Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 54
Filtrar
1.
Geohealth ; 5(5): e2021GH000385, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33977181

RESUMEN

Wildfire smoke is a growing public health concern in the United States. Numerous studies have documented associations between ambient smoke exposure and severe patient outcomes for single-fire seasons or limited geographic regions. However, there are few national-scale health studies of wildfire smoke in the United States, few studies investigating Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions as an outcome, and few specifically framed around hospital operations. This study retrospectively examined the associations between ambient wildfire-related PM2.5 at a hospital ZIP code with total hospital ICU admissions using a national-scale hospitalization data set. Wildfire smoke was characterized using a combination of kriged PM2.5 monitor observations and satellite-derived plume polygons from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Hazard Mapping System. ICU admissions data were acquired from Premier, Inc. and encompass 15%-20% of all U.S. ICU admissions during the study period. Associations were estimated using a distributed-lag conditional Poisson model under a time-stratified case-crossover design. We found that a 10 µg/m3 increase in daily wildfire PM2.5 was associated with a 2.7% (95% CI: 1.3, 4.1; p = 0.00018) increase in ICU admissions 5 days later. Under stratification, positive associations were found among patients aged 0-20 and 60+, patients living in the Midwest Census Region, patients admitted in the years 2013-2015, and non-Black patients, though other results were mixed. Following a simulated severe 7-day 120 µg/m3 smoke event, our results predict ICU bed utilization peaking at 131% (95% CI: 43, 239; p < 10-5) over baseline. Our work suggests that hospitals may need to preposition vital critical care resources when severe smoke events are forecast.

2.
Popul Health Manag ; 24(4): 470-477, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33290149

RESUMEN

Self-reported data suggest American adults with multiple chronic conditions account for 25.7% to 60% of the population. Despite emphasis on information technology to improve quality in health care, data addressing outcomes of clinically focused, provider-oriented dashboards are limited. To explore integrating performance platforms into clinical care, the authors designed a platform-based intervention to address 2 prevalent chronic conditions with significant long-term burden. This study used a performance platform to enhance clinicians' management of patients with diabetes and osteoporosis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patients' surveys and quality metrics, and to analyze clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in the pre and post time frames. The frequency of screening for osteoporosis in women improved post intervention (40% vs. 44%, P < 0.0001), whereas other quality metrics did not. Clinician respondents were primarily physicians (82%), white (73%), internal medicine specialists (58%), with an average of 18 years' experience, and nearly equally male and female. Their percent of correctly answered knowledge questions increased slightly in the postintervention phase for osteoporosis and hypoglycemia (0.53 and 1.74, respectively); however, results were not statistically significant (P > 0.4). Post intervention, clinicians reported that their attitudes and beliefs regarding disease management had changed in the past 6 months in a positive direction. Although few outcomes studied changed over time, results suggest that performance platforms may have a role to play in managing chronic conditions. However, their efficacy must continue to be evaluated in order to improve understanding of optimal approaches to integrating technology into patient care.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Autoinforme
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(3): 354-361, 2020 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812224

RESUMEN

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions are common and costly. The association between comprehensive ACS care pathways, outcomes, and costs are lacking. From 434,172 low-risk, uncomplicated ACS patients eligible for early discharge (STEMI 35%, UA/NSTEMI 65%) from the Premier database, we identified ACS care pathways, by stratifying low-risk, uncomplicated STEMI and UA/NSTEMI patients by access site for PCI (trans-radial intervention [TRI] vs transfemoral intervention [TFI]) and by length of stay (LOS). Associations with costs and outcomes (death, bleeding, acute kidney injury, and myocardial infarction at 1-year) were tested using hierarchical, mixed-effects regression, and projections of cost savings with change in care pathways were obtained using modeling. In low-risk uncomplicated STEMI patients, compared with TFI and LOS ≥3 days, a strategy of TRI with LOS <3 days and TFI with LOS <3 days were associated with cost savings of $6,206 and $4,802, respectively. Corresponding cost savings for UA/NSTEMI patients were $7,475 and $6,169, respectively. These care-pathways did not show an excess risk of adverse outcomes. We estimated that >$300 million could be saved if prevalence of the TRI with LOS <3 days and TFI with LOS <3 days strategies are modestly increased to 20% and 70%, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrate the potential opportunity of cost savings by repositioning ACS care pathways in low-risk and uncomplicated ACS patients, toward transradial access and a shorter LOS without an increased risk of adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/economía , Predicción , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Sistema de Registros , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
5.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 36(1): 43-50, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490097

RESUMEN

Objective: This study utilized a large, national US database to explore the impact of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on hospital services utilization and costs during the first 100 days following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT).Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study used data from the Premier Healthcare database to identify patients undergoing their first (index) allo-HSCT procedure between 1 January 2006 and 31 March 2015. Three subgroups were analyzed according to CMV-related readmissions during the 100-day follow-up (0, 1, or 2+ readmissions) to compare healthcare utilization and costs.Results: A total of 1610 patients (mean age, 50.5 years; 56.9% male) from 52 US hospitals met the inclusion criteria. During follow-up, 212 (13.2%) patients had 1 (n = 161; 10.0%) or 2+ (n = 51; 3.2%) CMV-related readmissions. The mean ± SD number of all follow-up encounters (inpatient admissions and hospital-based outpatient visits) was similar for the no CMV (3.9 ± 3.9), 1 CMV (3.7 ± 3.9), and 2+ CMV (4.5 ± 3.8) readmission groups (p = .439). Mean total costs of hospital-based healthcare encounters (inpatient admissions and hospital-based outpatient visits) during follow-up were significantly greater in patients who had a CMV readmission ($111,729 [1 CMV readmission]; $184,021 [2+ CMV readmissions]) compared to those without a CMV readmission ($46,064; p < .001]. 100-day follow-up mortality was higher in the CMV vs. non-CMV readmission groups (30.2 vs. 8.2%; p < .001).Conclusions: This large, national database study revealed significantly higher healthcare utilization and costs, as well as mortality, among patients with CMV-related re-hospitalization during the first 100 days post-transplant as compared to patients without CMV-related hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/economía , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo
6.
Circulation ; 141(4): 273-284, 2020 01 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31735078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Impella was approved for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in 2008, but large-scale, real-world data on its use are lacking. Our objective was to describe trends and variations in Impella use, clinical outcomes, and costs across US hospitals in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with MCS (Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump). METHODS: From the Premier Healthcare Database, we analyzed 48 306 patients undergoing PCI with MCS at 432 hospitals between January 2004 and December 2016. Association analyses were performed at 3 levels: time period, hospital, and patient. Hierarchical models with propensity adjustment were used for association analyses. We examined trends and variations in the proportion of Impella use, and associated clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality, bleeding requiring transfusion, acute kidney injury, stroke, length of stay, and hospital costs). RESULTS: Among patients undergoing PCI treated with MCS, 4782 (9.9%) received Impella; its use increased over time, reaching 31.9% of MCS in 2016. There was wide variation in Impella use across hospitals (>5-fold variation). Specifically, among patients receiving Impella, there was a wide variation in outcomes of bleeding (>2.5-fold variation), and death, acute kidney injury, and stroke (all ≈1.5-fold variation). Adverse outcomes and costs were higher in the Impella era (years 2008-2016) versus the pre-Impella era (years 2004-2007). Hospitals with higher Impella use had higher rates of adverse outcomes and costs. After adjustment for the propensity score, and accounting for clustering of patients by hospitals, Impella use was associated with death: odds ratio, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.13-1.36); bleeding: odds ratio, 1.10 (95% CI, 1.00-1.21); and stroke: odds ratio, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.18-1.53), although a similar, nonsignificant result was observed for acute kidney injury: odds ratio, 1.08 (95% CI, 1.00-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: Impella use is rapidly increasing among patients undergoing PCI treated with MCS, with marked variability in its use and associated outcomes. Although unmeasured confounding cannot be ruled out, when analyzed by time periods, or at the hospital level or the patient level, Impella use was associated with higher rates of adverse events and costs. More data are needed to define the appropriate role of MCS in patients undergoing PCI.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/economía , Modelos Económicos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(1): 29-33, 2020 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711633

RESUMEN

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite its substantial burden, contemporary data on the incremental costs of AKI are lacking. We designed this large, nationally representative study to examine: (1) the independent, incremental costs associated with AKI after PCI and (2) to identify the departmental components of cost contributing to the incremental costs associated with AKI. In this observational cross-sectional study from the Premier database, we analyzed 1,443,297 PCI patients at 518 US hospitals from 1/2006 to 12/2015. Incremental cost of AKI from a hospital perspective obtained by a microcosting approach, was estimated using mixed-effects, multivariable linear regression with hospitals as random effects. Costs were inflation-corrected to 2016 US$. AKI occurred in 82,683 (5.73%) of the PCI patients. Those with AKI had higher hospitalization cost than those without ($38,869, SD 42,583 vs $17,167 SD 13,994, p <0.001). After adjustment, the incremental cost associated with an AKI was $9,448 (95% confidence interval $9,338 to $9,558, p <0.001). AKI was also independently associated with an incremental length of stay of 3.6 days (p <0.001). Room and board costs were the largest driver of AKI costs ($4,841). Extrapolated to the United States, our findings imply an annual AKI cost burden of 411.3 million US$. In conclusion, in this national study of PCI patients, AKI was common and independently associated with ∼$10,000 incremental costs, implying a substantial burden of AKI costs in US hospitals. Successful efforts to prevent AKI in patients who underwent PCI could result in meaningful cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/economía , Predicción , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Sistema de Registros , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Ahorro de Costo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Circulation ; 139(7): 877-888, 2019 02 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586747

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at intermediate surgical risk, treatment with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) results in similar rates of death or stroke at 2 years. Whether TAVR is cost-effective compared with SAVR for intermediate-risk patients remains uncertain. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2014, 3110 intermediate-risk AS patients were treated with TAVR or SAVR in the PARTNER 2 trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 2). A total of 2032 patients were randomized to receive TAVR using the SAPIEN XT valve (XT-TAVR) or SAVR in the PARTNER 2A trial, whereas the PARTNER S3i registry included an additional 1078 patients treated with TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 valve (S3-TAVR), which offers a lower delivery profile and sealing skirt designed to reduce paravalvular regurgitation compared with XT-TAVR. Procedural costs were estimated using measured resource utilization. Other in-trial costs were assessed by linkage of trial data with Medicare claims (n=2333) or by linear regression models for unlinked patients (n=682). Health utilities were estimated using the EQ-5D at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 months. Using a Markov model informed by in-trial costs, utilities, and survival data, lifetime cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the US healthcare system was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. RESULTS: Although procedural costs were ≈$20 000 higher with TAVR than SAVR, total cost differences for the index hospitalization were only $2888 higher with XT-TAVR ( P=0.014) and were $4155 lower with S3-TAVR ( P<0.001) owing to reductions in length of stay with TAVR. Follow-up costs were significantly lower with XT-TAVR (Δ=-$9304; P<0.001) and S3-TAVR (Δ=-$11 377; P<0.001) than with SAVR. Over a lifetime horizon, TAVR was projected to lower total costs by $8000 to $10 000 and to increase quality-adjusted survival by 0.15 to 0.27 years. XT-TAVR and S3-TAVR were found to be economically dominant compared with SAVR in 84% and 97% of bootstrap replicates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among intermediate-risk AS patients, TAVR is projected to be economically dominant from the perspective of the US healthcare system by providing both greater quality-adjusted life expectancy and lower long-term costs than SAVR. If long-term data demonstrate comparable late mortality with TAVR and SAVR, these findings suggest that TAVR might be the preferred treatment strategy for intermediate-risk AS patients based on both clinical and economic considerations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01314313.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/economía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/economía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Modelos Económicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
JAMA Cardiol ; 3(11): 1041-1049, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267035

RESUMEN

Importance: Same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with lower costs and preferred by patients. However, to our knowledge, contemporary patterns of SDD after elective PCI with respect to the incidence, hospital variation, trends, costs, and safety outcomes in the United States are unknown. Objective: To examine (1) the incidence and trends in SDD; (2) hospital variation in SDD; (3) the association between SDD and readmissions for bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or mortality at 30, 90, and 365 days after PCI; and (4) hospital costs of SDD and its drivers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cross-sectional cohort study included 672 470 patients enrolled in the nationally representative Premier Healthcare Database who underwent elective PCI from 493 hospitals between January 2006 and December 2015 with 1-year follow-up. Exposures: Same-day discharge, defined by identical dates of admission, PCI procedure, and discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death, bleeding requiring a blood transfusion, AKI and AMI at 30, 90, or 365 days after PCI, and costs from hospitals' perspective, inflated to 2016. Results: Among 672 470 elective PCIs, 221 997 patients (33.0%) were women, 30 711 (4.6%) were Hispanic, 51 961 (7.7%) were African American, and 491 823 (73.1%) were white. The adjusted rate of SDD was 3.5% (95% CI, 3.0%-4.0%), which increased from 0.4% in 2006 to 6.3% in 2015. We observed substantial hospital variation for SDD from 0% to 83% (median incidence rate ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 3.48-4.23), implying an average (median) 382% likelihood of SDD at one vs another hospital. Among SDD (vs non-SDD) patients, there was no higher risk of death, bleeding, AKI, or AMI at 30, 90, or 365 days. Same-day discharge was associated with a large cost savings of $5128 per procedure (95% CI, $5006-$5248), driven by reduced supply and room and boarding costs. A shift from existing SDD practices to match top-decile SDD hospitals could annually save $129 million in this sample and $577 million if adopted throughout the United States. However, residual confounding may be present, limiting the precision of the cost estimates. Conclusions and Relevance: Over 2006 to 2015, SDD after elective PCI was infrequent, with substantial hospital variation. Given the safety and large savings of more than $5000 per PCI associated with SDD, greater and more consistent use of SDD could markedly increase the overall value of PCI care.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
10.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(4): 342-351, 2017 02 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28231901

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the independent impact of various care pathways, including those involving transradial intervention (TRI) and same-day discharge (SDD) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), on hospital costs. BACKGROUND: PCI is associated with costs of $10 billion annually. Alternative payment models for PCI are being implemented, but few data exist on strategies to reduce costs. Various PCI care pathways, including TRI and SDD, exist, but their association with costs and outcomes is unknown. METHODS: In total, 279,987 PCI patients eligible for SDD in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry linked to Medicare claims files were analyzed. Hospital costs in 2014 U.S. dollars were estimated using cost-to-charge ratios. Propensity scores for TRI and SDD, with propensity adjustment via inverse probability weighting, was performed. RESULTS: Of the 279,987 PCI procedures, TRI was used in 9.0% (13.5% of which were SDD), and SDD was used in 5.3% of cases (23.1% of which were TRI). TRI (vs. transfemoral intervention) was associated with lower adjusted costs of $916 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $778 to $1,035), as was SDD ($3,502; 95% CI: $3,486 to $3,902). The adjusted cost associated with TRI and SDD was $13,389 (95% CI: $13,161 to $13,607), while the cost associated with transfemoral intervention and non-same-day discharge was $17,076 (95% CI: $16,999 to $17,147), a difference of $3,689 (95% CI: $3,486 to $3,902; p < 0.0001). Shifting current practice from transfemoral intervention non-same-day discharge to TRI SDD by 30% could potentially save a hospital performing 1,000 PCIs each year $1 million and the country $300 million annually. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries, TRI with SDD was independently associated with fewer complications and lower in-hospital costs. These findings have important implications for changing the current PCI care pathways to improve outcomes and reduce costs.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/economía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Vías Clínicas/economía , Costos de Hospital , Beneficios del Seguro/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Medicare/economía , Alta del Paciente/economía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/economía , Arteria Radial , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Análisis Multivariante , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Propensión , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
11.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res ; 5(1): 1-15, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37664687

RESUMEN

Background: Pain is a leading cause of admission to the emergency department (ED) and moderate-to-severe acute pain in medically supervised settings is often treated with intravenous (IV) opioids. With novel noninvasive analgesic products in development for this indication, it is important to assess the costs associated with IV administration of opioids. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study of data derived from the Premier database was conducted. All ED encounters of adult patients treated with IV opioids during a 2-year time period, who were charged for at least one IV opioid administration in the ED were included. Hospital reported costs were used to estimate the costs to administer IV opioids. Results: Over a 24 month-period, 7.3 million encounters, which included the administration of IV opioids took place in 614 US EDs. The mean cost per encounter of IV administration of an initial dose of the three most frequently prescribed opioids were: morphine $145, hydromorphone $146, and fentanyl $147. The main driver of the total costs is the cost of nursing time and equipment cost to set up and maintain an IV infusion ($140 ± 60). Adding a second dose of opioid, brings the average costs to $151-$154. If costs associated with the management of opioid-related adverse events and IV-related complications are also added, the total costs can amount to $269-$273. Of these 7.3 million encounters, 4.3 million (58%) did not lead to hospital admission of the patient and, therefore, the patient may have only required an IV catheter for opioid administration. Conclusions: IV opioid use in the ED is indicated for moderate-to-severe pain but is associated with significant costs. In subjects who are discharged from the ED and may not have required an IV for reasons other than opioid administration, rapid-onset analgesics for moderate-to-severe pain that do not require IV administration could lead to direct cost reductions and improved care.

12.
Am J Cardiol ; 117(7): 1127-34, 2016 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26993976

RESUMEN

Left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). LA device-related thrombus (DRT) is poorly defined and understood. We aimed to (1) develop consensus echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for DRT; (2) estimate the incidence of DRT; and (3) determine clinical event rates in patients with DRT. In phase 1 (training), a training manual was developed and reviewed by 3 echocardiographers with left atrial appendage closure device experience. All available transesophageal (TEE) studies in the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for embolic protection in patients with atrial fibrillation (PROTECT-AF) trial patients with suspected DRT were reviewed in 2 subsequent phases. In phase 2 (primary blind read), each reviewer independently scored each study for DRT, and final echo criteria were developed. Unanimously scored studies were considered adjudicated, whereas all others were reevaluated by all reviewers in phase 3 (group adjudication read). DRT was suspected in 35 of 485 patients by the site investigator, the echocardiography core laboratory, or both; 93 of the individual TEE studies were available for review. In phase 2, 3 readers agreed on 67 (72%) of time points. Based on phases 1 and 2, 5 DRT criteria were developed. In phase 3, studies without agreement in phase 2 were adjudicated using these criteria. Overall, at least 1 TEE was DRT positive in 27 (5.7%) PROTECT-AF patients. Stroke, peripheral embolism, or cardiac/unexplained death occurred in subjects with DRT at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up. In conclusion, DRT were identified on at least 1 TEE in 27 PROTECT-AF patients, indicating a DRT incidence of 5.7%. Primary efficacy events in patients with DRT occurred at a rate of 3.4 per 100 patient-years follow-up, intermediate in frequency between event rates previously reported for the overall device and warfarin arms in PROTECT-AF.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Trombosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Dispositivos de Protección Embólica/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/uso terapéutico
13.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(6): 1149-55, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26892836

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association of health status change and long-term survival among patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). BACKGROUND: Early gains in health status after successful endovascular therapy (EVT) for symptomatic PAD can be maintained up to 1 year. Whether such health status improvements are associated with long-term survival benefits is unknown. METHODS: Between February 2001 and August 2004, 258 patients with symptomatic PAD treated with EVT participated in a prospective study evaluating baseline and 1 year health status using the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (range 0-100, higher scores = better). All-cause mortality was assessed for all patients at a median of 9.4 years following EVT. RESULTS: The mean age at enrollment was 68 ± 11 years; 61% were male, 97% were Caucasian, and 38% had diabetes. Patients with a clinically meaningful health status improvement (≥8 points) 1 year after their index procedure (79%) were identified as responders. Responders had a significantly better 10 year survival compared with nonresponders (60% vs 38%, p = 0.025). Responder status was associated with a survival advantage that persisted in risk-adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio for long-term mortality, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45-0.97]; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing EVT, improvement of PAD-specific health status at 1 year follow-up was associated with improved long-term survival. Whether additional treatment for patients with poor response to EVT could improve long-term survival warrants further investigation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Estado de Salud , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Anciano , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Health Informatics J ; 22(3): 579-93, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25814483

RESUMEN

To establish a process for the development of a prioritization tool for a clinical decision support build within a computerized provider order entry system and concurrently to prioritize alerts for Saint Luke's Health System. The process of prioritizing clinical decision support alerts included (a) consensus sessions to establish a prioritization process and identify clinical decision support alerts through a modified Delphi process and (b) a clinical decision support survey to validate the results. All members of our health system's physician quality organization, Saint Luke's Care as well as clinicians, administrators, and pharmacy staff throughout Saint Luke's Health System, were invited to participate in this confidential survey. The consensus sessions yielded a prioritization process through alert contextualization and associated Likert-type scales. Utilizing this process, the clinical decision support survey polled the opinions of 850 clinicians with a 64.7 percent response rate. Three of the top rated alerts were approved for the pre-implementation build at Saint Luke's Health System: Acute Myocardial Infarction Core Measure Sets, Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis within 4 h, and Criteria for Sepsis. This study establishes a process for developing a prioritization tool for a clinical decision support build within a computerized provider order entry system that may be applicable to similar institutions.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas/organización & administración , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas/organización & administración , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas/normas , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 27(1): 305-13, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26229137

RESUMEN

Trimethlyamine-N-oxide (TMAO) was recently identified as a promoter of atherosclerosis. Patients with CKD exhibit accelerated development of atherosclerosis; however, no studies have explored the relationship between TMAO and atherosclerosis formation in this group. This study measured serum concentrations and urinary excretion of TMAO in a CKD cohort (n=104), identified the effect of renal transplant on serum TMAO concentration in a subset of these patients (n=6), and explored the cross-sectional relationship between serum TMAO and coronary atherosclerosis burden in a separate CKD cohort (n=220) undergoing coronary angiography. Additional exploratory analyses examined the relationship between baseline serum TMAO and long-term survival after coronary angiography. Serum TMAO concentrations demonstrated a strong inverse association with eGFR (r(2)=0.31, P<0.001). TMAO concentrations were markedly higher in patients receiving dialysis (median [interquartile range], 94.4 µM [54.8-133.0 µM] for dialysis-dependent patients versus 3.3 µM [3.1-6.0 µM] for healthy controls; P<0.001); whereas renal transplantation resulted in substantial reductions in TMAO concentrations (median [min-max] 71.2 µM [29.2-189.7 µM] pretransplant versus 11.4 µM [8.9-20.2 µM] post-transplant; P=0.03). TMAO concentration was an independent predictor for coronary atherosclerosis burden (P=0.02) and predicted long-term mortality independent of traditional cardiac risk factors (hazard ratio, 1.26 per 10 µM increment in TMAO concentration; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.40; P<0.001). In conclusion, serum TMAO concentrations substantially increase with decrements in kidney function, and this effect is reversed by renal transplantation. Increased TMAO concentrations correlate with coronary atherosclerosis burden and may associate with long-term mortality in patients with CKD undergoing coronary angiography.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/sangre , Trasplante de Riñón , Metilaminas/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/cirugía , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones
16.
Am J Cardiol ; 114(12): 1912-6, 2014 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25438921

RESUMEN

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is frequently performed in patients with acute ischemic cerebrovascular events to exclude a cardioembolic source. We aimed to determine the clinical impact of TEE on management. This is a retrospective single-center study of 1,458 consecutive patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack who underwent TEE for evaluation of a suspected cardioembolic cause. Significant TEE findings were determined for each patient as recorded on the TEE report. The medical record was reviewed for baseline, clinical, and demographic variables and to determine whether significant management changes occurred as a result of the TEE findings. Potential significant changes in management included initiation of anticoagulation, placement of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device, initiation of antibiotic therapy for endocarditis, surgical PFO closure, other cardiac surgery, and coil embolization of a pulmonary arteriovenous malformation. A significant change in management occurred in 243 patients (16.7%); 173 (71%) underwent treatment for PFO with a percutaneous PFO closure device (n = 100), initiation of chronic systemic anticoagulation (n = 68), or surgical PFO closure (n = 5). Additional findings leading to a change in management included endocarditis (n = 20), aortic arch atheroma (n = 14), intracardiac thrombus (n = 13), pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (n = 2), aortic valve fibroelastoma (n = 2), other valve masses (n = 4), and miscellaneous causes (n = 15). In conclusion, in patients with suspected cardioembolic stroke, TEE findings led to a change in management in 16.7% of patients. Of these, most (71%) were directed at prevention of subsequent paradoxical emboli in patients with PFO.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Embolia/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Embolia/complicaciones , Embolia/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Missouri/epidemiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Adulto Joven
17.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 6(8): 827-34, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23871512

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention (TFI) from a contemporary hospital perspective. BACKGROUND: Whereas the TRI approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to reduce access-site complications compared with TFI, whether it is associated with lower costs is unknown. METHODS: TRI and TFI patients were identified at 5 U.S. centers. The primary outcome was the cost of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospitalization, defined as cost on the day of PCI through hospital discharge. Cost was obtained from each hospital's cost accounting system. Independent costs of TRI were identified using propensity-scoring methods with inverse probability weighting. Secondary outcomes of interest were bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay, which were stratified by pre-procedural risk and PCI indication. RESULTS: In 7,121 PCI procedures performed from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2011, TRI was performed in 1,219 (17%) patients and was associated with shorter lengths of stay (2.5 vs. 3.0 days; p < 0.001) and lower bleeding events (1.1% vs. 2.4%, adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34 to 0.79; p = 0.002). TRI was associated with a total cost savings of $830 (95% CI: $296 to $1,364; p < 0.001), of which $130 (95% CI: -$99 to $361; p = 0.112) were procedural savings and $705 (95% CI: $212 to $1,238; p < 0.001) were post-procedural savings. There was an associated graded increase in savings among patients at higher predicted risk of bleeding: low risk: $642 (95% CI: $43 to $1,236; p = 0.035); moderate risk: $706 (95% CI: $104 to $1,308; p = 0.029); and high risk: $1,621 (95% CI: $271 to $2,971, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: TRI was associated with a cost savings exceeding $800 per patient relative to TFI. Increased adoption of TRI may result in cost savings at hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Arteria Femoral , Costos de Hospital , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Arteria Radial , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hemorragia/economía , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Puntaje de Propensión , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
18.
Am Heart J ; 165(3): 303-9.e2, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23453097

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transradial intervention (TRI) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with shorter length of stay, fewer bleeding complications, and higher patient satisfaction. Less is known about the economic implications of TRI in contemporary practice. METHODS: This is a retrospective inpatient cohort analysis using medical data from the Premier research database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC), which contains approximately one-fifth of all acute care hospitalizations in the US annually. The database was queried to identify patients undergoing PCI from 2004 to 2009. Patients with TRI were identified by center-level charge codes for radial-specific devices and matched one-to-many with patients undergoing transfemoral intervention (TFI). Adjusted total hospitalization costs were compared between patients undergoing TRI and TFI. Patients were additionally classified by periprocedural risk of bleeding as low (<1%), moderate (1%-3%), and high (>3%). RESULTS: There were 609 TRI cases matched with 60,900 TFI cases. Total adjusted costs for TRI were $11,736 ± $6,748 vs $12,288 ± $23,418 for TFI, a difference of $553 favoring TRI (95% CI $45-$1,060, P = .033). Day-of-procedure costs were similar, at $17 higher for TRI compared with TFI (95% CI -$318 to $353, P = .37); however, costs from the following day until discharge were significantly lower for TRI (-$571, 95 % CI -$912 to $229, P = .001). Postprocedure costs were lower for patients with TRI vs patients with TFI at moderate (-$478, 95% CI -$887 to $69, P = .022) and high (-$917, 95% CI -$1,814 to $19, P = .045) risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide administrative hospital database, transradial compared with transfemoral PCI access was associated with lower average direct hospital costs and shorter length of hospital stay. Postprocedure costs associated with TRI were also lower in patients at greater bleeding risk.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
JAMA ; 309(10): 1022-9, 2013 Mar 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23483177

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Bleeding is the most common complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with increased morbidity and health care costs. The incidence of bleeding-related mortality after PCI has not been described in a nationally representative population. Furthermore, the relationships among bleeding risk, bleeding site, and mortality are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe the association between bleeding events and in-hospital mortality after PCI and to estimate the adjusted population attributable risk (estimated as the proportion of mortality risk associated with bleeding events), risk difference, and number needed to harm (NNH) for bleeding-related in-hospital mortality after PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Data from 3,386,688 procedures in the CathPCI Registry performed in the United States between 2004 and 2011 were analyzed. The population attributable risk was calculated after adjustment for baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural variables. To calculate the NNH for bleeding-related mortality, a propensity-matched analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: There were 57,246 bleeding events (1.7%) and 22,165 in-hospital deaths (0.65%) in 3,386,688 PCI procedures. The adjusted population attributable risk for mortality related to major bleeding was 12.1% (95% CI, 11.4%-12.7%) in the entire CathPCI cohort. The propensity-matched population consisted of 56,078 procedures with a major bleeding event and 224 312 controls. In this matched cohort, major bleeding was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (5.26% vs 1.87%; risk difference, 3.39% [95% CI, 3.20%-3.59%]; NNH = 29 [95% CI, 28-31]; P < .001). The association between major bleeding and in-hospital mortality was observed in all strata of preprocedural bleeding risk (low: 1.62% vs 0.17%; risk difference, 1.45% [95% CI, 1.13%-1.77%], NNH = 69 [95% CI, 57-88], P < .001; intermediate: 3.27% vs 0.71%; risk difference, 2.56% [95% CI, 2.33%-2.79%], NNH = 39 [95% CI, 36-43], P < .001; and high: 8.16% vs 3.45%; risk difference, 4.71% [95% CI, 4.35%-5.07%], NNH = 21 [95% CI, 20-23], P < .001). Although both access-site and non-access-site bleeding were associated with increased in-hospital mortality (2.73% vs 1.87%; risk difference, 0.86% [95% CI, 0.66%-1.05%], NNH = 117 [95% CI, 95-151], P < .001; and 8.25% vs 1.87%; risk difference, 6.39% [95% CI, 6.04%-6.73%], NNH = 16 [95% CI, 15-17], P < .001, respectively), the NNH was lower for nonaccess bleeding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In a large registry of patients undergoing PCI, postprocedural bleeding events were associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality, with an estimated 12.1% of deaths related to bleeding complications.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Endocr Pract ; 19(1): 81-90, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23186969

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of intravenous exenatide to control hyperglycemia in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). METHODS: A prospective, single-center, open-label, nonrandomized pilot study. Forty patients admitted to the CICU with glucose levels of 140 to 400 mg/dL received intravenous exenatide as a bolus followed by a fixed dose infusion for up to 48 hours. Exenatide effectiveness was benchmarked to two historical insulin infusion cohorts, one (INT) with a target glucose of 90 to 119 mg/dL (n = 84) and the other (MOD) with a target of 100 to 140 mg/dL (n = 71). RESULTS: Median admission glucose values were 185.5 mg/dL (161.0, 215.5), 259.0 mg/dL (206.0, 343.0), and 189.5 mg/dL (163.5, 245.0) in the exenatide, MOD, and INT groups, respectively (P<.001). Steady state glucose values were similar between the exenatide (132.0 mg/dL [110.0, 157.0]) and the MOD groups (127.0 mg/dL [105.0, 161.0], P = .15), but lower in the INT group (105.0 mg/dL [92.0, 128.0], P<.001 for exenatide versus INT). Median (IQR) time to steady state was 2.0 hours (1.5, 5.0) in the exenatide group compared to 12.0 hours (7.0, 15.0) in the MOD group (P<.001) and 3.0 hours (1.0, 5.0) in the INT group (P = .80 for exenatide versus INT). Exenatide was discontinued in 3 patients after failure to achieve glycemic control. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia (<50 mg/dL) occurred in patients who received exenatide. Nausea was reported by 16 patients and vomiting by 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Intravenous exenatide is effective in lowering glucose levels in CICU patients, but its use may be limited by nausea.


Asunto(s)
Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Ponzoñas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia , Exenatida , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Péptidos/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ponzoñas/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA