Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 52(3): 808-816, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33694097

RESUMEN

Only half of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with elevated stroke risk receive anticoagulation (AC). Electronic health record (EHR) alerts have the potential to close the gap. We designed an outpatient EHR alert (linked to an order set for ordering AC, labs, and specialty referrals) that fired when cardiology and primary care providers (PCPs) saw AF patients not on AC. We assigned all untreated patients seen by cardiology providers and PCPs in the 8 months before and after the alert launch to pre- and post-launch intervention cohorts, respectively. Untreated AF patients seeing other types of providers became controls. We then compared the difference in AC starts between intervention and control patients post-launch to the same difference prelaunch (adjusting for covariates). We measured alert responsiveness as how often patients had at least one encounter with a provider, who interacted with the alert. The adjusted percentage of AC starts for the prelaunch cohort was 20% for intervention patients and 17% for controls (difference = 3%); post-launch, the percentage was 13% for both post-launch intervention and controls (difference = 0%). The difference in difference was - 3% (p value 0.63). For half of patients, at least one provider was responsive to our alert. Reasons for no AC commonly included relative contraindications (e.g. fall, gastrointestinal bleed). Our alert did not increase AC starts but responsiveness to it was high. Increasing AC starts will likely require education surrounding relative contraindications.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Obes Med ; 22: 100325, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36567747

RESUMEN

This study aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on weight status, obesity and overweight among US children and identify associated factors. METHODS: At a large safety net health system in Massachusetts, anthropometric measurements of 701 children were analyzed before and after the COVID-19 lockdown. Chi-square and paired t-test were computed for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with obesity and overweight. RESULTS: Post-lockdown, the overall mean body mass index (BMI) increased from 21.07 to 21.57 kg/m2 (p < .001). The overall obesity (23.2%-27.4%, p < .001) and overweight (41.1%-44.5%, p < .001) burdens increased after the lockdown period. Obesity (40.5%-46.9%, p < .001) was highest among Spanish speakers. The youngest age group (2-5 years) had the greatest obesity rate increase by 26% (19.7%-24.8%, p < .001). Obesity was associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91, 1.00), higher baseline BMI (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.23) and Spanish speaking children (OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.10, 4.33). CONCLUSIONS: BMI, obesity and overweight increased among children during the COVID-19 lockdown, disproportionately affecting disadvantaged subpopulations. Strategies are needed to counteract the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on unhealthy weight gain and childhood obesity.

3.
BMC Geriatr ; 20(1): 394, 2020 10 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33028223

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frail older surgical patients face more than a two-fold increase in postoperative complications, including myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, ileus, and others. Many of these complications occur because of postoperative loss of stamina and poor mobility. Preoperative exercise may better prepare these vulnerable patients for surgery. We present the protocol for our ongoing randomized trial to assess the impact of a preoperative walking intervention with remote coaching and pedometer on outcomes of stamina (six-minute walk distance- 6MWD) and mobility (postoperative steps) in older adults with frailty traits. METHODS: We will be conducting a randomized clinical trial with a total of 120 patients permitting up to a 33% rate of attrition, to reach a final sample size of 80 (with 40 patients for each study arm). We will include patients who are age 60 or higher, score 4 or greater on the Edmonton Frailty Scale assessment, and will be undergoing a surgical operation that requires a 2 or more night hospital stay to be eligible for our trial. Using block randomization stratified on baseline 6MWD, we will assign patients to wear a pedometer. At the end of three baseline days, an athletic trainer (AT) will provide a daily step count goal reflecting a 10-20% increase from baseline. Subsequently, the AT will call weekly to further titrate the goal or calls more frequently if the patient is not meeting the prescribed goal. Controls will receive general walking advice. Our main outcome is change in 6MWD on postoperative day (POD) 2/3 vs. baseline. We will also collect 6MWD approximately 4 weeks after surgery and daily in-hospital steps. CONCLUSION: If changes in a 6MWD and step counts are significantly higher for the intervention group, we believe this will confirm our hypothesis that the intervention leads to decreased loss of stamina and mobility. Once confirmed, we anticipate expanding to multiple centers to assess the interventional impact on clinical endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The randomized clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT03892187 on March 27, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Fragilidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Anciano , Humanos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Periodo Preoperatorio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Caminata
4.
J Contin Educ Health Prof ; 40(2): 76-80, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32404775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A previously tested intervention featured educational outreach with modified academic detailing (AD) to increase anticoagulation use in patients with atrial fibrillation. Currently, this study compares providers receiving and not receiving AD in terms of inclusion of AD educational topics and shared decision-making elements in documentation. METHODS: Physicians reviewed themes discussed with providers during AD and evaluated charts for evidence of shared decision-making. Frequencies of documentation of individual items for providers receiving AD versus non-AD providers were compared. To understand baseline documentation practices of AD providers, encounters of AD providers before their AD participation were randomly selected. RESULTS: There were 113 eligible encounters in the four months after AD-36 from AD providers and 77 from non-AD providers. Thirty-five encounters were identified from AD providers before participating in the intervention. Providers infrequently documented many reviewed items (% documenting): anticoagulation mentioned (44%), multiple options for anticoagulation (5%), CHA2DS2-VASc score (11%), bleeding risk factors (2%). Compared with non-AD providers, AD providers had statistically significant higher percentages for the following items: mention of anticoagulation (64% versus 35%), stroke risk (11% versus 0%), anticoagulation benefits (8% versus 0%), and patient involvement (17% versus 0%). There was no improvement, however, for AD providers compared with baseline documentation percentages. DISCUSSION: Providers infrequently documented important items in anticoagulation management and shared decision-making. AD participation did not improve documentation. Improving adoption of AD educational items may require more prolonged interaction with providers. Improving shared decision-making may require an intervention more focused on it and its documentation.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Documentación/normas , Personal de Salud/psicología , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Documentación/métodos , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Personal de Salud/normas , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0207009, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30403742

RESUMEN

Rabies is a fatal encephalitic disease in humans and animals caused by lyssaviruses, most commonly rabies virus (RABV). Human antemortem diagnosis of rabies is a complex process involving multiple sample types and tests for the detection of antibodies, antigen (protein), and nucleic acids (genomic RNA). Serological diagnosis of human rabies includes the detection of either neutralizing or binding antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum samples from unimmunized individuals without prior rabies vaccination or passive immunization with purified immunoglobulins. While neutralizing antibodies are targeted against the surface-expressed glycoprotein (G protein), binding antibodies to viral antigens are predominantly against the nucleoprotein (N protein), although there can be antibodies against all RABV-expressed proteins. To determine N protein-specific antibody responses in the CSF and serum during RABV infection, we developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with purified recombinant N protein expressed in E. coli. N protein-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) subtypes IgG and IgM were detected in the CSF or serum of previously diagnosed human rabies cases. In addition, anti-N protein seroconversion was demonstrated over the course of illness in individual rabies cases. We compared the N protein ELISA results to those of an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test, the current binding antibody assay used in diagnosis, and show that our ELISA is consistent with the IFA test. Sensitivity and specificity of the N protein ELISA ranged from 78.38-100% and 75.76-96.77% with respect to the IFA results. Our data provide evidence for the use of an N protein ELISA as an additional option for the detection of RABV-specific IgG or IgM antibodies in human CSF or serum specimens.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Nucleoproteínas/inmunología , Virus de la Rabia/metabolismo , Rabia/diagnóstico , Proteínas Virales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente Indirecta , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Nucleoproteínas/metabolismo , Rabia/inmunología , Rabia/virología , Virus de la Rabia/aislamiento & purificación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Proteínas Virales/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA