Plasma and tissue concentrations of 2 g prophylactic cefazolin prior to lower extremity surgery.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most clinically relevant complications and the use of prophylactic cefazolin is common practice. However, the knowledge about the pharmacological aspects of prophylactic cefazolin in the lower extremities remains limited. In this prospective cohort, a sub-study of the WIFI-2 randomized controlled trial, adults between 18 and 75 years of age who were scheduled for implant removal below the level of the knee and randomized for cefazolin, was included. A maximum of two venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue samples were taken during surgery. The primary outcomes were the cefazolin concentrations in venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue. A total of 27 patients [median (interquartile range) age, 42 (29-59) years; 17 (63%) male] with 138 samples were included in the study. A minimum of 6 weeks follow-up was available for all patients. The mean (SD) venous plasma, target-site plasma, and target-site tissue concentrations were 36 (13) µg/mL, 29 (13) µg/mL, and 28 (13) µg/g, respectively, and the cefazolin concentrations between the different locations of surgery did not differ significantly in both target-site plasma and target-site tissue (P = 0.822 and P = 0.840). In conclusion, 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin demonstrates adequacy in maintaining coverage for a duration of at least 80 minutes of surgery below the level of the knee, significantly surpassing the MIC90 required to combat the most prevalent microorganisms. This study represents the first of its kind to assess cefazolin concentrations in the lower extremities by examining both plasma and tissue samples in this magnitude.

Fusariosis in patients with hematological malignancies: Two case reports.

Immunosuppressed patients with hematological malignancies are at risk for invasive fungal infections (IFI), including infections with Fusarium species (spp.), which are increasingly reported. Particularly at risk are patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with high-dose cytarabine as remission-induction therapy. Whether cytarabine increases the risk of IFI in comparison to other chemotherapy remains not fully determined. Additionally, no clear correlation between the in vitro established minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungal agents and clinical outcome has been established for fusariosis. To increase awareness and knowledge of invasive fusariosis, we report two cases of Fusarium spp. infections in neutropenic patients following treatment with cytarabine for AML. Despite high MICs for azoles both patients were treated with an azole in combination with liposomal amphotericin B. The combination therapy was successful in one patient, however the other patient did not survive the disseminated Fusarium infection.

Benzylpenicillin concentrations in umbilical cord blood and plasma of premature neonates following intrapartum doses for group B streptococcal prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: Dutch obstetrics guideline suggest an initial maternal benzylpenicillin dose of 2,000,000 IU followed by 1,000,000 IU every 4 h for group-B-streptococci (GBS) prophylaxis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether concentrations of benzylpenicillin reached concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in umbilical cord blood (UCB) and neonatal plasma following the Dutch guideline. RESULTS: Forty-six neonates were included. A total of 46 UCB samples and 18 neonatal plasma samples were available for analysis. Nineteen neonates had mothers that received intrapartum benzylpenicillin. Benzylpenicillin in UCB corresponded to concentrations in plasma drawn directly postpartum (R2 = 0.88, p < 0.01). A log-linear regression suggested that benzylpenicillin concentrations in neonates remained above the MIC threshold 0.125 mg/L up to 13.0 h after the last intrapartum dose. CONCLUSIONS: Dutch intrapartum benzylpenicillin doses result in neonatal concentrations above the MIC of GBS.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Optimization of Ceftazidime in Term Asphyxiated Neonates during Controlled Therapeutic Hypothermia.

Ceftazidime is an antibiotic commonly used to treat bacterial infections in term neonates undergoing controlled therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after perinatal asphyxia. We aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftazidime in asphyxiated neonates during hypothermia, rewarming, and normothermia and propose a population-based rational dosing regimen with optimal PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment. Data were collected in the PharmaCool prospective observational multicenter study. A population PK model was constructed, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed during all phases of controlled TH using targets of 100% of the time that the concentration in the blood exceeds the MIC (T>MIC) (for efficacy purposes and 100% T>4×MIC and 100% T>5×MIC to prevent resistance). A total of 35 patients with 338 ceftazidime concentrations were included. An allometrically scaled one-compartment model with postnatal age and body temperature as covariates on clearance was constructed. For a typical patient receiving the current dose of 100 mg/kg of body weight/day in 2 doses and assuming a worst-case MIC of 8 mg/L for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the PTA was 99.7% for 100% T>MIC during hypothermia (33.7°C; postnatal age [PNA] of 2 days). The PTA decreased to 87.7% for 100% T>MIC during normothermia (36.7°C; PNA of 5 days). Therefore, a dosing regimen of 100 mg/kg/day in 2 doses during hypothermia and rewarming and 150 mg/kg/day in 3 doses during the following normothermic phase is advised. Higher-dosing regimens (150 mg/kg/day in 3 doses during hypothermia and 200 mg/kg/day in 4 doses during normothermia) could be considered when achievements of 100% T>4×MIC and 100% T>5×MIC are desired.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review.

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic with a small therapeutic window that is currently used primarily as part of short-term empirical combination therapy. Gentamicin dosing schemes still need refinement, especially for subpopulations where pharmacokinetics can differ from pharmacokinetics in the general adult population: obese patients, critically ill patients, paediatric patients, neonates, elderly patients and patients on dialysis. This review summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in these patient populations and the consequences for optimal dosing of gentamicin for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, highlighting new insights from the last 10 years. In this period, several new population pharmacokinetic studies have focused on these subpopulations, providing insights into the typical values of the most relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, the variability of these parameters and possible explanations for this variability, although unexplained variability often remains high. Both dosing schemes and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets varied widely between these studies. A gentamicin starting dose of 7 mg/kg based on total body weight (or on adjusted body weight in obese patients) appears to be the optimal strategy for increasing the probability of target attainment (PTA) after the first administration for the most commonly used PK/PD targets in adults and children older than 1 month, including critically ill patients. However, evidence that increasing the PTA results in higher efficacy is lacking; no studies were identified that show a correlation between estimated or predicted PK/PD target attainment and clinical success. Although it is unclear if performing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for optimization of the PTA is of clinical value, it is recommended in patients with highly variable pharmacokinetics, including patients from all subpopulations that are critically ill (such as elderly, children and neonates) and patients on intermittent haemodialysis. In addition, TDM for optimization of the dosing interval, targeting a trough concentration of at least < 2 mg/L but preferably < 0.5-1 mg/L, has proven to reduce nephrotoxicity and is therefore recommended in all patients receiving more than one dose of gentamicin. The usefulness of the daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve for predicting nephrotoxicity should be further investigated. Additionally, more research is needed on the optimal PK/PD targets for efficacy in the clinical situations in which gentamicin is currently used, that is, as monotherapy for urinary tract infections or as part of short-term combination therapy.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Probability of Target Attainment of Different Dosing Regimens of Ceftazidime in Critically Ill Patients with a Proven or Suspected Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection.

Altered pharmacokinetics (PK) of hydrophilic antibiotics in critically ill patients is common, with possible consequences for efficacy and resistance. We aimed to describe ceftazidime population PK in critically ill patients with a proven or suspected Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and to establish optimal dosing. Blood samples were collected for ceftazidime concentration measurement. A population PK model was constructed, and probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed for targets 100% T > MIC and 100% T > 4 × MIC in the first 24 h. Ninety-six patients yielded 368 ceftazidime concentrations. In a one-compartment model, variability in ceftazidime clearance (CL) showed association with CVVH. For patients not receiving CVVH, variability in ceftazidime CL was 103.4% and showed positive associations with creatinine clearance and with the comorbidities hematologic malignancy, trauma or head injury, explaining 65.2% of variability. For patients treated for at least 24 h and assuming a worst-case MIC of 8 mg/L, PTA was 77% for 100% T > MIC and 14% for 100% T > 4 × MIC. Patients receiving loading doses before continuous infusion demonstrated higher PTA than patients who did not (100% T > MIC: 95% (n = 65) vs. 13% (n = 15); p < 0.001 and 100% T > 4 × MIC: 20% vs. 0%; p = 0.058). The considerable IIV in ceftazidime PK in ICU patients could largely be explained by renal function, CVVH use and several comorbidities. Critically ill patients are at risk for underexposure to ceftazidime when empirically aiming for the breakpoint MIC for P. aeruginosa. A loading dose is recommended.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Ganciclovir in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetic (PK) data of ganciclovir (GCV), a first-line antiviral treatment for cytomegalovirus infections, in critically ill patients are limited. This study aimed at characterizing GCV population PK and interindividual variability (IIV) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Secondary objectives were to identify patient characteristics responsible for IIV and simulate GCV exposure for different dosing regimens. METHOD: In this retrospective observational study, clinical data and serum GCV levels were collected from ICU patients on intravenous GCV. PK modeling, covariate analyses, and explorative Monte Carlo dosing simulations (MCS) were performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Bootstrap and visual predictive checks were used to determine model adequacy. RESULTS: In total, 128 GCV measurements were obtained from 34 patients. GCV PK conformed to a 1-compartment model with first-order elimination. After multivariate analyses, only the estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula (P < 0.001) was included as a covariate. In the final model, the estimated clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V1) were 2.3 L/h and 42 L, respectively, for a patient with the median CKD-EPI of the population (65 mL/min per 1.73 m). The association between CKD-EPI and CL decreased the residual variability from 0.56 to 0.43 and V1-IIV from 114% to 80%, whereas CL-IIV changed from 43% to 47%. MCS revealed that a substantial number of patients may not achieve the GCV PK/pharmacodynamic target trough level (>1.5 mg/L) when administering the label-recommended dose reductions for patients with CKD-EPI <50 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: A large IIV was observed in GCV PK among ICU patients. CKD-EPI could partially explain the IIV, although a large part of the variability remains unclear. MCS suggested that recommended dose reductions for CKD-EPI <50 mL/min may lead to subtherapeutic plasma GCV levels in these patients.

Predictive performance of a gentamicin population pharmacokinetic model in two western populations of critically ill patients.

External validation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models is warranted before they can be clinically applied to aid in antibiotic dose selection. The primary objective of this study was to assess the predictive performance of a gentamicin population PK model in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in two independent western populations of critically ill patients. METHODS: Data were collected from the ICU where the model was developed (Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam [AMC]) and from the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes). Primary endpoints were bias and accuracy. The model was regarded as valid if bias was not significantly different from 0 and accuracy was equal to or less than 2.5 mg/L. Non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The AMC validation dataset consisted of 192 samples from 66 ICU patients and the CHU Nîmes dataset of 230 gentamicin samples from 50 ICU patients. The structural model predicted the gentamicin plasma concentrations in the AMC population with a non-significant bias (0.35, 95%CI: -0.11-0.81) and a sufficient accuracy of 2.5 mg/L (95%CI: 2.3-2.8). The gentamicin plasma concentrations were overpredicted in the CHU Nîmes population with a significant bias of 4.8 mg/L (95%CI: 4.00-5.62) and an accuracy of 5.5 mg/L (95%CI: 4.7-6.2). CONCLUSION: The model is valid for use in the AMC ICU population but not in the CHU Nîmes ICU population. This illustrates that caution is needed when using a population PK model in an external population.

Fecal microbiota transplantation against intestinal colonization by extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: a proof of principle study.

OBJECTIVE: Infections with multidrug-resistant microorganisms are associated with increased hospitalization, medication costs and mortality. Based on our fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) experience for Clostridium difficile infection, we treated 15 patients carrying ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-EB) with FMT. Seven patients underwent a second FMT after 4 weeks when ESBL-EB remained, amounting to a total number of 22 transplants. The objective was decolonization of ESBL-EB. RESULTS: Three out of fifteen (20%) patients were ESBL-negative at 1, 2 and 4 weeks after the first transplant, while six out of 15 (40%) were negative after the second transplant. Comparison of fecal microbiota at baseline and 4 weeks after FMT revealed restoration of microbial diversity after FMT and a microbial shift towards donor composition. Finally, we suggest several possible factors of response to therapy, such as donor-recipient microbiota match and number of FMTs. Therefore, FMT can be an effective treatment in patients carrying ESBL-EB. Response may be determined by microbiota composition and number of FMT procedures. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN48328635 Registered 11 October 2017, retrospectively registered.

Optimization of therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with ceftazidime and meropenem using chemostats as model for infections.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause life-threatening infections in patients admitted to intensive care units. Resistance rapidly develops against two drugs of choice: ceftazidime and meropenem. Several therapeutic protocols were compared for reduction in viable cells and limiting development of resistance. Chemostat cultures were exposed to antibiotic concentrations measured in the blood of patients at low (5th percentile), medium (50th percentile) or high (95th percentile) levels in several therapy protocols to simulate therapy. Cultures exposed to ceftazidime recovered after 1 day at low, 2 days at medium and 3 days at high concentrations and developed corresponding levels of resistance. Patterns were very similar for meropenem except that recovery was delayed. Fluctuating levels and intermittent treatment achieved similar reduction of cell numbers at lower resistance costs. Treatment alternating ceftazidime and meropenem reduced cell numbers more than monotherapy, while strongly limiting resistance. Combination therapy was even more effective in both respects. Therapeutic goals are best reached with least risk of resistance when ceftazidime and meropenem are used in combination or alternating, at the highest concentrations the patient can endure. Monotherapy should also apply the highest concentration that is safe for the shortest time that achieves treatment objectives.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Gentamicin Peak Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Adequate gentamicin peak concentrations (Cmax) are important for optimal clinical efficacy. Within a critically ill patient, substantial variability in Cmax can occur over time, hampering the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gentamicin dosing based on Cmax after the first dose on gentamicin target attainment in critically ill patients. METHODS: From gentamicin-treated critically ill patients, dosing information, clinical parameters, and serum concentrations were collected prospectively. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to estimate Cmax after each dose. To evaluate the usefulness of routine TDM, percentages of Cmax within (%Cther, 15-20 mg/L), above (>20 mg/L), and below (%Csubther, <15 mg/L) the therapeutic range after the first and second doses were compared. In addition, simulations were performed to evaluate the impact of TDM. RESULTS: Four hundred sixteen measurements from 59 patients receiving 130 gentamicin doses were included. In the 30 patients who received >1 dose, TDM increased %Cther from 40% after a first median dose of 5.0 mg/kg to 50% after the second dose, and decreased %Csubther from 47% to 30%. Simulations using a 5 mg/kg starting dose revealed %Cther after the second dose of 28.4% without and 36.8% with TDM and %Csubther of 56.9% and 29.3%, respectively. Increasing the simulated starting dose to 6 mg/kg increased %Cther after the first dose from 27.7% to 33.5% and decreased %Csubther from 58.6% to 35.6%. TDM after a first dose of 6 mg/kg had no substantial effect on %Cther or %Csubther after the second dose. CONCLUSIONS: Gentamicin dosing based on Cmax after the first dose increased %Cther and decreased %Csubther, but did not result in therapeutic Cmax in half of the patients. When simulating a higher starting dose, %Csubther after the first dose decreased, and TDM showed no additional influence. These data suggest that a starting dose of 6 mg/kg should be considered and that repeated Cmax measurements are not of added value.

Determinants of gentamicin concentrations in critically ill patients: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.

When treating critically ill patients with gentamicin for severe infection, peak concentrations (Cmax) determine clinical efficacy and trough concentrations (Cmin) determine toxicity. Despite administration of body weight-standardised starting doses, a wide range of Cmax is generally observed. Furthermore, in therapeutic drug monitoring, several measures of renal function are used to predict appropriate Cmin and gentamicin dosing intervals, but the most accurate predictor is not known. This study aimed to quantify the impact of several patient parameters on gentamicin Cmax values and to determine which measure of renal function best predicts gentamicin clearance (CL). Clinical data and serum gentamicin levels were retrospectively collected from all critically ill patients treated with gentamicin at our intensive care unit between 1 January and 30 June 2011. Data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM v.7.1.2). A two-compartmental model was developed based on 303 gentamicin concentration-time data from 44 critically ill patients. Serum albumin levels explained 25% of interindividual variability in the volume of distribution (Vd). Creatinine clearance calculated from the creatinine concentration in a 6-h urine portion (CalcCLCr) resulted in acceptable estimation of gentamicin CL, whilst serum creatinine (SCr) and creatinine clearance estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CGCLCr) overestimated gentamicin CL and therefore underestimated Cmin. In conclusion, low albumin concentrations resulted in a larger Vd and lower Cmax of gentamicin. These results suggest that use of a higher gentamicin starting dose in critically ill patients with hypoalbuminaemia may prevent underdosing. Urinary CalcCLCr is a better predictor of Cmin than SCr or CGCLCr.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Considerations for Gentamicin in Newborns with Suspected or Proven Sepsis Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria.

The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of gentamicin in neonates with suspected or proven Gram-negative sepsis and determine the optimal dosage regimen in relation to the bacterial MICs found in this population. Data were prospectively collected between October 2012 and January 2013 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. A single nonlinear mixed-effects regression analysis (NONMEM) was performed to describe the population PK of gentamicin. Dosage regimens based upon gestational age (GA) were generated using Monte Carlo simulations with the final model. Target values were based on the MIC distribution in our patient population. In total, 136 gentamicin concentrations from 65 (pre)term neonates were included. The PK was best described by an allometric 2-compartment model with postmenstrual age (PMA) as a covariate on clearance (Cl). The MIC distribution (median, 0.75 [range, 0.5 to 1.5] mg/liter) justified a gentamicin target peak concentration of 8 to 12 mg/liter. This study describes the PK of gentamicin in (pre)term neonates. Dosage regimens of 5 mg/kg of body weight every 48 h, 5 mg/kg every 36 h, and 5 mg/kg every 24 h for patients with GAs of <37 weeks, 37 to 40 weeks, and ≥40 weeks, respectively, are recommended.

Comparison of the PRNT and an immune fluorescence assay in yellow fever vaccinees receiving immunosuppressive medication.

BACKGROUND: The 17D-yellow fever (YF) vaccination is considered contraindicated in immune-compromised patients; however, accidental vaccination occurs. In this population, measuring the immune response is useful in clinical practice. METHODS: In this study we compare two antibody tests (the Immune Fluorescence Assay and the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test) in a group of Dutch immune-compromised travellers with a median of 33 days (IQR [28-49]) after primary YF vaccination. RESULTS: We collected samples of 15 immune-compromised vaccinees vaccinated with the 17D yellow fever vaccine between 2004 and 2012. All samples measured in the plaque reduction neutralization test yielded positive results (>80% virus neutralization with a 1:10 serum dilution). Immune Fluorescence Assay sensitivity was 28% (95% CI [0.12-0.49]). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: All immune-compromised patients mounted an adequate response with protective levels of virus neutralizing antibodies to the 17-D YF vaccine. No adverse effects were reported. Compared to the plaque reduction neutralization test, the sensitivity of the Immune Fluorescence Assay test was low. Further research is needed to ascertain that 17D vaccination in immune-compromised patients is safe.

Development of Antibiotic Resistance during Simulated Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Chemostats.

During treatment of infections with antibiotics in critically ill patients in the intensive care resistance often develops. This study aims to establish whether under those conditions this resistance can develop de novo or that genetic exchange between bacteria is by necessity involved. Chemostat cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were exposed to treatment regimes with ceftazidime and meropenem that simulated conditions expected in patient plasma. Development of antibiotic resistance was monitored and mutations in resistance genes were searched for by sequencing PCR products. Even at the highest concentrations that can be expected in patients, sufficient bacteria survived in clumps of filamentous cells to recover and grow out after 3 to 5 days. At the end of a 7 days simulated treatment, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) had increased by a factor between 10 and 10,000 depending on the antibiotic and the treatment protocol. The fitness costs of resistance were minimal. In the resistant strains, only three mutations were observed in genes associated with beta-lactam resistance. The development of resistance often observed during patient treatment can be explained by de novo acquisition of resistance and genetic exchange of resistance genes is not by necessity involved. As far as conclusions based on an in vitro study using P. aeruginosa and only two antibiotics can be generalized, it seems that development of resistance can be minimized by treating with antibiotics in the highest concentration the patient can endure for the shortest time needed to eliminate the infection.

The impact of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis on the occurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infections among renal allograft recipients: a retrospective before-after study.

BACKGROUND: The international guidelines recommend the administration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis for six months after transplantation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of TMP-SMX prophylaxis on the occurrence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) as cystitis and allograft pyelonephritis (AGPN) and its impact on the antimicrobial resistance pattern of causative microorganisms. METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective before-after study in adult renal allograft recipients with one year follow-up after transplantation. We compared the ("after") group that received TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis to the ("before") group that did not receive it. RESULTS: In total, 343 renal allograft recipients were analysed, of whom 212 (61.8 %) received TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis. In this study, 63 (18.4 %) did only develop ASB without UTI, 26 (7.6 %) developed cystitis and 43 (12.5 %) developed AGPN. The remaining 211 (61.5 %) renal allograft recipients did not develop any bacteriuria at all. Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis indicated that TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis was not associated with reduced prevalence of ASB (Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52, 95 % CI = 0.79-2.94, p = 0.213), nor with reduced incidence of cystitis (HR = 2.21, 95 % CI = 0.76-6.39, p = 0.144), nor AGPN (HR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 0.57-2.21, p = 0.751). Among the group receiving TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis there was a trend was observed in increase of both amoxicillin (86 % versus 70 %) and TMP-SMX (89 % versus 48 %) resistance which already appeared within the first 30 days after TMP-SMX exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Among renal allograft recipients, administration of TMP-SMX as PJP prophylaxis does not prevent ASB nor UTI, however it is associated with tendency towards increased amoxicillin and TMP-SMX resistance.

Diagnosis and management of aspergillosis in the Netherlands: a national survey.

A survey of diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis was conducted in eight University Medical Centers (UMCs) and eight non-academic teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Against a background of emerging azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus routine resistance screening of clinical isolates was performed primarily in the UMCs. Azole resistance rates at the hospital level varied between 5% and 10%, although rates up to 30% were reported in high-risk wards. Voriconazole remained first choice for invasive aspergillosis in 13 out of 16 hospitals. In documented azole resistance 14 out of 16 centres treated patients with liposomal amphotericin B.

Inadequate vancomycin therapy in term and preterm neonates: a retrospective analysis of trough serum concentrations in relation to minimal inhibitory concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is effective against gram-positive bacteria and the first-line antibiotic for treatment of proven coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections. The aim of this study is bipartite: first, to assess the percentage of therapeutic initial trough serum concentrations and second, to evaluate the adequacy of the therapeutic range in interrelationship with the observed MIC-values in neonates. METHODS: In this study, preterm and term neonates admitted at a tertiary NICU in the Netherlands from January 2009 to December 2012 and treated with vancomycin for a proven gram-positive infection were included. Trough serum concentrations were measured prior to administration of the 5th dose. Trough concentrations in the range of 10 to 15 mg/L were considered therapeutic. Staphylococcal species minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC's) were determined using the E-test method. Species identification was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Of the 112 neonates, 53 neonates (47%) had sub-therapeutic initial trough serum concentrations of vancomycin, whereas 22% had supra-therapeutic initial trough serum concentrations. In all patients doses were adjusted on basis of the initial trough concentration. In 40% (23/57) of the neonates the second trough concentration remained sub-therapeutic. MIC's were determined for 30 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates obtained from 19 patients. Only 4 out of 19 subjects had a trough concentration greater than tenfold the MIC. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-seven percent of the neonates had sub-therapeutic initial trough serum concentrations of vancomycin. The MIC-data indicate that the percentages of underdosed patients may be greater. It may be advisable to increase the lower limit of the therapeutic range for European neonates.