The role of preoperative prostatic shape in the recovery of urinary continence after robotic radical prostatectomy: a single cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: To explore the role of preoperative MRI prostate shape in urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Patients were stratified into four groups based on the mpMRI prostatic apex shape: Group A (prostatic apex overlapping the membranous urethra anteriorly and posteriorly), Group B and C (overlap of the prostatic apex of the anterior or posterior membranous urethra, respectively) and Group D (no overlap). Preoperative variables and intraoperative data were compared. Continence recovery was defined as no pad/day or 1 safety pad/day by an outpatient evaluation performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent RARP were classified as belonging to Group A (n = 30), Group B (n = 16), Group C (n = 14), and Group D (n = 40). Group D showed a significantly more favorable urinary continence recovery after RARP respect to all the other shapes presenting any forms of overlapping (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.007). The estimated HR remained substantially unchanged after adjusting by age, body mass index, CCI, prostate volume, and bladder neck sparing (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, p = 0.016). The continence recovery median time was 9 months for Group A + B + C (95% CI 5-11) and 4 months for Group D (95% CI 2-6) (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Shape D showed a better continence recovery when compared to other shapes presenting any kind of overlapping of the prostatic apex over the membranous urethra.

Vapoenucleación prostática con láser Tulio. ¿Es igual de segura y efectiva en pacientes ancianos? Análisis por puntuación de propensión de los resultados funcionales y perioperatorios tempranos / Is thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate equally safe and effective in elderly patients? A propensity score matched analysis of early perioperative and functional outcomes

Objetivo: Evaluar la seguridad y efectividad de la vapoenucleación prostática con laser Tulio (TuLEP) en una cohorte seleccionada de pacientes ancianos en comparación con pacientes «más jóvenes».Material y métodosSe realizó un análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a TuLEP entre septiembre de 2018 y febrero de 2020. Tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión/exclusión, los pacientes se estratificaron según el punto de corte de 75 años sugerido por la OMS: el grupo A incluyó a los pacientes < 75 años; el grupo B incluyó a los pacientes > 75 años.La evaluación preoperatoria incluyó una consulta con el urólogo, el valor del antígeno prostático específico (PSA), el International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) y quality of life (QoL), ecografía transrectal para estimar el volumen prostático (PVol) y uroflujometría para evaluar los valores preoperatorios de maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) y average urinary flow rate (Qave), así como el volumen residual postmiccional (PVR). Se analizaron los datos perioperatorios y postoperatorios con un seguimiento de 3 meses.ResultadosTras el análisis de puntuación de propensión, 51 pacientes fueron emparejados 1:1 frente a otros 51 con base en PVol, PSA, Qmax, IPSS y QoL. Los pacientes eran comparables al inicio excluyendo la edad 65 (IQR 59-70) vs. 79 (IQR 77-82) años, Grupo A vs. grupo B, respectivamente (valor p < 0,001).No se encontraron diferencias en cuanto al descenso de la hemoglobina, la tasa de complicaciones, el tiempo de cateterismo y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. Los pacientes del grupo A (más jóvenes) experimentaron una mejora significativamente mayor en cuanto al valor absoluto de Qmax, Qave y ΔQmax a los 30 días. A los 90 días de seguimiento, las diferencias entre los grupos desaparecieron.Durante los 90 días de seguimiento, no se encontraron diferencias significativas en la tasa de reingreso ni se requirieron reintervenciones. (AU)

Purpose: To evaluate if thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) is equally safe and effective in a selected cohort of elderly patients when compared to “younger” patients.Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent ThuVEP between September 2018 and February 2020. After application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, patients were stratified according to the 75 years-old cut-off point suggested by the WHO. Group A included patients < 75 years-old; Group B included patients > 75 years-old.Preoperative assessment included urological consultation, prostate specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life index, transrectal ultrasound to estimate prostate volume (PVol), and uroflowmetry to assess preoperative Qmax, Qave and post-void residual volume (PVR). Perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed during 3-month follow-up.ResultsAfter propensity-score analysis, 51 versus 51 patients were 1:1 matched according to PVol, PSA, Qmax, IPSS and QoL. Patients were comparable at baseline excluding age (65 (IQR 59-70) versus 79 (IQR 77-82) years, Group A versus B, respectively, p-value < 0.001).No differences were found in terms of hemoglobin drop, complications rate, catheterization time and length of hospital stay. Group A (younger) patients had more significant improvement in 30-days absolute Qmax, Qave and ΔQmax. At 90-days follow-up, the differences between the groups disappeared.Within the 90-days follow-up, no significant differences were found in the readmission rate, with no need of reinterventions. (AU)

Is thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate equally safe and effective in elderly patients? A propensity score matched analysis of early perioperative and functional outcomes. / Vapoenucleación prostática con láser Tulio. ¿Es igual de segura y efectiva en pacientes ancianos? Análisis por puntuación de propensión de los resultados funcionales y perioperatorios tempranos.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) is equally safe and effective in a selected cohort of elderly patients when compared to "younger" patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent ThuVEP between September 2018 and February 2020. After application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, patients were stratified according to the 75 years-old cut-off point suggested by the WHO. Group A included patients < 75 years-old; Group B included patients > 75 years-old. Preoperative assessment included urological consultation, prostate specific antigen (PSA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life index, transrectal ultrasound to estimate prostate volume (PVol), and uroflowmetry to assess preoperative Qmax, Qave and post-void residual volume (PVR). Perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed during 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: After propensity-score analysis, 51 versus 51 patients were 1:1 matched according to PVol, PSA, Qmax, IPSS and QoL. Patients were comparable at baseline excluding age (65 (IQR 59-70) versus 79 (IQR 77-82) years, Group A versus B, respectively, p-value < 0.001). No differences were found in terms of hemoglobin drop, complications rate, catheterization time and length of hospital stay. Group A (younger) patients had more significant improvement in 30-days absolute Qmax, Qave and ΔQmax. At 90-days follow-up, the differences between the groups disappeared. Within the 90-days follow-up, no significant differences were found in the readmission rate, with no need of reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: In our hands, even in elderly patients affected by BPH, ThuVEP appears to be a safe and effective treatment option.

Diagnostic pathway of the biopsy-naïve patient suspected for prostate cancer: Real-life scenario when multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging is not centralized.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the pathway including multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) versus the one without mpMRI in detection of prostate cancer (PCa) when mpMRI is not centralized. MATERIALS: January 2019-March 2020: prospective data collection of trans-perineal prostate biopsies. Group A: biopsy-naïve patients who underwent mpMRI (at any institution) versus Group B: patients who did not. Within Group A, patients were stratified into those with negative mpMRI (mpMRI-, PIRADS v2.1=1-3, with PSA density <0.15 if PIRADS 3) who underwent standard biopsy (SB), versus those with positive mpMRI (mpMRI+, when PIRADS 3-5, with PSA density>0.15 if PIRADS 3) who underwent cognitive fusion biopsy. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty one biopsies were analyzed. 153 patients underwent mpMRI (Group A). 98 mpMRI+ underwent fusion biopsy; 55 mpMRI- underwent SB. 128 Group B patients underwent SB. Overall PCa detection rate was 52.3% vs. 48.4% (Group A vs. B, P=0.5). Non-clinically-significant PCa was detected in 7.8 vs. 13.3% (Group A vs. B, P=0.1). Among the 98 mpMRI+ Group A patients only 2 had non clinically-significant disease. In 55 mpMRI- patients who underwent SB, 10 (18.2%) had clinically-significant PCa. Prostate volume predicted detection of PCa. In Group B, age and PSA predicted PCa. Sensitivity of mpMRI was 75.0% for all PCa, 85.3% for clinically-significant PCa. CONCLUSION: Higher detection of PCa and lower detection of non-clinically-significant PCa favored mpMRI pathway. A consistent number of clinically-significant PCa was diagnosed after a mpMRI-. Thus, in real-life scenario, mpMRI- does not obviate indication to biopsy when mpMRI is not centralized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Urodynamics in patients with multiple sclerosis: A consensus statement from a urodynamic experts working group.

AIMS: Urodynamics (UDS) is often indicated for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients either at presentation to specialized medical centers or after failure of conservative management of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). However, the ideal moment and context to indicate this exam in this group of patients remain controversial. We aimed to establish a consensus panel to address the role of UDS in MS patients. METHODS: A panel representing urology, rehabilitation medicine, and neurology skilled in neuro-urology participated in a consensus-forming project using a Delphi method to reach consensus on the role of UDS in MS patients. RESULTS: In total, five experts participated. All panelists participated in the four phases of the consensus process. Consensus was reached if ≥70% of the experts agreed on recommendations. To facilitate a common understanding among all experts, a face-to-face consensus meeting was held in Florence in September 2017 and then with a follow-up teleconference in March 2018. By the end of the Delphi process, formal consensus was achieved for 100% of the items and an algorithm was then developed in a face-to-face meeting in Philadelphia in August 2018. The final expert opinion recommendations were approved by the unanimous consensus of the panel. CONCLUSIONS: UDS represents an important diagnostic tool for MS patients and is particularly useful to evaluate the pattern of LUT dysfunction in high-risk patients. There is a lack of high-evidence level studies to support an optimal urodynamic long-term follow-up protocol.

Intravescical prostatic protrusion is a predictor of alpha blockers response: results from an observational study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of tamsulosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) with intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP). Ultrasound measurement of the IPP has been previously described as an effective instrument for the evaluation of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and could help in clarifying the role of alpha-blockers in patients with (BPE). METHODS: Patients with BPE and LUTS were enrolled in this observational study. Intravesical prostatic protrusion was graded as grade 1 (< 5 ml), 2 (5 < IPP < 10 ml) and 3 (> 10 ml). Patients were treated with tamsulosin for twelve weeks. Evaluation was performed before and at the end of treatment by means of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and uroflowmetry. Patients were considered responders if a reduction of IPSS > 3 points was reported. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients were enrolled. Twelve patients were excluded because of incomplete data. Fifty patients showed an IPP grade 1 (group A), 52 a grade 2 (group B) and 28 a grade 3 (group C). Treatment success was obtained in 82%, 38,5% and 7,1% of patients respectively; these differences (group A vs B-C and group B vs C) were highly significant. The odd ratio to obtain a treatment success was of 59 and 8.1 in group A and group B respectively, in comparison to group C. After a multivariate regression, the relationship between IPP grade and treatment success remained significant. Improvement of uroflowmetry parameters has been reported in all the groups especially in patients with a low grade IPP (p value = 0,016 group A vs group B; p value = 0,005 group A vs group C). Prostate volume seems not to influence this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical prostatic protrusion has found to be significantly and inversely correlated with treatment success in patients with LUTS and BPE under alpha-blockers therapy. Alpha blockers odd ratio of success is 59 times higher in patients with a low grade IPP in comparison to patients with a high grade.

Intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the management of chronic cystitis.

In this article we review the current status of evidence on the clinic applications of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in urology, with particular emphasis on the therapeutic use in all the chronic forms of cystitis. The so called "bladder layer" is mainly composed by chondroitin sulphate, dermatan sulphate and heparan sulphate. Demages of this mucus film seem to be involved in the pathogenesis of several bladder diseases. Hence, GAG replenishment therapy is widely accepted as a therapy for interstitial cystitis/ bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), radiation and chemo-immunotherapy cystis and overactive bladder (OAB). A MEDLINE search from the first clinical application in 1996 allowed us to find a total of 33 works regarding the use of intravesical GAGs. Although the evidences regarding GAG replenishment therapy are very encouraging in all the forms of chronic cystitis, well-powered randomized clinical trials are needed to better comprehend the exact role of this treatment.