Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 80(4): 216-219, 2019 Apr 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30951408

RESUMEN

The high-risk surgical patient only constitutes approximately 4% of the elective non-cardiac surgical population but contributes to the vast majority of in-hospital deaths following surgery. This, in conjunction with a high morbidity rate, can lead to a perioperative pathway fraught with challenges. It is incredibly difficult to anticipate which complications may arise and the risks involved before surgery. It is for this reason that patients need to be engaged in the decision-making processes regarding their perioperative care involved before major surgery. A combination of good medical practice, medicolegal influences and a governmental drive have begun to result in a shift away from paternalistic medicine to a shared decision-making approach. This article defines shared decision making, explores its benefits and limitations and addresses the relevant legal literature.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Humanos , Participación del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Perioperativa/legislación & jurisprudencia , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA