Prevalence of Carnitine Deficiency and Decreased Carnitine Levels in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Carnitine deficiency is common in patients on dialysis. Serum free carnitine concentration is significantly lower in patients on hemodialysis (HD) than in healthy individuals. However, there are few reports on serum free carnitine concentration in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS: We examined serum concentrations of total, free, and acylcarnitine and the acylcarnitine/free carnitine ratio in 34 PD and 34 age-, sex-, and dialysis duration-matched HD patients. We investigated the prevalence of carnitine deficiency and clinical factors associated with carnitine deficiency in the PD group. RESULTS: Prevalence of carnitine deficiency was 8.8% in the PD group and 17.7% in the HD group (p = 0.283). High risk of carnitine deficiency was found in 73.5% of the PD group and 76.4% of the HD group (p = 0.604). Carnitine insufficiency was found in 82.3% of the PD group and 88.2% of HD group (p = 0.733). Multivariate analysis revealed that duration of dialysis and age were independent predictors of serum free carnitine level in the PD group. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of carnitine deficiency, high risk of carnitine deficiency, and carnitine insufficiency in PD patients was 8.8%, 73.5%, and 82.3%, respectively. These rates were comparable to those in patients on HD.

Prevalence of Carnitine Deficiency and Decreased Carnitine Levels in Patients on Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) are known to be at risk of carnitine deficiency. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of carnitine deficiency in patients on dialysis and to compare the likelihood of a reduction in the serum carnitine level on HD with that on hemodiafiltration (HDF). METHODS: The prevalence of carnitine deficiency, defined as a serum free carnitine level < 20 µmol/L, and that of carnitine insufficiency, defined as an acyl/free carnitine ratio > 0.4, was investigated in 150 patients on dialysis. The reduction rate of serum carnitine was then compared between HD and HDF. RESULTS: The prevalence of carnitine deficiency and that of carnitine insufficiency was 25.3 and 86.7%, respectively. Patients at high risk of carnitine deficiency accounted for 64.7%. Multivariate regression identified an association of duration of dialysis with the free serum carnitine level. The reduction rates of serum free carnitine in HD and HDF were 64 ± 4 and 75 ± 7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence rates of carnitine deficiency and carnitine insufficiency were high in patients on dialysis. The serum carnitine reduction rate was greater with HDF than with HD.

Correlation between Aortic Calcification Score and Biochemical Parameters in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between aortic calcification and demographic and biochemical parameters in hemodialysis patients. SUMMARY: Calcification scores of the aortic arch and abdominal aorta were determined from multi-slice computed tomography scans and evaluated according to the Agatston score. The associations between demographic and biochemical parameters and aortic calcification score were determined. In total, 190 patients were included in the study. There was a significant positive correlation between aortic calcification scores and age, duration of hemodialysis, cardiothoracic ratio, normalized protein catabolic rate, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), serum markers of mineral metabolism, and inflammation. A significant negative correlation was found between aortic calcification scores and platelet count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, duration of hemodialysis, baPWV, phosphate, calcium and phosphate (Ca×P) product, parathyroid hormone, and C-reactive protein levels were independent risk factors for calcification of the aortic arch, while baPWV and Ca×P product were independent risk factors for calcification of the abdominal aorta. Key Messages: Aortic calcification scores correlate with age, duration of hemodialysis, and several biochemical parameters of inflammation and mineral metabolism.

Efficacy of L-carnitine supplementation for improving lean body mass and physical function in patients on hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Carnitine deficiency is common in patients on hemodialysis. However, the efficacy of L-carnitine supplementation for improving lean body mass (LBM) and physical function has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled trial, 91 patients on hemodialysis who developed carnitine deficiency were randomly assigned to receive injections of 1,000 mg L-carnitine 3 times per week after each hemodialysis session (L-carnitine group) or no injections (control group) with monitoring for 12 months. RESULTS: The data for 84 of the 91 patients were available for analysis (L-carnitine group, n = 42; control group, n = 42). Dry weight and body mass index did not significantly change in the L-carnitine group, but significantly decreased in the control group. Arm muscle area (AMA) did not change significantly in the L-carnitine group but decreased significantly in the control group; the difference in mean AMA between the groups was 6.22% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.90-10.5; P = 0.037). Hand grip strength did not change significantly in the L-carnitine group, but decreased significantly in the control group. The difference in change in hand grip strength between the groups was 4.27% (95% CI 0.42-8.12; P = 0.030). Furthermore, LBM did not change significantly in the L-carnitine group but decreased significantly in the control group; the difference in mean LBM between the groups was 2.92 % (95% CI 1.28-4.61; P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: L-carnitine supplementation is useful in patients who develop carnitine deficiency on hemodialysis because it maintains physical function and LBM.

Effects of Levocarnitine on Cardiac Function and Renal Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Carnitine deficiency is a common condition in hemodialysis patients. There have been numerous reports on the efficacy of levocarnitine therapy in hemodialysis patients, including different views. Reported effects of levocarnitine are: (1) improvement of renal anemia, (2) improvement of cardiac functions, (3) effects on muscle spasm and asthenia, (4) anti-atherogenic effects, (5) anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, and (6) inhibitory effects on dialysis hypotension. SUMMARY: Here, I present the effects of levocarnitine on renal anemia in hemodialysis patients with carnitine deficiency, focusing on the effect on dose reduction in erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and the influence on erythropoiesis resistance index. We also describe the effects on cardiac functions based on changes in cardiac ultrasonography. Key Message: To confirm the efficacy of levocarnitine therapy clinical studies would be required as well as the study of carnitine supplementation therapy for hemodialysis patients with carnitine deficiency.

Levocarnitine Injections Decrease the Need for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Hemodialysis Patients with Renal Anemia.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of levocarnitine injection for renal anemia in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients on maintenance hemodialysis at our hospital to receive levocarnitine injections (n = 30) or no injection (n = 30) and monitored the patients during 12 months of treatment. In the treatment group, patients received an injection of levocarnitine 1,000 mg 3 times weekly after hemodialysis sessions. All patients received recombinant human erythropoietin as an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). Response to ESA therapy was determined by calculating the erythropoietin responsiveness index (ERI; ESA dose·kg-1·g-1· dL-1·week-1). RESULTS: (1) The target levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit were maintained during the study period in both the levocarnitine group and the control group. (2) The dose of ESAs required to maintain these levels decreased gradually in the levocarnitine group and was significantly lower at 6 and 12 months than at study initiation. Furthermore, the dose of ESAs was significantly lower than that in the control group at 12 months. (3) The ERI showed a significant decrease at 6 and 12 months in the levocarnitine group, with a significant difference between the 2 groups at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that levocarnitine administration can reduce the dose of ESAs required in patients with renal anemia on hemodialysis and improve the response to ESA therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Pregabalin is a gamma aminobutyric acid derivative administered for neuropathic pain. It binds to α2δ subunits of voltage-dependent calcium channels, and inhibits calcium inflow of synapses and the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS: This study was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multi-center trial. Patients were treated with an initial dose of pregabalin at 25 mg; this was then increased up to a maximum of 150 mg depending on the patient during a 12-week study period. Visual Analog Scale, Eight-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8), and laboratory data were collected at baseline and the end of the study. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients with peripheral neuropathic pain were included, of whom 35 patients were analyzed. The final mean dose of pregabalin was 50.7 mg daily. Mean Visual Analog Scale scores significantly decreased from 52.4 mm at baseline to 34.1 mm at the end of the study (p < 0.0001). Scores for all eight categories of the SF-8 significantly increased compared with baseline (p < 0.05). Both physical and mental component summary scores of the SF-8 also significantly increased (p < 0.05). Ten patients were withdrawn from the study because of drowsiness, dizziness, and invalidity; however, no serious adverse drug reactions were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: If adverse effects are carefully monitored and the administered dosage prudently determined, pregabalin can be an effective treatment for peripheral neuropathic pain in patients undergoing hemodialysis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000023117.

Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy: A randomized open-label prospective trial.

AIMS: Saxagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor that was approved in Japan for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in 2013. We examined its efficacy and safety in Japanese hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, parallel-group study, Japanese hemodialysis patients were randomized to receive either oral saxagliptin (2.5mg/day) or usual care (control group) for 24weeks. Before randomization, patients received fixed doses of conventional antidiabetic drugs (oral drugs and/or insulin) for 8weeks; these drugs were continued during the study. Endpoints included changes in glycated albumin (GA), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and adverse events. RESULTS: Both groups included 41 patients. Mean GA, HbA1c, and PPG decreased significantly in the saxagliptin group (-3.4%, -0.6% [-7mmol/mol], and -38.3mg/dL, respectively; all P<0.0001) but not in the control group (0%, -0.1% [-1mmol/mol], and -3.7mg/dL, respectively) (P<0.0001, P<0.001, and P<0.0001, respectively). In saxagliptin-treated patients, the reduction in GA was significantly greater when saxagliptin was administered as monotherapy than in combination therapy (-4.2% vs. -3.0%, P=0.012) despite similar baseline values (24.5% vs. 23.3%). Reductions in GA, HbA1c, and PPG were greater in patients whose baseline values exceeded the median (23.8% for GA, 6.6% for HbA1c, and 180mg/dL for PPG). There were no adverse events associated with saxagliptin. CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin (2.5mg/day) was effective and well tolerated when used as monotherapy or combined with other antidiabetic drugs in Japanese hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000018445.

Levocarnitine Improves Cardiac Function in Hemodialysis Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Levocarnitine deficiency in hemodialysis patients is common. Although the effect of levocarnitine therapy on uremic anemia has been studied in small trials, its effects on cardiac function remain unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, open-label, parallel, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis with carnitine deficiency (free carnitine plasma concentration < 40µmol/L) enrolled in 3 hemodialysis centers. INTERVENTION: Random assignment to treatment for 12 months with oral levocarnitine therapy at a dose of 20mg/kg/d or control group (no levocarnitine therapy). OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography. The primary end point was change in ejection fraction from baseline at the end of the study. Secondary end points included changes in left ventricular mass index and clinical parameters from baseline at the end of the study. RESULTS: 222 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 148 patients (levocarnitine group, n=75; control group, n=73) were analyzed. Ejection fraction increased from baseline to the end of the study in the levocarnitine group by 5.43% (95% CI, 4.53%-6.32%), but not in the control group (change, -0.14%; between-group difference, 5.57% [95% CI, 4.48%-6.66%]; P<0.001). Left ventricular mass index decreased from baseline to the end of the study in the levocarnitine group (change of -8.89 [95% CI, -11.7 to -6.09] g/m(2)), but not in the control group (change of 1.62g/m(2); between-group difference, 10.50 [95% CI, 7.51 to 13.60] g/m(2); P<0.001). Levocarnitine therapy reduced N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and improved the erythropoietin responsiveness index, whereas no such effects were observed in the control group. LIMITATIONS: Not a double-blinded study. CONCLUSIONS: Levocarnitine therapy is useful for hemodialysis patients with carnitine deficiency; these patients may benefit from such therapy, with amelioration of cardiac function and reduction of left ventricular mass index.

Association of restless legs syndrome with oxidative stress and inflammation in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing hemodialysis, but clinical factors predictive of RLS risk and severity have not been identified. The aims of this multicenter cross-sectional study were to document RLS prevalence and severity in patients undergoing hemodialysis and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: One-hundred and fifty-nine stable patients on maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled (113 men, 46 women; mean age: 68 ± 11 years; mean duration of dialysis: 54 ± 60 months). Diagnosis of RLS was based on the criteria proposed by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG), and RLS severity was assessed using the IRLSSG Severity Scale. Potential factors associated with RLS and IRLSSG Severity Scale score were assessed by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: RLS affected 22% of the study population. The RLS subgroup had a significantly longer duration of hemodialysis and higher cardiothoracic ratio compared to the non-RLS subgroup. The RLS subgroup also had significantly higher serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, ferritin, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and a significantly lower transferrin saturation level compared to the non-RLS subgroup, suggesting a chronic inflammatory state and associated oxidative stress in comorbid patients. Serum 8-OHdG level was an independent risk factor for high IRLSSG Severity Scale score. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the high prevalence of RLS among hemodialysis patients and identifies the oxidative stress marker serum 8-OHdG as a significant independent predictor of RLS severity. Further studies are needed to identify detailed risk factors and the pathophysiological role of oxidative stress in RLS.

Oral zinc supplementation reduces the erythropoietin responsiveness index in patients on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis (HD) patients, zinc depletion caused by inadequate intake, malabsorption, and removal by HD treatment leads to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) hyporesponsiveness. This study investigated the effects of zinc supplementation in HD patients with zinc deficiency on changes in the erythropoietin responsiveness index (ERI). METHODS: Patients on HD with low serum zinc levels (<65 µg/dL) were randomly assigned to two groups: The polaprezinc group (who received daily polaprezinc, containing 34 mg/day of zinc) (n = 35) and the control group (no supplementation) (n = 35) for 12 months. All the 70 patients had been taking epoetin alpha as treatment for renal anemia. ERI was measured with the following equation: Weekly ESA dose (units)/dry weight (kg)/hemoglobin (g/dL). RESULTS: There were no significant changes in hemoglobin levels within groups or between the control and polaprezinc groups during the study period. Although reticulocyte counts were increased immediately after zinc supplementation, this change was transient. Serum zinc levels were significantly increased and serum copper levels were significantly decreased in the polaprezinc group after three months; this persisted throughout the study period. Although there was no significant change in the serum iron or transferrin saturation levels in the polaprezinc group during the study period, serum ferritin levels significantly decreased following polaprezinc treatment. Further, in the polaprezinc group, ESA dosage and ERI were significantly decreased at 10 months and nine months, respectively, as compared with the baseline value. Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that the change in the serum zinc level was an independent predictor of lowered ERI. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc supplementation reduces ERI in patients undergoing HD and may be a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with renal anemia and low serum zinc levels.

Effects of levocarnitine on brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease patients often exhibit a deficiency in L-carnitine due to loss during hemodialysis (HD). We studied the effects of L-carnitine supplementation on brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), a marker of atherosclerosis, in HD patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel controlled, multi-center trial testing the anti-atherosclerotic efficacy of oral L-carnitine administration (20 mg/kg/day). HD patients (n = 176, mean age, 67.2 ± 10.3 years old; mean duration of HD, 54 ± 51 months) with plasma free L-carnitine deficiency (<40 µmol/L) were randomly assigned to the oral L-carnitine group (n = 88) or control group (n = 88) and monitored during 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline clinical variables between the L-carnitine and control groups. L-carnitine supplementation for 12 months significantly increased total, free, and acyl carnitine levels, and reduced the acyl/free carnitine ratio. The baPWV value decreased from 2085 ± 478 cm/s at baseline to 1972 ± 440 cm/s after six months (p < 0.05) to 1933 ± 363 cm/s after 12 months (p < 0.001) of L-carnitine administration, while no significant changes in baPWV were observed in the control group. Baseline baPWV was the only factor significantly correlated with the decrease in baPWV. CONCLUSIONS: L-carnitine supplementation significantly reduced baPWV in HD patients. L-carnitine may be a novel therapeutic strategy for preventing the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES: The potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor alogliptin improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes through incretin hormone-mediated increases in both α- and ß-cell responsiveness to glucose. In this study, the efficacy and safety of alogliptin in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) were evaluated. METHODS: A prospective, open-label study of 30 patients (male/female: 24/6; mean age: 69.7 ± 1.7 years) with type 2 diabetes who were undergoing HD without insulin injection therapy was conducted. Patients were administered 6.25 mg/day alogliptin and efficacy and safety were determined by monitoring clinical and laboratory parameters during the 48-week study period. RESULTS: After 48 weeks, alogliptin had decreased postprandial plasma glucose levels from 212 ± 8 mg/dL baseline to 156 ± 7 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c levels from 7.1 ± 0.2% baseline to 6.3 ± 0.2% and glycated albumin (GA) levels from 25.6 ± 0.6% baseline to 20.7 ± 0.4% (all p < 0.0001). Alogliptin efficacy did not differ according to median age or body mass index, but the GA reduction was significantly greater in the antidiabetic agents-naïve group. The magnitude of GA reduction was baseline GA-dependent, being greater at higher baseline GA levels. No serious adverse effects, such as hypoglycemia or liver impairment, were observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: Alogliptin as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents improved glycemic control and was generally well tolerated in patients with HD over a 48-week period.

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis.

The potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes through incretin hormone-mediated increases in both α- and ß-cell responsiveness to glucose. We conducted a prospective, open-label, parallel group, controlled study of 51 patients with type 2 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) during the 24-week study period. Patients were assigned to two groups: the vildagliptin group (n = 30) and the control group (n = 21). Vildagliptin was administered at 50 mg/day for the first 8 weeks. Then doses were titrated by dose-doubling to a maximum of 100 mg/day if hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or glycated albumin (GA) target levels had not been reached. No vildagliptin was administered to the controls. The average final dose of vildagliptin was 80 ± 5 mg daily. After 24 weeks, vildagliptin had decreased average HbA1c levels from 6.7 % baseline to 6.1 %, average GA levels from 24.5 % baseline to 20.5 % and average postprandial plasma glucose levels from 186 mg/dL baseline to 140 mg/dL (all p < 0.0001). In the control group, we observed no such changes. Vildagliptin efficacy did not differ according to age or body mass index, but the GA reduction was significantly greater in the anti-diabetic agents-naïve group. Furthermore, in patients with higher baseline GA levels, a higher vildagliptin dosage was required to produce a noticeable effect. No serious adverse effects such as hypoglycemia or liver impairment were observed in any patient. Vildagliptin was effective as a treatment for diabetic patients undergoing HD.

Zinc-finger transcriptional factor Sall1 induces angiogenesis by activation of the gene for VEGF-A.

Zinc-finger transcriptional factor Sall1 modulates gene expression and regulates organogenesis, including kidney development. Angiogenesis induced by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is also required for organogenesis. We investigated whether Sall1 induces angiogenesis through VEGF gene activation. Sall1 gene transfer induced marked neovascularization in rat cornea and in mouse embryoid bodies (EBs). The neovascularization in EBs was abolished by co-administration of anti-VEGF antibody. Sall1 gene transfer in Swiss 3T3 cells significantly increased the expression of VEGF-A mRNA but did not markedly increase the expression of fibroblast growth factor-2, epidermal growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor and ETS-1 mRNA. Sall1 gene transfer significantly increased VEGF-A protein levels in conditioned medium from cultured fibroblasts. Sall1 gene transfer significantly increased VEGF-A promoter activity in HEK293T cells as compared with cells transfected with mock vector or truncated Sall1. These results suggest that Sall1 induces angiogenesis by stimulating VEGF-A promoter activity.

Evaluation of serum fetuin-A relationships with biochemical parameters in patients on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Complications associated with atherosclerosis in dialysis patients are attracting attention. Fetuin-A, a circulating calcium-regulatory glycoprotein that inhibits vascular calcification, is associated with inflammation and outcome in dialysis patients. In this study, the relation between serum fetuin-A concentration and biochemical parameters in patients on hemodialysis was investigated. METHODS: Forty hemodialysis patients, 22 men and 18 women, aged 57 +/- 12 years; and 20 controls, 10 men and 10 women, aged 50 +/- 10 years, participated in this study. We measured serum fetuin-A by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The biochemical parameters of serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone, total cholesterol, triglyceride, lipoprotein (a), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), hemoglobin, and hematocrit in whole blood were also measured before starting dialysis sessions. Other parameters included the cardio ankle vascular index, age, mean arterial pressure, total weekly urea clearance (Kt/V), smoking habit, body mass index (BMI), and duration of dialysis. These variables were included in simple regression analysis. RESULTS: Levels of serum fetuin-A in the hemodialysis patients (331 +/- 55 microg/ml) were significantly lower than those in the healthy controls (361 +/- 55 microg/ml; P < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between serum fetuin-A levels and duration of dialysis (r = -0.37, P < 0.01), BNP (r = -0.37, P < 0.001), and hsCRP (r = -0.40, P < 0.01), and a positive association with serum albumin (r = 0.31, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a low fetuin-A level is a useful predictor of malnutrition and inflammation, as well as being a useful predictor of the cardiac failure caused by an increased ventricular load in hemodialysis patients.

A case report of hemodialysis intolerance with eosinophilia.

We report the case of a patient who developed eosinophilia during hemodialysis and became intolerant to dialysis therapy. The patient, a 40-year-old woman, was initiated on hemodialysis for end-stage renal failure caused by chronic glomerulonephritis. After starting on dialysis, her eosinophil count gradually increased. During the ninth session, she developed abdominal pain of an unknown cause after approximately 1 h of dialysis. The symptom, which persisted in the following sessions, was considered to be a dialysis-related complication. We attempted different dialyzers and anticoagulants, but without improvement. The dialysis therapy was discontinued and steroid treatment was given. The hypereosinophilic condition improved rapidly and dialysis therapy was restarted successfully without causing abdominal pain. To investigate the cause of this problem, we measured the leukocyte count and anaphylatoxin C3a level in peripheral blood during dialysis, and compared the results before and after steroid treatment. The results showed that the significant decrease in the leukocyte count observed before steroid treatment was reduced to a mild decrease after steroid treatment. In contrast, C3a did not show a significant difference between the values obtained before and after steroid treatment. These findings suggest that eosinophilia played an important role in the etiology of dialysis intolerance and that C3a was not involved in the decrease in leukocytes under the conditions experienced by the present patient.

Correction of copper deficiency improves erythropoietin unresponsiveness in hemodialysis patients with anemia.

We have encountered five hemodialysis patients who had received enteral nutrition and recovered from erythropoietin-resistant anemia with neutropenia after the correction of copper deficiency. We reduced the required doses of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) to maintain the target hematocrit levels and three patients were finally weaned from the rHuEPO therapy. Thus, copper deficiency is involved in erythropoietin-resistant anemia in hemodialysis patients.

The influence of uremic serum on interleukin-1beta and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

We investigated whether or not uremic serum has an influence on IL-1beta and IL-1Ra production by normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Four groups of subjects were divided into healthy controls and non-dialyzed patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. We examined cytokine concentrations and cytokine production by PBMC from a normal subject at the density of 2.5 x 10(6) cells/mL incubated with 25% serum in the medium and serum containing polymyxin-B or lipopolysaccharides (LPS). IL-1Ra concentrations in the serum of the uremic groups were significantly higher than those of the controls. In IL-1beta production by PBMC in medium with both serum and serum containing polymyxin-B, these values in the uremic groups were significantly higher than in the controls. In IL-1Ra production with serum containing polymyxin-B, these values in the uremic groups were significantly higher than in the controls. In contrast, in IL-1Ra production by PBMC in medium with serum containing LPS, these values in the uremic groups were significantly lower than in the controls. It was concluded that uremic serum not only contains nonendotoxemic cytokine-inducing substances, but also shows impaired cytokine production by PBMC in response to LPS.

Prolonged protective effect of short daily hemodialysis against dialysis-induced hypotension.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Short daily hemodialysis (HD) has a protective effect against dialysis-induced hypotension (DIH). We examined whether this effect extends beyond the treatment period. METHODS: We analyzed clinical variables in 6 patients (5 with diabetes mellitus) who underwent conventional hemodialysis (CHD) for 4 h three times weekly for 12 weeks; then short daily HD for 2 h six times weekly for 12 weeks, and then 12 more weeks of CHD. All patients had been given vasopressors for severe DIH. RESULTS: The severe DIH disappeared during the short daily HD. There were significant decreases in body weight (BW), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), blood pressure (BP), normal saline solution (NSS) amount (62.8 +/- 26.4 vs. 9.8 +/- 7.4 ml/session, p < 0.05), frequency (0.60 +/- 0.26 vs. 0.10 +/- 0.07 infusions/session, p < 0.05) and postdialysis atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) (176.8 +/- 56.4 vs. 104.8 +/- 42.3 pg/ml, p < 0.05). Weekly ultrafiltration volume (6.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.7 l, p < 0.05) was significantly higher during the short daily HD period than during the first CHD period. The vasopressor treatment was therefore stopped or reduced in all patients during the short daily HD period. Because DIH recurred in the second CHD period despite a significant increase in BP, the vasopressor treatment was resumed in 5 patients. BW, CTR, NSS infusion amount and frequency, or postdialysis ANP did not differ significantly between the short daily HD and second CHD periods. CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of short daily HD against DIH lasted more than 12 weeks after the treatment ended. We therefore conclude that temporary short daily HD is useful for preventing DIH.