Lasers in the era of evidence-based medicine.

Transvaginal laser therapies are being increasingly used for a variety of indications, particularly genitourinary syndrome of the menopause and stress urinary incontinence. This article reviews the current data pertaining to the place of these devices in current clinical practice. Whilst there has been a rapid increase in the number of publications over the last few years, many of the studies are of small numbers, short duration, and poor quality and are device-sponsored. The evidence suggests that vaginal laser therapy with either the erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser (FotonaSmooth®) or the CO2 laser (MonaLisa Touch®) is an effective intervention for the relief of symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy in symptomatic women. The benefits of three laser treatments appear to last for at least 12 months and the procedure is generally well tolerated, with transient minor discomfort being the most common adverse event. Whilst the vaginal laser certainly has the potential to be an alternative treatment to vaginal estrogens for those groups of women, such as breast cancer patients, who cannot take them, there are still many unanswered questions about the role of vaginal laser therapy in clinical practice, particularly in relation to standard conservative management. The place of vaginal laser therapy in other conditions such as stress urinary incontinence is less clear. The outcomes from several ongoing randomized trials should help to answer some of these questions. In the meantime, the use of vaginal laser devices should be confined to clinical trials.

Hormone replacement therapy in women with past history of endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a common clinical condition and its treatment will often lead to an estrogen deficiency status. As most of these patients are young, they will need to consider hormone replacement therapy. Endometriosis is a hormone-dependent disease and estrogen replacement can be associated with a risk of recurrence or malignant transformation. Only a few studies have addressed this problem. With the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), there is an increased, although undefined, risk of recurrence of endometriosis, especially in known severe cases and in obese patients. Unopposed estrogen appears to carry a higher risk than combined preparations. Delay in starting HRT after pelvic clearance is not of any benefit. After radical surgery for severe endometriosis, women often have much to gain from HRT, particularly in the early years. Benefits of HRT in terms of control of menopausal symptoms, prevention of urogenital atrophy and loss of libido and bone protection are of particular importance. HRT may still have a role in prevention of cardiovascular disease in early menopause, but this remains unproven. Although there is no firm evidence, continuous combined preparations or tibolone would appear to be the optimum choice.

Intranasal salmon calcitonin for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we have studied the effects of intranasal salmon calcitonin (SCT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover over a period of 2 years. Our study comprised 117 Caucasian postmenopausal women, otherwise healthy apart from reduced bone density. They received either intranasal synthetic SCT (200 IU either three times weekly or daily) or placebo. Compared with placebo, daily intranasal calcitonin resulted in no significant bone loss in the lumbar spine, as assessed by dual photon absorptiometry, over the 2-year study period (P < 0.02). In this group, women more than 5 years postmenopause, with the lowest baseline bone mass, showed the greatest response to this treatment, with a total increase placebo in lumbar spine BMD of 3.1%. Significant spinal bone loss (P < 0.005) occurred in women receiving either placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin. Although the rates of bone loss in the proximal femur were not significantly different in the three groups, there were differences over time. Whereas bone loss in the daily calcitonin group was insignificant, women who received placebo or thrice-weekly calcitonin experienced significant bone loss (P < 0. 001). No significant changes in biochemical markers were observed in any group. Therapy was well tolerated and there were no significant treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that intranasal SCT 200 IU daily is effective and safe for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women with reduced bone mass.

Hormone replacement therapy in the aged. A state of the art review.

The use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the immediate postmenopause for the relief of menopausal symptoms and for the prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease is well established. The continuation of treatment beyond the age of 60 years is likely to maximise these long term benefits and there is now increasing evidence to suggest that commencing treatment de novo in women of this age is likely to be beneficial. Many women remain symptomatic well into their sixties and the introduction of HRT at this stage will not only relieve these symptoms but will also conserve bone density and reduce future osteoporotic fracture risk. Furthermore, HRT appears to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, even in those women with pre-existing heart disease. The possible association between HRT and breast cancer remains controversial. Overall, there seems to be a slight increase in risk with long term HRT usage (longer than 10 years) but certain subgroups of women may be more at risk. This review discusses the merits and potential problems of prescribing HRT to the elderly and gives some guidance on the type, dose and route of administration of estrogen and progestogen to be used. Poor compliance with HRT is a major problem and the more widespread use of pretreatment counselling together with a wider range of products should have a positive impact in this area. The final decision about whether to continue or commence HRT in the elderly should be an informed one made by the woman and her clinician together.

Long-term effects of transdermal and oral hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal bone loss.

Transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is now an accepted form of treatment, but the long-term skeletal effects have not been assessed. Sixty-six early postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either transdermal HRT (continuous 17 beta-oestradiol 0.05 mg/day, with 0.25 mg/day of norethisterone acetate added for 14 days of each 28-day cycle) or oral HRT (continuous conjugated equine oestrogens 0.625 mg/day, with 0.15 mg/day dl-norgestrel added for 12 days of each 28-day cycle). Treatment was given for 3 years and 30 matched untreated women were studied concurrently as a control group. Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine and proximal femur by dual-photon absorptiometry at 6-monthly intervals. Bone turnover was assessed by measurement of biochemical markers. At 3 years bone density had declined by 4% in the lumbar spine and by more than 5% in the femoral neck in the untreated group. By comparison bone density increased in both treatment groups at both sites (p < 0.001 vs. untreated) and biochemical measurements indicated a significant reduction in bone turnover. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Twelve per cent of women on transdermal or oral treatments lost a significant amount of bone from the femoral neck by 3 years despite adequate compliance. Women taking therapy primarily for hip fracture prevention may require a follow-up bone density measurement to establish the efficacy of treatment.

Postmenopausal bone loss: does HRT always work?

In a 3-year study comparing oral and transdermal HRT, we measured bone density in the spine and proximal femur by dual-photon absorptiometry. Sixty-six women were randomly allocated to receive either oral conjugated equine oestrogens, 0.625 mg daily, together with cyclical oral dl-norgestrel, 0.15 mg daily, or transdermal 17 beta-oestradiol, 0.05 mg daily, together with cyclical transdermal norethisterone acetate, 0.25 mg daily. We found that only 2% showed significant vertebral bone loss on either treatment, whilst approximately 12% lost from the proximal femur. Compliance was demonstrated by monitoring all used patches and pill packets, recording all side effects and bleeding patterns, and by the demonstration of appropriate changes in levels of gonadal steroids and lipoproteins. Comparing the bone losers with the ten highest gainers, lowers were closer to their menopause but were not different in body mass or life style. Serum oestradiol levels were similar, and both groups showed a similar response in terms of changes in bone biochemical markers and lipoproteins in response to HRT. In thus seems that a small proportion of women do not conserve bone density in the proximal femur with standard doses of HRT. It remains to be determined whether they could be identified by more specific biochemical markers of bone turnover, and whether they would maintain with a higher dose of oestrogen.

Differential effects of transdermal estradiol and sequential progestogens on impedance to flow within the uterine arteries of postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between estradiol (E2), progestogen, and impedance to blood flow in the uterine artery. SUBJECTS: Twelve postmenopausal women treated for two cycles with transdermal E2, 0.05 mg/d, with either norethindrone acetate, 0.7 mg, or medroxyprogesterone acetate, 10 mg added sequentially. MEASUREMENTS: Transvaginal ultrasonography and color flow imaging were used to measure the pulsatility index in the uterine arteries before and during the E2-only and combined E2/progestogen phases. RESULTS: The mean pulsatility index fell to 53% of its pretreatment value within 12 days E2 administration (P < or = 0.0001) and was 66% of its pretreatment value in the combined phase (P < 0.005). Similar changes were seen in cycle 2. Time since menopause was correlated with the pretreatment pulsatility index (r = 0.674, P < 0.05) and change in pulsatility index on treatment (r = 0.856, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Gonadal hormones have a profound effect on arterial tone in postmenopausal women; this action may help explain some of the beneficial effects of estrogen on arterial disease risk.

Continuous combined conjugated equine estrogen-progestogen therapy: effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethindrone acetate on bleeding patterns and endometrial histologic diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the incidence of amenorrhea with continuous combined therapy by using two different progestogens and to determine whether early bleeding predicts subsequent bleeding and endometrial response. STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-nine postmenopausal women on sequential estrogen-progestogen treatment were switched to continuous combined estrogen-progestogen therapy comprising conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg daily with either norethindrone acetate 0.35 mg twice daily or medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg twice daily added continuously for 78 weeks. All bleeding was recorded, and endometrial biopsies were performed at 26 and 78 weeks. RESULTS: Only one third of the women who starting the study had amenorrhea by week 78, but 46 (62%) of these women had withdrawn, mainly because of chronic irregular bleeding. Endometrial atrophy was observed in the majority of biopsy specimens. The two progestogens had similar effects. Bleeding patterns were useful predictors of subsequent bleeding, but not of endometrial response. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent irregular bleeding is common with continuous combined estrogen-progestogen therapy. Women with persistent early bleeding should probably revert to sequential treatment. Regular endometrial sampling is advised.

Comparison of transdermal and oral estrogen-progestin replacement therapy: effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins.

OBJECTIVE: We attempted to ascertain whether transdermal postmenopausal estrogen-progestin therapy has the typical effects of oral therapy on serum lipoprotein risk markers for cardiovascular disease. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-one postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either transdermal continuous 17 beta-estradiol, 0.05 mg/day, with transdermal cyclic norethindrone acetate, 0.25 mg/day, or oral continuous conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625 mg/day, with oral cyclic dl-norgestrel, 0.15 mg/day. Twenty-nine untreated subjects served as controls. Lipoprotein profiles at 3 and 6 months were compared with baseline values by means of analysis of variance. RESULTS: In the estrogen-alone phase both therapies reduced serum levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; high-density lipoproteins were largely unchanged. Oral therapy increased triglycerides whereas this lipid fell with transdermal therapy. In the combined phase of the cycle both therapies reduced triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. CONCLUSION: Transdermal and oral therapies had similar effects on lipoprotein cholesterol but different effects on triglycerides.

The long-term risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy.

There is increasing awareness that the long-term consequences of ovarian failure can be prevented or reduced with appropriate hormone replacement therapy (HRT). After the menopause, there is a rapid loss of trabecular bone resulting in a one in two lifetime risk of osteoporotic fracture. HRT prevents this bone loss and decreases the incidence of fracture. A minimum of 5 years treatment is recommended for significant benefit. Epidemiological evidence is accumulating that post-menopausal oestrogen therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke by between 30 and 70% even in the presence of established risk factors. Given the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, this is likely to be one of the principle benefits of HRT in the next decade. Concerns about the long-term safety of HRT have focused on endometrial and breast cancer. The increase in risk of endometrial cancer associated with oestrogen only therapy is abolished with the sequential addition of a progestogen for 10-12 days each cycle. The possible effect of HRT on breast cancer risk has to be considered against the background of a one in 12 lifetime risk of developing this disease. The epidemiological studies investigating this relationship are reviewed in this paper. There is a broad consensus that 5-6 years duration of HRT does not increase breast cancer risk. Longer durations of therapy (10-15 years) have been reported to increase this risk although not all the data are in agreement. Other factors, such as family history and benign breast disease, may also influence the risk of breast cancer. The potential benefits of HRT on mortality and morbidity are enormous. Against this is a possible small increase in breast cancer risk with long-term usage. Greater awareness of the long term consequences of the menopause and the potential benefits of HRT should be encouraged so that women can make informed decisions about their need for HRT.

Role of oestrogen in the development of osteoporosis.

The evidence now strongly supports a central role for oestrogen in the maintenance of the normal female skeleton. Loss of endogenous oestrogen leads to a period of accelerated bone loss which can be prevented with appropriate oestrogen replacement. The route of administration is not important provided adequate dosages are prescribed. Oestrogens may exert their actions by a direct steroid receptor mechanism or via local and/or systemic factors such as cytokines, prostaglandins or calcitonin. As the requirement for osteoporosis prevention grows, it is essential that the extent of the involvement oestrogen has in skeletal homeostasis is fully recognized.

A risk-benefit assessment of estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women.

Estrogen therapy is extremely effective in relieving menopausal symptoms such as hot flushes, night sweats, urogenital atrophy and certain psychological symptoms. The short term side effects from this therapy are usually mild and self-limiting. They are more common in women who commence hormone replacement therapy some years after the menopause than in those who start treatment at about the time of the ovarian failure. Pre-existing gynaecological conditions such as fibroids and endometriosis can be worsened by estrogen therapy. The majority of published studies suggest a beneficial effect of postmenopausal estrogen therapy on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. These effects may be mediated by favourable changes in lipids, but other mechanisms may also be involved. It is uncertain whether the adverse changes in lipids caused by progestogen therapy will reduce any of the benefits of estrogen therapy on the cardiovascular system. Osteoporosis is the major bone disease of the Western world; long term estrogen therapy will prevent its development in most postmenopausal women. The risk of endometrial carcinoma is increased with unopposed estrogen therapy; this increased risk appears to be abolished if a progestogen is added at an adequate dose and duration for each cycle. The risk of ovarian or cervical cancer is not increased with estrogen therapy. There may be an increased risk of breast carcinoma with long term postmenopausal estrogen use, but the studies show inconsistent results.

Effects of transdermal versus oral hormone replacement therapy on bone density in spine and proximal femur in postmenopausal women.

66 early postmenopausal women were randomised to 28-day cycles of either transdermal hormone replacement therapy--continuous oestradiol 17-beta 0.05 mg daily, with norethisterone acetate 0.25 mg daily for 14 of each 28 days--or oral therapy--continuous conjugated equine oestrogens 0.625 mg daily, with dl-norgestrel 0.15 mg daily for 12 of each 28 days. An untreated reference group of 30 women were studied concurrently. Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine and proximal femur by dual photon absorptiometry at 6-month intervals for 18 months. Skeletal turnover was assessed by serum measurements of calcium, phosphate, and alkaline phosphatase, and by urine estimations of hydroxyproline/creatinine and calcium/creatinine excretion. In both treatment groups by comparison with the untreated groups by comparison with the untreated group, bone density increased in the vertebrae and proximal femur and biochemical measurements indicated a significant reduction in bone turnover.

The role and use of progestogens.

Certain epidemiologic, histologic, and biochemical data on the effects of estrogens and progestogens on the endometrial, physical, psychological, and lipid status of postmenopausal women are reviewed. Unopposed estrogen replacement increases the risk of endometrial cancer not only while treatment is being taken but also for many years after it is discontinued. Strategies must be developed for posttreatment surveillance. The addition of a cyclic progestogen reduces this risk, but it is not clear whether the reduction is to, or below, that observed in an untreated population. Protective doses of C-19 (norethindrone) and C-21 (medroxy-progesterone acetate) progestogens are suggested. All progestogens may cause physical, psychological, and metabolic side effects. In addition, most women taking cyclic progestogens experience regular withdrawal bleeding. Continuous/combined therapy has been introduced to minimize these side effects and induce amenorrhea. Published data on the efficacy and safety of continuous combined therapy are few. Although the regimen is effective in relieving menopausal symptoms and inducing endometrial atrophy in most patients, side effects of progestogen are common and there is a high incidence of bleeding in the first few months, which is unacceptable to many patients. In our view, the effect of continuous combined therapy on lipids and lipoproteins has not been properly addressed. Based upon the available literature, we believe that the enthusiasm for continuous combined therapy is premature and we urge caution in its use until further, more conclusive, data become available.