Measurable residual disease analysis in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients with ABL-class fusions.

BACKGROUND: ABL-class fusions including NUP214-ABL1 and EBF1-PDGFRB occur in high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with gene expression patterns similar to BCR-ABL-positive ALL. Our aim was to evaluate new DNA-based measurable residual disease (MRD) tests detecting these fusions and IKZF1-deletions in comparison with conventional immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (Ig/TCR) markers. METHODS: Precise genomic breakpoints were defined from targeted or whole genome next generation sequencing for ABL-fusions and BCR-ABL1. Quantitative PCR assays were designed and used to re-measure MRD in remission bone marrow samples previously tested using Ig/TCR markers. All MRD testing complied with EuroMRD guidelines. RESULTS: ABL-class patients had 46% 5year event-free survival and 79% 5year overall survival. All had sensitive fusion tests giving high concordance between Ig/TCR and ABL-class fusion results (21 patients, n = 257 samples, r2 = 0.9786, P < 0.0001) and Ig/TCR and IKZF1-deletion results (9 patients, n = 143 samples, r2 = 0.9661, P < 0.0001). In contrast, in BCR-ABL1 patients, Ig/TCR and BCR-ABL1 tests were discordant in 32% (40 patients, n = 346 samples, r2 = 0.4703, P < 0.0001) and IKZF1-deletion results were closer to Ig/TCR (25 patients, n = 176, r2 = 0.8631, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MRD monitoring based on patient-specific assays detecting gene fusions or recurrent assays for IKZF1-deletions is feasible and provides good alternatives to Ig/TCR tests to monitor MRD in ABL-class ALL.

Sensitive Measurement of Minimal Residual Disease in Blood by HAT-PCR.

PCR is widely used to measure minimal residual disease (MRD) in lymphoid neoplasms, but its sensitivity is limited. High Adenine/Thymine PCR and High Annealing Temperature PCR (HAT-PCR) is a modified PCR designed to minimize nonspecificity and hence increase sensitivity. It was evaluated in the laboratory and the clinic, using samples from 58 patients. Of these patients, 57 were adolescents or young adults who were participating in the Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group ALL06 trial in which MRD was measured in blood principally by HAT-PCR and in marrow by conventional PCR. HAT-PCR produced significantly less nonspecificity than conventional PCR, and its limit of detection was <10-6 in 90% of patients. In 196 samples, an excellent correlation was found between blood and marrow MRD. Variable partitioning of leukemic cells between blood and marrow was observed. Measurement of MRD in blood by HAT-PCR was noninferior to measurement of MRD in marrow by conventional PCR, in terms of both detecting disease and predicting clinical outcome. At a median follow-up of 3 years and for MRD levels in blood at the end of consolidation treatment, an MRD level of >10-4 cells/L significantly predicted relapse and mortality, whereas undetectable MRD significantly predicted relapse-free survival and overall survival. HAT-PCR is a simple, quick, cheap and sensitive method for measurement of MRD, and its adoption for MRD in blood may be clinically useful.

Whole-genome sequencing facilitates patient-specific quantitative PCR-based minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, neuroblastoma and Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease (MRD) measurement is a cornerstone of contemporary acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treatment. The presence of immunoglobulin (Ig) and T cell receptor (TCR) gene recombinations in leukaemic clones allows widespread use of patient-specific, DNA-based MRD assays. In contrast, paediatric solid tumour MRD remains experimental and has focussed on generic assays targeting tumour-specific messenger RNA, methylated DNA or microRNA. METHODS: We examined the feasibility of using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to design tumour-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based MRD tests (WGS-MRD) in 18 children with high-risk relapsed cancer, including ALL, high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) and Ewing sarcoma (EWS) (n = 6 each). RESULTS: Sensitive WGS-MRD assays were generated for each patient and allowed quantitation of 1 tumour cell per 10-4 (0.01%)-10-5 (0.001%) mononuclear cells. In ALL, WGS-MRD and Ig/TCR-MRD were highly concordant. WGS-MRD assays also showed good concordance between quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR formats. In serial clinical samples, WGS-MRD correlated with disease course. In solid tumours, WGS-MRD assays were more sensitive than RNA-MRD assays. CONCLUSIONS: WGS facilitated the development of patient-specific MRD tests in ALL, HR-NB and EWS with potential clinical utility in monitoring treatment response. WGS data could be used to design patient-specific MRD assays in a broad range of tumours.