Evaluation of Hemodynamic Alterations after Flow Diverter Placement using the AneurysmFlowTM tool.

Background: AneurysmFlow (Phillips Healthcare) is the flow measurement tool, utilizing an optical flow-based algorithm from DSA, lacks sufficient published studies. This study aimed to assess the significance of flow velocity changes and the Mean Aneurysm Flow Amplitude (MAFA) ratio in evaluating outcomes following flow-diverting treatments. Methods: Between June 2021 and October 2022, 41 patients with 42 aneurysms underwent FDS treatment with AneurysmFlow measu-rement at the Bach Mai Radiology Center. Results: The tool achieved a 90.5% success rate in 38 out of 42 patients. Most aneurysms (89.5%) were small to medium-sized (<10 mm), and a decrease in flow velocity post-stent deployment was ob-served in 78.9% of cases. Conversely, 21.1% showed increased flow, mainly in aneurysms smaller than 5 mm. No significant association was found between flow changes or MAFA ratio and aneurysm size characteristics. Twenty-two patients (59.5%) underwent re-examination at 6 months, revealing no correlation in MAFA ratio between completely and incompletely occluded aneurysms. Conclusions: Our current investigation, primarily centered on small and medium-sized aneurysms, did not uncover any link between quantitative flow changes assessed using the AneurysmFlow software and the occlusion status of aneurysms at the 6-month follow-up post-flow diverter treatment. Larger case series with extended follow-up imaging are necessary to further explore these findings.

Balloon Angioplasty with or without Stenting for Acute Intracranial Atherothrombosis.

Objectives: Due to limited evidence on the optimal strategy for acute atherothrombosis in a large intracranial vessel, we aimed to provide further evidence on the safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty with or without stenting after failed thrombectomy. Materials & Methods: This single-center retrospective study was performed from June 2017 to February 2021. Patients with acute atherothrombosis in large intracranial vessels treated by balloon angioplasty with or without stenting after failed thrombectomy were enrolled and analyzed. Results: A total of 23 patients were recruited. All patients had a moderate stroke and the majority of them had ASPECTS ≥7 (82.6%). MCA was the most commonly affected artery (13 cases), followed by supraclinoid ICA (6 cases), and BA (4 cases). Balloon angioplasty was firstly performed in 15 cases, of which 8 cases required subsequent stenting. Intracranial stenting was firstly performed in 8 cases. Success-ful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 19/23 cases (82.6%) on the final angiogram. Perforated complications occurred in 1/23 cases (4.3%). Good outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days was achieved in 13/23 cases (56.5%) and the mortality rate was 4/23 cases (17.4%). The good clinical outcome rate was significantly higher in patients adapted with balloon angioplasty alone versus intracranial stenting. Conclusions: In the present study, balloon angioplasty with or without stenting was obsversed to be safe and efficient as a rescue therapy after failed thrombectomy for acute atherothrombosis in a large intracranial vessel. Balloon angioplasty should be the first choice and stenting should be performed later in refractory cases.

Effect of mechanical thrombectomy with vs. without intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.

Background: The results of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), wi-thout or with intravenous thrombolysis, were evaluated and compared in 178 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusions (LVO) at Bach Mai Hospital. Methods: A total of 178 patients with AIS due to LVO were assigned to undergo MT alone (MT-alone group) or MT preceded by intravenous alteplase (the combined group), at a dose of 0.9 mg per kilogram, administered within 4.5 hours after symptom onset (combined group). The successful recanalization rate (assessed as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] classification of 2b-3) and the incidence of good clinical recovery outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≤2) after 3 months were analyzed in both groups and compared. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled (median age, 65 years; 55% men; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]: 14.3). Favorable outcomes were reported in 76 patients (66.7%) in the MT-alone group and 42 patients (65.6%) in the com-bined group, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.31 for noninferiority). However, MT alone was associated with a lower percentage of patients with successful reperfusion after MT compared with the combined group (87.7% vs. 90.6%). Mortality at 90 days was 12.2% (14 patients) in the MT-alone group and 17.2% (11 patients) in the combined group. The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was not significantly different between groups (6 [5.3%] vs. 1 [1.6%]; P = 0.42). Conclusion: Among patients with AIS due to LVO in our study, MT alone was noninferior in terms of functional outcomes compared with MT preceded by the administration of intravenous alteplase within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.

Thrombectomy Alone versus Bridging Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Preliminary Results of an Experimental Trial.

Background: For patients with acute large vessel occlusion (ALVO) in the anterior circulation who are able to undergo mechani-cal thrombectomy (MTB) within 4.5 hours, the need for intravenous thrombolysis prior to the intervention remains unclear. Methods: Patients who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, who presented with ALVO in the anterior circulation, and who started MTB within 4.5 hours were matched at a 1:1 ratio to a thrombectomy alone group or to a bridging therapy group. Patients in the bridging therapy group were administered intravenous alteplase at a standard dose of 0.9 mg/kg. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the throm-bectomy alone group compared with the bridging therapy group. Results: From December 2020 to September 2021, 60 patients were recruited in the study and completed the trial. The baseline para-meters of patients were similar between the two groups. At the 90-day follow-up, 18 patients (60%) in the thrombectomy alone group versus 18 patients (60%) in the bridging therapy group achieved functional independence (odds ratio [OR]: 1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-2.81). The successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [TICI] grade 2b to 3) rates on final angiography were 90% and 86.7%, respectively (OR, 0.72, 95% CI, 0.15-3.55). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or 90-day mortality. Conclusion: Our preliminary results did not show the superiority of thrombectomy alone versus standard bridging therapy in patients with ALVO in the anterior circulation who undergo MTB within 4.5 hours. A larger sample size and other randomized controlled trials remain necessary to validate these results.