Abstract Background: The COVID-19 lockdown possibly meant a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma and therefore, worsening its prognosis. This unique situation of diagnosis deferral is an exceptional opportunity to investigate melanoma biology. Objectives: To evaluate the immediate and mid-term impact of diagnosis delay on melanoma. Methods: A retrospective observational study of melanoma diagnosed between March 14th 2019 and March 13th 2021. We compared the characteristics of melanomas diagnosed during the first 6-month period after the lockdown instauration and a second period after recovery of normal activity with the same periods of the previous year, respectively. Results: A total of 119 melanomas were diagnosed. There were no differences in age, sex, incidence, location, presence of ulceration or mitoses, and in situ/invasive melanoma rate (p > 0.05). After the recovery of the normal activity, Breslow thickness increased in comparison with the previous year (2.4 vs 1.9 mm, p < 0.05) resulting in a significant upstaging according to the AJCC 8th ed. (p < 0.05). Study limitations: The main limitation is that this is a single-center study. Conclusions: The COVID-19 lockdown implied a diagnosis delay leading to a mid-term increase in Breslow thickness and an upstaging of invasive melanomas. However, the detection deferral did not result in a higher progression of in situ to invasive melanoma, in our sample.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 lockdown possibly meant a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma and therefore, worsening its prognosis. This unique situation of diagnosis deferral is an exceptional opportunity to investigate melanoma biology. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immediate and mid-term impact of diagnosis delay on melanoma. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of melanoma diagnosed between March 14th 2019 and March 13th 2021. We compared the characteristics of melanomas diagnosed during the first 6-month period after the lockdown instauration and a second period after recovery of normal activity with the same periods of the previous year, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 119 melanomas were diagnosed. There were no differences in age, sex, incidence, location, presence of ulceration or mitoses, and in situ/invasive melanoma rate (p>0.05). After the recovery of the normal activity, Breslow thickness increased in comparison with the previous year (2.4 vs 1.9mm, p<0.05) resulting in a significant upstaging according to the AJCC 8th ed. (p<0.05). STUDY LIMITATIONS: The main limitation is that this is a single-center study. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 lockdown implied a diagnosis delay leading to a mid-term increase in Breslow thickness and an upstaging of invasive melanomas. However, the detection deferral did not result in a higher progression of in situ to invasive melanoma, in our sample.
COVID-19 , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Melanoma/diagnosis , Melanoma/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
No disponible
Humans , Male , Aged , Hyperbilirubinemia/complications , Urticaria/complications , Urticaria/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Hyperbilirubinemia/diagnosis
