Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 6 de 6
1.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 51(1): 246-252, 2021 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33385865

OBJECTIVE: Both psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a significant impact on quality of life, but few reports have compared the two diseases. The current study assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PsA at diagnosis and after five years compared with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a matched general population. METHODS: Patients with early PsA and early RA included in two Swedish registries with HRQoL data measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and at five years follow-up were included. Differences in SF-36 scores compared with the general population were calculated for each patient. Physical function, disease activity, the delay before diagnosis, pain, and general wellbeing were used as explanatory variables. Statistical tests included t-tests and univariate and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: PsA (n = 166) and RA (n = 133) patients of both sexes had significantly reduced HRQoL at disease onset. After five years, PsA patients still had impairments in several domains of SF-36, whereas RA patients had an almost normalized HRQoL. The time from symptom onset to diagnosis, disease activity, and disability independently contributed to the reduced improvement in PsA. CONCLUSION: Both early PsA and RA are characterized by severely reduced HRQoL. Despite more severe disease at inclusion, normalization of HRQoL is seen in patients with RA but not PsA. This may be due to delay in the diagnosis of PsA or more powerful interventions in RA. Earlier detection, lifestyle intervention, and more aggressive management strategies may be needed for PsA.


Arthritis, Psoriatic , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain , Quality of Life
2.
BMJ ; 371: m4328, 2020 12 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33268527

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare benefits and harms of three biological treatments with different modes of action versus active conventional treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Investigator initiated, randomised, open label, blinded assessor, multiarm, phase IV study. SETTING: Twenty nine rheumatology departments in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and Iceland between 2012 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment naive rheumatoid arthritis, symptom duration less than 24 months, moderate to severe disease activity, and rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity, or increased C reactive protein. INTERVENTIONS: Randomised 1:1:1:1, stratified by country, sex, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody status. All participants started methotrexate combined with (a) active conventional treatment (either prednisolone tapered to 5 mg/day, or sulfasalazine combined with hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular corticosteroids), (b) certolizumab pegol, (c) abatacept, or (d) tocilizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was adjusted clinical disease activity index remission (CDAI≤2.8) at 24 weeks with active conventional treatment as the reference. Key secondary outcomes and analyses included CDAI remission at 12 weeks and over time, other remission criteria, a non-inferiority analysis, and harms. RESULTS: 812 patients underwent randomisation. The mean age was 54.3 years (standard deviation 14.7) and 68.8% were women. Baseline disease activity score of 28 joints was 5.0 (standard deviation 1.1). Adjusted 24 week CDAI remission rates were 42.7% (95% confidence interval 36.1% to 49.3%) for active conventional treatment, 46.5% (39.9% to 53.1%) for certolizumab pegol, 52.0% (45.5% to 58.6%) for abatacept, and 42.1% (35.3% to 48.8%) for tocilizumab. Corresponding absolute differences were 3.9% (95% confidence interval -5.5% to 13.2%) for certolizumab pegol, 9.4% (0.1% to 18.7%) for abatacept, and -0.6% (-10.1% to 8.9%) for tocilizumab. Key secondary outcomes showed no major differences among the four treatments. Differences in CDAI remission rates for active conventional treatment versus certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not abatacept, remained within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 15% (per protocol population). The total number of serious adverse events was 13 (percentage of patients who experienced at least one event 5.6%) for active conventional treatment, 20 (8.4%) for certolizumab pegol, 10 (4.9%) for abatacept, and 10 (4.9%) for tocilizumab. Eleven patients treated with abatacept stopped treatment early compared with 20-23 patients in the other arms. CONCLUSIONS: All four treatments achieved high remission rates. Higher CDAI remission rate was observed for abatacept versus active conventional treatment, but not for certolizumab pegol or tocilizumab versus active conventional treatment. Other remission rates were similar across treatments. Non-inferiority analysis indicated that active conventional treatment was non-inferior to certolizumab pegol and tocilizumab, but not to abatacept. The results highlight the efficacy and safety of active conventional treatment based on methotrexate combined with corticosteroids, with nominally better results for abatacept, in treatment naive early rheumatoid arthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT2011-004720-35, NCT01491815.


Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , C-Reactive Protein/immunology , Certolizumab Pegol/therapeutic use , Denmark , Drug Therapy, Combination , Early Medical Intervention , Female , Finland , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Norway , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Rheumatoid Factor/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Sulfasalazine/therapeutic use , Sweden , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 35(6): 936-942, 2017.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28628468

OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment patterns in the Swedish early psoriatic arthritis cohort (SwePsA) of the mono-/oligo-arthritic (M/O) and polyarthritis (P) and identify early predictive factors for treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic (DMARD), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), and tumour necrosis factor inhibition (TNFi) after 5 years. METHODS: Data for 198 M/O and P PsA were obtained within the programme for SwePsA. Multinomial and binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between early predictive factors and treatment after 5 years adjusted for age at inclusion. The analysis of DMARD/NSAID was adjusted for medication at inclusion. RESULTS: After inclusion visit, DMARD was prescribed in 30% of M/O and 56% of P PsA; mainly methotrexate. TNFi was not prescribed at inclusion, but 23 patients were treated at 5-year follow-up. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for treatment with both DMARD and NSAID after 5 years was 3.65 (1.34 - 9.89) (p=0.010) for Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) >3.2 and 2.90 (1.20-6.99) (p=0.038) for Disease Activity Index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) >14 at inclusion. TNFi treatment was, after adjusting for age, associated with high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p=0.0043), high C-reactive protein (p=0.013), DAPSA (p<0.001), not reaching minimal disease activity (p=0.001) high health assessment questionnaire (p=0.001), patient's overall assessment on the visual analogue scale (VAS) (p=0.009), high pain VAS (p=0.007), and high number of tender and swollen joints (p=0.031) at inclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Disease activity in early M/O and P PsA is to be considered in deciding the level of health care assessment and future pharmacological treatment. DAS28 >3.2 and DAPSA>14 early in the disease predict subsequent treatment with DMARD. For prediction of biological treatment, not reaching MDA at onset of disease, would be the composite index of choice.


Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
4.
J Rheumatol ; 42(11): 2110-7, 2015 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26472410

OBJECTIVE: To describe early radiographic findings in patients from the Swedish psoriatic arthritis (SwePsA) registry, progression of destruction, correlations with clinical disease variables, and predictors of destruction. METHODS: Hand and foot radiographs were available for 72 of 197 SwePsA patients followed for 5 years. Clinical data were collected according to the SwePsA protocol. RESULTS: Disease characteristics and clinical improvement were similar in men and women. Radiographic abnormalities were more pronounced in men. Total Wassenberg radiographic score at baseline was 0 in 45% of men and 51% of women. One man and one woman had a score > 10. At 5 years, total score was 0 in 14% of men and 40% of women (p = 0.018); 17% of men and 7% of women had scores > 10. Mean total scores for men and women had increased. Baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate was associated with baseline total radiographic score. In men, swollen joint count was positively, and in women tender joint count negatively, correlated to total radiographic score. After 5 years, only male scores, mainly hand scores, significantly correlated with 28-joint Disease Activity Score and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis scores, swollen joint count, and dactylitis. Achieving remission or minimal disease activity after 5 years protected against structural damage, mainly in men. CONCLUSION: Radiographic progression in early PsA was generally slow but substantial. Male sex appears to be a risk factor for early radiographic damage while the presence of baseline radiographic damage and dactylitis developing during followup seem to predict further destruction. Hand and foot radiograph scoring cannot be substituted with clinical signs.


Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnostic imaging , Arthritis, Psoriatic/pathology , Finger Joint/diagnostic imaging , Pain Measurement/methods , Registries , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Disease Progression , Female , Finger Joint/physiopathology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inflammation/diagnostic imaging , Inflammation/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Sweden , Time Factors , Young Adult
5.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 73(2): 407-13, 2014 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23355078

OBJECTIVE: The Swedish Early Psoriatic Arthritis Register describes the course of early psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a real life clinical setting in Sweden. The aim of this study was to obtain information on predictors of clinical outcomes over a 5-year period with special focus on effects of gender, joint patterns, diagnostic delay and initial disease activity. METHODS: In six centres, patients with signs suggestive of PsA were included in the Swedish Early Psoriatic Arthritis Register within 2 years of symptom onset. CASPAR (classification for psoriatic arthritis) criteria were fulfilled by 197 patients who had passed the 5-year follow-up. Disease activity was measured by the Disease Activity Score including 28 joints (DAS28) and the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA). Remission and minimal disease activity (MDA) were used as outcome measures. RESULTS: Mean age at inclusion was 46 years, younger in male than female patients (43 vs 48 years). Mean DAS28 was 3.7 and 3.0 at inclusion and 2.8 and 2.1 at follow-up for women and men, respectively-significantly higher in women at both visits. Likewise, DAPSA scores were significantly higher in women. The degree of improvement (change in DAS28 and DAPSA) was similar. Men achieved MDA or remission (50% vs 33%, 25% vs 13%, respectively) more often, and women had significantly more polyarthritis at inclusion (49% vs 27%) and after 5 years (25% vs 15%). Axial or mono/oligoarticular disease was predominant in men. Independent predictors of MDA at the 5-year follow-up were: shorter symptom duration; greater general well-being (global visual analogue scale); and low Health Assessment Questionnaire at inclusion. CONCLUSIONS: In early PsA, short delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis, preserved function, and male gender are the most important predictors of favourable clinical outcome at the 5-year follow-up. Early recognition of PsA and active treatment may be important, particularly in women with polyarticular disease.


Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnosis , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Arthritis, Psoriatic/pathology , Arthritis, Psoriatic/physiopathology , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Delayed Diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Registries , Remission Induction , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Rheumatol ; 35(4): 668-73, 2008 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18278834

OBJECTIVE: Patients with symptoms and signs compatible with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with or without psoriasis, have been documented in the Swedish Early Psoriatic Arthritis (SwePsA) register. Our aim was to find markers for disease progression and to evaluate treatments for PsA using these data. METHODS: Patients referred to rheumatology outpatient clinics within 2 years of onset were assessed on inclusion and at followup 2 years later. Data collection was performed according to the program for SwePsA, and classification was as described by Moll and Wright and the ClASsification Criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR). Remission was recorded if the patient had no tender or swollen joints and if erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were within the reference range. Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recruited from the Swedish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Register (Ramona) provided comparison data. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients with PsA according to CASPAR were assessed; 44% were classified as having mono/oligoarthritis and 47% as polyarthritis. Two patients (1%) were in remission initially, and 23 (17%) at followup. Patients with polyarticular disease had the highest inflammatory activity, measured by swollen and tender joint counts, ESR, Health Assessment Questionnaire, and self-assessment by visual analog scale of pain and global disease activity. Dactylitis was associated with radiological findings. Compared with RA patients, they had significantly lower CRP, ESR, and number of swollen joints (p = 0.0003, p = 0.0026, p = 0.0380, respectively) at inclusion, but equal numbers of tender joints and self-assessment of pain and disease activity. CONCLUSION: About half the patients had polyarthritis and the other half had mono/oligoarthritis at followup after 2 years. Patients with polyarthritis had the highest inflammatory activity. Apart from ESR, CRP, and swollen joint count, there were no significant differences in activity between RA and polyarticular PsA.


Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Registries , Adult , Arthritis, Psoriatic/blood , Arthritis, Psoriatic/therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Sedimentation , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Joints/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Remission Induction , Sweden
...