RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop a robust, sensitive, and fully automatic algorithm to quantify diabetes-related capillary dropout using optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA). METHODS: A 1,050-nm wavelength, 400 kHz A-scan rate swept-source optical coherence tomography prototype was used to perform volumetric optical coherence tomography angiography imaging over 3 mm × 3 mm fields in normal controls (n = 5), patients with diabetes without diabetic retinopathy (DR) (n = 7), patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (n = 9), and patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (n = 5); for each patient, one eye was imaged. A fully automatic algorithm to quantify intercapillary areas was developed. RESULTS: Of the 26 evaluated eyes, the segmentation was successful in 22 eyes (85%). The mean values of the 10 and 20 largest intercapillary areas, either including or excluding the foveal avascular zone, showed a consistent trend of increasing size from normal control eyes, to eyes with diabetic retinopathy but without diabetic retinopathy, to nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy eyes, and finally to PDR eyes. CONCLUSION: Optical coherence tomography angiography-based screening and monitoring of patients with diabetic retinopathy is critically dependent on automated vessel analysis. The algorithm presented was able to automatically extract an intercapillary area-based metric in patients having various stages of diabetic retinopathy. Intercapillary area-based approaches are likely more sensitive to early stage capillary dropout than vascular density-based methods.
Asunto(s)
Capilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico por imagen , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico por imagen , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Retinianos/diagnóstico por imagen , Algoritmos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare visualization of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using an ultrahigh-speed swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) prototype vs a spectral-domain (SD) OCTA device. DESIGN: Comparative analysis of diagnostic instruments. METHODS: Patients were prospectively recruited to be imaged on SD OCT and SS OCT devices on the same day. The SD OCT device employed is the RTVue Avanti (Optovue, Inc, Fremont, California, USA), which operates at â¼840 nm wavelength and 70 000 A-scans/second. The SS OCT device used is an ultrahigh-speed long-wavelength prototype that operates at â¼1050 nm wavelength and 400 000 A-scans/second. Two observers independently measured the CNV area on OCTA en face images from the 2 devices. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare area measurements and P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Fourteen eyes from 13 patients were enrolled. The CNV in 11 eyes (78.6%) were classified as type 1, 2 eyes (14.3%) as type 2, and 1 eye (7.1%) as mixed type. Total CNV area measured using SS OCT and SD OCT 3 mm × 3 mm OCTA were 0.949 ± 1.168 mm(2) and 0.340 ± 0.301 mm(2), respectively (P = .001). For the 6 mm × 6 mm OCTA the total CNV area using SS OCT and SD OCT were 1.218 ± 1.284 mm(2) and 0.604 ± 0.597 mm(2), respectively (P = .0019). The field of view did not significantly affect the measured CNV area (P = .19 and P = .18 for SS OCT and SD OCT, respectively). CONCLUSION: SS OCTA yielded significantly larger CNV areas than SD OCTA. It is possible that SS OCTA is better able to demarcate the full extent of CNV vasculature.