Proof-of-concept study exploring the effect of spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a considerable disease burden. Existing treatment options are limited and often suboptimal; a high unmet need exists for effective targeted therapies. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effects of spesolimab treatment in patients with HS. METHODS: This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled proof-of-clinical-concept (PoCC) study was conducted at 25 centres across 12 countries from 3 May 2021 to 21 April 2022. Patients had moderate-to-severe HS for ≥ 1 year before enrolment. Patients were randomized (2 : 1) to receive a loading dose of 3600-mg intravenous spesolimab (1200 mg at weeks 0, 1 and 2) or matching placebo, followed by maintenance with either 1200-mg subcutaneous spesolimab every 2 weeks from weeks 4 to 10 or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at week 12. Secondary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), percentage change from baseline in draining tunnel (dT) count, the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of 0, absolute change from baseline in the revised Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index (HASI-R), the proportion of patients achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50), the proportion of patients with ≥ 1 flare (all at week 12) and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: In this completed trial, randomized patients (n = 52) received spesolimab (n = 35) or placebo (n = 17). The difference vs. placebo in least squares mean is reported. At week 12, the percentage change in total AN count was similar between treatment arms: -4.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) -31.7 to 23.4]. There was greater numerical improvement in the spesolimab arm, as measured by IHS4 (13.9, 95% CI -25.6 to -2.3); percentage change from baseline in dT count (-96.6%, 95% CI -154.5 to -38.8); and the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of 0 (18.3%, 95% CI -7.9 to 37.5). Spesolimab treatment also improved HASI-R and HiSCR50 vs. placebo. Spesolimab demonstrated a favourable safety profile, similar to that observed in trials in other diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory PoCC study supports the development of spesolimab as a new therapeutic option in HS.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects approximately 0.4% to 1% of people worldwide. HS mainly affects areas where skin touches skin and can result in painful lumps and abscesses. Tunnel-shaped structures often form below the skin and discharge pus and can greatly affect a person's quality of life. In this study, we tested a drug called 'spesolimab' as a treatment for people with moderate-to-severe HS. Spesolimab is a medicine in development that affects the immune system. This 12-week study included 52 adults who had moderate-to-severe HS for at least 1 year, from North America, Europe and Australia. People who took part were selected at random to receive either spesolimab or placebo. Thirty-five people received spesolimab and 17 received placebo into a vein once a week for 3 weeks, starting at week 0. They then received four injections of spesolimab or placebo under the skin once every 2 weeks until week 10. The number of lumps and abscesses, tunnels and a score based on their combination, called the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), were evaluated before spesolimab or placebo were given, and at week 12. We found that spesolimab and the placebo had a similar effect on the number of lumps and abscesses. However, more people treated with spesolimab showed improvements in tunnels and IHS4 score than those who received the placebo. The safety of spesolimab was favourable, similar to when spesolimab has been used in studies of other diseases. Our findings support further research into the use of spesolimab as a medicine for HS.

Unmet Educational Needs and Clinical Practice Gaps in the Management of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: Global Perspectives from the Front Line.

INTRODUCTION: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, potentially life-threatening, neutrophilic, autoinflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent flares of generalised sterile pustules and associated systemic features. Inconsistent diagnostic criteria and a lack of approved therapies pose serious challenges to GPP management. Our objectives were to discuss the challenges encountered in the care of patients with GPP and identify healthcare provider (HCP) educational needs and clinical practice gaps in GPP management. METHODS: On 24 July 2020, 13 dermatologists from 10 countries (Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, the UK and the USA) attended a workshop to share experiences in managing patients with GPP. Educational needs and clinical practice gaps grouped according to healthcare system level were discussed and ranked using interactive polling. RESULTS: Lack of experience of GPP among HCPs was identified as an important individual HCP-level clinical practice gap. Limited understanding of the presentation and pathogenesis of GPP among non-specialists means misdiagnosis is common, delaying referral and treatment. In countries where patients may present to general practitioners or emergency department HCPs, GPP is often mistaken for an infection. Among dermatologists who can accurately diagnose GPP, limited knowledge of treatments may necessitate referral to a colleague with more experience in GPP. At the organisational level, important needs identified were educating emergency department HCPs to recognise GPP as an autoinflammatory disease and improving communication, cooperation and definitions of roles within multidisciplinary teams supporting patients with GPP. At the regulatory level, robust clinical trial data, clear and consistent treatment guidelines and approved therapies were identified as high priorities. CONCLUSIONS: The educational imperative most consistently identified across the participating countries is for HCPs to understand that GPP can be life-threatening if appropriate treatment initiation is delayed, and to recognise when to refer patients to a colleague with more experience of GPP management.

Health outcomes and unmet needs in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis attending tertiary care in Greece: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: No previous studies have characterized a patient's experience of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in Greece and unmet needs may exist despite a broad range of available treatments. Therefore, we assessed quality of life (QoL), functional ability, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with established RA and receiving treatment in a tertiary care setting in Greece. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort of patients aged ≥18 years, receiving any type of treatment for RA, and followed for 12 months at 7 rheumatology referral centers across mainland Greece (NCT01001182). Patient data were collected at the initial visit and 3, 6, and 9 months. QoL was evaluated using the Euro Quality of Life-5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) and functional ability was evaluated using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). RESULTS: A total of 210 patients with RA were enrolled (76.7% women, mean ± standard deviation [SD] age: 59.1 ± 12.6 years, median [interquartile range] disease duration: 11.9 [5.0-16.0] years). Baseline mean ± SD EQ-5D and HAQ scores were 0.57 ± 0.32 and 0.75 ± 0.63, respectively, and remained largely unchanged throughout the study. Post-hoc comparison showed that patients receiving non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (non-bDMARDs) had significantly higher EQ-5D and lower HAQ-DI scores compared with those receiving biologic DMARDs. A majority of patients reported having difficulty doing housework or other duties (61.4 and 61.9%, respectively), and 55.2% reported needing external support for these tasks. Positive correlation was observed between QoL and functional ability. Hospitalization at least once during the study occurred in 9.5% of the patients, and 12.5% of these cases were due to exacerbation of RA. At baseline, 52.4% of the patients were retired, with 38.5% of retirees having retired early due to RA. Among the patients who were retired at baseline, the mean ± SD period from actual retirement to expected retirement age was 12.1 ± 8.1 years. CONCLUSION: QoL and functional ability were positively correlated in patients with long-standing RA, with a large proportion showing impairments in both. Timely, target-oriented treatment initiated as soon as possible after diagnosis may help to improve patient-reported outcomes and limit the burden of RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01001182 . Registered 23 October 2009.