Predicting the return of bladder function following vaginal native tissue repair using data from a suprapubic catheter regimen.

AIMS: To evaluate time to return of normal voiding function following native tissue vaginal reconstruction and evaluate risk factors for postoperative urinary retention (POUR). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of women undergoing vaginal reconstruction and suprapubic catheter with standardized regimen for voiding trials. Postvoid residual <150 ml at 4 h post catheter clamping was used as surrogate marker for return of bladder function. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for return of bladder function >4 days after surgery. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2018, 148 women underwent surgery, 124 were analyzed. Mean age was 67 years (±11.1), 62.9% (n = 78) had greater than or equal to stage 3 prolapse. Mean time to return of bladder function: 4.1 days (±3.1). Significant risk factors for >4 days to return of bladder function on univariate analysis included (mean ± SD): surgery length (150.4 min ±44.6) (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; confidence interval [CI], 1.12, 1.38); anesthesia length (228.1 min ±53.5) (OR, 1.12; CI: 1.04, 1.23); length of stay (2.2 days ±2.7) (OR, 2.43; CI: 1.11, 5.35); hysterectomy (OR, 3.10; CI: 1.39, 6.90); estimated blood loss (124.4 ml ±64.8) (OR, 1.39; CI: 1.04, 1.87). Postmenopausal status was protective (OR, 0.17; CI: 0.03, 0.92.). On multivariate analysis, significant findings were diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.18; CI: 0.04, 0.93) and surgery length (OR, 1.21; CI: 1.06, 1.38). CONCLUSIONS: Hysterectomy, surgical length and estimated blood loss were significantly associated with delayed return of bladder function after native tissue vaginal reconstruction. This data can help clinicians tailor postoperative voiding trials after failed initial attempt.

Non-bladder centric interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome phenotype is significantly associated with co-occurring endometriosis.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) and endometriosis are coexistent diagnoses in 48%-65% of women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), suggesting that dual screening may be warranted. To further investigate the clinical relationship and risk factors between these two conditions, we performed a retrospective review of our large IC/BPS patient data registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated IC/BPS patients who were prospectively enrolled into our registry who completed validated questionnaires and underwent therapeutic hydrodistension, during which anesthetic bladder capacity (BC) and Hunner's lesion (HL) status were recorded. Demographic/medical history were reviewed. IC/BPS patients with co-occurring endometriosis diagnosis versus those without were compared using descriptive statistics as well as multivariate regression analyses to determine predictors of co-occurring disease. RESULTS: Of 431 IC/BPS participants, 82 (19%) were also diagnosed with endometriosis. These women were significantly younger, had increased prevalence of non-low BC (> 400 cc), and decreased prevalence of HL (p < 0.05). Patients with co-occurring endometriosis also had increased prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), CPP, fibromyalgia, and vulvodynia (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, non-low BC (OR 4.53, CI 1.004-20.42, p = 0.049), CPP (OR 1.84, CI 1.04-3.24, p = 0.04), and fibromyalgia (OR 1.80, CI 1.03-3.14, p < 0.04) were significantly associated with a diagnosis of endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IC/BPS and co-occurring endometriosis were significantly more likely to carry a non-bladder centric IC/BPS phenotype as well as several comorbid, systemic pain diagnoses. This study characterizes features of a target IC/BPS phenotype that could potentially benefit from endometriosis and systemic pain syndrome screening.

Is a pelvic examination contributory in the initial evaluation of women with recurrent urinary tract infections?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) affect up to 44% of women; evidenced-based guidelines regarding the contributory role of a pelvic examination in these women are lacking. We hypothesize that routine pelvic examination has a limited role in evaluation and management of women with rUTI when appropriate symptoms-based screening is performed and normal post-void residual volume (PVR) is confirmed. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of women ages 18-85 years presenting to Wake Forest Pelvic Health Center with two culture-proven UTIs in 6 months or three UTIs in 12 months with a documented pelvic examination. Pregnant women were excluded. Data extraction included demographics, medical history, screening assessment of vaginal bulge symptoms, urine culture results, imaging, physical/pelvic examination findings, PVR, treatment recommendations and outcomes within 1 year of initial assessment. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were performed. RESULTS: Of 160 charts screened, 91 met the inclusion criteria. Nineteen (21%) had symptoms of vaginal bulge, and 14 (17%) had PVR > 100 ml. Pelvic examination provided new/contributory information in eight (8.8%) of women. The negative predictive value of absence of bulge symptoms and normal PVR was 89%. Within 1 year, 41 (46%) reported symptom resolution with rUTI treatment with no difference between those with or without a contributory pelvic examination (p value = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: In women with rUTI who report absence of vaginal bulge symptoms and have a PVR < 100 ml, a pelvic examination provides contributory information in < 10% of women and did not change treatment outcomes.

Peripartum Perineal Hernia: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: This article reviews the literature for the management and repair of perineal hernias and presents a previously undescribed case of perineal bladder herniation after intrapartum pubic symphysis rupture. METHODS: A review of the literature was completed through the PubMed database using the search terms "bladder," "canal of Nuck," "labial hernia," "gynecology," "hernia," "obstetrics," "perineal hernia," "postpartum," "pubic diastasis," "pubic symphysis," "vaginal delivery," "symphyseal rupture," and "symphyseal separation." The electronic medical record for the patient was reviewed and used with the consent of the patient. RESULTS: There were no reports of peripartum perineal hernias in the English language literature on human subjects. Literature review with the previously mentioned search terms demonstrated that there is not a standardized approach to repair given the rarity of these defects. There are data to support the use of mesh as opposed to primary repair but no data to support abdominal versus perineal versus combined approach. We describe a successful repair of a complicated peripartum perineal hernia using a combined abdominal-perineal approach with mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetric trauma is a previously unreported cause of perineal hernias. Perineal hernias are rare conditions that must be considered in any patient who presents with a bulging perineal mass. Puerperal pubic symphysis rupture can lead to a large bladder hernia. Our combined abdominal-perineal approach of repair resulted in minimal perioperative morbidity and short-term resolution of the hernia.