Indirect laryngoscopy is more effective than direct laryngoscopy when tracheal intubation is performed by novice operators: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether indirect laryngoscopy has an advantage over direct laryngoscopy in terms of the tracheal intubation rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time when used by novice operators. METHODS: We extracted adult prospective randomized trials comparing tracheal intubation with indirect vs direct laryngoscopy in novice operators from electronic databases. We extracted the following data from the identified studies: success rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time. Data from each trial were combined via a random-effects model to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We also performed a trial sequential analysis. RESULTS: We included 15 articles (17 trials) comprising 2,290 patients in the systematic review. Compared with the direct laryngoscopy, indirect laryngoscopy improved success rate (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.24; P = 0.0002; I2 = 88%), glottic visualization (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.28; P < 0.001; I2 = 85%), and intubation time (WMD, -9.06 sec; 95% CI, -16.4 to -1.76; P = 0.01; I2 = 98%) in tracheal intubation. Trial sequential analysis showed that the total sample size was sufficient to analyze the success rate and intubation time. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review, we found that the tracheal intubation success rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time were improved when novice operators used indirect laryngoscopy rather than direct laryngoscopy. Trial sequential analysis results indicated that the sample size was sufficient for examining the success rate and intubation time. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022309045); first registered 4 September 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons cherché à réaliser une revue systématique et une méta-analyse pour déterminer si la laryngoscopie indirecte présente un avantage par rapport à la laryngoscopie directe en termes de taux de succès d'intubation trachéale, de visualisation glottique et de temps d'intubation lorsqu'elle est utilisée par des opératrices et opérateurs novices. MéTHODE: Nous avons extrait des études randomisées prospectives chez l'adulte comparant l'intubation trachéale avec une laryngoscopie indirecte vs directe réalisée par des opérateurs et opératrices novices à partir de bases de données électroniques. Nous avons extrait les données suivantes des études identifiées : taux de succès, visualisation glottique et temps d'intubation. Les données de chaque étude ont été combinées au moyen d'un modèle à effets aléatoires pour le calcul du risque relatif (RR) groupé ou de la différence moyenne pondérée (DMP) avec un intervalle de confiance (IC) de 95 %. Nous avons également réalisé une analyse séquentielle des études. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 15 articles (17 études) portant sur 2290 patient·es dans notre revue systématique. Par rapport à la laryngoscopie directe, la laryngoscopie indirecte a amélioré le taux de succès (RR, 1,15; IC 95 %, 1,07 à 1,24; P = 0,0002; I2 = 88 %), la visualisation glottique (RR, 1,76; IC 95 %, 1,36 à 2,28; P < 0,001; I2 = 85 %), et le temps d'intubation (DMP, −9,06 s; IC 95 %, −16,4 à −1,76; P = 0,01; I2 = 98 %) pour l'intubation trachéale. L'analyse séquentielle des études a montré que la taille totale de l'échantillon était suffisante pour analyser le taux de succès et le temps d'intubation. CONCLUSION: Dans cette revue systématique, nous avons constaté que le taux de succès de l'intubation trachéale, la visualisation glottique et le temps d'intubation étaient améliorés lorsque les opératrices et opérateurs novices utilisaient la laryngoscopie indirecte plutôt que la laryngoscopie directe. L'analyse séquentielle des études a montré que la taille totale de l'échantillon était suffisante pour analyser le taux de succès et le temps d'intubation. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42022309045); première inscription le 4 septembre 2022.

Incidence of long-term post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection related to pain and other symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Persistent symptoms are reported in patients who survive the initial stage of COVID-19, often referred to as "long COVID" or "post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection" (PASC); however, evidence on their incidence is still lacking, and symptoms relevant to pain are yet to be assessed. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and CHINAL and preprint servers MedRχiv and BioRχiv through January 15, 2021. The primary outcome was pain-related symptoms such as headache or myalgia. Secondary outcomes were symptoms relevant to pain (depression or muscle weakness) and symptoms frequently reported (anosmia and dyspnea). Incidence rates of symptoms were pooled using inverse variance methods with a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The source of heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression, with follow-up period, age and sex as covariates. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies including 19,460 patients were eligible. Eight pain-related symptoms and 26 other symptoms were identified. The highest pooled incidence among pain-related symptoms was chest pain (17%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 11%-24%), followed by headache (16%, 95% CI, 9%-27%), arthralgia (13%, 95% CI, 7%-24%), neuralgia (12%, 95% CI, 3%-38%) and abdominal pain (11%, 95% CI, 7%-16%). The highest pooled incidence among other symptoms was fatigue (44%, 95% CI, 32%-57%), followed by insomnia (27%, 95% CI, 10%-55%), dyspnea (26%, 95% CI, 17%-38%), weakness (25%, 95% CI, 8%-56%) and anosmia (19%, 95% CI, 13%-27%). Substantial heterogeneity was identified (I2, 50-100%). Meta-regression analyses partially accounted for the source of heterogeneity, and yet, 53% of the symptoms remained unexplained. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis may provide a complete picture of incidence in PASC. It remains unclear, however, whether post-COVID symptoms progress or regress over time or to what extent PASC are associated with age or sex.

Successful Tracheal Intubation With Airway Scope After Failure With McGrath.

The use of video laryngoscopy is growing in patients with anatomical factors suggestive of a difficult airway. This case report describes the successful tracheal intubation of a 54-year-old female patient with limited mouth opening scheduled for third molar extraction under general anesthesia. The Airway scope (AWS) along with a gum-elastic bougie was used to secure the airway after failed direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy using the McGrath MAC with an X-blade. The AWS has a J-shaped structure in which the blade approximates the curvature of the pharynx and larynx. This blade shape makes it easy to match the laryngeal axis with the visual field direction, enabling successful tracheal intubation even for patients with limited mouth opening. A major key to successful video laryngoscopy is to select a video laryngoscope based on the anatomical characteristics of patients with a difficult airway.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor-associated perioperative ketoacidosis: a systematic review of case reports.

Although the recommended preoperative cessation period for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) changed in 2020 (from 24 h to 3-4 days preoperatively) to reduce the risk of SGLT2i-associated perioperative ketoacidosis (SAPKA), the validity of the new recommendation has not been verified. Using case reports, we assessed the new recommendation effectiveness and extrapolated precipitating factors for SAPKA. We searched electronic databases up to June 1, 2022 to assess SAPKA (blood pH < 7.3 and blood or urine ketone positivity within 30 days postoperatively in patients taking SGLT2i). We included 76 publications with 99 cases. The preoperative SGLT2i cessation duration was reported for 59 patients (59.6%). In all cases with available cessation periods, the SGLT2is were interrupted < 3 days preoperatively. No SAPKA cases with > 2-day preoperative cessation periods were found. Many case reports lack important information for estimating precipitating factors, including preoperative SGLT2i cessation period, body mass index, baseline hemoglobin A1c level, details of perioperative fluid management, and type of anesthesia. Our study suggested that preoperative SGLT2i cessation for at least 3 days could prevent SAPKA. Large prospective epidemiologic studies are needed to identify risk factors for SAPKA.

Hemodynamic response related to the Airway Scope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is important to reduce the hemodynamic response during tracheal intubation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Airway Scope and Macintosh laryngoscope to determine whether they reduce the hemodynamic responses of heart rate (HR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) after tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases for clinical trials comparing hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. The primary aim of our meta-analyst is to determine if the Airway Scope reduces hemodynamic responses (HR and mean MBP) 60 seconds after tracheal intubation compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope. We expressed pooled differences in hemodynamic responses between the 2 devices as weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. We conducted trial sequential analysis. Secondarily, we investigated the ability of the Airway Scope and Macintosh laryngoscope to reduce hemodynamic responses at 120 seconds, 180 seconds, and 300 seconds after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: We identified clinical trials comparing hemodynamic response via a comprehensive literature search. Of 185 articles found in the search, we selected 8. In comparison to the Macintosh laryngoscope, the Airway Scope significantly reduced HR and MBP at 60 seconds after tracheal intubation (HR; weighted mean difference = -7.29; 95% confidence interval, -10.9 to -3.62; P < .0001; I2 = 57%, MBP; weighted mean difference = -11.5; 95% confidence interval, -20.4 to -2.65; P = .01; I2 = 91%). At the secondary outcome, the Airway Scope significantly reduced the fluctuation of HR after 120 seconds and 180 seconds of tracheal intubation. However, the Airway Scope did not significantly reduce MBP 120 seconds, 180 seconds, and 300 seconds after tracheal intubation. Trial sequential analysis suggested that the total sample size reached the required information size for heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggested that the Airway Scope attenuated hemodynamic responses at 60 seconds after tracheal intubation in comparison with that of the Macintosh laryngoscope. However, the MBP sample size is small and further research is needed.

3M microfoam™ surgical tape prevents nasal pressure injury associated with nasotracheal intubation: A randomized double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: 3M microfoam™ surgical tape (3ST: 3M Japan Limited) is used for pressure wound control of medical equipment. It is cushioned and can be fitted to any body part. Here we investigated whether 3ST prevents nasal pressure injury associated with nasotracheal intubation (NTI). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized double-blind study, enrolling 63 patients aged 20 to 70 years, who underwent general anesthesia with NTI. They were divided into 2 groups; those treated with 3ST (group S; n = 31) and control (group C; n = 31). After NTI and before securing the nasotracheal tube, a 35 × 25 mm 3ST was used to protect the nasal wing in group S, and the nasotracheal tube was fixed in place after NTI without protection in group C. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of nasal pressure injury after extubation. The Chi-Square test was used to assess the association between the 2 categorical variables. RESULTS: Nasal pressure injury was observed in 7 and 19 patients from groups S and C, respectively, representing a significant difference between the 2 groups (24.1% vs 67.8%, P = .001). Remarkably, none of the patients developed ulcers. CONCLUSION: 3ST prevents nasal pressure injury associated with NTI.

Comparison of Indirect and Direct Laryngoscopes in Pediatric Patients with a Difficult Airway: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This meta-analysis was performed to determine whether an indirect laryngoscope is more advantageous than a direct laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in the setting of a difficult pediatric airway. Data on the intubation failure and intubation time during tracheal intubation were extracted from prospective and retrospective studies identified through a comprehensive literature search. Data from 10 individual articles (11 trials) were combined, and a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate either the pooled relative risk (RR) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of the 10 articles indicated that the intubation failure of tracheal intubation with an indirect laryngoscope was not significantly different from that of a direct laryngoscope in patients with a difficult airway (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51-1.46; p = 0.59; Cochrane's Q = 50.5; I2 = 82%). Intubation time with an indirect laryngoscope was also similar to that with a direct laryngoscope (WMD 4.06 s; 95% CI -1.18-9.30; p = 0.13; Cochrane's Q 39.8; I2 = 85%). In conclusion, indirect laryngoscopes had the same intubation failure and intubation time as direct laryngoscopes in pediatric patients with a difficult airway. Currently, the benefits of indirect laryngoscopes have not been observed in the setting of a difficult pediatric airway.

Nasal protection strategy reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injuries during nasotracheal intubation: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nasal pressure injury is a serious problem during nasotracheal intubation. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether use of a nasal protection strategy (a protective dressing or a modified fixation method for the tracheal tube) reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. METHODS: Literature searches were performed using three electronic databases. Data from each of the eligible trials were combined, and calculations were made using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. The pooled effect estimates for nasal pressure injury were evaluated using the relative risk and 95% confidence interval, the Cochrane Q statistic, and the I2 statistic. We also performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to assess sensitivity to prevent type I error. We separated patients into subgroups to analyze the incidence of nasal pressure injury according to whether a protective dressing or a modified fixation method for the tracheal tube was used. RESULTS: The literature search yielded five eligible trials. Meta-analysis of these trials showed that a nasal protection strategy significantly reduced the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation (relative risk (RR) 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.56; P < .0001; Cochrane's Q = 5.86, I2 = 32%). The TSA boundary for futility could not be calculated because of an insufficient sample size. In subgroup analysis, both methods significantly reduced the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that a nasal protection strategy significantly reduces the incidence of nasal pressure injury during nasotracheal intubation. During nasotracheal intubation, the use of a protective dressing or modified fixation method for the tracheal tube can prevent to the incidence of nasal pressure injuries. However, the number of samples in our meta-analysis was too small for TSA and further studies are required. TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; registration number 252091).

Effectiveness of Indirect and Direct Laryngoscopes in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

This research aimed to produce a coherent ranking of the effectiveness of intubation devices in pediatric patients using network meta-analysis (NMA). We searched the electric databases for prospective randomized studies that compared different tracheal intubation devices in pediatric patients. The primary outcome was intubation failure at the first attempt. Secondary outcomes were glottic visualization and intubation time. The statistical analysis performed used DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted, and network plots and network league tables were produced. Subgroup analysis was performed after excluding rigid-fiberscope-type indirect laryngoscopes. Thirty-four trials comparing 13 devices were included. Most laryngoscopes had the same intubation failure rate as the Macintosh reference device. Only the Truview PCD™ had a significantly higher intubation failure rate than the Macintosh (odds ratio 4.78, 95% confidence interval 1.11-20.6) The highest-ranking laryngoscope was the Airtaq™ (P score, 0.90), and the AirwayScope™, McGrath™, and Truview EVO2™ ranked higher than the Macintosh. The Bullard™ had the lowest ranking (P score, 0.08). All laryngoscopes had the same level of glottic visualization as the Macintosh and only the C-MAC™ had a significantly shorter intubation time. Intubation time was significantly longer when using the GlideScope™, Storz DCI™, Truview PCD™, or Bullard™ compared with the Macintosh. P score and ranking of devices in the subgroup analyses were similar to those in the main analysis. We applied NMA to create a consistent ranking of the effectiveness of intubation devices in pediatric patients. The findings of NMA suggest that there is presently no laryngoscope superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of tracheal intubation failure rate and glottic visualization in pediatric patients.

Airtraq® versus GlideScope® for tracheal intubation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

PURPOSE: In recent years, various types of indirect laryngoscopes have been developed. Nevertheless, no conclusions have been drawn about which type of indirect laryngoscope is most effective for tracheal intubation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether the Airtraq® or the GlideScope® is more effective for tracheal intubation. METHODS: We extracted studies of adult prospective randomized trials comparing tracheal intubation between the Airtraq and GlideScope. An electronic database was used to extract the studies included in our meta-analysis. We extracted the following data from the identified studies: success rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time. Data from each trial were combined via a random-effects model for calculation of pooled relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We also performed trial sequential analysis. RESULTS: We included eight trials comprising 571 patients for review. Compared with the GlideScope, Airtraq did not improve success rate, glottic visualization, or intubation time in tracheal intubation (success rate: RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.05; P = 0.58; I2 = 65%; glottic visualization: RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.29; P = 0.69; I2 = 64%; and intubation time: WMD, 1.4 seconds ; 95% CI, -6.2 to 9.1; P = 0.72; I2 = 96%). The quality of evidence was graded as "very low." Trial sequential analysis showed that total sample size did not reach the required information size for all parameters. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, use of the Airtraq indirect laryngoscope did not result in improved success rate, glottic visualization, or intubation time in tracheal intubation compared with the GlideScope. Trial sequential analysis suggests that further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Ces dernières années, différents types de laryngoscopes indirects ont été mis au point. Néanmoins, aucune conclusion n'a été tirée sur le type de laryngoscope indirect le plus efficace pour l'intubation trachéale. Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique et une méta-analyse pour déterminer quel dispositif était le plus efficace pour l'intubation trachéale, soit l'Airtraq® ou le GlideScope®. MéTHODE: Nous avons extrait les études portant sur les essais randomisés prospectifs chez l'adulte comparant l'intubation trachéale avec l'Airtraq ou le GlideScope. Une base de données électronique a été utilisée pour extraire les études incluses dans notre méta-analyse. Nous avons extrait les données suivantes des études identifiées : taux de réussite, visualisation glottique et temps d'intubation. Les données de chaque étude ont été combinées au moyen d'un modèle à effets aléatoires pour le calcul du risque relatif (RR) groupé ou de la différence moyenne pondérée (DMP) avec un intervalle de confiance (IC) de 95 %. Nous avons également réalisé une analyse séquentielle des études. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus huit études portant sur 571 patients pour notre revue. Par rapport au GlideScope, l'Airtraq n'a pas amélioré le taux de réussite, la visualisation glottique ou le temps d'intubation pour l'intubation trachéale (taux de réussite : RR, 0,98; IC 95 %, 0,91 à 1,05; P = 0,58; I2 = 65 %; visualisation glottique : RR, 1.07; IC 95 %, 0,88 à 1,29; P = 0,69; I2 = 64 %; et temps d'intubation : DMP, 1,4 seconde; IC 95 %, -6,2 à 9,1; P = 0,72; I2 = 96 %). La qualité des données probantes a été classée comme « très faible ¼. L'analyse séquentielle des études a montré que la taille totale de l'échantillon n'atteignait pas la taille d'information requise pour tous les paramètres. CONCLUSION: Selon cette méta-analyse, l'utilisation du laryngoscope indirect Airtraq® n'entraîne pas d'amélioration du taux de réussite, de la visualisation glottique ou du temps d'intubation pour une intubation trachéale par rapport au GlideScope®. L'analyse séquentielle des études suggère que d'autres études sont nécessaires pour confirmer ces résultats.

Anesthetic management with remimazolam for a pediatric patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

RATIONALE: With Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) being the most common and most severe type of muscular dystrophy, DMD patients are at risk for complications from general anesthesia due to impaired cardiac and respiratory functions as the pathological condition progresses. In recent years, advances in multidisciplinary treatment have improved the prognosis of DMD patients, and the number of patients requiring surgery has increased. Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine derivative similar to midazolam. Its circulatory stability and the fact that it has an antagonist make it superior to propofol.There are no reports of pediatric patients with DMD undergoing total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 4-year boy was scheduled for single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia under general anesthesia, but the surgery was postponed because his serum creatine phosphokinase level was extremely high. DIAGNOSIS: He was diagnosed with DMD. According to the results of the genetic test, exon deletion of the DMD gene was detected using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, although he had no symptoms of DMD except for elevated serum levels of creatine phosphokinase, etc. INTERVENTION: He was admitted for the same surgical purpose. Anesthesia was induced with 3 mg of intravenously administered remimazolam. He lost the ability to respond to verbal commands. After the intravenous administration of 100 µg of fentanyl, a continuous infusion of remifentanil (1.0 µg/kg/min) and remimazolam (15 mg/h) was started, and the endotracheal tube was inserted smoothly after the administration of 10 mg of rocuronium with which the muscle twitches disappeared in train-of-four monitoring. At the end of the surgery, 15 mg of flurbiprofen was administered intravenously. After surgery, we injected 40 mg of sugammadex to confirm a train-of-four count of 100%. OUTCOMES: Although the dose of remimazolam was reduced to 5 mg/h 30 minutes before the end of the surgery, it took 20 minutes after the discontinuation of remimazolam for the patient to open his eyes upon verbal command. On postoperative Day 2, he was discharged from the hospital without any complications. LESSONS: Remimazolam was shown to be safe to use for general anesthesia in a pediatric patient with DMD.

Systematic Review of Systemic and Neuraxial Effects of Acetaminophen in Preclinical Models of Nociceptive Processing.

Acetaminophen (APAP) in humans has robust effects with a high therapeutic index in altering postoperative and inflammatory pain states in clinical and experimental pain paradigms with no known abuse potential. This review considers the literature reflecting the preclinical actions of acetaminophen in a variety of pain models. Significant observations arising from this review are as follows: 1) acetaminophen has little effect upon acute nociceptive thresholds; 2) acetaminophen robustly reduces facilitated states as generated by mechanical and thermal hyperalgesic end points in mouse and rat models of carrageenan and complete Freund's adjuvant evoked inflammation; 3) an antihyperalgesic effect is observed in models of facilitated processing with minimal inflammation (eg, phase II intraplantar formalin); and 4) potent anti-hyperpathic effects on the thermal hyperalgesia, mechanical and cold allodynia, allodynic thresholds in rat and mouse models of polyneuropathy and mononeuropathies and bone cancer pain. These results reflect a surprisingly robust drug effect upon a variety of facilitated states that clearly translate into a wide range of efficacy in preclinical models and to important end points in human therapy. The specific systems upon which acetaminophen may act based on targeted delivery suggest both a spinal and a supraspinal action. Review of current targets for this molecule excludes a role of cyclooxygenase inhibitor but includes effects that may be mediated through metabolites acting on the TRPV1 channel, or by effect upon cannabinoid and serotonin signaling. These findings suggest that the mode of action of acetaminophen, a drug with a long therapeutic history of utilization, has surprisingly robust effects on a variety of pain states in clinical patients and in preclinical models with a good therapeutic index, but in spite of its extensive use, its mechanisms of action are yet poorly understood.

Comparison of hemostatic effect and safety between epinephrine and tramazoline during nasotracheal intubation: a double-blind randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Nasal bleeding is the most common complication during nasotracheal intubation (NTI). To reduce nasal bleeding, the nasal mucosa is treated with vasoconstrictors (epinephrine [E] or tramazoline [T]) prior to NTI. This study aimed to determine whether E or T is more effective and safe for reducing nasal bleeding during NTI. METHODS: This study was preregistered on UMIN-CTR after being approved by the IRB of the School of Dentistry at Aichi Gakuin University. Written consent was received from all the patients. Total 206 patients aged 20-70 years and classified as 1-2 on American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status were scheduled to undergo general anesthesia with NTI. At last, 197 patients were randomly divided into two groups and treated with either E (n = 99; 3 patients were discontinued) or T (n = 98; 2 patient were discontinued). After induction of general anesthesia, each patient's nasal mucosa was treated using either E or T. The E used in this study was BOSMIN® SOLUTION 0.1% (Daiichi-Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo), and the T used in this study was TRAMAZOLIN Nasal Solution 0.118% AFP, (Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Osaka). E was diluted five times according to the package insert (final concentration of E = 0.02%), and T was used in its original solution. After 2 min, NTI was performed via the right nostril. Primary outcome were the presence of nasal bleeding (if bleeding was recognized at the posterior pharyngeal wall via nasal cavity during intubation, it was defined as bleeding) and the degree of bleeding (classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe). Secondary outcomes were arrhythmia, and hemodynamic (mean atrial pressure and heart rate) changes associated with vasoconstrictors. RESULTS: The presence of bleeding was comparable in both groups (12.5%, E; 14.5%, T; P = 0.63). No significant difference between the groups regarding the degree of bleeding (P = 0.78) was observed, with most patients having no bleeding (n = 84, E; n = 82, T). No severe bleeding and no arrhythmias induced by vasoconstrictor were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal treatment with E or T shows no difference in nasal bleeding during NTI. Although no arrhythmia associated with E was observed in this study, it has been reported in literature. Therefore, as frequency and degree of nasal bleeding were comparable, nasal treatment with T could reduce the risk of NTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (Registration No. UMIN000037907 ). Registered (05/09/2019).

Patient satisfaction with deep versus light/moderate sedation for non-surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Deep sedation relieves a patient's anxiety and stress during the procedure by inducing patient unconsciousness. However, it remains unclear whether deep sedation actually improves patient satisfaction with the procedure. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the satisfaction of patients undergoing deep sedation with that of those undergoing light/moderate sedation during non-surgical procedures. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using electronic databases (search until September 2020). The primary outcome was whether patient satisfaction was higher after deep sedation or light/moderate sedation. The secondary outcome was the relative safety of deep sedation compared with light/moderate sedation in terms of oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate. The tertiary outcomes were the relative procedure and recovery times for deep versus light/moderate sedation.Data from each of the trials were combined, and calculations were made using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. The pooled effect estimates for patient satisfaction were evaluated using relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). The pooled effect estimates for continuous data are expressed as weighted mean difference with the 95% CI. We assessed heterogeneity with the Cochrane Q statistic and the I2 statistic. The risk of bias assessment and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach were used as the quality assessment method. RESULTS: After removing unrelated studies and applying the exclusion criterion, 5 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in those who received deep sedation compared with light/moderate sedation (relative risk = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.20; P = .003; Cochrane Q = 25.0; I2 = 76%).There was no significant difference in oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and procedure times according to whether the procedures were performed under deep or light/moderate sedation. However, the recovery time was significantly prolonged in patients under deep sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that deep sedation resulted in improved patient satisfaction compared with light/moderate sedation. Deep sedation is recommended for patients undergoing procedures because it improves patient satisfaction. However, respiration and circulation should be carefully monitored both intra-operatively and postoperatively.

Effects of intrathecal opioids on cesarean section: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the beneficial and harmful effects of opioids used as adjuncts to local anesthetics in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until March, 2021 without language restrictions. The primary outcome was the complete analgesia duration (Time to VAS > 0). Data were synthesized using the Bayesian random-effects model. Evidence confidence was evaluated using the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis. RESULTS: We identified 66 placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 4400 patients undergoing elective cesarean section. Compared with the placebo, intrathecal opioids (fentanyl, sufentanil, and morphine) significantly prolonged the analgesia duration by 96, 96, and 190 min, respectively (mean difference). Despite morphine ranking first, opioid efficacy was similar; the results were inconsistent with respect to other analgesic outcomes. Except for diamorphine, all opioids were associated with significant increases in the pruritus incidence. Sufentanil and morphine were associated with increases in the respiratory depression incidence. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that intrathecal opioids benefit postoperative analgesia. Although morphine seems to be the most appropriate agent, some results were inconsistent, and the evidence confidence was often moderate or low, especially for adverse outcomes. Well-designed RCTs with an evidence-based approach are imperative for determining the most appropriate opioid for cesarean sections.

Asystole Triggered by the Mouth Opening With a Dental Mouth Gag Under General Anesthesia During Pediatric Oral Surgery: Report of a Rare Case.

The trigeminovagal reflex manifests as a sudden onset of bradycardia, hypotension, and cardiac arrest in response to the stimulation of the trigeminal nerve. The incidence of trigeminovagal reflex in maxillofacial surgical procedures is approximately 1.6%. We report a case of asystole in a pediatric patient in whom a dental mouth gag triggered the trigeminovagal reflex during oral surgery. The patient was a 5-year-old boy who was scheduled to undergo extraction of maxillary supernumerary teeth. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil. At the beginning of the surgery, his mouth was opened with a dental mouth gag, and electrocardigram showed asystole for 20 seconds. Thereafter, his heart rate spontaneously returned to basal value within 60 seconds. Since sufficient mouth opening was required to conduct the surgery, his mouth was opened again with the gag. When the interincisal distance exceeded about 40 mm, his heart rate suddenly decreased, but spontaneously returned to baseline within 60 second. The subsequent anesthetic course was uneventful.

Comparison of polyurethane tracheal tube cuffs and conventional polyvinyl chloride tube cuff for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was to evaluate the effect of a polyurethane (PU) tracheal tube cuff on the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: We performed a systematic search using the MEDLINE database through PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, SCOPUS, and Web of Science.Randomized controlled trials comparing the incidence of VAP and clinically relevant outcomes between PU cuff tubes and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cuff tubes in adult patients. Two authors independently extracted study details, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes such as incidence of VAP, bacterial colonization of tracheal aspirate, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and ICU mortality. RESULTS: From 309 studies identified as potentially eligible, six studies with 1226 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All studies compared the incidence of VAP between PU cuffs and PVC cuffs. Use of a PU cuff was not associated with a reduction in VAP incidence (RR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45-1.03) with significant statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 65%). The quality of evidence was "very low." According to the TSA, the actual sample size was only 15.8% of the target sample size, and the cumulative Z score did not cross the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit. No positive impact was reported for the other relevant outcomes for PU cuffs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a PU cuff for mechanical ventilation did not prevent VAP. Further trials with a low risk of bias need to be performed.