Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 54
1.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 212, 2024 May 24.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787406

The use of botulinum toxin for off-label indications has become more prevalent, but the specific benefits in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) have not yet been fully elucidated. A systematic review was performed of PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus databases to identify all articles describing the use of botulinum toxin in MMS. Analysis was subdivided into scar minimization, parotid injury, and pain management. A total of nine articles were included. Scar minimization and treatment of parotid injury were the most reported uses. One case reported the use of botulinum toxin for pain management. Off label uses of botulinum toxin are being explored. Additional research is warranted to determine the efficacy and utility of botulinum toxin in MMS.


Cicatrix , Mohs Surgery , Off-Label Use , Humans , Cicatrix/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/administration & dosage , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Botulinum Toxins/administration & dosage , Pain Management/methods , Parotid Gland/surgery
3.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 22(12): 1228-1231, 2023 Dec 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051836

Dehydrated human amnion chorion membrane (dHACM) allografts are synthetic skin substitutes derived from placental tissue. dHACM allografts are used for replacing lost or damaged dermal tissue, as they contain many of the components found within the extracellular matrix that are beneficial in wound healing. Common uses of dHACM allografts include the healing of diabetic and non-diabetic foot and leg ulcers, decubitus ulcers, and wounds following debridement. While these grafts have been proven to be beneficial in other disciplines of medicine, their potential for use in the field of dermatology is emerging. Current clinical cases and research have shown dHACM allografts to be beneficial in repairing damaged tissue due to dermatologic conditions. They could play a role in the treatment of conditions causing chronic wounds, including dermal scarring or loss, and the repair of fragile skin. Examples of dHACM allograft use in dermatology include cases of pyoderma gangrenosum, Netherton syndrome, and wound healing with Mohs micrographic surgery. This literature review explores the efficacy of using dHACM allografts for the treatment of healing wounds within the field of dermatology. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1228-1231. doi:10.36849/JDD.7115.


Allografts , Amnion , Chorion , Dermatology , Leg Ulcer , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Allografts/transplantation , Amnion/transplantation , Chorion/transplantation , Placenta , Treatment Outcome , Ulcer/therapy , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Leg Ulcer/surgery
4.
Dermatol Surg ; 48(3): 290-292, 2022 03 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35025848

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use criteria (AUC) were established to optimize the use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and confer the highest possible clinical benefit to the patient. OBJECTIVE: We documented our adherence to AUC and review reasons for nonadherence regarding lesions classified as inappropriate, in the hopes of informing future versions of the AUC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,000 consecutive patients who underwent MMS at a single institution. A total of 1,318 biopsy-proven nonmelanoma skin cancers were treated with MMS, and each skin cancer that underwent MMS was classified as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate based on the AUC. RESULTS: Data were collected on 1,318 lesions with 1,237 (93.9%) categorized as appropriate, 59 (4.5%) uncertain, and 22 (1.7%) not appropriate. The primary variables that determined appropriateness were type of cancer (p = .001), size (p < .001), and area of body (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Institutional adherence to AUC was high, with 93.9% of treated tumors classified as appropriate, 4.5% as uncertain and 1.7% as inappropriate. By far the most commonly reported reason for performing MMS on an inappropriate lesion in our review was the treatment of adjacent lesions in 1 session.


Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Skin Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Mohs Surgery , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery
6.
Dermatol Surg ; 48(1): 47-50, 2022 Jan 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743122

BACKGROUND: Deep transection of invasive melanoma precludes accurate measurement of Breslow depth, which may affect tumor staging. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of upstaging of transected invasive melanomas after excision, characterize the impact on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNN)-recommended treatment, and determine predictors of subsequent upstaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of invasive melanomas between January 2017 and December 2019 at a single institution. Deeply transected biopsy reports were compared with subsequent excisions to calculate the frequency of upstaging. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty (49.6%) of 726 invasive melanomas identified were transected. Forty-nine (13.6%) transected tumors had upstaging that would have altered NCCN-recommended management. "Broadly" transected tumors had upstaging that would have resulted in a change in the management in 5/23 cases (21.7%) versus 2/41 cases (4.9%) for "focally" transected tumors (p = .038). Breslow depth increased by 0.59 mm on average for "broad" transection versus 0.06 mm for "focal" transection (p =< .01). Of the 89 transected pT1a melanomas, specimens with gross residual tumor or pigment after biopsy were upstaged in 8/17 (47.1%) of cases versus 5/72 (6.9%) of specimens without (p =< .01). CONCLUSION: Upstaging of deeply transected invasive melanomas that would alter NCCN-recommended management occurred in 13.6% of cases. Broad transection and gross residual tumor or pigment after biopsy predicted higher likelihood of upstaging.


Melanoma/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin/pathology , Biopsy , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery
10.
Cancer Invest ; 39(6-7): 559-570, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34043476

The study evaluated whether SPP1/osteopontin (OPN) splice variants are differentially expressed in nonmelanoma skin cancer compared to normal skin. The absolute number of mRNA molecules of OPN-a predominated in normal skin and nonmelanoma skin cancer compared to OPN-b, OPN-c, and OPN-5. However, mRNAs of OPN-a, OPN-b, and OPN-c were expressed in higher levels in cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs) and basal cell carcinomas relative to normal skin. Additionally, OPN-5 expression was higher than OPN-b and OPN-c, and OPN-c, in normal skin and nonmelanoma skin cancer, respectively. Furthermore, we identified four OPN-5 splice variants, which were cloned and analyzed for protein expression.


Alternative Splicing , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Osteopontin/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cloning, Molecular , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genetic Variation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteopontin/genetics , RNA Isoforms/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/metabolism , Up-Regulation
15.
Dermatol Surg ; 46(4): 525-529, 2020 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567613

BACKGROUND: Pathologists sometimes include commentary on margin involvement in shave biopsy reports of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC). This practice can lead to confusion regarding the need for further treatment. There is limited literature evaluating the reliability of reported histologic margin status in shave biopsies of KC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of reported clear shave biopsy margins in basal and squamous cell carcinomas to determine whether this assessment is a reliable predictor of complete tumor removal. METHODS: A literature review was performed using the PubMed database. The data were compiled, NPVs were calculated by the tumor subgroup, and a statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Four studies met inclusion criteria. Two hundred twenty-one KCs were identified (n = 221). All specimens had negative-reported histologic margins (39 squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] and 182 BCC). Fifty-five cases initially noted to have negative margins on biopsy were found to have residual tumor on subsequent analysis: 5 SCC and 50 BCC, translating to 12.8% of all SCC (5/39) and 27.5% for BCC (50/182). Negative predictive values were found to be 75.1% for all KCs, 87.2% for SCC, and 72.5% for BCC. CONCLUSION: Negative histologic margin status on shave biopsy specimens of KC has a poor NPV and is an inadequate predictor for complete tumor removal.


Carcinoma, Basal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Margins of Excision , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin/pathology , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Humans , Keratinocytes/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Skin/cytology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
16.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 82(1): 87-93, 2020 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31326466

BACKGROUND: Biopsies of dysplastic nevi processed by bread-loafing allow for limited margin assessment; however, reported biopsy margins often influence management. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the negative predictive value of biopsy margins of dysplastic nevi. METHODS: A retrospective search of a single academic institution's pathology database was conducted to identify all biopsy specimens of dysplastic nevi between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017. Biopsy specimen margin assessments were compared with excision pathology reports to calculate negative predictive value and to assess the frequency of residual nevus on excision after positive biopsy margins. RESULTS: A total of 1245 dysplastic nevi from 934 patients were identified. Clear biopsy margins had a negative predictive value for the absence of residual nevus on excision of 87.3% for dysplastic nevi of moderate atypia or greater. Residual nevus was identified on excision in 29.41% of cases of dysplastic nevi of moderate atypia or greater when initial biopsy margins were positive. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective, single-institution study. The calculations likely overestimate the true negative predictive value of biopsy margins because of processing of excision specimens by bread-loafing. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides additional evidence that reported biopsy margins are not representative of true margin status.


Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome/pathology , Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Biopsy, Needle , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
Lancet Oncol ; 20(12): e699-e714, 2019 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31797796

Sebaceous carcinoma usually occurs in adults older than 60 years, on the eyelid, head and neck, and trunk. In this Review, we present clinical care recommendations for sebaceous carcinoma, which were developed as a result of an expert panel evaluation of the findings of a systematic review. Key conclusions were drawn and recommendations made for diagnosis, first-line treatment, radiotherapy, and post-treatment care. For diagnosis, we concluded that deep biopsy is often required; furthermore, differential diagnoses that mimic the condition can be excluded with special histological stains. For treatment, the recommended first-line therapy is surgical removal, followed by margin assessment of the peripheral and deep tissue edges; conjunctival mapping biopsies can facilitate surgical planning. Radiotherapy can be considered for cases with nerve or lymph node involvement, and as the primary treatment in patients who are ineligible for surgery. Post-treatment clinical examination should occur every 6 months for at least 3 years. No specific systemic therapies for advanced disease can be recommended, but targeted therapies and immunotherapies are being developed.


Adenocarcinoma, Sebaceous/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Sebaceous Gland Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Prognosis
18.
Transpl Int ; 32(12): 1268-1276, 2019 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31502728

Skin cancer is the most common malignancy affecting solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), and SOTR experience increased skin cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. There are no formal multidisciplinary guidelines for skin cancer screening after transplant, and current practices are widely variable. We conducted three rounds of Delphi method surveys with a panel of 84 U.S. dermatologists and transplant physicians to establish skin cancer screening recommendations for SOTR. The transplant team should risk stratify SOTR for screening, and dermatologists should perform skin cancer screening by full-body skin examination. SOTR with a history of skin cancer should continue regular follow-up with dermatology for skin cancer surveillance. High-risk transplant patients include thoracic organ recipients, SOTR age 50 and above, and male SOTR. High-risk Caucasian patients should be screened within 2 years after transplant, all Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic, and high-risk African American patients should be screened within 5 years after transplant. No consensus was reached regarding screening for low-risk African American SOTR. We propose a standardized approach to skin cancer screening in SOTR based on multidisciplinary expert consensus. These guidelines prioritize and emphasize the need for screening for SOTR at greatest risk for skin cancer.


Delphi Technique , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Consensus , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Transplant Recipients , United States
19.
JAMA Dermatol ; 155(9): 1059-1068, 2019 Sep 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31268498

IMPORTANCE: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC) occurs primarily in older adults of white race/ethnicity on sun-exposed skin of the head and neck. There are no formal guiding principles based on expert review of the evidence to assist clinicians in providing the highest-quality care for patients. OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the care of adults with MAC. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of the literature (1990 to June 2018) was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The keywords searched were microcystic adnexal carcinoma, sclerosing sweat gland carcinoma, sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma, syringomatous carcinoma, malignant syringoma, sweat gland carcinoma with syringomatous features, locally aggressive adnexal carcinoma, and combined adnexal tumor. A multidisciplinary expert committee critically evaluated the literature to create recommendations for clinical practice. Statistical analysis was used to estimate optimal surgical margins. FINDINGS: In total, 55 studies met our inclusion criteria. The mean age of 1968 patients across the studies was 61.8 years; 54.1% were women. Recommendations were generated for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of MAC. There are 5 key findings of the expert committee based on the available evidence: (1) A suspect skin lesion requires a deep biopsy that includes subcutis. (2) MAC confined to the skin is best treated by surgery that examines the surrounding and deep edges of the tissue removed (Mohs micrographic surgery or complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment). (3) Radiotherapy can be considered as an adjuvant for MAC at high risk for recurrence, surgically unresectable tumors, or patients who cannot have surgery for medical reasons. (4) Patients should be seen by a physician familiar with MAC every 6 to 12 months for the first 5 years after treatment. Patient education on photoprotection, periodic skin self-examination, postoperative healing, and the possible normal changes in local sensation (eg, initial hyperalgesia) should be considered. (5) There is limited evidence to guide the treatment of metastasis in MAC due to its rarity. Limitations of our findings are that the medical literature on MAC comprises only retrospective reviews and descriptions of individual patients and there are no controlled studies to guide management. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The presented clinical practice guidelines provide an outline for the diagnosis and management of MAC. Future efforts using multi-institutional registries may improve our understanding of the natural history of the disease in patients with lymph node or nerve involvement, the role of radiotherapy, and the treatment of metastatic MAC with drug therapy.

...