High-dose BCNU/Melphalan conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Single-agent high-dose melphalan (HDM, 200 mg/m2) has been the most commonly used conditioning regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplant, since its introduction in 1992. We used a more aggressive alkylator-based conditioning regimen in an attempt to overcome early relapse and combat drug resistance. We present a retrospective comparison and long-term follow-up of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with induction followed by either high-dose carmustine (BCNU) and HDM, or HDM alone, both followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Between 1997 and 2002, 104 patients were treated with BCNU/HDM; from 2001 to 2008, 103 patients were treated with HDM alone. Median follow-up of survivors was 78 and 68 months for the BCNU/HDM and HDM groups, respectively. The median PFS was significantly increased with the BCNU/HDM regimen (40.4 vs 20.5 months, P<0.001). Median overall survival was increased with the BCNU/HDM regimen when compared with HDM alone (88.4 vs 67.2 months, P=0.07), but the difference was not statistically significant. Transplant-related mortality was similar in both groups (2.9% with BCNU and HDM vs 3.9% with HDM alone). Our findings suggest that the BCNU/HDM preparative regimen should be investigated further and potentially compared in a prospective randomized manner with HDM alone.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing prior to myeloablative allo-SCT: a feasibility study.

The feasibility of symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) prior to allo-SCT was assessed in addition to the prognostic value of CPET-derived measures. CPET was performed prospectively on 21 patients with hematologic malignancies, with assessments of peak (for example, peak oxygen consumption, VO2peak) and submaximal (for example, ventilatory threshold (VT)) measures of cardiopulmonary function. No serious adverse events were observed during CPET procedures, with 95% of patients achieving criteria for a peak test. Mean VO2peak was 24.7±6.4 mL kg(-1 )min(-1) (range: 10.9-35.5), equivalent to 29%±17% below that of age-matched healthy controls. All patients proceeded with the conditioning regimen followed by allo-SCT. Median follow-up was 25 months. During this period, 11 (52.4%) patients died (n=6, relapsed disease; n=5, non-relapse mortality (NRM)); 9 patients (43%) developed pulmonary toxicity. In univariate analyses, both peak and submaximal markers of cardiopulmonary function were predictors of OS, pulmonary toxicity and NRM. For OS, the HR for VO2peak and VT were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.8-0.99, P=0.04) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71-0.98, P=0.03), respectively. In conclusion, CPET is safe and feasible prior to allo-SCT. Patients have marked impairments in cardiopulmonary function prior to allo-SCT. CPET-derived metrics may complement conventional measures to improve risk stratification.

Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone.

Chemotherapy plus G-CSF (C+G) and G-CSF alone are two of the most common methods used to mobilize CD34(+) cells for autologous hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT). In order to compare and determine the real-world outcomes and costs of these strategies, we performed a retrospective study of 226 consecutive patients at 11 medical centers (64 lymphoma, 162 multiple myeloma), of whom 55% of lymphoma patients and 66% of myeloma patients received C+G. Patients with C+G yielded more CD34(+) cells/day than those with G-CSF alone (lymphoma: average 5.51 × 10(6) cells/kg on day 1 vs 2.92 × 10(6) cells/kg, P=0.0231; myeloma: 4.16 × 10(6) vs 3.69 × 10(6) cells/kg, P<0.00001) and required fewer days of apheresis (lymphoma: average 2.11 vs 2.96 days, P=0.012; myeloma: 2.02 vs 2.83 days, P=0.0015), although nearly all patients ultimately reached the goal of 2 × 10(6) cells/kg. With the exception of higher rates of febrile neutropenia in myeloma patients with C+G (17% vs 2%, P<0.05), toxicities and other outcomes were similar. Mobilization with C+G cost significantly more (lymphoma: median $10,300 vs $7300, P<0.0001; myeloma: $8800 vs $5600, P<0.0001), although re-mobilization adds $6700 for drugs alone. Our results suggest that although both C+G and G-CSF alone are effective mobilization strategies, C+G may be more cost-effective for patients at high risk of insufficient mobilization.

Pre-engraftment syndrome after myeloablative dual umbilical cord blood transplantation: risk factors and response to treatment.

High fevers and/or rashes prior to neutrophil engraftment are frequently observed after umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation, and the condition is referred to as pre-engraftment syndrome (PES). Few studies have evaluated the risk factors for and treatment response to PES. Therefore, we retrospectively characterized PES in 57 consecutive engrafted patients (≥ 12 years old) who received myeloablative dual UCB transplantation. All patients received TBI (≥ 13.2 Gy)-based myeloablative conditioning. Tacrolimus (n=35) or CYA (n=22) combined with mycophenolate mofetil was used as GVHD prophylaxis. PES was defined as the presence of non-infectious fever (≥ 38.5 °C) and/or rash prior to or on the day of neutrophil engraftment. The incidence (95% confidence interval) of PES was 77% (66-88%). The incidence of PES was significantly higher in patients who received CYA as a GVHD prophylaxis than those who received tacrolimus (P<0.001), and this association was confirmed in the multivariate analysis. The occurrence of PES did not impact OS or tumor relapse, although it may have increased non-relapse mortality (P=0.071). The incidence of acute GHVD or treatment-related mortality was not influenced by the choice to use corticosteroids to treat PES. This study suggests that use of CYA for GVHD prophylaxis increases the risk of PES following dual UCB transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of hematopoietic stem cell remobilization with plerixafor+G-CSF in adult patients with germ cell tumors.

Autologous hematopoietic SCT (auto-HSCT) can be curative for patients with germ cell tumors. Poor stem cell mobilization jeopardizes the ability to deliver this therapy. Herein, we describe a retrospective study examining safety and efficacy of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF for patients with germ cell tumors who had previously failed stem cell collection. Overall, 21 patients with germ cell tumors and previous mobilization failure were remobilized with G-CSF (10 µg/kg SC) and plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) beginning the evening of day 4 of G-CSF treatment. Dosing of G-CSF and plerixafor was repeated until collection of ≥ 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Remobilization resulted in a median yield of 3.2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 17 (81%) patients collected ≥ 2 × 10(6) and 9 (43%) patients collected ≥ 4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in a median of 2 (range 1-3) and 3 (range 1-4) days, respectively. In all, 16 (76%) patients proceeded to transplant; 8 (38%) received tandem transplants. There were no serious adverse events. In summary, the majority of patients with germ cell tumors who failed prior mobilization with growth factors ± chemotherapy were remobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF facilitating at least one auto-HSCT. Use of plerixafor plus G-CSF can increase access of this potentially life-saving procedure to patients with high-risk germ cell tumors.

Preemptive dosing of plerixafor given to poor stem cell mobilizers on day 5 of G-CSF administration.

Plerixafor, given on day 4 of G-CSF treatment is more effective than G-CSF alone in mobilizing hematopoietic progenitor cells. We tested a strategy of preemptive plerixafor use following assessment of the peak mobilization response to 5 days of G-CSF. Patients were eligible for plerixafor if, on day 5 of G-CSF, there were <7 circulating CD34+ cells/µL or if <1.3 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected on the first day of apheresis. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg s.c.) was given on day 5 of G-CSF followed by apheresis on day 6. This was repeated for up to two additional doses of plerixafor. The primary end point of the study was the percentage of patients who collected at least 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Twenty candidates for auto-SCT enrolled on the trial. The circulating CD34+ cell level increased a median of 3.1 fold (range 1-8 fold) after the first dose of plerixafor and a median of 1.2 fold (range 0.3-6.5 fold) after the second dose of plerixafor. In all, 15 out of 20 (75%) patients achieved the primary end point. In conclusion, the decision to administer plerixafor can be delayed until after the peak mobilization response to G-CSF has been fully assessed.

Outcomes of a 1-day nonmyeloablative salvage regimen for patients with primary graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Primary graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a life-threatening complication. A shortened conditioning regimen may reduce the risk of infection and increase the chance of survival. Here, we report the outcome of 11 patients with hematologic diseases (median age, 44; range, 25-67 years, seven males) who received a 1-day reduced-intensity preparative regimen given as a re-transplantation for primary graft failure. The salvage regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, alemtuzumab and TBI, all administered 1 day before re-transplantation. All patients received T-cell replete PBSCs from the same or a different haploidentical donor (n=10) or from the same matched sibling donor (n=1). Neutrophil counts promptly increased to >500/µL for 10 of the 11 patients at a median of 13 days. Of these, none developed grade III/IV acute GVHD. At present, 8 of the 11 patients are alive with a median follow-up of 11.2 months from re-transplantation and 5 of the 8 are in remission. In conclusion, this series suggests that our 1-day preparative regimen is feasible, leads to successful engraftment in a high proportion of patients, and is appropriate for patients requiring immediate re-transplantation after primary graft failure following reduced-intensity transplantation.

Differential impact of inhibitory and activating Killer Ig-Like Receptors (KIR) on high-risk patients with myeloid and lymphoid malignancies undergoing reduced intensity transplantation from haploidentical related donors.

The impact of activating KIR (aKIR) and inhibitory KIR (iKIR) on OS, relapse-related mortality (RRM) and acute GVHD (aGVHD) was prospectively studied in 84 adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies receiving reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) T-cell depleted hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) from haploidentical related donors. In this clinical model, freedom from RRM is dependent on GVL effect. Patients were divided into myeloid (n=49) and lymphoid (n=35) malignancy groups. KIR-ligand and ligand-ligand models were studied in both GVH and rejection directions and statistically correlated with outcome measures. In the myeloid group, OS was higher (P=0.009) and RRM was lower (P=0.036) in patients missing HLA-C group2 ligand to donor iKIR. OS was higher if patients had >1 missing ligand (P=0.018). In lymphoid malignancy, missing ligand to donor KIR had no impact on OS or RRM. However, OS was better with donor aKIR 2DS2 (P=0.028). There was a trend towards shorter OS in recipient with KIR 2DS1, 2DS5 and 3DS1, although sample sizes were too small to provide inferential statistics. Findings in lymphoid malignancy patients should be further studied. These results suggest that the absence of appropriate HLA ligands in the recipient to donor iKIR may induce GVL without aGVHD in myeloid malignancy patients undergoing TCD-RIC transplants.

Lymphocyte reconstitution following non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation follows two patterns depending on age and donor/recipient chimerism.

The effect of mixed chimerism on the pace of post-transplant immune reconstitution is unknown. Using flow cytometry, recall and neo-antigen vaccine responses, and T cell receptor recombination excision circle (TREC) quantification, we evaluated phenotypic and functional characteristics of T and B cells in nine patients following non-myeloablative, HLA-identical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for chronic granulomatous disease. Engraftment of T cell, B cell, and myeloid lineages proceeded at similar paces within each patient, but engraftment kinetics segregated patients into two groups: adults, who became full donor T cell chimeras before 6 months (rapid engrafters) and children, who became full donor T cell chimeras after 6 months or not at all (slow engrafters). Quantitative B cell recovery was achieved by 6 weeks after transplantation in children, but was delayed until 1 year in adults. Early quantitative B cell recovery was not accompanied by an early humoral immune response to tetanus toxoid (TT). Emergence of TT-specific T cell responses coincided with naive T cell reconstitution, as measured by CD4/CD45RA T cell recovery and TREC quantification. These data suggest that immune reconstitution occurs faster in pediatric patients who have prolonged mixed hematopoietic chimerism compared to adults, who have rapid donor stem cell engraftment.

Treatment of chronic granulomatous disease with nonmyeloablative conditioning and a T-cell-depleted hematopoietic allograft.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of chronic granulomatous disease with conventional allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation carries a high risk of serious complications and death. We investigated the feasibility of stem-cell transplantation without ablation of the recipient's bone marrow. METHODS: Ten patients, five children and five adults, with chronic granulomatous disease underwent peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling. We used a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and antithymocyte globulin. The allograft was depleted of T cells to reduce the risk of severe graft-versus-host disease. Donor lymphocytes were administered at intervals of 30 days or more after the transplantation to facilitate engraftment. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 17 months (range, 8 to 26), the proportion of donor neutrophils in the circulation in 8 of the 10 patients was 33 to 100 percent, a level that can be expected to provide normal host defense; in 6 the proportion was 100 percent. In two patients, graft rejection occurred. Acute graft-versus-host disease (grade II, III, or IV) developed in three of the four adult patients with engraftment, one of whom subsequently had chronic graft-versus-host disease. None of the five children had grade II, III, or IV acute graft-versus-host disease. During the follow-up period, four serious infections occurred among the patients who had engraftment. Three of the 10 recipients died. Preexisting granulomatous lesions resolved in the patients in whom transplantation was successful. CONCLUSIONS: Nonmyeloablative conditioning followed by a T-cell-depleted hematopoietic stem-cell allograft is a feasible option for patients with chronic granulomatous disease, recurrent life-threatening infections, and an HLA-identical family donor.

Stem-cell transplantation for inherited immunodeficiency disorders.

For patients with well-characterized, rapidly fatal, nonmalignant immunodeficiency disorders, such as SCID, the decision to proceed with allogeneic SCT is clear-cut. For patients with many other disorders, this decision can be extremely difficult. Disorders such as LAD or CGD have a variable natural history. Each patient must be considered individually, with the risk for SCT-related morbidity and mortality carefully weighed against that of the underlying disease. Significant advances during the past 10 years have made SCT a much safer procedure. Use of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens as a means of reducing toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and irradiation hold great promise. Highly immunosuppressive, nonchemotherapeutic agents that inhibit graft rejection or GVHD by blocking the critical costimulatory component of the T-cell receptor-antigen interaction are beginning to emerge and may be ideal for SCT of nonmalignant diseases. Therefore, the risk-benefit equation must be reassessed each year as the severity of patients' disorders is better defined and techniques of SCT improve.

The gene for familial Mediterranean fever, MEFV, is expressed in early leukocyte development and is regulated in response to inflammatory mediators.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a recessive disorder characterized by episodes of fever and neutrophil-mediated serosal inflammation. We recently identified the gene causing FMF, designated MEFV, and found it to be expressed in mature neutrophils, suggesting that it functions as an inflammatory regulator. To facilitate our understanding of the normal function of MEFV, we extended our previous studies. MEFV messenger RNA was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in bone marrow leukocytes, with differential expression observed among cells by in situ hybridization. CD34 hematopoietic stem-cell cultures induced toward the granulocytic lineage expressed MEFV at the myelocyte stage, concurrently with lineage commitment. The prepromyelocytic cell line HL60 expressed MEFV only at granulocytic and monocytic differentiation. MEFV was also expressed in the monocytic cell lines U937 and THP-1. Among peripheral blood leukocytes, MEFV expression was detected in neutrophils, eosinophils, and to varying degrees, monocytes. Consistent with the tissue specificity of expression, complete sequencing and analysis of upstream regulatory regions of MEFV revealed homology to myeloid-specific promoters and to more broadly expressed inflammatory promoter elements. In vitro stimulation of monocytes with the proinflammatory agents interferon (IFN) gamma, tumor necrosis factor, and lipopolysaccharide induced MEFV expression, whereas the antiinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL) 4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor beta inhibited such expression. Induction by IFN-gamma occurred rapidly and was resistant to cycloheximide. IFN-alpha also induced MEFV expression. In granulocytes, MEFV was up-regulated by IFN-gamma and the combination of IFN-alpha and colchicine. These results refine understanding of MEFV by placing the gene in the myelomonocytic-specific proinflammatory pathway and identifying it as an IFN-gamma immediate early gene.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cells enter into G1 of the cell cycle and express higher levels of amphotropic retrovirus receptor mRNA.

We compared the cell cycle status and expression of mRNA for the amphotropic retroviral receptor in hematopoietic stem cells isolated from bone marrow and cytokine mobilized peripheral blood. CD34+ cells from six normal volunteers were enriched by immune selection from steady-state bone marrow and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood (10 microg/kg/day for 5 days). Cell cycle status of the phenotypically primitive CD34+CD38- hematopoietic stem cell population was analyzed using a four-color flow cytometry technique that distinguished the G0, G1, and S/IG2/M phases of the cell cycle. Semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was performed to measure mRNA expression of the amphotropic retroviral receptor. Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells had 2.6-fold more cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle compared to steady-state bone marrow. Furthermore, lineage CD34+CD38- cells from G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood had a fourfold higher level of amphotropic retrovirus receptor mRNA. In conclusion, we found that CD34+ CD38- hematopoietic stem cells isolated from G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood differ from those isolated from steady-state bone marrow in that a significant proportion have entered the G1 phase of the cell cycle and express higher levels of amphotropic receptor mRNA. These biologic properties are consistent with the reported rapid recovery of hematopoietic function following transplantation with peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells and make these cells a preferred target for retroviral-based gene transfer.

Medicaid primary care services in New York State: partial capitation vs full capitation.

BACKGROUND: Forty-nine states have applied to the Health Care Financing Administration for waivers to allow special program development for Medicaid recipients. In an effort to identify issues relevant to making the transition of its entire Medicaid population into a capitation model, New York State has encouraged the development of partial capitation and full capitation models. This paper is a critical description analysis of a 1-year experience, utilizing data provided by the New York State Department of Social Services. METHODS: Data collected by the New York State Department of Social Services were used to compare the costs for matched cohorts enrolled in partial capitation programs in which the primary care physician is paid a monthly fee to provide ambulatory primary care for Medicaid recipients; and full capitation programs in which a health maintenance organization (HMO) or a hospital-based prepaid health services program (PHSP) is paid a more encompassing monthly fee to provide a larger range of services, including inpatient, outpatient, and specialty care. RESULTS: Partial capitation programs were reported to save the state 38% compared with a matched control group enrolled in traditional, fee-for-service Medicaid (P<.05), and offered greater savings than HMOs and PHSPs (P=NS). The HMOs and PHSPs saved the state 9.3% and 16.8%, respectively, compared with traditional enrollment. Quality measures and patient satisfaction for partial and full capitation programs were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that New York State primary care physicians who participated in programs that reimburse a prepaid monthly fee for outpatient primary care services achieved savings comparable to those of HMOs. A partial capitation primary care model may offer an affordable and more flexible alternative to full-service HMOs in caring for Medicaid recipients, especially in communities with limited HMO penetration.

The impact of informal care giving on labor force participation by rural farming and nonfarming families.

Using data from the National Survey of Families and Households, 1987, this study contrasts urban versus rural, and farm versus rural nonfarm informal care givers of the elderly and disabled to illustrate the conflicts that each group experiences when combining work and care giving. Women are the primary care givers in both rural and urban areas. Rural care givers spent more time providing care than urban care givers, whether the dependent resided in the care giver's home or elsewhere in the community. A moderate difference existed in the number of hours care givers spent at work, although the rural care giver's spouses worked significantly more hours than urban spouses. Rural nonfarm care givers spent more hours caring for individuals residing in their communities, while farm care givers spent the most time in household-related activities when caring for someone in their homes. In-home activity decreased the number of hours spent at work, while community care giving did not.