Is there a role for the use of aviation assessment instruments in surgical training preparation? A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Selection for surgical residency programmes could potentially be improved through pretraining preparation, after assessment of surgical candidates' sensorimotor skills and personality traits. Existing aviation pilot selection instruments are available to test sensorimotor skills and personality traits. This study examined selected instruments to assess medical trainees' sensorimotor skills and personality traits. METHODS: Aviation's validated computer-based Computerized Pilot Aptitude and Screening System (COMPASS) and Checklist Professional Profile (CPP) were applied to 166 final year medical students during a surgical clerkship between 2013 and 2015. RESULTS: All trainees completed COMPASS and CPP within the prescribed 2 hours. Compared with an age-matched and gender-matched cohort of 165 pilot candidates, medical trainees scored significantly higher on eye-hand coordination (p<0.001), need for variation (p<0.001), empathy (p=0.006), helpfulness (p<0.001) and autonomy (p<0.001). Pilot candidates scored higher on eye-hand-foot coordination (p<0.001), spatial orientation (p<0.001), persuasiveness (p<0.001), stress tolerance (p<0.001), dominance (p<0.001), ambition (p<0.001) and resilience (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Final year medical trainees from one medical school were able to complete aviation's sensorimotor skills and personality traits selection instruments within the set time frame. They scored differently from aviation trainees on selected skills and personality traits. The applicability and utility of aviation instruments to presurgical training preparation remains to be tested.

Walk the talk: leaders' enacted priority of safety, incident reporting, and error management.

PURPOSE: The main goal of the current research was to investigate whether and how leaders in health care organizations can stimulate incident reporting and error management by "walking the safety talk" (enacted priority of safety). DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Open interviews (N = 26) and a cross-sectional questionnaire (N = 183) were conducted at the Rotterdam Eye Hospital (REH) in The Netherlands. FINDINGS: As hypothesized, leaders' enacted priority of safety was positively related to incident reporting and error management, and the relation between leaders' enacted priority of safety and error management was mediated by incident reporting. The interviews yielded rich data on (near) incidents, the leaders' role in (non)reporting, and error management, grounding quantitative findings in concrete case descriptions. RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: We support previous theorizing by providing empirical evidence showing that (1) enacted priority of safety has a stronger relationship with incident reporting than espoused priority of safety and (2) the previously implied positive link between incident reporting and error management indeed exists. Moreover, our findings extend our understanding of behavioral integrity for safety and the mechanisms through which it operates in medical settings. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings indicate that for the promotion of incident reporting and error management, active reinforcement of priority of safety by leaders is crucial. VALUE/ORIGINALITY: Social sciences researchers, health care researchers and health care practitioners can utilize the findings of the current paper in order to help leaders create health care systems characterized by higher incident reporting and more constructive error handling.

Quality of care from the perspective of the cataract patient. QUOTE cataract questionnaire.

PURPOSE: To examine the potential of a questionnaire (QUOTE Cataract) to measure quality of care from the perspective of cataract patients in quality-assurance or improvement programs. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, and Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. METHODS: Cataract patients (N = 540) who had cataract surgery 2 to 8 months previously rated 31 quality-of-care aspects in terms of importance (range 0, not important, to 10, extremely important) and performance (0 = yes, 1 = no). An arithmetic combination of the 2 parameters was used to generate quality-impact factors (Q) (range 0, best quality of care, to 10, this aspect needs improvement according to every respondent). The goal was to identify bottlenecks in the quality of care. RESULTS: Patients scored aspects concerning patient education as the most important quality aspects. The top 3 quality-impact factors were to inform patients what to do in emergency situations (Q = 3.39), inform patients about the risks of treatment (Q = 3.00), and minimize the number of ophthalmologists to 1 per patient (Q = 2.79). CONCLUSIONS: The QUOTE Cataract Questionnaire effectively measured quality of care in cataract surgery patients in different hospital settings and provided practical information for quality-assurance programs.

Factors related to fear in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a qualitative study focusing on factors associated with fear and reassurance among patients who need to undergo cataract surgery.

The aim was to identify factors that are related to fear among patients who need to undergo cataract surgery. The data were collected by focus group interviews (n=27). The doctor-patient relationship, patient education, the wait, hospital organization, social support, sensations, previous experience, outcome of surgery, and coping strategies were identified as the main factors that contribute to feelings of fear related to cataract surgery. Five stages of fear were identified: at home after diagnosis, during preparation for surgery at the hospital, the day of surgery, the post-operative visits, and the period after these follow-up visits at home. A model regarding the factors related to fear in patients awaiting cataract surgery was developed, which emphasizes the importance of a good doctor-patient relationship, and the need for patient education that is tailored to the individual patients.