Opposite modulation of functional recovery following contusive spinal cord injury in mice with oligodendrocyte-selective deletions of Atf4 and Chop/Ddit3.

The integrated stress response (ISR)-activated transcription factors ATF4 and CHOP/DDIT3 may regulate oligodendrocyte (OL) survival, tissue damage and functional impairment/recovery in white matter pathologies, including traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Accordingly, in OLs of OL-specific RiboTag mice, Atf4, Chop/Ddit3 and their downstream target gene transcripts were acutely upregulated at 2, but not 10, days post-contusive T9 SCI coinciding with maximal loss of spinal cord tissue. Unexpectedly, another, OL-specific upregulation of Atf4/Chop followed at 42 days post-injury. However, wild type versus OL-specific Atf4-/- or Chop-/- mice showed similar white matter sparing and OL loss at the injury epicenter, as well as unaffected hindlimb function recovery as determined by the Basso mouse scale. In contrast, the horizontal ladder test revealed persistent worsening or improvement of fine locomotor control in OL-Atf4-/- or OL-Chop-/- mice, respectively. Moreover, chronically, OL-Atf-/- mice showed decreased walking speed during plantar stepping despite greater compensatory forelimb usage. Therefore, ATF4 supports, while CHOP antagonizes, fine locomotor control during post-SCI recovery. No correlation between those effects and white matter sparing together with chronic activation of the OL ISR suggest that in OLs, ATF4 and CHOP regulate function of spinal cord circuitries that mediate fine locomotor control during post-SCI recovery.

Role of circadian rhythms in pathogenesis of acute CNS injuries: Insights from experimental studies.

A wide range of physiological processes show circadian oscillations that are critical for organismal homeostasis. Consequently, disruption of such rhythmicity contributes to the pathogenesis of various chronic diseases. The occurrence, severity, and resolution of acute injuries to the central nervous system may also be modulated by circadian rhythms and/or anti-rhythmic disruptions. Mechanistically, circadian rhythmicity originates from the intrinsic circadian activity of the clock pathway transcription factors that regulate gene expression in a cycle of about 24 h. In addition, their activity is synchronized by external time cues including light, sleep or feeding to produce diurnal rhythms of 24 h. The pathogenic significance of circadian rhythms can be tested experimentally by determining the effects of (i) natural diurnal/circadian time, (ii) time cue manipulations that perturb the rhythmicity, (iii) drugs that target the clock pathway, and (iv) genetic manipulations to inactivate key mediators of the clock pathway. This review summarizes emerging evidence from all those strategies that supports a role of circadian and/or diurnal rhythms in rodent models of stroke, traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, status epilepticus and encephalomyelitis. Potential clinical implications are also considered, including pathogenic effects of the chronodisruptive environment or time of day variability in response to therapeutic interventions. Well-controlled animal studies avoid effects of confounding factors that may complicate interpretation of epidemiological data. They can also help to identify mechanisms that mediate the circadian modulation of a CNS pathology.

Limited changes in locomotor recovery and unaffected white matter sparing after spinal cord contusion at different times of day.

The circadian gene expression rhythmicity drives diurnal oscillations of physiological processes that may determine the injury response. While outcomes of various acute injuries are affected by the time of day at which the original insult occurred, such influences on recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) are unknown. We report that mice receiving moderate, T9 contusive SCI at ZT0 (zeitgeber time 0, time of lights on) and ZT12 (time of lights off) showed similar hindlimb function recovery in the Basso mouse scale (BMS) over a 6 week post-injury period. In an independent study, no significant differences in BMS were observed after SCI at ZT18 vs. ZT6. However, the ladder walking test revealed modestly improved performance for ZT18 vs. ZT6 mice at week 6 after injury. Consistent with those minor effects on functional recovery, terminal histological analysis revealed no significant differences in white matter sparing at the injury epicenter. Likewise, blood-spinal cord barrier disruption and neuroinflammation appeared similar when analyzed at 1 week post injury at ZT6 or ZT18. Therefore, locomotor recovery after thoracic contusive SCI is not substantively modulated by the time of day at which the neurotrauma occurred.