Reversal of secondary protein-losing enteropathy after surgical revision of a jejunal Roux-en-Y loop in a patient after liver transplantation.

Secondary protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) is a rare complication following pediatric liver transplantation (LT), mostly related to venous outflow obstruction of the liver. Here, we discuss a thus far unknown cause of secondary PLE following pediatric LT. A 7-month-old boy underwent LT with biliary anastomosis using a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop. Eleven months later he developed PLE. Routine diagnostic workup was negative. No hepatic outflow obstruction was detected during catheterization. Although the hepatic venous pressure gradient was slightly increased (10 mm Hg), there were no clinical signs of portal hypertension. Albumin scintigraphy with specific early recordings suggested focal albumin intestinal entry in the jejunal Roux-en-Y loop. Local bacterial overgrowth or local lymphangiectasia, possibly due to (venous) congestion, was considered. Treatment with metronidazole did not improve albumin loss. Next, surgical revision of the jejunal Roux-en-Y loop was performed. The explanted loop contained a small abnormal area with a thin hyperemic mucosa, near the former anastomosis. Histopathological analysis showed changes both in the blood vessels and the lymphatic vessels with focal deeper chronic active inflammation resulting in congestion of vessels, hampering lymphatic outflow leading to lymphangiectasia and patchy distortion of lymphatic vessels. Following surgical revision, secondary PLE disappeared, up to now, 1.5 year post revision.

Cell-mediated immune responses to inactivated trivalent influenza-vaccination are decreased in patients with common variable immunodeficiency.

Influenza-specific cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses can protect from influenza, but may be decreased in CVID-patients since defects in CMI responses have been demonstrated in CVID-patients. Therefore CMI responses were evaluated in 15 CVID-patients and 15 matched healthy controls (HC) by determining frequencies of interferon (IFN)γ-producing PBMC, and frequencies of IFNγ-, interleukin (IL)-2- and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)α-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells before and after influenza vaccination using IFNγ enzyme-linked immunospot (IFNγ-ELISpot) and flow cytometry. Humoral responses were determined using haemagglutination inhibition assay. In CVID-patients the number of spotforming PBMC in the IFNγ-ELISpot did not increase following influenza vaccination, in contrast to HC. In flow cytometry, the frequencies of IFNγ-producing T-cells decreased in CVID-patients after influenza vaccination, while in HC the frequencies of IFNγ-production flow cytometry increased. Concluding, CMI responses following influenza vaccination are hampered in CVID-patients compared to HC. Additional protective strategies against influenza other than vaccination are warranted.

Patients with humoral primary immunodeficiency do not develop protective anti-influenza antibody titers after vaccination with trivalent subunit influenza vaccine.

Yearly influenza vaccination is recommended for patients with humoral primary immunodeficiency (hPID). However, humoral responses following vaccination can be expected to be reduced in these patients. The efficacy of influenza vaccination in patients with hPID, anti-influenza antibody responses was assessed in 26 patients with hPID and 26 matched healthy controls (HC) using hemagglutination inhibition assay. Following vaccination, geometric mean titers (GMT) significantly increased for all influenza strains in the HC group, but only for A/H1N1 in the patient group. Fold increase in anti-influenza titer and seroprotection rates were lower for patients than for HC for A/H3N2 and A/H1N1, leading to postvaccination titer > or =40 in only 29% and 83% vs. 77% and 100%, respectively. Previous vaccination in patients and treatment with IVIg did not result in a higher rate of postvaccination titer > or =40. In conclusion, patients with hPID show hardly any humoral response following influenza vaccination.

Cell-mediated immune responses to influenza vaccination in Wegener's granulomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Both antibody and cell-mediated immune responses are involved in the defence against influenza. In Wegener's granulomatosis (WG), antibody responses to influenza vaccination appear to be similar to those in healthy controls, but cell-mediated responses have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cell-mediated responses to influenza vaccination in WG vary from those in controls. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with WG and healthy controls received subunit influenza vaccine. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained before and 1 month after vaccination. Cell-mediated responses to A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 were assessed using interferon gamma (IFN gamma) ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining for IFN gamma, tumour necrosis factor and interleukin 2. RESULTS: Before vaccination, patients and controls showed similar recall responses to A/H1N1 and A/H3N2. After vaccination, patients and controls showed similar levels of increase in spot-forming cells against A/H1N1 and A/H3N2. By flow cytometry, upon vaccination, proportions of cytokine-producing CD4 T cells increased in patients and controls for A/H1N1 and A/H3N2. CONCLUSIONS: Cell-mediated responses to influenza vaccination in patients with WG are comparable to those in healthy controls.

Humoral responses after influenza vaccination are severely reduced in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yearly influenza vaccination is recommended. However, its efficacy in patients treated with rituximab is unknown. The objectives of this study were to investigate the efficacy of influenza vaccination in RA patients treated with rituximab and to investigate the duration of the possible suppression of the humoral immune response following rituximab treatment. We also undertook to assess the safety of influenza vaccination and the effects of previous influenza vaccination. METHODS: Trivalent influenza subunit vaccine was administered to 23 RA patients who had received rituximab (4-8 weeks after rituximab for 11 patients [the early rituximab subgroup] and 6-10 months after rituximab for 12 patients [the late rituximab subgroup]), 20 RA patients receiving methotrexate (MTX), and 29 healthy controls. Levels of antibodies against the 3 vaccine strains were measured before and 28 days after vaccination using hemagglutination inhibition assay. The Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) was used to assess RA activity. RESULTS: Following vaccination, geometric mean titers (GMTs) of antiinfluenza antibodies significantly increased for all influenza strains in the MTX-treated group and in healthy controls, but for no strains in the rituximab-treated group. However, in the late rituximab subgroup, a rise in GMT for the A/H3N2 and A/H1N1 strains was demonstrated, in the absence of a repopulation of CD19+ cells at the time of vaccination. Seroconversion and seroprotection occurred less often in the rituximab-treated group than in the MTX-treated group for the A/H3N2 and A/H1N1 strains, while seroprotection occurred less often in the rituximab-treated group than in the healthy controls for the A/H1N1 strain. Compared with unvaccinated patients in the rituximab-treated group, previously vaccinated patients in the rituximab-treated group had higher pre- and postvaccination GMTs for the A/H1N1 strain. The DAS28 did not change after vaccination. CONCLUSION: Rituximab reduces humoral responses following influenza vaccination in RA patients, with a modestly restored response 6-10 months after rituximab administration. Previous influenza vaccination in rituximab-treated patients increases pre- and postvaccination titers. RA activity was not influenced.

Effect of a second, booster, influenza vaccination on antibody responses in quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus: an open, prospective, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: In SLE, a decreased antibody response on influenza vaccination has been reported. In this study, we assessed whether a booster vaccination could improve antibody responses, as determined by seroprotection rates, in SLE patients. METHODS: SLE patients (n = 52) with quiescent disease (SLEDAI < or =4) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 28) received subunit influenza vaccine in October-December 2007. After 4 weeks, only SLE patients received a second dose of vaccination. Sera were obtained before both vaccinations, and 4 weeks after the second vaccination. At each visit, SLE disease activity was recorded. The haemagglutination inhibition test was used to measure antibody titres. Seroprotection was defined as a titre > or =40. RESULTS: Following the first vaccination, seroprotection rates and geometric mean titres (GMTs) to each vaccine strain increased in both SLE patients and controls to comparable levels. Seroprotection rates in SLE patients after the first vaccination were 86.5% to A/H1N1, 80.8% to A/H3N2 and 61.5% to the B-strain while GMTs were 92.6, 56.2 and 39.2, respectively. Overall, the booster vaccination did not lead to a further rise of seroprotection rates and GMTs in SLE patients. However, in patients not vaccinated in the previous year, GMT and seroconversion rate to A/H1N1 did rise following the booster vaccination. Both influenza vaccinations did not increase SLEDAI scores. CONCLUSIONS: Additional value of a booster influenza vaccination in SLE is limited to patients who were not vaccinated in the previous year.

Studies of cell-mediated immune responses to influenza vaccination in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Both antibody and cell-mediated responses are involved in the defense against influenza. In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a decreased antibody response to subunit influenza vaccine has been demonstrated, but cell-mediated responses have not yet been assessed. This study was therefore undertaken to assess cell-mediated responses to influenza vaccination in patients with SLE. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with SLE and 54 healthy control subjects received subunit influenza vaccine. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and sera were obtained before and 1 month after vaccination. Cell-mediated responses to A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 vaccines were evaluated using an interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) enzyme-linked immunospot assay and flow cytometry. Antibody responses were measured using a hemagglutination inhibition test. RESULTS: Prior to vaccination, patients with SLE had fewer IFNgamma spot-forming cells against A/H1N1 compared with control subjects and a lower frequency of IFNgamma-positive CD8+ T cells. After vaccination, the number of IFNgamma spot-forming cells increased in both patients and control subjects, although the number remained lower in patients. In addition, the frequencies of CD4+ T cells producing tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-2 were lower in patients after vaccination compared with healthy control subjects. As expected for a subunit vaccine, vaccination did not induce a CD8+ T cell response. For A/H3N2-specific responses, results were comparable. Diminished cell-mediated responses to influenza vaccination were associated with the use of prednisone and/or azathioprine. The increase in A/H1N1-specific and A/H3N2-specific antibody titers after vaccination was lower in patients compared with control subjects. CONCLUSION: In addition to a decreased antibody response, cell-mediated responses to influenza vaccination are diminished in patients with SLE, which may reflect the effects of the concomitant use of immunosuppressive drugs. This may render these patients more susceptible to (complicated) influenza infections.