Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in elective bariatric surgery patients: a prospective monocentric study.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the population pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in obese patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery and evaluates different dosing regimens for achievement of pre-defined target exposures. METHODS: Serial blood samples were collected during surgery with relevant clinical data. Total serum cefoxitin concentrations were measured by chromatographic assay and analysed using a population PK approach with Pmetrics®. The cefoxitin unbound fraction (fu) was estimated. Dosing simulations were performed to ascertain the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve cefoxitin fu above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) from surgical incision to wound closure. Fractional target attainment (FTA) was calculated against MIC distributions of common pathogens. RESULTS: A total of 123 obese patients (median BMI 44.3 kg/m2) were included with 381 cefoxitin concentration values. Cefoxitin was best described by a one-compartment model, with a mean clearance and volume of distribution of 10.9 ± 6.1 L/h and 23.4 ± 10.5 L, respectively. In surgery <2 h, a 2 and a 4 g doses were sufficient for an MIC up to 4 and 8 mg/L (fu 50%), respectively. In prolonged surgery (2-4 h), only continuous infusion enabled optimal PTA for an MIC up to 16 mg/L. Optimal FTAs were obtained against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli only when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding (intermittent regimen) and regardless of the protein binding for the continuous infusion. CONCLUSION: Intermittent dosing regimens resulted in optimal FTAs against susceptible MIC distributions of S. aureus and E. coli when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding. Continuous infusion of cefoxitin may improve FTA regardless of protein binding. STUDY REGISTRATION: Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306290.

TMPRSS2 inhibitors for the treatment of COVID-19 in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of nafamostat and camostat mesylate.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic serine protease inhibitors block the cellular enzyme transmembrane protease serine 2, thus preventing SARS-CoV-2 cell entry. There are two relevant drugs in this class, namely, nafamostat (intravenous formulation) and camostat (oral formulation). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether transmembrane protease serine 2 inhibition with nafamostat or camostat is associated with a reduced risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in adults with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: Scientific databases and clinical trial registry platforms. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, INTERVENTIONS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Preprints or published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of nafamostat or camostat vs. usual care or placebo in adults requiring treatment for COVID-19. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS AND RISK-OF-BIAS ASSESSMENT: The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included time to recovery, adverse events, and serious adverse events. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the revised Cochrane RoB 2 tool for individually randomized trials. Meta-analysis was conducted in the R package meta (v7.0-0) using inverse variance and random effects. Protocol registration number was INPLASY202320120. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were included. Overall, the number of available patients was small (nafamostat = 387; camostat = 1061), the number of enrolled patients meeting the primary outcome was low (nafamostat = 12; camostat = 13), and heterogeneity was high. In hospitalized adults, we did not identify differences in 30-day all-cause mortality (risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.58 [0.19, 1.80], p 0.34; I2 = 0%; n = 6) and time to recovery (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.08 days [-0.74, 0.89], p 0.86; n = 2) between nafamostat vs. usual care; and for 30-day all-cause mortality (risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.31, 3.18], p 0.99; n = 2) between camostat vs. placebo. CONCLUSION: The RCT evidence is inconclusive to determine whether there is a mortality reduction and safety with either nafamostat or camostat for the treatment of adults with COVID-19. There were high RoB, small sample size, and high heterogeneity between RCTs.

A phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single- and multiple-dose study of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral ceftibuten in healthy adult subjects.

This was a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single- and multiple-dose study of oral ceftibuten to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cis-ceftibuten (administered form) and trans-ceftibuten (metabolite), and to describe safety and tolerability at higher than licensed doses. Subjects received single 400, 600, or 800 mg doses of ceftibuten on Days 1 and 4, followed by 7 days of twice-daily dosing from Days 4 to 10. Non-compartmental methods were used to describe parent drug and metabolite PK in plasma and urine. Dose proportionality was examined using C max, AUC0-12, and AUC0-INF. Accumulation was calculated as the ratio of AUC0-12 on Days 4 and 10. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Following single ascending doses, mean cis- and trans-ceftibuten C max were 17.6, 24.1, and 28.1 mg/L, and 1.1, 1.5, and 2.2 mg/L, respectively; cis-ceftibuten urinary recovery accounted for 64.3%-86.9% of the administered dose over 48 h. Following multiple ascending doses, mean cis- and trans-ceftibuten C max were 21.7, 28.1, and 38.8 mg/L, and 1.4, 1.9, and 2.8 mg/L, respectively; cis-ceftibuten urinary recovery accounted for 72.2%-96.4% of the administered dose at steady state. The exposure of cis- and trans-ceftibuten increased proportionally with increasing doses. Cis- and trans-ceftibuten accumulation factor was 1.14-1.19 and 1.28-1.32. The most common gastrointestinal treatment emergent AEs were mild and resolved without intervention. Ceftibuten was well tolerated. Dose proportionality and accumulation of cis- and trans-ceftibuten were observed. These results support the ongoing development of ceftibuten at doses up to 800 mg twice-daily. (The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03939429.).

A protocol for an international, multicentre pharmacokinetic study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units: The SAFE-ICU study.

Objective: To describe whether contemporary dosing of antifungal drugs achieves therapeutic exposures in critically ill patients that are associated with optimal outcomes. Adequate antifungal therapy is a key determinant of survival of critically ill patients with fungal infections. Critical illness can alter an antifungal agents' pharmacokinetics, increasing the risk of inappropriate antifungal exposure that may lead to treatment failure and/or toxicity. Design setting and participants: This international, multicentre, observational pharmacokinetic study will comprise adult critically ill patients prescribed antifungal agents including fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, and amphotericin B for the treatment or prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease. A minimum of 12 patients are targeted for enrolment for each antifungal agent, across 12 countries and 30 intensive care units to perform descriptive pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic sampling will occur during two dosing intervals (occasions): firstly, between days 1 and 3, and secondly, between days 4 and 7 of the antifungal course, collecting three samples per occasion. Patients' demographic and clinical data will be collected. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint of the study is attainment of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target exposures that are associated with optimal efficacy. Thirty-day mortality will also be measured. Results and conclusions: This study will describe whether contemporary antifungal drug dosing achieves drug exposures associated with optimal outcomes. Data will also be used for the development of antifungal dosing algorithms for critically ill patients. Optimised drug dosing should be considered a priority for improving clinical outcomes for critically ill patients with fungal infections.

Stability of nafamostat in intravenous infusion solutions, human whole blood and extracted plasma: implications for clinical effectiveness studies.

Aim: To describe the stability of nafamostat in infusion solutions, during blood sample collection and in extracted plasma samples in the autosampler. Methods: Nafamostat infusion solutions were stored at room temperature in the light for 24 h. For sample collection stability, fresh blood spiked with nafamostat was subjected to combinations of anticoagulants, added esterase inhibitor and temperature. Nafamostat was monitored in the extracted plasma samples in the autosampler. Results: Nafamostat was stable in infusion solutions. Nafamostat in whole blood was stable for 3 h before centrifugation when collected in sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate tubes (4°C). Nafamostat in extracted plasma samples degraded at 4.7 ± 0.7% per h. Conclusion: Viable samples can be obtained using blood collection tubes with sodium fluoride, chilling and processing promptly.

Nafamostat Mesylate for Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalised Patients: A Structured, Narrative Review.

The search for clinically effective antivirals against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is ongoing. Repurposing of drugs licensed for non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) indications has been extensively investigated in laboratory models and in clinical studies with mixed results. Nafamostat mesylate (nafamostat) is a drug licensed in Japan and Korea for indications including acute pancreatitis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. It is available only for continuous intravenous infusion. In vitro human lung cell line studies with nafamostat demonstrate high antiviral potency against SARS-CoV-2 (half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 0.0022 µM [compared to remdesivir 1.3 µM]), ostensibly via inhibition of the cellular enzyme transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) preventing viral entry into human cells. In addition, the established antithrombotic activity is hypothesised to be advantageous given thrombosis-associated sequelae of COVID-19. Clinical reports to date are limited, but indicate a potential benefit of nafamostat in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. In this review, we will explore the pre-clinical, pharmacokinetic and clinical outcome data presently available for nafamostat as a treatment for COVID-19. The recruitment to ongoing clinical trials is a priority to provide more robust data on the safety and efficacy of nafamostat as a treatment for COVID-19.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Recommendations of Levetiracetam in Adult and Elderly Patients With Epilepsy.

The objective was to develop and externally validate a population pharmacokinetic model of levetiracetam in adult and elderly patients with epilepsy, and to perform dosing simulations to propose individualized dosing regimens more likely to achieve therapeutic concentrations. This prospective study included 367 plasma samples from 107 patients receiving oral levetiracetam. Samples were analyzed by HPLC-UV. Pharmacokinetic data, as well as patient demographic, clinical characteristics, other drug therapy, and the use of innovator or generic products of levetiracetam, were collected. Population modeling was performed with NONMEM and included internal and external validations of the final model. Simulations were used to propose optimized dosing regimens. The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam was described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination. Body surface area had a significant effect on the apparent volume of distribution, as did creatinine clearance (CrCL) over the drug clearance (p < 0.01). The final model performed adequately during external validation testing. The final model showed a better predictive performance. Dosing simulations support 1000 mg 12-hourly dosing of levetiracetam for patients with CrCL ~60-75 mL/min with higher dose needed for higher values (1500 mg 12-hourly for CrCL ~93-111 mL/min). Dosing regimens should be personalized to the patient's CrCL to maximize the likelihood of therapeutic concentrations.