Qualification of Hemophilia Treatment Centers to Enable Multi-Center Studies of Gene Expression Signatures in Blood Cells from Pediatric Patients.

Hemophilia A is a rare congenital bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of functionally active coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Most patients with the severe form of the disease require FVIII replacement therapies, which are often associated with the development of neutralizing antibodies against FVIII. Why some patients develop neutralizing antibodies while others do not is not fully understood. Previously, we could demonstrate that the analysis of FVIII-induced gene expression signatures in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained from patients exposed to FVIII replacement therapies provides novel insights into underlying immune mechanisms regulating the development of different populations of FVIII-specific antibodies. The aim of the study described in this manuscript was the development of training and qualification test procedures to enable local operators in different European and US clinical Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTC) to produce reliable and valid data for antigen-induced gene expression signatures in PBMC obtained from small blood volumes. For this purpose, we used the model antigen Cytomegalovirus (CMV) phosphoprotein (pp) 65. We trained and qualified 39 local HTC operators from 15 clinical sites in Europe and the US, of whom 31 operators passed the qualification at first attempt, and eight operators passed at the second attempt.

Nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody signatures in patients with hemophilia A and in healthy donors.

Previous studies identified nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies in the circulation of severe and nonsevere hemophilia A (sHA and nsHA) patients without FVIII inhibitors and also in some healthy individuals. To gain a better understanding of the nature of these nonneutralizing antibody responses, we analyzed and compared anti-FVIII antibody signatures in 3 study cohorts: previously treated sHA as well as nsHA patients without FVIII inhibitors, and healthy donors. FVIII-binding IgM, IgG1-4, and IgA antibodies were differentiated, FVIII-specificity was assessed, and associated apparent affinity constants were determined. Our results indicate that the nonneutralizing FVIII-specific antibody response in all study cohorts is dominated by IgG1 and IgA. Prevalences, titers, and affinities of these nonneutralizing antibodies were higher in the hemophilia A cohorts than in healthy donors. Stratification for the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody status demonstrated the presence of FVIII-specific IgA with elevated titers in sHA patients with an active or past HCV infection when compared with HCV antibody-positive nsHA patients or HCV antibody-negative patients and healthy donors. Increased titers and affinities of FVIII-specific IgG1 antibodies were observed in a considerable number of hemophilia A patients as opposed to healthy subjects independently of the patients' anti-HCV antibody status. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that the generation of nonneutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies in healthy individuals and in noninhibitor hemophilia A patients might be based on similar immune mechanisms. However, differences in prevalences, titers, and affinities of these antibodies indicate distinct differences in the antibody evolution between healthy individuals and patients.

FVIII-binding IgG modulates FVIII half-life in patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A without inhibitors.

The substantial variability in pharmacokinetic parameters in hemophilia patients A poses a challenge for optimal treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) products. We investigated the effect of FVIII-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) on FVIII half-life in a cohort of 42 adult patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A without inhibitors. Fifteen (35.7%) of 42 patients tested positive for FVIII-binding IgG with titers ≥1:20 in the initial antibody screen, 9 of these 15 patients had FVIII-specific antibodies with titers ≥1:40, mostly low-to-moderate-affinity IgG1 and IgG3, and 1 had high-affinity IgG4 and later developed low-titer FVIII inhibitors. His brother with low-to-moderate-affinity IgG1 and IgG3 also later developed low-titer FVIII inhibitors. The presence of FVIII-specific IgG subclass titer ≥1:40 antibodies was significantly associated with shorter FVIII half-life (median, 7.8 hours [interquartile range, 6.6-9.2 hours]) vs 10.4 hours [interquartile range, 8.9-13.8 hours]); the regression coefficient adjusted for log age and log von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen was -0.32 (P = .004), accounting for 16.9% of the observed variability of FVIII half-life in our cohort. Our data indicate a significant contribution of non-neutralizing FVIII-specific IgG to FVIII half-life reduction in hemophilia A patients. Thus, screening for FVIII-specific IgG could be beneficial in tailoring FVIII prophylactic regimens.

Anti-factor VIII IgA as a potential marker of poor prognosis in acquired hemophilia A: results from the GTH-AH 01/2010 study.

Neutralizing autoantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII), also called FVIII inhibitors, are the cause of acquired hemophilia A (AHA). They are quantified in the Bethesda assay or Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay by their ability to neutralize FVIII in normal human plasma. However, FVIII inhibitors do not represent the whole spectrum of anti-FVIII autoantibodies. Here, we studied isotypes, immunoglobulin G subclasses, and apparent affinities of anti-FVIII autoantibodies to assess their prognostic value for the outcome in AHA. We analyzed baseline samples from patients enrolled in the prospective GTH-AH 01/2010 study. Our data suggest that anti-FVIII immunoglobulin A (IgA) autoantibodies are predictors of poor outcome in AHA. Anti-FVIII IgA-positive patients achieved partial remission similar to anti-FVIII IgA-negative patients but had a higher risk of subsequent recurrence. Consequently, IgA-positive patients achieved complete remission less frequently (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.68; P < .01) and had a higher risk of death (aHR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.11-6.22; P < .05). Anti-FVIII IgA was the strongest negative predictor of recurrence-free survival after achieving partial remission and remained significant after adjustment for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. In conclusion, anti-FVIII IgA represents a potential novel biomarker that could be useful to predict prognosis and tailor immunosuppressive treatment of AHA.

Affinity of FVIII-specific antibodies reveals major differences between neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies in humans.

Recently, we reported that distinct immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes and IgG subclasses of factor VIII (FVIII)-specific antibodies are found in different cohorts of patients with hemophilia A and in healthy individuals. Prompted by these findings, we further investigated the distinguishing properties among the different populations of FVIII-specific antibodies. We hypothesized that the affinity of antibodies would discriminate between the neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies found in different study cohorts. To test this idea, we established a competition-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technology to assess the apparent affinities for each isotype and IgG subclass of FVIII-specific antibodies without the need for antibody purification. We present a unique data set of apparent affinities of FVIII-specific antibodies found in healthy individuals, patients with congenital hemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors, and patients with acquired hemophilia A. Our data indicate that FVIII-specific antibodies found in patients with FVIII inhibitors have an up to 100-fold higher apparent affinity than that of antibodies found in patients without inhibitors and in healthy individuals. High-affinity FVIII-specific antibodies could be retrospectively detected in longitudinal samples of an individual patient with FVIII inhibitors 543 days before the first positive Bethesda assay. This finding suggests that these antibodies might serve as potential biomarkers for evolving FVIII inhibitor responses.

Distinct characteristics of antibody responses against factor VIII in healthy individuals and in different cohorts of hemophilia A patients.

Neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) remain the major complication in the replacement therapy of hemophilia A patients. To better understand the evolution of these antibodies it is important to generate comprehensive datasets which include both neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies, their isotypes, and IgG subclasses. We developed sensitive ELISAs to analyze FVIII-binding antibodies in different cohorts of hemophilia A patients and in healthy individuals. Our data reveal the prevalence of FVIII-binding antibodies among healthy individuals (n = 600) to be as high as 19%, with a prevalence of antibody titers > or =1:80 of 2%. The prevalence of FVIII-binding antibodies was 34% (5% for titers > or =1:80) in patients without FVIII inhibitors (n = 77), 39% (4% for titers > 1:80) in patients after successful immune tolerance induction therapy (n = 23), and 100% (n = 20, all titers > or =1:80) in patients with FVIII inhibitors. We found significant differences for IgG subclasses of FVIII-binding antibodies between the different study cohorts. IgG4 and IgG1 were the most abundant IgG subclasses in patients with FVIII inhibitors. Strikingly, IgG4 was completely absent in patients without FVIII inhibitors and in healthy subjects. These findings point toward a distinct immune regulatory pathway responsible for the development of FVIII-specific IgG4 associated with FVIII inhibitors.