Comparative Analysis of Clinical Severity and Outcomes in Penetrating Versus Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury Propensity Matched Cohorts.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health challenge; however, penetrating brain injury (PBI) remains under-represented in evidence-based knowledge and research efforts. This study utilized data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to investigate outcomes of PBI as compared with clinical-severity-matched non-penetrating or blunt TBI. A total of 1765 patients with PBI were 1:1 propensity score-matched for clinical severity with blunt TBI patients. The intent of PBI was self-inflicted in 34.1% of the cases, and the mechanism was firearm-inflicted in 89.1%. Mortality was found to be significantly more common in PBI than in the severity- matched TBI cohort (33.9% vs. 14.3 %, p < 0.001) as was unfavorable outcome. Mortality was mediated by withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WOLST) 30% of the time, and WOLST occurred earlier (median 3 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001) in PBI. Increased rate of mortality was observed with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of <11 in PBI as compared with <7 in blunt TBI. In conclusion, PBI patients exhibited higher mortality rates and unfavorable outcomes; one third of excess mortality was mediated by WOLST. The study also brings into question the applicability of the conventional TBI classification, based on GCS, in PBI. We emphasize the need to address the observed disparities and better understand the distinctive characteristics and mechanisms underlying PBI outcomes to improve patient care and reduce mortality.

The Time Burden of Office Visits in Contemporary Pituitary Care, 2016 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: The concept of "time toxicity" has emerged to address the impact of time spent in the healthcare system; however, little work has examined the phenomenon in the field of otolaryngology. OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of Evaluation and Management (E/M) current procedural terminology codes as a method to assess time burden and to pilot this tool to characterize the time toxicity of office visits associated with a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma between 2016 and 2019. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of outpatient office visits quantified differences between timestamps documenting visit length and their associated E/M code visit length. The IBM MarketScan database was queried to identify patients with a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma in 2016 and to analyze their new and return claims between 2016 and 2019. One-way ANOVA and two-sample t-tests were used to examine claim quantity, time in office, and yearly visit time. RESULTS: In the validation study, estimated visit time via E/M codes and actual visit time were statistically different (P < 0.01), with E/M codes underestimating actual time spent in 79.0% of visits. In the MarketScan analysis, in 2016, 2099 patients received a primary diagnosis of pituitary adenoma. There were 8490 additional-related claims for this cohort from 2016 to 2019. The plurality of new office visits were with endocrinologists (n = 857; 29.3%). Total time spent in office decreased yearly, from a mean of 113 min (2016) to 69 min (2019) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: E/M codes underestimate the length of outpatient visits; therefore, time toxicity experienced by pituitary patients may be greater than reported. Further studies are needed to develop additional assessment tools for time toxicity and promote increased efficiency of care for patients with pituitary adenomas.