate gastrointestinal or hematologic AEs. CONCLUSION: The addition of PTX to corticosteroid-treated boys with DMD at a moderate to late ambulatory stage of disease did not improve or halt the deterioration of muscle strength and function over a 12-month study period. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that treatment with PTX does not prevent deterioration in muscle function or strength in corticosteroid-treated boys with DMD.
Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/drug therapy , Pentoxifylline/therapeutic use , Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Child , Delayed-Action Preparations , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/physiopathology , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/psychology , Neurologic Examination , Pentoxifylline/administration & dosage , Pentoxifylline/adverse effects , Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests , Sample Size , Treatment Outcome
OBJECTIVE: To perform a double-blind, randomized study comparing efficacy and safety of daily and weekend prednisone in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). METHODS: A total of 64 boys with DMD who were between 4 and 10 years of age were randomized at 1 of 12 centers of the Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group. Efficacy and safety of 2 prednisone schedules (daily 0.75 mg/kg/day and weekend 10 mg/kg/wk) were evaluated over 12 months. RESULTS: Equivalence was met for weekend and daily dosing of prednisone for the primary outcomes of quantitative muscle testing (QMT) arm score and QMT leg score. Secondary strength scores for QMT elbow flexors also showed equivalence between the 2 treatment groups. Overall side effect profiles of height and weight, bone density, cataract formation, blood pressure, and behavior, analyzed at 12 months, did not differ between weekend and daily dosing of prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend dosing of prednisone is equally beneficial to the standard daily dosing of prednisone. Analysis of side effect profiles demonstrated overall tolerability of both dosing regimens. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that weekend prednisone dosing is as safe and effective as daily prednisone in preserving muscle strength and preventing body mass index increases in boys with DMD over a 12-month period.
Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/drug therapy , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength/drug effects , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
Measurements of muscle strength in clinical trials of Duchenne muscular dystrophy have relied heavily on manual muscle testing (MMT). The high level of intra- and interrater variability of MMT compromises clinical study results. We compared the reliability of 12 clinical evaluators in performing MMT and quantitative muscle testing (QMT) on 12 children with muscular dystrophy. QMT was reliable, with an interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of >0.9 for biceps and grip strength, and >0.8 for quadriceps strength. Training of both subjects and evaluators was easily accomplished. MMT was not as reliable, and required repeated training of evaluators to bring all groups to an ICC >0.75 for shoulder abduction, elbow and hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. We conclude that QMT shows greater reliability and is easier to implement than MMT. Consequently, QMT will be a superior measure of strength for use in pediatric, neuromuscular, multicenter clinical trials.
Hand Strength/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Muscular Dystrophies/physiopathology , Child , Hand , Humans , Joints/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/physiopathology , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results
