Preparation and evaluation of transdermal permeation of Huperzine A ethosomes gel in vitro.

This study aimed to design and evaluate the transdermal permeation of Huperzine A ethosomes gel in vitro. Huperzine A ethosomes were prepared using the injection method, and their physical and chemical properties were characterized. A comparison was made between Huperzine A ethosomes gel, ordinary gel, and cream. The Franz diffusion cell test on mouse abdominal skin was conducted, and Huperzine A concentration was determined using LC-MS/MS. Transdermal volume, skin retention, and transdermal rate were used to assess the percutaneous permeability of the three preparations. Results demonstrated that Huperzine A ethosomes gel exhibited significantly higher accumulative permeation, transdermal rate, and skin retention compared to ordinary gel and cream. The findings suggest that Huperzine A ethosomes gel, with its controllable quality and favorable transdermal absorption properties, holds potential as a safe option for clinical administration.

Potential interactions between triazole antifungal agents and lorlatinib based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in rat plasma.

AIM: Our study is to investigate the effects of triazole antifungal drugs on the pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in rats. METHODS: The samples were precipitated with methanol. Chromatographic separation was performed on a ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system using a BEH C18 column. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid water and methanol. Lorlatinib and crizotinib (internal standard) were detected in multiple reaction monitoring mode. The fragment ions were 407.3-228.07 for lorlatinib and m/z 450.3-260.0 for crizotinib. Lorlatinib and different triazole antifungal drugs were given to Sprague Dawley rats by gavage, and blood was collected from the tail vein at a certain time point. The validated UPLC-MS/MS method was applied to a drug interaction study of ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole with lorlatinib in rats. RESULTS: Ketoconazole and voriconazole significantly inhibited lorlatinib metabolism. When administration with ketoconazole and voriconazole, the area under the curve from time zero to infinity of lorlatinib increased by 49.0% and 104.3%, respectively; the clearance decreased by 40.0% and 40.0%, respectively. While itraconazole and posaconazole did not affect lorlatinib pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION: The UPLC-MS/MS-based assay is helpful to further understand the pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in rats, and confirmed the findings that the combination of lorlatinib with CYP3A inhibitors should be avoided as predicted by our pre-clinical studies.