Genetic and epigenetic changes in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis: association with decreased endometrial αvß3 integrin expression.

About 40% of women with infertility and 70% of women with pelvic pain suffer from endometriosis. The pregnancy rate in women undergoing IVF with low endometrial integrin αvß3 (LEI) expression is significantly lower compared to the women with high endometrial integrin αvß3 (HEI). Mid-secretory eutopic endometrial biopsies were obtained from healthy controls (C; n=3), and women with HEI (n=4) and LEI (n=4) and endometriosis. Changes in gene expression were assessed using human gene arrays and DNA methylation data were derived using 385 K Two-Array Promoter Arrays. Transcriptional analysis revealed that LEI and C groups clustered separately with 396 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (P<0.01: 275 up and 121 down) demonstrating that transcriptional and epigenetic changes are distinct in the LEI eutopic endometrium compared to the C and HEI group. In contrast, HEI vs C and HEI vs LEI comparisons only identified 83 and 45 DEGs, respectively. The methylation promoter array identified 1304 differentially methylated regions in the LEI vs C comparison. The overlap of gene and methylation array data identified 14 epigenetically dysregulated genes and quantitative RT-PCR analysis validated the transcriptomic findings. The analysis also revealed that aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) was hypomethylated and significantly overexpressed in LEI samples compared to C. Further analysis validated that AHR transcript and protein expression are significantly (P<0.05) increased in LEI women compared to C. The increase in AHR, together with the altered methylation status of the 14 additional genes, may provide a diagnostic tool to identify the subset of women who have endometriosis-associated infertility.

Constitutive regulation of CYP1B1 by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in pre-malignant and malignant mammary tissue.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a receptor/transcription factor which regulates cytochrome P450 (CYP) gene transcription and which is activated by environmental carcinogens, some of which are associated with increased breast cancer risk. Here, we show that the AhR is over-expressed and constitutively active in human and rodent mammary tumors, suggesting its ongoing contribution to tumorigenesis regardless of tumor etiology. AhR regulation of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 was studied to determine if constitutively active AhR effects the same transcriptional outcomes as environmental chemical-activated AhR. Elevated AhR and CYP1B1 but not CYP1A1 before tumor formation in a rat model of mammary tumorigenesis suggested differential CYP1B1 regulation by a constitutively active AhR. This hypothesis was tested with human mammary gland cell lines which hyper-express AhR and CYP1B1 but which express little or no CYP1A1. CYP1B1 expression was diminished by repression of AhR activity or by AhR knockdown, demonstrating AhR control of basal CYP1B1 levels. ChIP assays demonstrated constitutive AhR binding to both CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 promoters, demonstrating that differential CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 regulation by constitutively active AhR does not result from different amounts of promoter-bound AhR. While increasing AhR binding to both CYP1A1 and CYP1B1, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin induced CYP1A1 mRNA in both a malignant and non-malignant line but increased only CYP1B1 mRNA in the malignant line, again demonstrating that the level of promoter binding does not necessarily correlate with gene mRNA levels. These studies suggest that constitutively active AhR mediates different molecular outcomes than environmental chemical-activated AhR, and further implicate the AhR in mammary tumorigenesis.

Chromosome-wide mapping of estrogen receptor binding reveals long-range regulation requiring the forkhead protein FoxA1.

Estrogen plays an essential physiologic role in reproduction and a pathologic one in breast cancer. The completion of the human genome has allowed the identification of the expressed regions of protein-coding genes; however, little is known concerning the organization of their cis-regulatory elements. We have mapped the association of the estrogen receptor (ER) with the complete nonrepetitive sequence of human chromosomes 21 and 22 by combining chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with tiled microarrays. ER binds selectively to a limited number of sites, the majority of which are distant from the transcription start sites of regulated genes. The unbiased sequence interrogation of the genuine chromatin binding sites suggests that direct ER binding requires the presence of Forkhead factor binding in close proximity. Furthermore, knockdown of FoxA1 expression blocks the association of ER with chromatin and estrogen-induced gene expression demonstrating the necessity of FoxA1 in mediating an estrogen response in breast cancer cells.

Agonist and chemopreventative ligands induce differential transcriptional cofactor recruitment by aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a transcription factor whose activity is regulated by environmental agents, including several carcinogenic agonists. We measured recruitment of AHR and associated proteins to the human cytochrome P4501A1 gene promoter in vivo. Upon treatment with the agonist beta-naphthoflavone, AHR is rapidly associated with the promoter and recruits the three members of the p160 family of coactivators as well as the p300 histone acetyltransferase, leading to recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and induction of gene transcription. AHR, coactivators, and Pol II cycle on and off the promoter, with a period of approximately 60 min. In contrast, the chemopreventative AHR ligand 3,3'-diindolylmethane promotes AHR nuclear translocation and p160 coactivator recruitment but, remarkably, fails to recruit Pol II or cause histone acetylation. This novel mechanism of receptor antagonism may account for the antitumor properties of chemopreventative compounds targeting the AHR.

Relationships among the cell cycle, cell proliferation, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor expression in PLHC-1 cells.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) ligands such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) cause altered cell proliferation in many tissues in vivo and cell types in vitro, and the AHR has been suggested to play a role in cell cycle regulation in mammalian systems. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects are poorly understood. The overall objective of the present work was to investigate possible interactions between cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and AHR signal transduction in a piscine system, the PLHC-1 cell line, which is being used increasingly in aquatic toxicological research. The specific objectives were to characterize proliferation rates and the cell cycle in these cells, to measure effects of TCDD on cell proliferation, and to determine if expression of the AHR varies during the cell cycle. The doubling time of PLHC-1 cells was determined to be 22 h, and the durations of the G1, S and G2/M stages of the cell cycle were 13, 3, and 6 h, respectively. A minimum seeding density of 1.2 x 10(5) cells/cm(2) in medium with 10% calf serum and 0.3 x 10(5) cells/cm(2) in 10% fetal bovine serum was found to be required for subsequent proliferation. Of several cell cycle inhibitors tested, only aphidicolin and nocodazole were effective for obtaining synchronous cell populations. TCDD was found to inhibit PLHC-1 cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner in multiple passages of one sub-clone, but not in several other sub-clones. Neither AHR mRNA nor protein expression varied during the cell cycle, as measured by RT-PCR and specific binding of [(3)H]TCDD in synchronous PLHC-1 cells. This work establishes techniques for identifying and characterizing possible interactions between the cell cycle and AHR signal transduction in PLHC-1 cells. Taken together, the results indicate that PLHC-1 cells are amenable to analysis of AHR-cell cycle interactions, but that heterogeneity of sub-clones may complicate their use for investigating AHR-mediated changes in proliferation.

Serum withdrawal leads to reduced aryl hydrocarbon receptor expression and loss of cytochrome P4501A inducibility in PLHC-1 cells.

Changes in the expression of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) have been documented in several systems and in response to a variety of treatments. The significance of these findings is unclear, because the effects of such changes on subsequent responses to AHR ligands seldom have been measured. We tested the ability of changes in serum used in cell culture medium to alter expression of the AHR and induction of cytochrome P4501A (CYP1A) in PLHC-1 teleost hepatoma cells. Culture of early-passage cells in serum-free medium for 2 days led to a loss of CYP1A inducibility by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). In contrast, culture in 10% delipidated calf serum increased the TCDD-induced levels of both CYP1A protein and enzymatic activity relative to levels in cells cultured in 10% complete calf serum. These effects were consistent between 8 and 24hr post-treatment, indicating that the kinetics of induction were unaffected. In cells cultured in serum-free medium for 1 and 2 days there was a progressive loss of CYP1A inducibility. This loss of response paralleled a time-dependent decline in AHR protein, as measured by specific binding of [3H]TCDD. Using an operational model for AHR action in PLHC-1 cells, the measured reduction in AHR could be shown to predict the loss of CYP1A induction. Expression of AHR protein was unaffected by culture in 10% delipidated serum. The effects of serum-free medium and delipidated serum were found only in early-passage cells; inducibility of CYP1A and expression of AHR protein in late-passage cells were unaffected by serum withdrawal. Comparison of early- and late-passage cells revealed a 2-fold greater rate of proliferation in the latter, suggesting that a growth advantage is coincident with loss of the serum-dependency of AHR expression. These results provide a quantitative link between changes in receptor expression and a downstream response, establishing a foundation for future studies of receptor expression and sensitivity to toxic responses in vitro and in vivo.