Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Surg ; : 31348241262433, 2024 Jul 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028113

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Disparities secondary to underinsurance present throughout the surgical care continuum. Community free clinics are uniquely capable to provide health care services to the medically underserved, but surgery often falls outside their scope of care. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive community free clinic patients receiving free surgical services via referral to a partnering ambulatory surgery center between March 2016 and September 2021. Those with documented contact information were recruited 1-3 years post-procedure for long-term quality-of-life (LTQOL) outcomes assessment via modified Veterans RAND 12-item health survey. RESULTS: Of 142 included patients, 95.7% identified as Hispanic/Latino and 75.6% were uninsured. Twelve patients had cancerous or precancerous lesions detected and/or removed through diagnostic or definitive procedures. 3.5% experienced postoperative complication including bacterial (n = 2) or fungal (n = 1) surgical site infection and wound dehiscence (n = 2). With a 48.9% response rate, no significant differences in sociodemographic or clinical characteristics were found between surveyed vs non-surveyed patients. Of surveyed patients, 59.7% and 52.2% reported pre-/post-operative improvement in physical health and emotional health, respectively. DISCUSSION: Free diagnostic screening procedures provided timely diagnoses while free definitive surgeries safely and positively impacted long-term patient-reported physical health. Longitudinal, multidisciplinary follow-up and social support may be warranted to concurrently improve emotional and mental health in similarly underinsured populations.

2.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol ; 21(12): 633-643, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38039057

RESUMEN

Several pathways and mutations must develop or be in place for the onset of cancer. Therefore, therapies should ideally target as many of these pathways as possible to improve outcomes. Combining several agents has proven to be more effective than the use of monotherapy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and other cancers. Combination therapy can also include locoregional therapies such as ablation and embolization with systemic agents for synergistic effects. This review article discusses the current literature and clinical trials covering these multifactorial combination therapies in primary and metastatic liver tumors.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Renales/terapia
3.
Am Surg ; 87(10): 1633-1637, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672823

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies show follow-up phone calls decrease readmission rates (RR) in trauma patients and social vulnerabilities may play a role as well. Minimal literature exists comparing RR of trauma patients who required an inpatient stay to those whose treatment was limited to the Emergency Department (ED), as they are at high risk of recidivism. We hypothesized post-trauma follow-up calls would show higher RR for ED patients than those requiring inpatient stay, as well as potentially differing outcomes for minorities. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis from 2019-2020 of 1328 trauma patients from UCI Medical Center, discharged from inpatient facilities or the ED. A questionnaire script read by a nurse practitioner to patients via phone call following discharge. Data associated with readmission were captured. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for patient factors including severity of injury. RESULTS: Patients discharged from the ED were 47.4% less likely to be readmitted than those who required an inpatient stay (P < .01). However, ED patients were 88.7% less likely to receive a prescription than inpatient stay patients (P < .01). No difference between ED and inpatient discharge contact rates was noted (P < .99). Furthermore, no difference in readmission rates was noted for minorities. CONCLUSION: Post-trauma follow-up calls showed lower RR for index ED visit patients than those requiring inpatient stay, contrary to expectations. However, ED visit patients were also less likely to receive/fill prescriptions compared to those requiring inpatient stay. Ongoing analysis is warranted to further validate and improve follow-up call programs to ensure equitable health care.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Teléfono , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA