BACKGROUND: Approved on-demand treatments for hereditary angioedema attacks need to be administered parenterally, a route of administration that is associated with delays in treatment or withholding of therapy. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, three-way crossover trial, we randomly assigned participants at least 12 years of age with type 1 or type 2 hereditary angioedema to take up to two oral doses of sebetralstat (300 mg or 600 mg) or placebo for an angioedema attack. The primary end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the beginning of symptom relief, defined as a rating of "a little better" on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (ratings range from "much worse" to "much better") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours after the first administration of the trial agent. Key secondary end points, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, were a reduction in attack severity (an improved rating on the Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGI-S] scale, with ratings ranging from "none" to "very severe") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours and complete attack resolution (a rating of "none" on the PGI-S scale) within 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 136 participants were assigned to one of six trial sequences, with 110 treating 264 attacks. The time to the beginning of symptom relief with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P<0.001 and P = 0.001 for the two comparisons, respectively), with median times of 1.61 hours (interquartile range, 0.78 to 7.04), 1.79 hours (1.02 to 3.79), and 6.72 hours (1.34 to >12), respectively. The time to reduction in the attack severity with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P = 0.004 and P = 0.003), with median times of 9.27 hours (interquartile range, 1.53 to >12), 7.75 hours (2.19 to >12), and more than 12 hours (6.23 to >12). The time to complete resolution was faster with the 300-mg and 600-mg doses than with placebo (P = 0.002 and P<0.001). The percentage of attacks with complete resolution within 24 hours was 42.5% with the 300-mg dose, 49.5% with the 600-mg dose, and 27.4% with placebo. Sebetralstat and placebo had similar safety profiles; no serious adverse events related to the trial agents were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Oral sebetralstat provided faster times to the beginning of symptom relief, reduction in attack severity, and complete attack resolution than placebo. (Funded by KalVista Pharmaceuticals; KONFIDENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05259917; EudraCT number, 2021-001226-21.).
Background: Berotralstat is a once-daily oral inhibitor of plasma kallikrein for the prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) in patients ≥12 years. APeX-J aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berotralstat in Japan. Methods: APeX-J was a Phase III trial comprising 3 parts (NCT03873116). Part 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of berotralstat 150 or 110 mg over 24 weeks. Part 2 was a 28-week dose-blinded phase in which berotralstat-treated patients continued the same dose and placebo patients were re-randomized to berotralstat 150 or 110 mg. In Part 3, all patients remaining on study received berotralstat 150 mg in an open-label manner for up to an additional 52 weeks. The primary endpoint of Parts 2 and 3 was long-term safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints examined effectiveness. Results: Seventeen patients entered Part 2, and 11 continued into Part 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 14/17 patients (82.4%) in Parts 2 or 3; the most common were nasopharyngitis, abdominal pain, cystitis, influenza, and vertigo. One patient (5.9%) experienced a drug-related TEAE (Grade 4 increased hepatic enzyme). No drug-related serious TEAEs were reported. For patients who completed 26 months of treatment with berotralstat 150 mg (n = 5), mean (standard error of the mean) monthly HAE attack rates and on-demand medication use decreased from baseline by 1.15 (0.09) attacks/month and 2.8 (0.64) doses/month, respectively. Sustained improvements were also observed in patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Conclusions: Long-term prophylaxis with berotralstat raised no new safety signals and was effective at reducing attacks and improving patient-reported outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03873116. Registered March 13, 2019. Retrospectively registered.
We present the case of a 61-year-old man who developed nephrotic syndrome as a result of syphilis-associated secondary membranous nephropathy (MN). The patient showed nephrotic syndrome remission following antibiotic treatment for syphilis alone. Pathologically, the target antigen of immune complexes accumulated on glomerular basement membranes (GBM) in secondary MN caused by syphilis has been reported to be neuron-derived neurotrophic factor (NDNF). His renal histopathology was consistent with secondary MN caused by syphilis, with a full-house pattern on immunofluorescence microscopy, in addition to NDNF deposits that colocalized with IgG deposits granularly on the GBM. However, to date, there is no serological evidence for the involvement of NDNF in the GBM. In the present study, we found that anti-NDNF autoantibodies in the acute-phase serum disappeared in the convalescent-phase serum of a patient who recovered from syphilis and nephrotic syndrome after antibiotic therapy alone. This result supports the hypothesis that treatment of syphilis with antibiotics suppresses NDNF's antigenicity. In summary, we found new serological evidence emphasizing that NDNF is an etiological antigen in secondary MN caused by syphilis.
Hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction is a rare genetic disorder that causes recurrent episodes of swelling in various parts of the body. Treatment goals of HAE aim to "normalize" life for all patients; however, lack of diagnostic facilities and limited access to effective treatment options in developing nations cause delays in diagnosis and place a significant burden on patients. In this review, we aim to highlight the burden of disease caused by C1-inhibitor HAE across the Asia-Pacific region, considering its epidemiology, morbidity and mortality, and socioeconomic and psychological impact. We also review the availability of guideline-recommended diagnostic facilities and treatments, and how patients are currently managed. Data were collected from published literature and HAE experts in the region, who provided information regarding diagnosis and management in their countries. Current practice was reviewed against international guidelines, as well as local guidelines/consensus used in Australia, Japan, and China. Suggestions are provided for improving the time to diagnosis in the region, increasing access to guideline-recommended treatments, and providing support to reduce the burden on patients and caregivers. There is an urgent need to improve HAE services and provide access to life-saving treatment in developing countries, and efforts should be made to increase awareness of guideline recommendations in high-income economies that do not currently provide long-term prophylactic treatments.
Angioedemas, Hereditary , Humans , Angioedemas, Hereditary/diagnosis , Angioedemas, Hereditary/epidemiology , Angioedemas, Hereditary/therapy , Complement C1 Inhibitor Protein/genetics , Treatment Outcome , Asia/epidemiology , China , Japan
Background: Upacicalcet is a novel small-molecule calcimimetic agent developed for intravenous injection. Here, we evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of upacicalcet treatment via intraindividual dose adjustment in haemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Methods: A phase 2, multicentre, open-label, single-arm study was conducted. Upacicalcet was administered for 52 weeks; the starting dose was 50 µg thrice a week, and then adjusted to 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, or 300 µg, according to the dose-adjustment method set in the protocol. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level achieving a target range of 60-240 pg/mL (target achievement rate) at week 18. Results: A total of 58 patients were administered upacicalcet. The target achievement rate of serum iPTH level at week 18 was 57.9%, which increased to 80.8% at week 52. The serum-corrected calcium (cCa) level decreased immediately after upacicalcet administration, but no further decrease was observed. Adverse events were observed in 94.8% of patients, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 20.7% of patients. The most common ADR was decreased adjusted calcium in eight patients; dizziness occurred as a serious ADR in one patient. The serum cCa level of patients who interrupted upacicalcet treatment at a serum cCa level of <7.5 mg/dL recovered to ≥7.5 mg/dL immediately after the interruption. Conclusions: In haemodialysis patients with SHPT, upacicalcet doses of 25-300 µg for 52 weeks were found to be highly effective and well-tolerated, with minor safety concerns.
Hereditary angioedema (HAE), caused by C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency or dysfunction, is a rare and potentially life-threatening disease that leads to unpredictable recurrent attacks of angioedema in localized regions, including the larynx. As medical or dental procedures can trigger laryngeal edema, resulting in asphyxiation, major global guidelines recommend short-term prophylaxis prior to invasive procedures and long-term prophylaxis to prevent acute attacks and achieve near-normal lives. Here, we report the case of a 63-year-old male who experienced asphyxiation after tooth extraction. Emergency tracheotomy had saved his life at the age of 40 years, before the diagnosis of HAE. At the age of 63, when he had another opportunity for tooth extraction, he was definitively diagnosed with HAE. Administering short-term prophylaxis with ongoing long-term prophylaxis for HAE and perioperative multidisciplinary management for tooth extraction helped prevent recurrent fatal angioedema due to dental procedures and this can be useful when managing patients with HAE.
BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a major complication of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Upacicalcet, a new injectable calcimimetic, acts on calcium-sensing receptors to suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. We examined the efficacy and safety of upacicalcet in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving HD. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomized Japanese patients undergoing HD with serum intact PTH (iPTH) concentrations >240 pg/ml and corrected calcium concentrations ≥8.4 mg/dl. Either upacicalcet or placebo was administered after each HD session for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants achieving the target mean serum iPTH concentration (60-240 pg/ml) at weeks 22-24. RESULTS: A total of 103 participants received upacicalcet, and 50 participants received the placebo. The percentage of participants achieving mean serum iPTH concentrations of 60-240 pg/ml during the evaluation period was 67% (69/103) in the upacicalcet group and 8% (4/50) in the placebo group. The difference between the two groups was 59% (95% confidence interval, 48% to 71%). Upacicalcet also decreased serum fibroblast growth factor-23, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, total type 1 procollagen-N-propeptide, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b concentrations. Adverse events were reported in 85% (88/103) and 72% (36/50) participants in the upacicalcet and placebo groups, respectively. The incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events, such as nausea and vomiting, was similar between the two groups. Serum corrected calcium concentrations <7.5 mg/dl were observed in 2% of participants in the upacicalcet group and no participants in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Upacicalcet, a novel injectable calcimimetic, is effective and safe for secondary hyperparathyroidism patients receiving HD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Phase 3 Study of SK-1403, NCT03801980 .
Calcium , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary , Humans , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/drug therapy , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/etiology , Parathyroid Hormone
BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE), which is caused by C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency or dysfunction, is a rare and potentially life-threatening disease. In patients with HAE, excess production of bradykinin causes acute unpredictable recurrent attacks of angioedema in localized regions, including the larynx and intestines. Given the fact that HAE is an autosomal dominant disease, C1-INH produced in patients with HAE is 50% of that produced in healthy individuals. However, most patients with HAE present plasma C1-INH function of < 25% owing to the chronic consumption of C1-INH by kallikrein-kinin, contact, complement, coagulation, and fibrinolysis cascades. Recently, several therapeutic options have been developed for acute attacks and prophylaxis in the treatment of HAE; however, currently, there is no curative therapy for HAE. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report the case of a 48-year-old male patient who presented with a long-standing history of HAE and underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at the age of 39 years and has been in complete remission of AML and HAE thereafter. Notably, after BMT, his C1-INH function gradually increased as follows: < 25%, 29%, 37%, and 45.6%. Since his 20 s, he intermittently presented with an acute attack of HAE once every 3 months from the initial attack. Further, after undergoing BMT, the number of acute attacks decreased to twice within 4 years until the age of 45 years, and subsequently, the patient has been free of acute attacks. C1-INH is mainly synthesized by hepatocytes, but it is known to be partially produced and secreted from peripheral blood monocytes, macrophages, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. We speculate that the C1-INH function may be increased by extrahepatic production of C1-INH, possibly synthesized by differentiated cells derived from hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells after BMT. CONCLUSIONS: This case report supports efforts to focus on extrahepatic production of C1-INH in the next strategy of new treatment development for HAE.
Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a potentially life-threatening rare disease, which is mainly caused by the deficiency or dysfunction of C1-esterase inhibitor, and characterized by spontaneous, recurrent episodes of edema in various parts of the body including internal organs and the laryngeal area. Delayed diagnosis and treatment increase the burdens and risks of this condition. The current study aimed to understand the burden of illness for HAE patients in Japan before and after diagnosis through a patient reported outcome survey. A survey instrument was distributed to 121 adult patients with HAE by a patient organization via HAE treating physicians between July and November in 2016. Seventy patients (57.9%) returned the questionnaire. Patients reported high levels of medical resource utilization, including emergency procedures and services. Episodes of receiving laparotomy were somewhat less after diagnosis with HAE than before, but no apparent difference in episodes of tracheotomy between before and after the diagnosis. The economic burden, including direct and indirect medical costs, was highest before diagnosis, but still perceived as substantial after diagnosis. Patients reported disruption of work and school life, with 40% reporting that they miss 10 or more days from work or education per year. Sixty percent of patients reported that HAE affected their daily activities. We concluded that HAE is associated with considerable physical, social, economic and psycho-social burdens even after diagnosis, and that higher attack frequency is associated with a heavy disease burden for patients in Japan.
Infection-related glomerulonephritis (IRGN) is one of the most common causes of acute kidney injury (AKI). Positive glomerular staining of the nephritis-associated plasmin receptor (NAPlr) has been reported as a useful biomarker of IRGN. Although the infection can provoke acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (AIN), there are few reports of positive staining for NAPlr with AIN. We report a case of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection-related nephritis complicated with AIN, which showed positive staining for tubulointerstitial NAPlr. The patient developed AKI and nephrotic syndrome during an intraperitoneal MSSA infection. A diagnosis of IRGN complicated by infection-related acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (IRAIN) was made based on glomerular endocapillary proliferation with tubulointerstitial infiltrating cells and tubular atrophy. Tubulointerstitial infiltrating cells were positive for NAPlr staining and plasmin activity. Treatment of the infection by antibiotics and drainage did not improve the AKI, but steroid administration improved that. NAPlr evaluation is a helpful tool for identifying causes of AIN during infection.
Acute Kidney Injury , Glomerulonephritis, IGA , Glomerulonephritis , Nephritis, Interstitial , Nephritis , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Glomerulonephritis/diagnosis , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/complications , Nephritis/complications , Nephritis, Interstitial/complications , Nephritis, Interstitial/diagnosis , Nephritis, Interstitial/drug therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Immunoglobulin A
OBJECTIVE: Upacicalcet is a new renally excreted and injectable calcimimetic agent. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of single and multiple intravenous administration of upacicalcet in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: This study was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, dose-escalation study consisting of a single-dose study and a multiple-dose study. The single-dose study consisted of seven dose steps from 0.025 to 0.8 mg. For each step, six patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive upacicalcet or a placebo. The multiple-dose study occurred over 3 weeks in three-dose steps from 0.05 to 0.2 mg. For each step, 12 patients were randomly assigned 3:1 to receive upacicalcet or a placebo. RESULTS: The plasma concentration of upacicalcet increased in a dose-dependent manner and was maintained for the next dialysis. Upacicalcet was approximately 80% removed by a single dialysis and did not increase in the plasma concentration with repeated administration. Serum intact parathyroid hormone and corrected calcium (Ca2+) levels tended to decrease in response to the plasma concentration of upacicalcet. In the single-dose study, upper gastrointestinal symptoms were observed as a non-serious and mild adverse drug reaction in the groups receiving upacicalcet ≥ 0.4 mg. In the multiple-dose study, abdominal discomfort occurred in each patient in the 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg groups. CONCLUSIONS: Upacicalcet for patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis could be a calcimimetic agent that acts in a dose-dependent manner and persistently until the next dialysis session. No safety or tolerability issues specific to upacicalcet were found.
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary , Calcimimetic Agents/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/drug therapy , Japan , Parathyroid Hormone , Renal Dialysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Upacicalcet sodium hydrate is a novel small-molecule calcimimetic and has potential as a therapeutic agent for secondary hyperparathyroidism. We assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of a single intravenous dose of upacicalcet in Japanese healthy adults. METHOD: This was a single-center, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study. For each cohort, eight subjects were randomly assigned at a ratio of 3:1 to receive a single injection of placebo or upacicalcet 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, or 2.5 mg. RESULT: The plasma concentration of upacicalcet increased in a dose-dependent manner. Upacicalcet rapidly disappeared from plasma after administration. The half-life of upacicalcet was approximately 1-2 h. The major excretion route of upacicalcet was via urine. Serum intact parathyroid hormone decreased in accordance with the upacicalcet dose, from the lowest dose of 0.01 mg. Gastrointestinal disorders occurred in one patient in the 1.0 mg group and in five patients in the 2.5 mg group. All adverse events were nonserious, and no symptomatic hypocalcemia occurred. CONCLUSION: This study showed that upacicalcet acted as a calcimimetic and was excreted in the urine unchanged with little metabolism. Moreover, upacicalcet is a small molecule and has a small volume of distribution. In addition, less than 50% of upacicalcet binds to human plasma proteins. These findings suggest that upacicalcet administered to patients undergoing hemodialysis might be expected to have a long excretion period and sustained pharmacological effect.
Calcimimetic Agents , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary , Adult , Calcimimetic Agents/adverse effects , Calcimimetic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Japan , Parathyroid Hormone
BACKGROUND: Nephronophthisis (NPHP) is a chronic tubular interstitial disorder that exhibits an autosomal recessive genetic form and causes progressive renal failure in children. Patients with NPHP rarely show urinary abnormalities, edema, or hypertension. Thus, NPHP is often detected only when renal failure becomes advanced. NPHP can be divided into three types based on the age of end-stage renal failure, i.e., infant type (approximately 5 years old), juvenile type (approximately 13-14 years old), and adolescent type (approximately 19 years old). Here, we report a case of NPHP diagnosed by genetic analysis at 26 years of age with atypical histological abnormalities. CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old woman showed no growth disorders or urinary abnormalities in annual school physical examinations. However, at a check-up at 26 years old, she exhibited renal dysfunction (eGFR 26 mL/min/1.73 m2). Urine tests indicated low specific gravity of urine, but not proteinuria or microscopic hematuria. Urinary ß2-microglobulin was high (805 µg/L), and renal biopsy was performed for definitive diagnosis. Histological findings showed no significant findings in glomeruli. However, moderate fibrosis was observed in the interstitial area, and moderate atrophy was observed in the tubules. There were no significant findings in immunofluorescence analysis, and no electron dense deposits were detected by electron microscopy. Although cyst-like expansion of the tubules was unclear, tubular atrophy was dominantly found in the distal tubule by cytokeratin 7 staining. Genetic analysis of the NPHP1 gene showed complete deletion of this gene, leading to a definitive diagnosis of NPHP. CONCLUSIONS: NPHP is not merely a pediatric disease and is relatively high incidence in patients with adult onset end-stage of renal disease. In this case, typical histological abnormalities, such as cyst-like expansion of the tubular lesion, were not observed, and diagnosis was achieved by genetic analysis of the NPHP1 gene, which is responsible for the onset of NPHP. In patients with renal failure with tubular interstitial disease dominantly in the distal tubules, it is necessary to discriminate NPHP, even in adult cases.
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Cytoskeletal Proteins/genetics , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/congenital , Kidney Tubules , Renal Insufficiency , Adult , Atrophy , Biopsy/methods , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Keratin-7/metabolism , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/diagnosis , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/etiology , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/genetics , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/metabolism , Kidney Diseases, Cystic/physiopathology , Kidney Tubules/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Tubules/pathology , Renal Insufficiency/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Sequence Deletion
Hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) induces an acute attack of angioedema. In 2018, icatibant available for self-possession and subcutaneous self-administration was licensed for on-demand treatment in addition to intravenous C1-INH administration in Japan. We retrospectively evaluated the percentage of attacks in critical parts at emergency room (ER) visits and the time until visiting ER for C1-INH administration before and after the initial prescription of icatibant. The percentage of attacks in critical parts at ER visits before the prescription was 69.2%, but that was 80.0% when patients visited ER for additional C1-INH administration after the self-administration of icatibant. The time from the onset of an acute attack to visiting ER for the additional treatment after the self-administration of icatibant significantly increased from 6.2 h to 19.2 h (p < 0.001). Icatibant, therefore, promoted the patients' behavior modification associated with ER visits for C1-INH administration during an acute attack of HAE-C1-INH.
BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare but life-threatening condition. HAE types I and II (HAE-1/2) result from C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency. However, recent genetic analysis has established a new type of HAE with normal C1-INH (HAEnC1-INH). The mutations of factor XII, plasminogen, angiopoietin 1, and kininogen 1 genes may be the cause of HAEnC1-INH. Nevertheless, other causative molecules (HAE-unknown) may be involved. The Japanese therapeutic environment for HAE has been improving owing to the self-subcutaneous injection of icatibant, which was approved for the treatment of acute attack and enables early therapy. Erythema marginatum (EM) is a visible prodromal symptom which occasionally occurs prior to an angioedema attack; hence, recognizing the risk of an acute attack is important for early treatment. However, the detailed characteristics of EM remain unclear. In this study, we first investigated the clinical manifestations of EM in Japanese patients with HAE. METHODS: A 20-point survey was developed and distributed to 40 physicians to gather clinical data on EM from patients with HAE. RESULTS: Data on 68 patients with HAE (58 patients with HAE-1/2 and 10 patients with HAE-unknown) were collected. Of the patients with HAE-1/2, 53.4% experienced EM, whereas 43.1% did not. The forearm was the most frequent area of EM (64.5%), followed by the abdomen (29.0%) and upper arm and precordium (19.3%). Of the HAE-1/2 patients with EM, 41.9% always had angioedema following EM, while 29.0% always had colocalization of EM with angioedema. Moreover, 3.2% showed a correlation between the awareness of EM and severity of an angioedema attack. In 60.9% of HAE-1/2 patients with EM, the interval between the awareness of EM and appearance of angioedema was <3 h. Of the patients with HAE-unknown, 30.0% also experienced EM. CONCLUSION: We confirmed that more than one-half of Japanese patients with HAE-1/2 and one-third of those with HAE-unknown develop EM as the prodromal symptom of an angioedema attack. Physicians should communicate the significance of EM to patients with HAE to prepare them for possible imminent attacks.
Hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) is a rare disease, which induces an acute attack of angioedema mediated by bradykinin. HAE-C1-INH can cause serious abdominal pain when severe edema develops in the gastrointestinal tract. However, because it takes a long time, 13.8 years on average in Japan, from the occurrence of the initial symptom to the diagnosis due to low awareness of the disease, undiagnosed HAE-C1-INH patients sometimes undergo unnecessary surgical procedures for severe abdominal pain. We herein present a 56-year-old patient with HAE-C1-INH, who underwent numerous abdominal operations. He frequently needed hospitalization with the administration of opioid due to severe abdominal pain. However, after he was accurately diagnosed with HAE-C1-INH at 55 years of age, he could start self-administration for an acute attack with icatibant, a selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist. Consequently, he did not need hospitalizing for ten months after the beginning of the treatment. A series of an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment for HAE-C1-INH improved his quality of life. Thus, HAE-C1-INH should be considered, when we meet patients with unidentified recurrent abdominal pain. This case highlights significance of an early diagnosis and appropriate treatment for HAE-C1-INH.
Angioedemas, Hereditary , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Angioedemas, Hereditary/complications , Angioedemas, Hereditary/diagnosis , Complement C1 Inhibitor Protein , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life
Hereditary angioedema caused by C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) is a rare autosomal dominant disease. Primary care physicians sometimes face difficulties in diagnosing HAE-C1-INH owing to fluctuations in C1-INH function levels influenced by blood sampling conditions. International major guidelines do not stipulate a cut-off value of C1-INH function for the diagnosis. We aimed to explore the distribution of C1-INH function levels in patients with HAE-C1-INH and elucidate the influence of blood sampling conditions using healthy volunteers' samples to confirm the cut-off value of C1-INH function. In 48 patients with HAE-C1-INH who visited the Juntendo University Hospital in Japan between 2013 and 2019, C1-INH function levels were evaluated for 160 samples during symptom-free periods and 147 samples during an acute attack. Fluctuations of C1-INH function level were also evaluated for 8 healthy volunteers, wherein the samples were divided into 3 groups according to different sampling conditions. C1- INH function levels in all patients with HAE-C1-INH were found to be < 50%. The average C1- INH function level in healthy volunteers measured soon after blood collection in an appropriate sampling condition was 77% (61-92%) with some having lower C1-INH function levels than the reference value. C1-INH function levels fluctuated unstably in inappropriate sampling conditions. In conclusion, we can confirm that a < 50% C1-INH function level can be used as the diagnostic cut-off value for HAE-C1-INH. Moreover, it is necessary to repeat measurements of C1-INH function level in appropriate blood sampling conditions to accurately diagnose HAE-C1-INH.
