RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study examined whether the "Three Bears Passage" (TB), a standard Mandarin reading passage, could elicit significant vocal range variations in individuals with voice disorders. Relative sensitivity of TB versus another existing standard reading passage, "Passage in Mandarin" (PM), for differentiating between individuals with and without voice disorders was also evaluated. METHOD: Forty-two individuals with normal voice and 30 individuals with voice disorders participated in the study. Maximum fundamental frequency (f0), minimum f0, mean f0, f0 range, maximum vocal intensity, minimum intensity, mean intensity, and intensity range of all participants reading aloud the two passages were measured with Praat to construct speech range profiles (SRPs). RESULTS: Significantly larger vocal range was found for TB than for PM in individuals with voice disorders, including significantly higher maximum f0, mean f0, maximum intensity, mean intensity, and significantly larger f0 range and intensity range. Significantly more limited vocal range was observed in individuals with voice disorders than those without, with more obviously restricted SRPs while reading aloud TB compared to PM. Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested that TB was more sensitive than PM in distinguishing between individuals with and without voice disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings supported the potential of TB as a standard clinical assessment tool for evaluating pathological changes in vocal range. Future studies should explore if therapeutic approaches based on the passage or variations of it could be developed for overcoming functional limitations and restrictions in vocal range for specific voice disorders.
Asunto(s)
Lectura , Acústica del Lenguaje , Trastornos de la Voz , Calidad de la Voz , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Trastornos de la Voz/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Voz/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven , Medición de la Producción del Habla , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Lenguaje , Estudios de Casos y Controles , AdolescenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Attic cholesteatomas can be exenterated by transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES). In the limited operative field of exclusive transcanal endoscopic atticotomy, surgeons use either a piezosurgery scalpel or a drilling system to remove the posterior lateral bony wall of the epitympanum. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of using piezosurgery or microdrill for endoscopic atticotomy during exenteration of attic cholesteatomas. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with attic cholesteatoma, who were treated by exclusive TEES. The superior and posterior external auditory canal bones were excised using a piezosurgery scalpel or microdrill. Preoperative and postoperative hearing thresholds were measured by pure-tone audiometry. RESULTS: The postoperative follow-up duration varied from 6 to 37 months. There were no significant differences in age, sex, laterality of the affected ear, and preoperative bone conduction thresholds between the piezosurgery scalpel and microdrill groups. The operative duration was longer in the piezosurgery group than in the microdrill group (135.6 ± 19.5 minutes vs 117.3 ± 29.1 minutes, p = 0.042). Seven of 30 (23.3%) patients in the microdrill group, but none in the piezosurgery group, had a friction injury from the drilling. Postoperative testing at higher frequencies of 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz showed no deterioration in the bone conduction threshold in the piezosurgery group. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic atticotomy performed using a piezosurgery scalpel is potentially safer but slower than using a microdrill for exenteration of attic cholesteatomas.